1.
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
2.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
3.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
4.
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm1qdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
5.
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYudnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
6.
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto2qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
7.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
8.
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
9.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
10.
Law Commission. Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
11.
Law Commission. Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
12.
Land Registration Act 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents
13.
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014d86cbcc9b86e0e0ec&docguid=IC271DEA01D1711DFA70E8EB4A213CBD5&hitguid=I4F4EFBC0474711DEA68AD35FCEE89EC9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=101&crumb-action=append&context=34&resolvein=true
14.
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3etn1qZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
15.
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3yZnZCZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/thomas-v-clydesdale-bank-plc-ta-yorkshire-bank
16.
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3CJn4yJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
17.
Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 2004;120. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true
18.
Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2011; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true
19.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
20.
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
21.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
22.
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
23.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 1996; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true
24.
Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer [Internet]. 2000; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true
25.
Dixon M. To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 2011;70(3).
26.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
27.
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
28.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
29.
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm1CJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
30.
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo3atnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
31.
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014fd7a4bd014405a19f&docguid=I53991610E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I5398EF01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=186&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
32.
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd620f7c5d919e8cd&docguid=I2DB0FED0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I2DB0D7C1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2685&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
33.
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd621e792b5ce11f6&docguid=I7CC391A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I7CC34380E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3617&crumb-action=append&context=10&resolvein=true
34.
Bright, Susan. Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies [Internet]. 1993;13. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
35.
What is wrong with certainty in leases? The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1993;(Nov/Dec):461–465.
36.
Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. Legal Studies. 1996;16(2):200–217.
37.
Bright S. Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The law quarterly review. London: Stevens and Sons; 2000;116:7–11.
38.
Dixon, Martin. The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2000;59(01):25–28. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016
39.
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd63694b8ef34aed8&docguid=IEFE2BD90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEFE29680E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=204&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true
40.
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014fd6376fd1d681411c&docguid=I985FF060E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I985FC950E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=65&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true
41.
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto4atmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
42.
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50 [Internet]. Available from: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1370-TX1N-H139-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638
43.
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150 [Internet]. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd6382e6520f3e46b&docguid=I98408180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98405A70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2985&crumb-action=append&context=61&resolvein=true
44.
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJm5KJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
45.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
46.
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
47.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
48.
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
49.
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo4iZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
50.
Leases, Licences and Third Parties. The Modern Law Review. 1988 Mar;51(2):226–251.
51.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
52.
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYGJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
53.
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
54.
Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1987;
55.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. [London: Stevens and Sons; 1995;
56.
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/wayling-v-jones
57.
Estoppel - reliance and remedy. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1995;
58.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. [London: Stevens and Sons; 1995;
59.
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2itnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
60.
Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1997;458–464.
61.
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYutm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
62.
Estoppel: a return to principle. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2001;78–86.
63.
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCtoYmZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
64.
The flexibility of estoppel. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2003;225–238.
65.
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidnXKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
66.
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yZn3uJnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
67.
Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2009;260–268.
68.
The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. The law quarterly review. London: Stevens and Sons; 2006;
69.
Smith R. Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel [Internet]. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1996. p. 235–250. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ffe4529-61a7-e711-80cb-005056af4099
70.
McFarlane B. Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2003 Nov 3;62(3):661–696.
71.
Land Registration Act 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
72.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
73.
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
74.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
75.
Law of Property Act 1925 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
76.
Land Registration Act 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
77.
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
78.
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2KtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
79.
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJn4KdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
80.
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5KtmZitoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
81.
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm4eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
82.
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJn1CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
83.
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdm0uJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
84.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
85.
Law Commission. Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf
86.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
87.
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
88.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
89.
Law of Property Act 1925 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
90.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents
91.
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
92.
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJmYqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
93.
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm3idnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
94.
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmYudoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
95.
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo2itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
96.
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0uto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
97.
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJmXqtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
98.
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4etmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
99.
Davis. The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1998;57(03):522–553. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043
100.
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
101.
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014.
102.
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
103.
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmYidoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
104.
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/royal-bank-of-scotland-plc-v-etridge-no-2-kenyonbrown-v-desmond
105.
Wives, sureties and banks. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2002;
106.
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn5KtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
107.
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udm3KZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
108.
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmWatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
109.
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
110.
The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1977;40. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals
111.
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
112.
Haley. Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies [Internet]. 1997;17. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
113.
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4qZmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
114.
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmWedoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
115.
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
116.
Some lessons of Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1991;
117.
Abbey National Building Society v Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1991;
118.
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJm2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
119.
Administration of Justice Act 1970 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31
120.
Administration of Justice Act 1973 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8
