Bibliography for M32001 Land Law BETA

*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56. n.d.

Abbey National Building Society v Cann. 1991. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.

Administration of Justice Act 1970. n.d.

Administration of Justice Act 1973. n.d.

AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. n.d.

Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201. n.d.

Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. n.d.

*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147. n.d.

*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359. n.d.

Bright, Susan. 1993. ‘Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice?’ Legal Studies 13. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Bright, Susan. 2000. ‘Leases, Exclusive Possession and Estates’. The Law Quarterly Review 116:7–11.

*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778. n.d.

Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406. n.d.

Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429. n.d.

Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249. n.d.

*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343. n.d.

Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. n.d.

Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA. n.d.

*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949. n.d.

Davis. 1998. ‘The Principle of Benefit and Burden’. The Cambridge Law Journal 57(03):522–53. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043.

Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. 2011. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true.

Dixon, Martin. 2000. ‘The Non-Proprietary Lease: The Rise of the Feudal Phoenix’. The Cambridge Law Journal 59(01):25–28. http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016.

Dixon, Martin. 2011. ‘To Sell or Not to Sell: That Is the Question. The Irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’. The Cambridge Law Journal                            //Bind Click to Activate Export          $('a[Rel=export]’).Click(Function(Evt){            evt.preventDefault();            Document.Forms[’optionsForm’].Submit();          });                  }); 70(3).

*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137. n.d.

E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. n.d.-a.

E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. n.d.-b.

Estoppel - reliance and remedy. 1995. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.

Estoppel: a return to principle. 2001. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 78–86.

Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. 1987. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.

Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340. n.d.

*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594. n.d.

*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210. n.d.

*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247. n.d.

Gravells, N. P. 2010a. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010b. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010c. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010d. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010e. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010f. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010g. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Gravells, N. P. 2010h. Land Law: Text and Materials. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355. n.d.

Haley. 1997. ‘Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion’. Legal Studies 17. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. 1996. Legal Studies 16(2):200–217. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x.

Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? 1997. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 458–64.

J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590. n.d.

*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159. n.d.

Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783. n.d.

Land Registration Act 2002. n.d.-a.

Land Registration Act 2002. n.d.-b.

Land Registration Act 2002. n.d.-c.

Law Commission. 1998. ‘Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century’.

Law Commission. 2001. ‘Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution’.

Law Commission. 2011. ‘Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre’.

Law of Property Act 1925. n.d.-a.

Law of Property Act 1925. n.d.-b.

Leases, Licences and Third Parties. 1988. The Modern Law Review 51(2):226–51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x.

Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424. n.d.

*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA. n.d.

McFarlane, Ben. 2003. ‘Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002’. The Cambridge Law Journal 62(3):661–96. doi:10.1017/S0008197303006445.

Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513. n.d.

*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459. n.d.

*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84. n.d.

*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286. n.d.

Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? 2009. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 260–68.

Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386. n.d.

Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. 2004. Law Quarterly Review 120. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true.

*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318. n.d.

*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498. n.d.

Reliance and estoppel. 1995a. The Law Quarterly Review.

Reliance and estoppel. 1995b. The Law Quarterly Review.

*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. n.d.

*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40. n.d.

*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17. n.d.

Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50. n.d.

Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL. n.d.

Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150. n.d.

Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575. n.d.

Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? 2000. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true.

*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196. n.d.

Smith, Roger. 1996. ‘Chapter 11: How Proprietary Is Proprietary Estoppel?’ Pp. 235–50 in Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

Smith, Roger J. 2014a. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014b. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014c. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014d. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. 8th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014e. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014f. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014g. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

Smith, Roger J. 2014h. Property Law. Vol. Longman law series. Eighth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education.

*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500. n.d.

Some lessons of Cann. 1991. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.

Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144. n.d.

Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. n.d.

*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133. n.d.

The flexibility of estoppel. 2003. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 225–38.

The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. 1977. Modern Law Review 40. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals.

The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. 2006. The Law Quarterly Review.

The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true.

Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB). n.d.

Thompson, M. P. 2012a. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012b. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012c. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012d. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012e. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012f. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012g. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson, M. P. 2012h. Modern Land Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16. n.d.

Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18. n.d.

*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349. n.d.

Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9. n.d.

*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170. n.d.

*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1. n.d.

What is wrong with certainty in leases? 1993. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (Nov/Dec):461–65.

Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697. n.d.

Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487. n.d.

Wives, sureties and banks. 2002. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer.

Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358. n.d.

*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744. n.d.

Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752. n.d.