1
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
2
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
3
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
4
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487.
5
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513.
6
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783.
7
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
8
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
9
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
10
Law Commission. Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century. 1998.
11
Law Commission. Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution. 2001.
12
Land Registration Act 2002.
13
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16.
14
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424.
15
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB).
16
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249.
17
Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. Law Quarterly Review. 2004;120.
18
Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. Published Online First: 2011.
19
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
20
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
21
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
22
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429.
23
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. Published Online First: 1996.
24
Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. Published Online First: 2000.
25
Dixon M. To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 2011;70.
26
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
27
Smith RJ. Property law. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
28
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
29
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809.
30
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
31
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
32
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.
33
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406.
34
Bright, Susan. Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies. 1993;13.
35
What is wrong with certainty in leases? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1993;461–5.
36
Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. Legal Studies. 1996;16:200–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x
37
Bright S. Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The law quarterly review. 2000;116:7–11.
38
Dixon, Martin. The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2000;59:25–8.
39
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9.
40
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575.
41
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340.
42
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50.
43
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150.
44
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201.
45
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
46
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
47
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
48
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359.
49
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147.
50
Leases, Licences and Third Parties. The Modern Law Review. 1988;51:226–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x
51
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
52
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133.
53
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498.
54
Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1987.
55
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. 1995.
56
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170.
57
Estoppel - reliance and remedy. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1995.
58
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. 1995.
59
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196.
60
Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1997;458–64.
61
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210.
62
Estoppel: a return to principle. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 2001;78–86.
63
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159.
64
The flexibility of estoppel. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 2003;225–38.
65
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752.
66
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18.
67
Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 2009;260–8.
68
The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. The law quarterly review. 2006.
69
Smith R. Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel. London: Sweet & Maxwell 1996:235–50.
70
McFarlane B. Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2003;62:661–96. doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006445
71
Land Registration Act 2002.
72
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
73
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
74
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
75
Law of Property Act 1925.
76
Land Registration Act 2002.
77
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744.
78
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355.
79
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144.
80
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358.
81
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247.
82
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697.
83
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA.
84
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
85
Law Commission. Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre. 2011.
86
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
87
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
88
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
89
Law of Property Act 1925.
90
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
91
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500.
92
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310.
93
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594.
94
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40.
95
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590.
96
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA.
97
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286.
98
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459.
99
Davis. The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1998;57:522–53.
100
Gravells NP. Land law: text and materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2010.
101
Smith RJ. Property law. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
102
Thompson MP. Modern land law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
103
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84.
104
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL.
105
Wives, sureties and banks. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 2002.
106
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949.
107
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349.
108
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318.
109
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1.
110
The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. Modern Law Review. 1977;40.
111
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343.
112
Haley. Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies. 1997;17.
113
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17.
114
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778.
115
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56.
116
Some lessons of Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1991.
117
Abbey National Building Society v Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 1991.
118
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137.
119
Administration of Justice Act 1970.
120
Administration of Justice Act 1973.
