[1]
R. J. Smith, Property law, Eighth edition., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[2]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[3]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[4]
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm1qdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[5]
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYudnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[6]
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto2qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[7]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[8]
R. J. Smith, Property law, 8th ed., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[9]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[10]
Law Commission, ‘Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
[11]
Law Commission, ‘Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution’. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century
[12]
‘Land Registration Act 2002’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents
[13]
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014d86cbcc9b86e0e0ec&docguid=IC271DEA01D1711DFA70E8EB4A213CBD5&hitguid=I4F4EFBC0474711DEA68AD35FCEE89EC9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=101&crumb-action=append&context=34&resolvein=true
[14]
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3etn1qZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[15]
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB). [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3yZnZCZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/thomas-v-clydesdale-bank-plc-ta-yorkshire-bank
[16]
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3CJn4yJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[17]
‘Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 120, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true
[18]
‘Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true
[19]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[20]
R. J. Smith, Property law, 8th ed., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[21]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[22]
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[23]
‘The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true
[24]
‘Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law?’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true
[25]
M. Dixon, ‘To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’, The Cambridge Law Journal                            //bind click to activate export          $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){            evt.preventDefault();            document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit();          });                  });, vol. 70, no. 3, 2011.
[26]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[27]
R. J. Smith, Property law, 8th ed., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[28]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[29]
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm1CJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[30]
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo3atnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[31]
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014fd7a4bd014405a19f&docguid=I53991610E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I5398EF01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=186&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
[32]
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd620f7c5d919e8cd&docguid=I2DB0FED0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I2DB0D7C1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2685&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true
[33]
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd621e792b5ce11f6&docguid=I7CC391A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I7CC34380E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3617&crumb-action=append&context=10&resolvein=true
[34]
Bright, Susan, ‘Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice?’, Legal Studies, vol. 13, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
[35]
‘What is wrong with certainty in leases?’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, no. Nov/Dec, pp. 461–465, 1993.
[36]
‘Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*’, Legal Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 200–217, 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x.
[37]
S. Bright, ‘Leases, exclusive possession and estates’, The law quarterly review, vol. 116, pp. 7–11, 2000.
[38]
Dixon, Martin, ‘The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 59, no. 01, pp. 25–28, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016
[39]
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd63694b8ef34aed8&docguid=IEFE2BD90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEFE29680E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=204&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true
[40]
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014fd6376fd1d681411c&docguid=I985FF060E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I985FC950E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=65&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true
[41]
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto4atmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[42]
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50. [Online]. Available: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1370-TX1N-H139-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638
[43]
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd6382e6520f3e46b&docguid=I98408180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98405A70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2985&crumb-action=append&context=61&resolvein=true
[44]
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJm5KJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[45]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[46]
R. J. Smith, Property law, Eighth edition., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[47]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[48]
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[49]
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo4iZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[50]
‘Leases, Licences and Third Parties’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 226–251, Mar. 1988, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x.
[51]
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[52]
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYGJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[53]
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[54]
‘Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, 1987.
[55]
‘Reliance and estoppel’, The law quarterly review, 1995.
[56]
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/wayling-v-jones
[57]
‘Estoppel - reliance and remedy’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, 1995.
[58]
‘Reliance and estoppel’, The law quarterly review, 1995.
[59]
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2itnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[60]
‘Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset?’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, pp. 458–464, 1997.
[61]
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYutm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[62]
‘Estoppel: a return to principle’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, pp. 78–86, 2001.
[63]
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCtoYmZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[64]
‘The flexibility of estoppel’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, pp. 225–238, 2003.
[65]
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidnXKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[66]
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yZn3uJnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[67]
‘Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle?’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, pp. 260–268, 2009.
[68]
‘The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again’, The law quarterly review, 2006.
[69]
R. Smith, ‘Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel?’, in Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996, pp. 235–250 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ffe4529-61a7-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[70]
B. McFarlane, ‘Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 661–696, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1017/S0008197303006445.
[71]
‘Land Registration Act 2002’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
[72]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[73]
R. J. Smith, Property law, Eighth edition., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[74]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[75]
‘Law of Property Act 1925’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
[76]
‘Land Registration Act 2002’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm
[77]
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[78]
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2KtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[79]
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJn4KdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[80]
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5KtmZitoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[81]
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm4eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[82]
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJn1CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[83]
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdm0uJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[84]
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[85]
Law Commission, ‘Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf
[86]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[87]
R. J. Smith, Property law, Eighth edition., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[88]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[89]
‘Law of Property Act 1925’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents
[90]
‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents
[91]
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[92]
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJmYqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
[93]
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm3idnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[94]
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmYudoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[95]
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo2itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[96]
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0uto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[97]
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJmXqtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[98]
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4etmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[99]
Davis, ‘The Principle of Benefit and Burden’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 57, no. 03, pp. 522–553, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043
[100]
N. P. Gravells, Land law: text and materials, 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2010.
[101]
R. J. Smith, Property law, Eighth edition., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.
[102]
M. P. Thompson, Modern land law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[103]
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmYidoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[104]
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/royal-bank-of-scotland-plc-v-etridge-no-2-kenyonbrown-v-desmond
[105]
‘Wives, sureties and banks’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, 2002.
[106]
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn5KtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[107]
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udm3KZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[108]
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmWatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[109]
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[110]
‘The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law’, Modern Law Review, vol. 40, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals
[111]
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[112]
Haley, ‘Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion’, Legal Studies, vol. 17, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
[113]
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4qZmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[114]
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmWedoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[115]
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[116]
‘Some lessons of Cann’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, 1991.
[117]
‘Abbey National Building Society v Cann’, The conveyancer and property lawyer, 1991.
[118]
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJm2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[119]
‘Administration of Justice Act 1970’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31
[120]
‘Administration of Justice Act 1973’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8