*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
‘Abbey National Building Society v Cann’. 1991. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell)
‘Administration of Justice Act 1970’. [n.d.]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31>
‘Administration of Justice Act 1973’. [n.d.]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8>
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo3atnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJm5KJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014fd7a4bd014405a19f&docguid=I53991610E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I5398EF01E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=186&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true>
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo4iZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Bright, Susan. 1993. ‘Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice?’, Legal Studies, 13 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd13&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>
Bright, Susan. 2000. ‘Leases, Exclusive Possession and Estates’, The Law Quarterly Review, 116 (London: Stevens and Sons): 7–11
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmWedoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd621e792b5ce11f6&docguid=I7CC391A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I7CC34380E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3617&crumb-action=append&context=10&resolvein=true>
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3CJn4yJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’. [n.d.]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents>
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0uto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn5KtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Davis. 1998. ‘The Principle of Benefit and Burden’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 57.03 (Cambridge University Press): 522–53 <http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1543&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0008197398003043>
‘Defining the Scope of Actual Occupation under the LRA 2002: Some Recent Judicial Clarification’. 2011. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014d86dd623f96213b9f&docguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&hitguid=I03C8E160C11711E0A129DD901EF85A08&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=85&resolvein=true>
Dixon, Martin. 2000. ‘The Non-Proprietary Lease: The Rise of the Feudal Phoenix’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 59.01 (Cambridge University Press): 25–28 <http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1485&fulltextType=SC&fileId=S0008197300290016>
Dixon, Martin. 2011. ‘To Sell or Not to Sell: That Is the Question. The Irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’, The Cambridge Law Journal //Bind Click to Activate Export $('a[Rel=export]’).Click(Function(Evt){ evt.preventDefault(); Document.Forms[’optionsForm’].Submit(); }); });, 70.3
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJm2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379. [n.d.-a]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZnWCZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Estoppel - Reliance and Remedy’. 1995. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell)
‘Estoppel: A Return to Principle’. 2001. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell): 78–86
‘Estoppel and the Ubiquitous Constructive Trust’. 1987. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell)
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto4atmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm3idnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYutm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm4eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Gravells, N. P. 2010a. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010b. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010c. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010d. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010e. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010f. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010g. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
———. 2010h. Land Law: Text and Materials, 4th ed (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2KtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Haley. 1997. ‘Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion’, Legal Studies, 17 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/legstd17&div=28&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>
‘Intention and the Creation of Proprietary Rights: Are Leases Different?*’. 1996. Legal Studies, 16.2: 200–217 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x>
‘Is Equitable Estoppel a Wasting Asset?’ 1997. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell): 458–64
J. Sainsbury Plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdo2itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCtoYmZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qto2qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Land Registration Act 2002’. [n.d.-a]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents>
‘———’. [n.d.-b]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm>
‘———’. [n.d.-c]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm>
Law Commission. 1998. ‘Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century’ <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century>
———. 2001. ‘Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution’ <http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century>
———. 2011. ‘Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre’ <http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf>
‘Law of Property Act 1925’. [n.d.-a]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents>
‘———’. [n.d.-b]. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents>
‘Leases, Licences and Third Parties’. 1988. The Modern Law Review, 51.2: 226–51 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x>
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3etn1qZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdm0uJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
McFarlane, Ben. 2003. ‘Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 62.3: 661–96 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006445>
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYudnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4etmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmYidoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJmXqtoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Proprietary Estoppel: A Return to Principle?’ 2009. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell): 260–68
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd620f7c5d919e8cd&docguid=I2DB0FED0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I2DB0D7C1E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2685&crumb-action=append&context=5&resolvein=true>
‘Purchaser Liability to Third Parties in the English Land Registration System: A Comparative Perspective’. 2004. Law Quarterly Review, 120 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86d7cce87df8361d&docguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I85254910E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=69&resolvein=true>
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJmWatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Reliance and Estoppel’. 1995a. The Law Quarterly Review ([London: Stevens and Sons)
‘———’. 1995b. The Law Quarterly Review ([London: Stevens and Sons)
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJmYqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa>
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udmYudoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4qZmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50. [n.d.]. <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4J44-1370-TX1N-H139-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/royal-bank-of-scotland-plc-v-etridge-no-2-kenyonbrown-v-desmond>
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd6382e6520f3e46b&docguid=I98408180E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98405A70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2985&crumb-action=append&context=61&resolvein=true>
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014fd6376fd1d681411c&docguid=I985FF060E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I985FC950E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=65&crumb-action=append&context=55&resolvein=true>
‘Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a Change in the Law?’ 2000. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0640000014d86e4cf50e081a76e&docguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I79298180E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=124&resolvein=true>
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2itnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Smith, Roger. 1996. ‘Chapter 11: How Proprietary Is Proprietary Estoppel?’, in Consensus Ad Idem: Essays in the Law of Contract in Honour of Guenter Treitel (London: Sweet & Maxwell), pp. 235–50 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ffe4529-61a7-e711-80cb-005056af4099>
Smith, Roger J. 2014a. Property Law, Eighth edition (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014b. Property Law, 8th ed (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014c. Property Law, 8th ed (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014d. Property Law, 8th ed (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014e. Property Law, Eighth edition (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014f. Property Law, Eighth edition (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014g. Property Law, Eighth edition (Harlow: Pearson Education)
———. 2014h. Property Law, Eighth edition (Harlow: Pearson Education)
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Some Lessons of Cann’. 1991. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell)
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJn4KdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CJm1CJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utmYGJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘The Flexibility of Estoppel’. 2003. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell): 225–38
‘The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law’. 1977. Modern Law Review, 40 <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=356&handle=hein.journals%2Fmodlr40&collection=journals>
‘The Remedial Discretion in Proprietary Estoppel - Again’. 2006. The Law Quarterly Review (London: Stevens and Sons)
‘The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996’. 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014d86e1942c58e8eb99&docguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I8156B4E0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=104&resolvein=true>
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank Plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB). [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3yZnZCZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/thomas-v-clydesdale-bank-plc-ta-yorkshire-bank>
Thompson, M. P. 2012a. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012b. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012c. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012d. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012e. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012f. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012g. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2012h. Modern Land Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014d86cbcc9b86e0e0ec&docguid=IC271DEA01D1711DFA70E8EB4A213CBD5&hitguid=I4F4EFBC0474711DEA68AD35FCEE89EC9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=101&crumb-action=append&context=34&resolvein=true>
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yZn3uJnYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udm3KZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9. [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014fd63694b8ef34aed8&docguid=IEFE2BD90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEFE29680E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=204&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true>
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYaZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/wayling-v-jones>
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘What Is Wrong with Certainty in Leases?’ 1993. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell): 461–65
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qJn1CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utm1qdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
‘Wives, Sureties and Banks’. 2002. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer (London: Sweet and Maxwell)
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5KtmZitoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZmXGdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidnXKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
