*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
Abbey National Building Society v Cann. (1991). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.
Administration of Justice Act 1970. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31
Administration of Justice Act 1973. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo3atnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJm5KJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014fd7a4bd014405a19f&docguid=I53991610E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I5398EF01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=186&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo4iZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Bright, S. (2000). Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The Law Quarterly Review, 116, 7–11.
Bright, Susan. (1993). Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies, 13. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmWedoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd621e792b5ce11f6&docguid=I7CC391A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I7CC34380E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3617&crumb-action=append&context=10&resolvein=true
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3CJn4yJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0uto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn5KtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Davis. (1998). The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal, 57(03), 522–553. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043
Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. (2011). Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true
Dixon, M. (2011). To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //Bind Click to Activate Export $('a[Rel=export]’).Click(Function(Evt){ evt.preventDefault(); Document.Forms[’optionsForm’].Submit(); }); });, 70(3).
Dixon, Martin. (2000). The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal, 59(01), 25–28. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJm2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. (n.d.-a). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. (n.d.-b). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Estoppel - reliance and remedy. (1995). [Electronic resource]. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.
Estoppel: a return to principle. (2001). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 78–86.
Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. (1987). [Electronic resource]. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto4atmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm3idnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYutm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm4eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Gravells, N. P. (2010a). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010b). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010c). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010d). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010e). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010f). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010g). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Gravells, N. P. (2010h). Land law: text and materials (4th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2KtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Haley. (1997). Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies, 17. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. (1996). Legal Studies, 16(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x
Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? (1997). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 458–464.
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo2itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCtoYmZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto2qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Land Registration Act 2002. (n.d.-a). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents
Land Registration Act 2002. (n.d.-b). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
Land Registration Act 2002. (n.d.-c). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
Law Commission. (1998). Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century. http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
Law Commission. (2001). Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution. http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
Law Commission. (2011). Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf
Law of Property Act 1925. (n.d.-a). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
Law of Property Act 1925. (n.d.-b). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
Leases, Licences and Third Parties. (1988). The Modern Law Review, 51(2), 226–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3etn1qZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdm0uJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
McFarlane, B. (2003). Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal, 62(3), 661–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006445
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYudnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4etmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmYidoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJmXqtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? (2009). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 260–268.
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd620f7c5d919e8cd&docguid=I2DB0FED0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I2DB0D7C1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2685&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. (2004). Law Quarterly Review, 120. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmWatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Reliance and estoppel. (1995a). [Electronic resource]. The Law Quarterly Review.
Reliance and estoppel. (1995b). [Electronic resource]. The Law Quarterly Review.
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJmYqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmYudoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4qZmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50. (n.d.). https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1370-TX1N-H139-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/royal-bank-of-scotland-plc-v-etridge-no-2-kenyonbrown-v-desmond
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd6382e6520f3e46b&docguid=I98408180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98405A70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2985&crumb-action=append&context=61&resolvein=true
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014fd6376fd1d681411c&docguid=I985FF060E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I985FC950E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=65&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true
Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? (2000). Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2itnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
Smith, R. (1996). Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? In Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel (pp. 235–250). Sweet & Maxwell. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ffe4529-61a7-e711-80cb-005056af4099
Smith, R. J. (2014a). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (Eighth edition). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014b). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (8th ed). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014c). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (8th ed). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014d). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (8th ed). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014e). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (Eighth edition). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014f). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (Eighth edition). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014g). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (Eighth edition). Pearson Education.
Smith, R. J. (2014h). Property law: Vol. Longman law series (Eighth edition). Pearson Education.
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Some lessons of Cann. (1991). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJn4KdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm1CJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYGJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
The flexibility of estoppel. (2003). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 225–238.
The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. (1977). Modern Law Review, 40. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals
The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. (2006). The Law Quarterly Review.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. (1996). Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB). (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3yZnZCZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/thomas-v-clydesdale-bank-plc-ta-yorkshire-bank
Thompson, M. P. (2012a). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012b). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012c). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012d). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012e). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012f). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012g). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. P. (2012h). Modern land law (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014d86cbcc9b86e0e0ec&docguid=IC271DEA01D1711DFA70E8EB4A213CBD5&hitguid=I4F4EFBC0474711DEA68AD35FCEE89EC9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=101&crumb-action=append&context=34&resolvein=true
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yZn3uJnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udm3KZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9. (n.d.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd63694b8ef34aed8&docguid=IEFE2BD90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEFE29680E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=204&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/wayling-v-jones
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
What is wrong with certainty in leases? (1993). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, Nov/Dec, 461–465.
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJn1CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm1qdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Wives, sureties and banks. (2002). The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5KtmZitoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752. (n.d.). https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidnXKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
