1
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions. 31 AD.
2
International Law Commission. Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 12 AD.
3
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
4
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). 10 AD.
5
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. 10 AD.
6
UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). 10 AD.
7
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new Article 1(4), as adopted in 2013).
8
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
9
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention). 17 AD.
10
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on non-disputing party participation. 7 AD.
11
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. 22 AD.
12
Shaw MN. International law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
13
Shaw MN. International law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2014.
14
Thirlway H. The Sources of International Law. International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018:91–117.
15
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
16
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
17
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
18
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
19
Asante, Samuel K. B. International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1988;37.
20
Franck, Susan D. Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law. Global Business & Development Law Journal. 2006;19.
21
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
22
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
23
Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183.
24
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003).
25
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486.
26
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20.
27
Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330.
28
Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007.
29
Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7.
30
Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9.
31
Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5.
32
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20.
33
Stern B. Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration. ICSID Review. ;25.
34
Mortenson, J. The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law. Harvard International Law Journal. 2010;51:257–318.
35
Stern B. The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment. ICSID Review. 2010;24.
36
Vargiu, Paolo. Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2009;10.
37
Gaillard E. Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009:403–16.
38
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
39
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
40
Dolzer R. The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005:261–75.
41
Yala F. The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly. Journal of International Arbitration. 2005;105–26.
42
Mendelson M. The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:97–149.
43
Ben Hamid W. The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts relating to the status of pre-investment expenditures. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:47–76.
44
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. 1 AD.
45
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
46
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
47
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
48
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021.
49
Vandevelde KJ. Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press 2010.
50
Salacuse, Jeswald W. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal. 2005;46.
51
Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5. 2007.
52
Sacerdoti G. Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection. Recueil des cours. 1997;269:298–338.
53
Carr C. Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. 2006;257–69.
54
Salacuse, Jeswald W. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal. 2005;46.
55
Schlemmer EC. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. 2003;292–300.
56
Schlemmer EC. Investor protection and forum selection in bilateral investment treaties. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. 2001;26:174–80.
57
Salacuse, Jeswald W. BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. International Lawyer. 1990;24.
58
Schwebel S. The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005:261–75.
59
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
60
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
61
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991), 580-655, per dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante.
62
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205.
63
Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133.
64
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT).
66
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). 1994.
67
NAFTA. Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents. 31 AD.
68
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
69
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
70
Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. 2012.
71
ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195.
72
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009.
73
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811.
74
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36.
75
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345.
76
Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85.
77
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347.
78
Waste Management Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967.
79
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002).
80
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006.
81
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005.
82
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008.
83
CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005.
84
Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82.
85
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6.
86
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
87
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004.
88
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007.
89
Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S. v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008.
90
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007.
91
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010.
92
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133.
93
Bonnitcha J. Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016.
94
Muchlinski P. ‘Caveat Investor’? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006;55:527–58. doi: 10.1093/iclq/lei104
95
Sornarajah M, British Institute of International and Comparative Law. The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity? In: Ortino F, ed. Investment treaty law: current issues II : nationality and investment treaty claims, fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007.
96
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
97
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
98
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021.
99
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. A Unified Theory of FET. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010;43.
100
Yannaca-Small K. FET Standard: Recent Developments. Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008:113–41.
101
Schill S. Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6). Published Online First: 2006.
102
Fietta S. Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration. 2006;23:375–99.
103
Dolzer, Rudoff. Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties. International Lawyer. 2005;39.
104
Weiler T. Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:701–45.
105
Wallace D. FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:669–700.
106
Dumberry P. The Quest to Define ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ for Investors under International Law. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2002;3:657–91. doi: 10.1163/221190002X00427
107
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). 1994.
108
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
109
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
110
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15.
111
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245.
112
American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531.
113
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121.
114
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006.
115
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007.
116
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008.
117
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
118
Cordero Moss G. Full Protection and Security. Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
119
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021.
120
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
121
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
122
ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470.
123
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005.
124
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009.
125
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15.
126
Feldman v Mexico [also known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM 625.
127
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209.
128
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345.
129
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
130
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59.
131
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007.
132
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352.
133
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347.
134
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408.
135
Thunderbird v Mexico [also known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006.
136
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002.
137
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007.
138
Douglas Z. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011;2:97–113. doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idq015
139
Schill SW. Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011;2:353–71. doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idr004
140
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
141
Douglas Z. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011;2:97–113. doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idq015
142
National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements). 2000.
143
Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2.
144
Weiler T. Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:557–95.
145
Schill, Stephan W. Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 2009;27.
146
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. 1 AD.
147
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
148
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
149
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
150
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
151
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
152
Christie, G. C. What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law. 1962;38.
153
Higgins R. The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil des cours. 1982;176:259–392.
154
Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15. 2000.
155
OECD. "Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4. 2004.
156
Aldrich, George H. What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. American Journal of International Law. 1994;88.
157
Reisman WM, Sloane RD. Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law. 2004;74:115–50. doi: 10.1093/bybil/74.1.115
158
Waelde T, Kolo A. Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2001;50.
159
Schreuer C. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:281–323.
160
Faruque A. Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value. Journal of International Arbitration. 2006;23:317–36.
161
Alvarez-Jiménez A. The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors. 2006;23:427–34.
162
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
163
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
164
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
165
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
166
Brower CN, Wrong J. General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May 2005:281–323.
167
Mouri A. The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff 1994.
168
Thomas Waelde. Compensation, Damages and Valuation. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008:1049–124.
169
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
170
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
171
Perezcano, Hugo. Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2005;6.
172
Jagusch, Stephen. Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2009;10.
173
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9.
174
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928).
175
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000).
176
Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French text only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457.
177
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006.
178
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205.
179
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002.
180
Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404.
181
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345.
182
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178.
183
Saluka Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006.
184
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408.
185
Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007.
186
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133.
187
Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603.
188
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245.
189
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9.
190
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928).
191
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121.
192
CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264.
193
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000).
194
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004.
195
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002.
196
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212.
197
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
198
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133.
199
Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 53rd Session, 2001, reproduced as an annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility).
200
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
201
Hobér K. State Responsibility and Attribution. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008:549–83.
202
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000.
203
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135.
204
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129.
205
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609.
206
Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896.
207
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. no 91-175. 83 Stat. https://www.opic.gov/
208
Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC).
209
Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC). 19 AD.
210
Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99. 11 AD.
211
OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones. 2006.
212
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
213
Ziegler AR, Gratton L-P. Investment Insurance. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008:524–48.
214
Shihata IFI. MIGA and foreign investment: origins, operations, policies, and basic documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff 1988.
215
Ibrahim F I. Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project. Journal of world trade law. 1972;6.
216
Perry, Maura B. A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Virginia Journal of International Law. 1995;36.
217
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. 1 AD.
218
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
219
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
220
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
221
Footer, Mary E. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law. 2009;18.
222
Laborde G. The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2010;1:97–122. doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idp008
223
Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205.
224
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006.
225
World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, paras. 138-157.
226
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007.
227
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345.
228
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
229
Sacerdoti G. Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005:276–98.
230
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
231
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). 10 AD.
232
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. 10 AD.
233
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013.
234
Blackaby N, Partasides C, Hunter M, et al. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.
235
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999.
236
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
237
Cremades BM, Cairnes DJA. The Brave New World of Global Arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2002;3:vii–209. doi: 10.1163/221190002X00085
238
Delaume GR. Consent to ICSID Arbitration. The changing world of international law in the twenty-first century: a tribute to the late Kenneth R. Simmonds. The Hague: Kluwer 1998:155–78.
239
Roberts, Anthea. Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration. ASIL Proceedings. 2012;106.
240
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
241
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003.
242
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004.
243
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010.
244
Paparinskis M. MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review. 2011;26:14–58. doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14
245
Sinclair AC. The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection. 2004;20.
246
Wong, Jarrod. Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes. George Mason Law Review. 2006;14.
247
Yannaca-Small K. Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3.
248
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
249
Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000.
250
Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004.
251
Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005.
252
HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011.
253
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
254
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. 10 AD.
255
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). 10 AD.
256
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013.
257
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
258
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
259
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on non-disputing party participation. 7 AD.
260
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. 22 AD.
261
Van Harten G. Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
262
Van Harten G. Chapter 7, The businessman’s court. Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007:152–84.
263
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
264
Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations - Trade - European Commission. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364
265
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15 January 2001.
266
Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005.
267
Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005.
268
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009.
269
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006.
270
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007.
271
UNCITRAL Transparency Rules applied for the first time in investor-State arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills. http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/
272
Footer, Mary E. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law. 2009;18.
273
Ishikawa, Tomoko. Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2010.
274
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001.
275
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003.
276
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006.
277
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on notices of intent to submit a claim to arbitration. 7 AD.
278
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions. 31 AD.
279
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
280
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008.
281
Materials on the IBA website. http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx
282
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
283
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
284
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
285
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
286
Marboe, Irmgard. Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2006;7.
287
Blackaby N, Partasides C, Hunter M, et al. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015.
288
Malintoppi L. Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties Request and What Tribunals Order. International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009:157–84.
289
Blessing M. State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions? Journal of International Arbitration. 2005;22:435–86.
290
Söderlund C. Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. 2005;22:301–22.
