*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
‘Abbey National Building Society v Cann’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1991): n. pag. Print.
‘Administration of Justice Act 1970’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31>.
‘Administration of Justice Act 1973’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8>.
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo3atnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJm5KJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014fd7a4bd014405a19f&docguid=I53991610E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I5398EF01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=186&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true>.
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo4iZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Bright, Susan. ‘Leases, Exclusive Possession and Estates’. The law quarterly review 116 (2000): 7–11. Print.
Bright, Susan. ‘Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice?’ Legal Studies 13 (1993): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmWedoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd621e792b5ce11f6&docguid=I7CC391A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I7CC34380E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3617&crumb-action=append&context=10&resolvein=true>.
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3CJn4yJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents>.
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0uto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn5KtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Davis. ‘The Principle of Benefit and Burden’. The Cambridge Law Journal 57.03 (1998): 522–553. Web. <http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043>.
‘Defining the Scope of Actual Occupation under the LRA 2002: Some Recent Judicial Clarification’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2011): n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true>.
Dixon, Martin. ‘The Non-Proprietary Lease: The Rise of the Feudal Phoenix’. The Cambridge Law Journal 59.01 (2000): 25–28. Web. <http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016>.
Dixon, Martin. ‘To Sell or Not to Sell: That Is the Question. The Irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 70.3 (2011): n. pag. Print.
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJm2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
---. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Estoppel - Reliance and Remedy’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1995): n. pag. Print.
‘Estoppel: A Return to Principle’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (2001): 78–86. Print.
‘Estoppel and the Ubiquitous Constructive Trust’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1987): n. pag. Print.
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto4atmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm3idnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYutm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm4eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Gravells, N. P. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
---. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print.
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2KtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Haley. ‘Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion’. Legal Studies 17 (1997): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.
‘Intention and the Creation of Proprietary Rights: Are Leases Different?*’. Legal Studies 16.2 (1996): 200–217. Web.
‘Is Equitable Estoppel a Wasting Asset?’ The conveyancer and property lawyer (1997): 458–464. Print.
J. Sainsbury Plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo2itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCtoYmZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto2qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Land Registration Act 2002’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents>.
‘---’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm>.
‘---’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm>.
Law Commission. ‘Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century’. 1998. Web. <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century>.
---. ‘Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution’. 2001. Web. <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century>.
---. ‘Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre’. 2011. Web. <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf>.
‘Law of Property Act 1925’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents>.
‘---’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents>.
‘Leases, Licences and Third Parties’. The Modern Law Review 51.2 (1988): 226–251. Web.
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3etn1qZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdm0uJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
McFarlane, Ben. ‘Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002’. The Cambridge Law Journal 62.3 (2003): 661–696. Web.
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYudnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4etmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmYidoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJmXqtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Proprietary Estoppel: A Return to Principle?’ The conveyancer and property lawyer (2009): 260–268. Print.
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd620f7c5d919e8cd&docguid=I2DB0FED0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I2DB0D7C1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2685&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true>.
‘Purchaser Liability to Third Parties in the English Land Registration System: A Comparative Perspective’. Law Quarterly Review 120 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true>.
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmWatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Reliance and Estoppel’. The law quarterly review (1995): n. pag. Print.
‘---’. The law quarterly review (1995): n. pag. Print.
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJmYqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa>.
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmYudoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4qZmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50. N.p. Web. <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1370-TX1N-H139-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>.
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/royal-bank-of-scotland-plc-v-etridge-no-2-kenyonbrown-v-desmond>.
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd6382e6520f3e46b&docguid=I98408180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98405A70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2985&crumb-action=append&context=61&resolvein=true>.
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014fd6376fd1d681411c&docguid=I985FF060E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I985FC950E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=65&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true>.
‘Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a Change in the Law?’ Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2000): n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true>.
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2itnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
Smith, Roger. ‘Chapter 11: How Proprietary Is Proprietary Estoppel?’ Consensus Ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996. 235–250. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ffe4529-61a7-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.
Smith, Roger J. Property Law. Eighth edition. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. 8th ed. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. 8th ed. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. 8th ed. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. Eighth edition. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. Eighth edition. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. Eighth edition. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
---. Property Law. Eighth edition. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014. Print.
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Some Lessons of Cann’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1991): n. pag. Print.
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJn4KdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm1CJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYGJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘The Flexibility of Estoppel’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (2003): 225–238. Print.
‘The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law’. Modern Law Review 40 (1977): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals>.
‘The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel - Again’. The law quarterly review (2006): n. pag. Print.
‘The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1996): n. pag. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true>.
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank Plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB). N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3yZnZCZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/thomas-v-clydesdale-bank-plc-ta-yorkshire-bank>.
Thompson, M. P. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
---. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014d86cbcc9b86e0e0ec&docguid=IC271DEA01D1711DFA70E8EB4A213CBD5&hitguid=I4F4EFBC0474711DEA68AD35FCEE89EC9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=101&crumb-action=append&context=34&resolvein=true>.
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yZn3uJnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udm3KZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9. N.p. Web. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd63694b8ef34aed8&docguid=IEFE2BD90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEFE29680E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=204&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true>.
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/wayling-v-jones>.
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘What Is Wrong with Certainty in Leases?’ The conveyancer and property lawyer Nov/Dec (1993): 461–465. Print.
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJn1CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm1qdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
‘Wives, Sureties and Banks’. The conveyancer and property lawyer (2002): n. pag. Print.
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5KtmZitoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>.
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752. N.p. Web. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidnXKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>.
