[1]
Bright, S. 2000. Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The law quarterly review. 116, (2000), 7–11.
[2]
Bright, Susan 1993. Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies. 13, (1993).
[3]
Davis 1998. The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal. 57, 03 (1998), 522–553.
[4]
Dixon, M. 2011. To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 70, 3 (2011).
[5]
Dixon, Martin 2000. The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal. 59, 01 (2000), 25–28.
[6]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[7]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[8]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[9]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[10]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[11]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[12]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[13]
Gravells, N.P. 2010. Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell.
[14]
Haley 1997. Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies. 17, (1997).
[15]
Law Commission 1998. Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century.
[16]
Law Commission 2001. Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution.
[17]
Law Commission 2011. Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre.
[18]
McFarlane, B. 2003. Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal. 62, 3 (Nov. 2003), 661–696. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006445.
[19]
Smith, R. 1996. Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel. Sweet & Maxwell. 235–250.
[20]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[21]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[22]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[23]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[24]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[25]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[26]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[27]
Smith, R.J. 2014. Property law. Pearson Education.
[28]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[31]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[33]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[34]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[35]
Thompson, M.P. 2012. Modern land law. Oxford University Press.
[36]
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56.
[37]
1991. Abbey National Building Society v Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1991).
[38]
Administration of Justice Act 1970.
[39]
Administration of Justice Act 1973.
[40]
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
[41]
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201.
[42]
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
[43]
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147.
[44]
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359.
[45]
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778.
[46]
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406.
[47]
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429.
[48]
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249.
[49]
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343.
[50]
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
[51]
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA.
[52]
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949.
[53]
2011. Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (2011).
[54]
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137.
[55]
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
[56]
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
[57]
1995. Estoppel - reliance and remedy. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1995).
[58]
2001. Estoppel: a return to principle. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (2001), 78–86.
[59]
1987. Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1987).
[60]
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340.
[61]
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594.
[62]
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210.
[63]
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247.
[64]
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355.
[65]
1996. Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. Legal Studies. 16, 2 (1996), 200–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x.
[66]
1997. Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1997), 458–464.
[67]
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590.
[68]
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159.
[69]
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783.
[70]
Land Registration Act 2002.
[71]
Land Registration Act 2002.
[72]
Land Registration Act 2002.
[73]
Law of Property Act 1925.
[74]
Law of Property Act 1925.
[75]
1988. Leases, Licences and Third Parties. The Modern Law Review. 51, 2 (Mar. 1988), 226–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x.
[76]
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424.
[77]
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA.
[78]
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513.
[79]
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459.
[80]
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84.
[81]
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286.
[82]
2009. Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? The conveyancer and property lawyer. (2009), 260–268.
[83]
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.
[84]
2004. Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. Law Quarterly Review. 120, (2004).
[85]
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318.
[86]
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498.
[87]
1995. Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. (1995).
[88]
1995. Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. (1995).
[89]
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310.
[90]
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40.
[91]
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17.
[92]
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50.
[93]
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL.
[94]
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150.
[95]
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575.
[96]
2000. Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (2000).
[97]
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196.
[98]
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500.
[99]
1991. Some lessons of Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1991).
[100]
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144.
[101]
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809.
[102]
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133.
[103]
2003. The flexibility of estoppel. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (2003), 225–238.
[104]
1977. The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. Modern Law Review. 40, (1977).
[105]
2006. The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. The law quarterly review. (2006).
[106]
1996. The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (1996).
[107]
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB).
[108]
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16.
[109]
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18.
[110]
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349.
[111]
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9.
[112]
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170.
[113]
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1.
[114]
1993. What is wrong with certainty in leases? The conveyancer and property lawyer. Nov/Dec (1993), 461–465.
[115]
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697.
[116]
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487.
[117]
2002. Wives, sureties and banks. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (2002).
[118]
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358.
[119]
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744.
[120]
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752.
