1.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
2.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
3.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
4.
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487.
5.
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513.
6.
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783.
7.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
8.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
9.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
10.
Law Commission. Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century. (1998).
11.
Law Commission. Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution. (2001).
12.
Land Registration Act 2002.
13.
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16.
14.
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424.
15.
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB).
16.
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249.
17.
Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. Law Quarterly Review 120, (2004).
18.
Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2011).
19.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
20.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
21.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
22.
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429.
23.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (1996).
24.
Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (2000).
25.
Dixon, M. To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 70, (2011).
26.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
27.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
28.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
29.
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809.
30.
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
31.
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
32.
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.
33.
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406.
34.
Bright, Susan. Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies 13, (1993).
35.
What is wrong with certainty in leases? The conveyancer and property lawyer 461–465 (1993).
36.
Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. Legal Studies 16, 200–217 (1996).
37.
Bright, S. Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The law quarterly review 116, 7–11 (2000).
38.
Dixon, Martin. The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal 59, 25–28 (2000).
39.
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9.
40.
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575.
41.
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340.
42.
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50.
43.
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150.
44.
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201.
45.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
46.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
47.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
48.
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359.
49.
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147.
50.
Leases, Licences and Third Parties. The Modern Law Review 51, 226–251 (1988).
51.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
52.
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133.
53.
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498.
54.
Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1987).
55.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review (1995).
56.
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170.
57.
Estoppel - reliance and remedy. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1995).
58.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review (1995).
59.
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196.
60.
Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? The conveyancer and property lawyer 458–464 (1997).
61.
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210.
62.
Estoppel: a return to principle. The conveyancer and property lawyer 78–86 (2001).
63.
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159.
64.
The flexibility of estoppel. The conveyancer and property lawyer 225–238 (2003).
65.
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752.
66.
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18.
67.
Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? The conveyancer and property lawyer 260–268 (2009).
68.
The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. The law quarterly review (2006).
69.
Smith, R. Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? in Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel 235–250 (Sweet & Maxwell, 1996).
70.
McFarlane, B. Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal 62, 661–696 (2003).
71.
Land Registration Act 2002.
72.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
73.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
74.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
75.
Law of Property Act 1925.
76.
Land Registration Act 2002.
77.
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744.
78.
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355.
79.
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144.
80.
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358.
81.
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247.
82.
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697.
83.
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA.
84.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
85.
Law Commission. Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre. (2011).
86.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
87.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
88.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
89.
Law of Property Act 1925.
90.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999.
91.
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500.
92.
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310.
93.
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594.
94.
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40.
95.
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590.
96.
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA.
97.
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286.
98.
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459.
99.
Davis. The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal 57, 522–553 (1998).
100.
Gravells, N. P. Land law: text and materials. (Sweet & Maxwell, 2010).
101.
Smith, R. J. Property law. vol. Longman law series (Pearson Education, 2014).
102.
Thompson, M. P. Modern land law. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
103.
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84.
104.
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL.
105.
Wives, sureties and banks. The conveyancer and property lawyer (2002).
106.
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949.
107.
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349.
108.
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318.
109.
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1.
110.
The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. Modern Law Review 40, (1977).
111.
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343.
112.
Haley. Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies 17, (1997).
113.
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17.
114.
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778.
115.
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56.
116.
Some lessons of Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1991).
117.
Abbey National Building Society v Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer (1991).
118.
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137.
119.
Administration of Justice Act 1970.
120.
Administration of Justice Act 1973.