Bibliography for M34113: International Investment Law BETA

ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf>.

ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf>.

‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’. 1AD. Web. <http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210>.

‘---’. 1AD. Web. <http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210>.

‘---’. 1AD. Web. <http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210>.

Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and  Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf>.

Aguas Del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on  Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0020_0.pdf>.

Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona  S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del Agua S.A. v The Argentine  Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in Response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0803.pdf>.

Aldrich, George H. ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’. American Journal of International Law 88 (1994): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil88&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002). N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf>.

Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto. ‘The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the  Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign  Investors’. 23.5 (2006): 427–434. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26892>.

American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf>.

Antoine Goetz and Others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French Text Only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0380.pdf>.

‘Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC)’. 19AD. Web. <http://www.isdb.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Articles%20of%20Agreement/ICIEC_Articles-of-Agreement.pdf>.

Asante, Samuel K. B. ‘International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37 (1988): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq37&div=33&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf>.

Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991),  580-655, per Dissenting Opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1035.pdf>.

Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf>.

Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf>.

Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf>.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0075.pdf>.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf>.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf>.

Ben Hamid, Walid. ‘The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts Relating to the Status of Pre-Investment Expenditures’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 47–76. Print.

‘Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5’. 2007. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiia20065_en.pdf>.

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No.  ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf>.

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No.  ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf>.

Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf>.

Blackaby, Nigel et al. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189>.

---. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189>.

Blessing, Marc. ‘State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions?’ Journal of International Arbitration 22.6 (2005): 435–486. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26350>.

Bonnitcha, Jonathan. Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Vol. 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1719625>.

Brower, Charles N, and Jarrod Wrong. ‘General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 281–323. Print.

Carr, Christopher. ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental’. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly (2006): 257–269. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130495>.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9. N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf>.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928). N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf>.

‘Case Summary’. Web. <http://www.biicl.org/files/3914_2004_occidental_v_ecuador.pdf>.

Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0144.pdf>.

Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0147.pdf>.

Christie, G. C. ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law’. British Year Book of International Law 38 (1962): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&div=9&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab>.

CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf>.

CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0180.pdf>.

CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf>.

CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf>.

CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf>.

Collier, John G., and A. V. Lowe. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Print.

‘Commission Proposes New Investment Court System for TTIP and Other EU Trade and Investment Negotiations - Trade - European Commission’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364>.

Compañía de Aguas Del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0206.pdf>.

Compañía de Aguas Del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf>.

Compañía Del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000). N.p. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152>.

---. N.p. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152>.

‘Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC)’. Web. <http://www.iaigc.net/UserFiles/file/en/EngConven.pdf>.

‘Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99’. 11AD. Web. <https://www.miga.org/who-we-are/miga-convention>.

‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as Amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf>.

Cordero Moss, G. ‘Full Protection and Security’. Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.

Cremades, Bernardo M., and David J. A. Cairnes. ‘The Brave New World of Global Arbitration’. The Journal of World Investment & Trade 3.2 (2002): vii–209. Web.

Delaume, Georges R. ‘Consent to ICSID Arbitration’. The Changing World of International Law in the Twenty-First Century: A Tribute to the Late Kenneth R. Simmonds. The Hague: Kluwer, 1998. 155–178. Print.

Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0248_0.pdf>.

Dolzer, Rudoff. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’. International Lawyer 39 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr39&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Dolzer, Rudolf. ‘The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice’. Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 261–275. Print.

Dolzer, Rudolf, and Christoph Schreuer. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174>.

Douglas, Z. ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.1 (2011): 97–113. Web.

---. ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.1 (2011): 97–113. Web.

Dumberry, Patrick. ‘The Quest to Define “Fair and Equitable Treatment” for Investors under International Law’. The Journal of World Investment & Trade 3.4 (2002): 657–691. Web.

Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15. N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf>.

Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf>.

Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision  on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf>.

Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0290.pdf>.

‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2012. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf>.

Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf>.

Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf>.

Faruque, Abdullah. ‘Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value’. Journal of International Arbitration 23.4 (2006): 317–336. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26690>.

Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf>.

Feldman v Mexico [Also Known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM  625. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf>.

Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf>.

Fietta, Stephen. ‘Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 23.5 (2006): 375–399. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26890>.

Footer, Mary E. ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’. Michigan State Journal of  International Law 18 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

---. ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’. Michigan State Journal of  International Law 18 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

Franck, Susan D. ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law’. Global Business & Development Law Journal 19 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tranl19&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf>.

Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’. International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 403–416. Web. <https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001/acprof-9780199571345>.

Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0358.pdf>.

Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf>.

Higgins, Rosalyn. ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’. Recueil des cours 176 (1982): 259–392. Print.

Hobér, Kaj. ‘State Responsibility and Attribution’. The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 549–583. Print.

HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on  Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf>.

‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’. 22AD. Web. <http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx>.

‘---’. 22AD. Web. <http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx>.

Ibrahim F I. ‘Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project’. Journal of world trade law 6 (1972): n. pag. Print.

‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’. 10AD. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx>.

‘---’. 10AD. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx>.

‘---’. 10AD. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx>.

Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf>.

International Law Commission. ‘Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. 12AD. Web. <http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup06/basicmats2/DASR.pdf>.

Ishikawa, Tomoko. ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 59. N.p., 2010. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq59&amp;div=21&amp;collection=journals&amp;set_as_cursor=0&amp;men_tab=srchresults>.

Jagusch, Stephen. ‘Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 10 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0441.pdf>.

Laborde, G. ‘The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1.1 (2010): 97–122. Web.

Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

Lowenfeld, Andreas F. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

---. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432>.

Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0496.pdf>.

Malintoppi, Lorette. ‘Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties  Request and What Tribunals Order’. International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 157–184. Print.

Marboe, Irmgard. ‘Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 7 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit7&div=42&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

‘Materials on the IBA Website’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx>.

Mendelson, Maurice. ‘The Runaway Train: The Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 97–149. Print.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf>.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf>.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf>.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the  Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to Intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15  January 2001. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf>.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf>.

Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf>.

Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf>.

Mortenson, J. ‘The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law’. Harvard International Law Journal 51.1 (2010): 257–318. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/hilj51&amp;id=259>.

‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE,  Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2’. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf>.

Mouri, Allahyar. The International Law of Expropriation as Reflected in the Work of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Developments in international law. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1994. Print.

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf>.

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf>.

Muchlinski, Peter. ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55.03 (2006): 527–558. Web.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

---. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

NAFTA. ‘Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of  Arbitration Documents’. 31AD. Web. <http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng>.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission. ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11  Provisions’. 31AD. Web. <http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp>.

---. ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11  Provisions’. 31AD. Web. <http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp>.

---. ‘Statement on Non-Disputing Party Participation’. 7AD. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf>.

---. ‘Statement on Non-Disputing Party Participation’. 7AD. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf>.

---. ‘Statement on Notices of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration’. 7AD. Web. <http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/Noticeintent_e.pdf>.

‘National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements)’. 2000. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.aspx?publicationid=340>.

‘North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)’. 1994. Web. <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download>.

‘---’. 1994. Web. <https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download>.

Occidental  Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf>.

Occidental  Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf>.

Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT). N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf>.

OECD. ‘"Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4’. 2004. Web. <http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/indirect-expropriation-and-the-right-to-regulate-in-international-investment-law_780155872321>.

‘OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones’. 2006. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/corporateresponsibility/36885821.pdf>.

Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0587.pdf>.

‘Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), Created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. No 91-175. 83 Stat’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.opic.gov/>.

Paparinskis, M. ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’ ICSID Review 26.2 (2011): 14–58. Web.

Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf>.

Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf>.

Perezcano, Hugo. ‘Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 6 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit6&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Perry, Maura B. ‘A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation’. Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (1995): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint36&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf>.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0686.pdf>.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf>.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf>.

Reisman, W. M., and R. D. Sloane. ‘Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation’. British Yearbook of International Law 74.1 (2004): 115–150. Web.

‘Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, Text Adopted by the International Law Commission at Its 53rd Session, 2001, Reproduced as an Annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility)’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf>.

Roberts, Anthea. ‘Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration’. ASIL Proceedings 106 (2012): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/asilp106&div=91&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’. 10AD. Web. <http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp>.

‘---’. 10AD. Web. <http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp>.

‘---’. 10AD. Web. <http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp>.

Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S.  v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0728.pdf>.

S D Myers Inc.  v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf>.

S D Myers Inc.  v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf>.

Sacerdoti, Giorgio. ‘Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law’. Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 276–298. Print.

---. ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’. Recueil des cours 269 (1997): 298–338. Print.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’. International Lawyer 24 (1990): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr24&div=53&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

---. ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’. Harvard International Law Journal 46 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

---. ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’. Harvard International Law Journal 46 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953>.

---. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953>.

---. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953>.

Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A.  v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003). N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf>.

Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf>.

Saluka  Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf>.

Schill, S. W. ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.2 (2011): 353–371. Web.

Schill, Stephan. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6)’. (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://www.iilj.org/publications/2006-6Schill.asp>.

Schill, Stephan W. ‘Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 27 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw27&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Schlemmer, E C. ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and  ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina’. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg (2003): 292–300. Print.

---. ‘Investor Protection and Forum Selection in Bilateral Investment Treaties’. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg 26 (2001): 174–180. Print.

Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 281–323. Print.

Schwebel, Stephen. ‘The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties’. Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 261–275. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494499>.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case  No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf>.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No.  ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf>.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines  (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf>.

Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Print.

---. International Law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Print.

Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. MIGA and Foreign Investment: Origins, Operations, Policies, and Basic Documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1988. Print.

Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf>.

Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0788.pdf>.

Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf>.

Sinclair, Anthony C. ‘The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection’. 2004 : n. pag. Print.

Söderlund, Christer. ‘Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial  Proceedings’. 22.4 (2005): 301–322. Web. <https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26277>.

Sornarajah, M and British Institute of International and Comparative Law. ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity?’ Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II : Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law. Ed. Federico Ortino. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2007. Print.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

---. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Web. <http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131>.

Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf>.

Stern, Brigitte. ‘Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration’. ICSID Review 25.1 n. pag. Web. <http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/1/26>.

---. ‘The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment’. ICSID Review 24.2 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/534.full.pdf+html>.

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0813.pdf>.

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v  The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad  General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del  Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG  Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the  Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/documents/Suez-VivendiChallenge2.pdf>.

‘Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15’. 2000. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd15.en.pdf>.

Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A.  v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

---. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0858.pdf>.

Thirlway, Hugh. ‘The Sources of International Law’. International Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 91–117. Print.

Thomas Waelde. ‘Compensation, Damages and Valuation’. The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 1049–1124. Print.

Thunderbird v Mexico [Also Known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0431.pdf>.

Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf>.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention)’. 10AD. Web. <https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf>.

‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration’. Web. <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/transparency-convention/Transparency-Convention-e.pdf>.

‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention)’. 17AD. Web. <https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/transparency>.

‘UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with New Article 1(4), as Adopted in 2013)’. Web. <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf>.

‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration’. Web. <https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf>.

‘UNCITRAL Transparency Rules Applied for the First Time in Investor-State Arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/>.

‘United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules  as Revised in 2013’. Web. <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf>.

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf>.

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003. N.p. Web. <http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/disp-diff/ups-52.pdf>.

United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf>.

United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf>.

Van Harten, Gus. ‘Chapter 7, The Businessman’s Court’. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 152–184. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e4b596d2-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb>.

---. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Web. <https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001>.

Vandevelde, Kenneth J. ‘A Unified Theory of FET’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 43 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp43&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Vandevelde, Kenneth J. Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

Vargiu, Paolo. ‘Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 10 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=45&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>.

Waelde, Thomas, and Abba Kolo. ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50 (2001): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq50&div=58&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults>.

Wallace, Don. ‘FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 669–700. Print.

Waste Management Inc.  v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf>.

Weiler, Todd. ‘Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 701–745. Print.

---. ‘Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law’. International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005. 557–595. Print.

Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896. N.p. Web. <http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf>.

Wong, Jarrod. ‘Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes’. George Mason Law Review 14 (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gmlr14&amp;div=10&amp;collection=journals&amp;set_as_cursor=0&amp;men_tab=srchresults>.

World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, Paras. 138-157. N.p. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlm46&page=337&collection=journals>.

Yala, Farouk. ‘The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting  Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly’. Journal of International Arbitration 22 (2005): 105–126. Web. <http://www.kluwerarbitration.com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26225>.

Yannaca-Small, K. ‘FET Standard: Recent Developments’. Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 113–141. Print.

Yannaca-Small, Katia. ‘Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE  Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on  International Investment, Number 2006/3’. Web. <http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9hkssg1xxt.pdf?expires=1439565908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=13117F01915B052B89921E4F1F0B76A9>.

Ziegler, Andreas R, and Louis-Philippe Gratton. ‘Investment Insurance’. The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 524–548. Print.