1.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
2.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
3.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
4.
Williams & Glyn’s Bank v Boland [1981] AC 487.
5.
Midland Bank Trust v Green [1981] AC 513.
6.
Kingsnorth Trust Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783.
7.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
8.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
9.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
10.
Law Commission: Law Commission No 254: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century, http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century, (1998).
11.
Law Commission: Law Commission No 271: Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century – A Conveyancing Revolution, http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/land-registration-for-the-21st-century/#land-registration-for-the-twenty-first-century, (2001).
12.
Land Registration Act 2002, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents.
13.
Thompson v Foy [2010] 1 P & CR 16.
14.
Link Lending Ltd v Bustard [2010] EWCA Civ 424.
15.
Thomas v Clydesdale Bank plc [2010] EWHC 2755 (QB).
16.
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314, [2013] Ch 249.
17.
Purchaser liability to third parties in the English land registration system: a comparative perspective. Law Quarterly Review. 120, (2004).
18.
Defining the scope of actual occupation under the LRA 2002: some recent judicial clarification. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (2011).
19.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
20.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
21.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
22.
Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429.
23.
The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (1996).
24.
Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 - a change in the law? Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. (2000).
25.
Dixon, M.: To sell or not to sell: that is the question. The irony of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. The Cambridge Law Journal //bind click to activate export $('a[rel=export]’).click(function(evt){ evt.preventDefault(); document.forms[’optionsForm’].submit(); }); }); 70, (2011).
26.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
27.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
28.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
29.
Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809.
30.
AG Securities v Vaughan; Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
31.
Antoniades v Villiers [1990] 1 AC 417.
32.
Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.
33.
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406.
34.
Bright, Susan: Uncertainty in Leases - Is It a Vice? Legal Studies. 13, (1993).
35.
What is wrong with certainty in leases? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 461–465 (1993).
36.
Intention and the creation of proprietary rights: are leases different?*. Legal Studies. 16, 200–217 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00003.x.
37.
Bright, S.: Leases, exclusive possession and estates. The law quarterly review. 116, 7–11 (2000).
38.
Dixon, Martin: The non-proprietary lease: the rise of the feudal phoenix. The Cambridge Law Journal. 59, 25–28 (2000).
39.
Walsh v Lonsdale (1882) 21 ChD 9.
40.
Scala House and District Property v Forbes [1974] QB 575.
41.
Expert Clothing Service and Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340.
42.
Ropemaker Properties v Noonhaven [1989] 2 EGLR 50.
43.
Savva v Hussein (1996) 73 P & CR 150.
44.
Akici v LR Butlin Ltd [2006] 1 WLR 201.
45.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
46.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
47.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
48.
*Binions v Evans [1972] Ch. 359.
49.
*Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1988] 2 All ER 147.
50.
Leases, Licences and Third Parties. The Modern Law Review. 51, 226–251 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1988.tb01753.x.
51.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
52.
*Taylors Fashions v Liverpool Victoria Trustees [1982] QB 133.
53.
*Re Basham [1986] 1 WLR 1498.
54.
Estoppel and the ubiquitous constructive trust. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1987).
55.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. (1995).
56.
*Wayling v Jones (1993) 69 P&CR 170.
57.
Estoppel - reliance and remedy. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1995).
58.
Reliance and estoppel. The law quarterly review. (1995).
59.
*Sledmore v Dalby (1996) 72 P&CR 196.
60.
Is equitable estoppel a wasting asset? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 458–464 (1997).
61.
*Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210.
62.
Estoppel: a return to principle. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 78–86 (2001).
63.
*Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159.
64.
The flexibility of estoppel. The conveyancer and property lawyer. 225–238 (2003).
65.
Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd v Cobbe [2008] UKHL 55, [2008] 1 WLR 1752.
66.
Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, [2009] UKHL 18.
67.
Proprietary estoppel: a return to principle? The conveyancer and property lawyer. 260–268 (2009).
68.
The remedial discretion in proprietary estoppel - again. The law quarterly review. (2006).
69.
Smith, R.: Chapter 11: How Proprietary is Proprietary Estoppel? In: Consensus ad idem: essays in the law of contract in honour of Guenter Treitel. pp. 235–250. Sweet & Maxwell, London (1996).
70.
McFarlane, B.: Proprietary Estoppel and Third Parties after the Land Registration Act 2002. The Cambridge Law Journal. 62, 661–696 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006445.
71.
Land Registration Act 2002, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm.
72.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
73.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
74.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
75.
Law of Property Act 1925, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents.
76.
Land Registration Act 2002, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2002/9/contents/data.htm.
77.
*Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 K.B. 744.
78.
Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355.
79.
Sovmots Investments v SSE [1979] A.C. 144.
80.
Wood v Waddington [2014] EWHC 1358.
81.
*Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch. 247.
82.
Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd [1995] 2 All ER 697.
83.
*McAdams Homes Ltd v Robinson [2004] EWCA Civ 214, CA.
84.
E.R. Ives Investment Ltd v High [1967] 2 QB 379.
85.
Law Commission: Law Commission Report LC327 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre, http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc327_easements_summary.pdf, (2011).
86.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
87.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
88.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
89.
Law of Property Act 1925, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/contents.
90.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/31/contents.
91.
*Smith v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949] 2 KB 500.
92.
*Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310.
93.
*Federated Homes v Mill Lodge Props [1980] 1 WLR 594.
94.
*Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40.
95.
J. Sainsbury plc v Enfield LBC [1989] 1 WLR 590.
96.
Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, CA.
97.
*Newton Abbott Co-Op Soc Ltd v Williamson & Treadgold Ltd [1952] Ch 286.
98.
*Morrells of Oxford Ltd v Oxford Utd FC Ltd [2001] Ch 459.
99.
Davis: The Principle of Benefit and Burden. The Cambridge Law Journal. 57, 522–553 (1998).
100.
Gravells, N.P.: Land law: text and materials. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
101.
Smith, R.J.: Property law. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
102.
Thompson, M.P.: Modern land law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
103.
*Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84.
104.
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021, HL.
105.
Wives, sureties and banks. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (2002).
106.
*Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance [1971] Ch 949.
107.
*Tse Kwong Lam v Wong Chit Sen [1983] 1 WLR 1349.
108.
*Quennell v Maltby [1979] 1 WLR 318.
109.
*Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1.
110.
The Mortgagee’s Right to Possession - The Modern Law. Modern Law Review. 40, (1977).
111.
*Cheltenham and Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343.
112.
Haley: Mortgage Default: Possession, Relief and Judicial Discretion. Legal Studies. 17, (1997).
113.
*Ropaigealach v Barclays Bank [1999] 3 WLR 17.
114.
*Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778.
115.
*Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56.
116.
Some lessons of Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1991).
117.
Abbey National Building Society v Cann. The conveyancer and property lawyer. (1991).
118.
*Equity & Law Home Loans Ltd v Prestidge [1992] 1 WLR 137.
119.
Administration of Justice Act 1970, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1970/31.
120.
Administration of Justice Act 1973, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/15/section/8.
