[1]
Aldrich, George H. 1994. What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. American Journal of International Law. 88, (1994).
[2]
Alvarez-Jiménez, A. 2006. The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors. 23, 5 (2006), 427–434.
[3]
Asante, Samuel K. B. 1988. International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 37, (1988).
[4]
Ben Hamid, W. 2005. The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts relating to the status of pre-investment expenditures. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 47–76.
[5]
Blackaby, N. et al. 2015. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Blackaby, N. et al. 2015. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Blessing, M. 2005. State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions? Journal of International Arbitration. 22, 6 (2005), 435–486.
[8]
Bonnitcha, J. 2016. Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
[9]
Brower, C.N. and Wrong, J. 2005. General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 281–323.
[10]
Carr, C. 2006. Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. (2006), 257–269.
[11]
Christie, G. C. 1962. What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law. 38, (1962).
[12]
Collier, J.G. and Lowe, A.V. 1999. The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations - Trade - European Commission: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364.
[14]
Cordero Moss, G. 2008. Full Protection and Security. Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Cremades, B.M. and Cairnes, D.J.A. 2002. The Brave New World of Global Arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 3, 2 (Jan. 2002), vii–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00085.
[16]
Delaume, G.R. 1998. Consent to ICSID Arbitration. The changing world of international law in the twenty-first century: a tribute to the late Kenneth R. Simmonds. Kluwer. 155–178.
[17]
Dolzer, R. 2005. The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge University Press. 261–275.
[18]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[21]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[22]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[23]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[25]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[26]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[27]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[28]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[29]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[31]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[32]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[33]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[34]
Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.
[35]
Dolzer, Rudoff 2005. Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties. International Lawyer. 39, (2005).
[36]
Douglas, Z. 2011. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2, 1 (Feb. 2011), 97–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
[37]
Douglas, Z. 2011. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2, 1 (Feb. 2011), 97–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
[38]
Dumberry, P. 2002. The Quest to Define ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ for Investors under International Law. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 3, 4 (Jan. 2002), 657–691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00427.
[39]
Faruque, A. 2006. Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value. Journal of International Arbitration. 23, 4 (2006), 317–336.
[40]
Fietta, S. 2006. Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration. 23, 5 (2006), 375–399.
[41]
Footer, Mary E. 2009. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law. 18, (2009).
[42]
Footer, Mary E. 2009. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law. 18, (2009).
[43]
Franck, Susan D. 2006. Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law. Global Business & Development Law Journal. 19, (2006).
[44]
Gaillard, E. 2009. Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford University Press. 403–416.
[45]
Higgins, R. 1982. The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil des cours. 176, (1982), 259–392.
[46]
Hobér, K. 2008. State Responsibility and Attribution. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford University Press. 549–583.
[47]
Ibrahim F I 1972. Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project. Journal of world trade law. 6, (1972).
[48]
International Law Commission 12AD. Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.
[49]
Ishikawa, Tomoko 2010. Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2010).
[50]
Jagusch, Stephen 2009. Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 10, (2009).
[51]
Laborde, G. 2010. The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 1, 1 (2010), 97–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idp008.
[52]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[55]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[57]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[58]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Lowenfeld, A.F. 2008. International economic law. Oxford University Press.
[60]
Malintoppi, L. 2009. Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties Request and What Tribunals Order. International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford University Press. 157–184.
[61]
Marboe, Irmgard 2006. Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 7, (2006).
[62]
Materials on the IBA website: http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx.
[63]
Mendelson, M. 2005. The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 97–149.
[64]
Mortenson, J. 2010. The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law. Harvard International Law Journal. 51, 1 (2010), 257–318.
[65]
Mouri, A. 1994. The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. M. Nijhoff.
[66]
Muchlinski, P. 2006. ‘Caveat Investor’? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 55, 03 (Jul. 2006), 527–558. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei104.
[67]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[68]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[69]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[70]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[71]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press.
[73]
NAFTA 31AD. Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents.
[74]
NAFTA Free Trade Commission 31AD. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions.
[75]
NAFTA Free Trade Commission 31AD. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions.
[76]
NAFTA Free Trade Commission 7AD. Statement on non-disputing party participation.
[77]
NAFTA Free Trade Commission 7AD. Statement on non-disputing party participation.
[78]
NAFTA Free Trade Commission 7AD. Statement on notices of intent to submit a claim to arbitration.
[79]
OECD 2004. "Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4.
[80]
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. no 91-175. 83 Stat: https://www.opic.gov/.
[81]
Paparinskis, M. 2011. MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review. 26, 2 (Sep. 2011), 14–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14.
[82]
Perezcano, Hugo 2005. Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 6, (2005).
[83]
Perry, Maura B. 1995. A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Virginia Journal of International Law. 36, (1995).
[84]
Reisman, W.M. and Sloane, R.D. 2004. Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law. 74, 1 (Jan. 2004), 115–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/74.1.115.
[85]
Roberts, Anthea 2012. Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration. ASIL Proceedings. 106, (2012).
[86]
Sacerdoti, G. 2005. Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge University Press. 276–298.
[87]
Sacerdoti, G. 1997. Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection. Recueil des cours. 269, (1997), 298–338.
[88]
Salacuse, Jeswald W. 1990. BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. International Lawyer. 24, (1990).
[89]
Salacuse, Jeswald W. 2005. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal. 46, (2005).
[90]
Salacuse, Jeswald W. 2005. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal. 46, (2005).
[91]
Salacuse, J.W. 2021. The law of investment treaties. Oxford University Press.
[92]
Salacuse, J.W. 2021. The law of investment treaties. Oxford University Press.
[93]
Salacuse, J.W. 2021. The law of investment treaties. Oxford University Press.
[94]
Schill, S. 2006. Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6). (2006).
[95]
Schill, Stephan W. 2009. Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 27, (2009).
[96]
Schill, S.W. 2011. Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2, 2 (Aug. 2011), 353–371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idr004.
[97]
Schlemmer, E.C. 2003. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. (2003), 292–300.
[98]
Schlemmer, E.C. 2001. Investor protection and forum selection in bilateral investment treaties. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. 26, (2001), 174–180.
[99]
Schreuer, C. 2005. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 281–323.
[100]
Schwebel, S. 2005. The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties. Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge University Press. 261–275.
[101]
Shaw, M.N. 2017. International law. Cambridge University Press.
[102]
Shaw, M.N. 2014. International law. Cambridge University Press.
[103]
Shihata, I.F.I. 1988. MIGA and foreign investment: origins, operations, policies, and basic documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. M. Nijhoff.
[104]
Sinclair, A.C. 2004. The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection.
[105]
Söderlund, C. 2005. Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. 22, 4 (2005), 301–322.
[106]
Sornarajah, M. and British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2007. The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity? Investment treaty law: current issues II : nationality and investment treaty claims, fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law. F. Ortino, ed. British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
[107]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[108]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[109]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[110]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[111]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[112]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[113]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[114]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[115]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[116]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[117]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[118]
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary 2017. The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press.
[119]
Stern, B. Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration. ICSID Review. 25, 1.
[120]
Stern, B. 2010. The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment. ICSID Review. 24, 2 (2010).
[121]
Thirlway, H. 2018. The Sources of International Law. International law. Oxford University Press. 91–117.
[122]
Thomas Waelde 2008. Compensation, Damages and Valuation. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford University Press. 1049–1124.
[123]
UNCITRAL Transparency Rules applied for the first time in investor-State arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills: http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/.
[124]
Van Harten, G. 2007. Chapter 7, The businessman’s court. Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press. 152–184.
[125]
Van Harten, G. 2007. Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press.
[126]
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. 2010. A Unified Theory of FET. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 43, (2010).
[127]
Vandevelde, K.J. 2010. Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. Oxford University Press.
[128]
Vargiu, Paolo 2009. Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention. Journal of World Investment & Trade. 10, (2009).
[129]
Waelde, T. and Kolo, A. 2001. Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 50, (2001).
[130]
Wallace, D. 2005. FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 669–700.
[131]
Weiler, T. 2005. Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 701–745.
[132]
Weiler, T. 2005. Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law. International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May. 557–595.
[133]
Wong, Jarrod 2006. Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes. George Mason Law Review. 14, (2006).
[134]
Yala, F. 2005. The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly. Journal of International Arbitration. 22 (2005), 105–126.
[135]
Yannaca-Small, K. 2008. FET Standard: Recent Developments. Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press. 113–141.
[136]
Yannaca-Small, K. Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3.
[137]
Ziegler, A.R. and Gratton, L.-P. 2008. Investment Insurance. The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford University Press. 524–548.
[138]
ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470.
[139]
ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195.
[140]
1AD. Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat.
[141]
1AD. Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat.
[142]
1AD. Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat.
[143]
Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005.
[144]
Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005.
[145]
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006.
[146]
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002).
[147]
American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531.
[148]
Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French text only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457.
[149]
19AD. Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC).
[150]
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245.
[151]
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245.
[152]
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991), 580-655, per dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante.
[153]
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006.
[154]
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006.
[155]
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006.
[156]
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009.
[157]
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005.
[158]
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005.
[159]
2007. Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5. United Nations.
[160]
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006.
[161]
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007.
[162]
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008.
[163]
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008.
[164]
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9.
[165]
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9.
[166]
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928).
[167]
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928).
[169]
Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330.
[170]
Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9.
[171]
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121.
[172]
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121.
[173]
CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264.
[174]
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205.
[175]
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205.
[176]
CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005.
[177]
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000.
[178]
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135.
[179]
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000).
[180]
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000).
[181]
Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC).
[182]
11AD. Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99.
[183]
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
[184]
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
[185]
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
[186]
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966).
[187]
Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82.
[188]
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15.
[189]
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15.
[190]
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129.
[191]
Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000.
[192]
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004.
[193]
2012. Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. UNCTAD.
[194]
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20.
[195]
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20.
[196]
Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183.
[197]
Feldman v Mexico [also known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM 625.
[198]
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002.
[199]
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002.
[200]
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007.
[201]
Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404.
[202]
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009.
[203]
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009.
[204]
HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011.
[205]
22AD. IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration.
[206]
22AD. IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration.
[207]
10AD. ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules).
[208]
10AD. ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules).
[209]
10AD. ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules).
[210]
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006.
[211]
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486.
[212]
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811.
[213]
Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007.
[214]
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209.
[215]
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36.
[216]
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212.
[217]
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345.
[218]
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345.
[219]
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345.
[220]
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15 January 2001.
[221]
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345.
[222]
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178.
[223]
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6.
[224]
Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85.
[225]
Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2.
[226]
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
[227]
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
[228]
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6.
[229]
2000. National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements).
[230]
1994. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
[231]
1994. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
[232]
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59.
[233]
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004.
[234]
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT).
[235]
2006. OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones. OECD.
[236]
Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5.
[237]
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007.
[238]
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007.
[239]
Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005.
[240]
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347.
[241]
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352.
[242]
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347.
[243]
Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 53rd Session, 2001, reproduced as an annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility).
[244]
10AD. Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID.
[245]
10AD. Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID.
[246]
10AD. Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID.
[247]
Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S. v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008.
[248]
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408.
[249]
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408.
[250]
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003).
[251]
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609.
[252]
Saluka Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006.
[253]
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003.
[254]
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010.
[255]
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004.
[256]
Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007.
[257]
Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004.
[258]
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007.
[259]
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007.
[260]
Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7.
[261]
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010.
[262]
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008.
[263]
2000. Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15. UNCTAD.
[264]
Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133.
[265]
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133.
[266]
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133.
[267]
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133.
[268]
Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603.
[269]
Thunderbird v Mexico [also known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006.
[270]
Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205.
[271]
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
[272]
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
[273]
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
[274]
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
[275]
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012).
[276]
10AD. UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention).
[277]
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
[278]
17AD. UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention).
[279]
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new Article 1(4), as adopted in 2013).
[280]
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
[281]
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration.
[282]
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013.
[283]
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013.
[284]
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001.
[285]
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003.
[286]
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007.
[287]
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002.
[288]
Waste Management Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967.
[289]
Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896.
[290]
World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, paras. 138-157.
