ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf
ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. (1 C.E.a). http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. (1 C.E.b). http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat. (1 C.E.c). http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf
Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0020_0.pdf
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0803.pdf
Aldrich, George H. (1994). What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. American Journal of International Law, 88. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil88&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002). (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf
Alvarez-Jiménez, A. (2006). The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors. 23(5), 427–434. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26892
American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf
Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French text only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0380.pdf
Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC). (19 C.E.). http://www.isdb.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Articles%20of%20Agreement/ICIEC_Articles-of-Agreement.pdf
Asante, Samuel K. B. (1988). International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 37. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq37&div=33&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991), 580-655, per dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1035.pdf
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0075.pdf
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf
Ben Hamid, W. (2005). The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts relating to the status of pre-investment expenditures. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 47–76). Cameron May.
Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5. (2007). United Nations. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiia20065_en.pdf
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
Blackaby, N., Partasides, C., Hunter, M., & Redfern, A. (2015a). Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th ed). Oxford University Press. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189
Blackaby, N., Partasides, C., Hunter, M., & Redfern, A. (2015b). Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (6th ed). Oxford University Press. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189
Blessing, M. (2005). State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions? Journal of International Arbitration, 22(6), 435–486. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26350
Bonnitcha, J. (2016). Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis (Vol. 110). Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1719625
Brower, C. N., & Wrong, J. (2005). General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 281–323). Cameron May.
Carr, C. (2006). Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 257–269. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130495
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9. (n.d.-a). http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9. (n.d.-b). http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928). (n.d.-a). http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928). (n.d.-b). http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
Case Summary. (n.d.). http://www.biicl.org/files/3914_2004_occidental_v_ecuador.pdf
Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0144.pdf
Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0147.pdf
Christie, G. C. (1962). What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law, 38. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&div=9&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf
CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0180.pdf
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
Collier, J. G., & Lowe, A. V. (1999). The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford University Press.
Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations - Trade - European Commission. (n.d.). http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0206.pdf
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000). (n.d.-a). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000). (n.d.-b). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152
Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC). (n.d.). http://www.iaigc.net/UserFiles/file/en/EngConven.pdf
Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99. (11 C.E.). https://www.miga.org/who-we-are/miga-convention
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966). (n.d.-a). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966). (n.d.-b). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966). (n.d.-c). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966). (n.d.-d). https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
Cordero Moss, G. (2008). Full Protection and Security. In Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press.
Cremades, B. M., & Cairnes, D. J. A. (2002). The Brave New World of Global Arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 3(2), vii–209. https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00085
Delaume, G. R. (1998). Consent to ICSID Arbitration. In The changing world of international law in the twenty-first century: a tribute to the late Kenneth R. Simmonds (pp. 155–178). Kluwer.
Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0248_0.pdf
Dolzer, R. (2005). The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice. In Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano (pp. 261–275). Cambridge University Press.
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012a). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012b). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012c). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012d). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012e). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012f). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012g). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012h). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012i). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012j). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012k). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012l). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012m). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012n). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012o). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012p). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012q). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
Dolzer, Rudoff. (2005). Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties. International Lawyer, 39. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr39&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Douglas, Z. (2011a). The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015
Douglas, Z. (2011b). The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015
Dumberry, P. (2002). The Quest to Define ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ for Investors under International Law. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 3(4), 657–691. https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00427
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15. (n.d.-a). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15. (n.d.-b). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0290.pdf
Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II. (2012). UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf
Faruque, A. (2006). Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value. Journal of International Arbitration, 23(4), 317–336. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26690
Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf
Feldman v Mexico [also known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM 625. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
Fietta, S. (2006). Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 23(5), 375–399. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26890
Footer, Mary E. (2009a). BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law, 18. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Footer, Mary E. (2009b). BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law, 18. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Franck, Susan D. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law. Global Business & Development Law Journal, 19. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tranl19&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf
Gaillard, E. (2009). Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. In International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer (pp. 403–416). Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001/acprof-9780199571345
Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0358.pdf
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf
Higgins, R. (1982). The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil Des Cours, 176, 259–392.
Hobér, K. (2008). State Responsibility and Attribution. In The Oxford handbook of international investment law (pp. 549–583). Oxford University Press.
HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. (22 C.E.a). http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration. (22 C.E.b). http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx
Ibrahim F I. (1972). Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project. Journal of World Trade Law, 6.
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). (10 C.E.a). https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). (10 C.E.b). https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules). (10 C.E.c). https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf
International Law Commission. (12 C.E.). Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup06/basicmats2/DASR.pdf
Ishikawa, Tomoko. (2010). Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 59. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq59&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Jagusch, Stephen. (2009). Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 10. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0441.pdf
Laborde, G. (2010). The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idp008
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008a). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008b). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008c). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008d). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008e). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008f). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008g). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Lowenfeld, A. F. (2008h). International economic law: Vol. International economic law series (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0496.pdf
Malintoppi, L. (2009). Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties Request and What Tribunals Order. In International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer (pp. 157–184). Oxford University Press.
Marboe, Irmgard. (2006). Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit7&div=42&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Materials on the IBA website. (n.d.). http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx
Mendelson, M. (2005). The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 97–149). Cameron May.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15 January 2001. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf
Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf
Mortenson, J. (2010). The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 257–318. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj51&id=259
Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2. (n.d.). http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf
Mouri, A. (1994). The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal: Vol. Developments in international law. M. Nijhoff.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
Muchlinski, P. (2006). ‘Caveat Investor’? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(03), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei104
Muchlinski, P. (2007a). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2007b). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2007c). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2007d). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2007e). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Muchlinski, P. (2007f). Multinational enterprises and the law: Vol. Oxford international law library (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
NAFTA. (31 C.E.a). Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (7 C.E.a). Statement on non-disputing party participation. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (7 C.E.b). Statement on non-disputing party participation. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (7 C.E.c). Statement on notices of intent to submit a claim to arbitration. http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/Noticeintent_e.pdf
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (31 C.E.b). Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions. http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. (31 C.E.c). Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions. http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp
National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements). (2000). http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.aspx?publicationid=340
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). (1994a). https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). (1994b). https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT). (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
OECD. (2004). "Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4. https://doi.org/10.1787/780155872321
OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones. (2006). OECD. http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/corporateresponsibility/36885821.pdf
Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0587.pdf
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. no 91-175. 83 Stat. (n.d.). https://www.opic.gov/
Paparinskis, M. (2011). MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review, 26(2), 14–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
Perezcano, Hugo. (2005). Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 6. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit6&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Perry, Maura B. (1995). A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Virginia Journal of International Law, 36. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint36&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0686.pdf
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf
Reisman, W. M., & Sloane, R. D. (2004). Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law, 74(1), 115–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/74.1.115
Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 53rd Session, 2001, reproduced as an annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility). (n.d.). http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
Roberts, Anthea. (2012). Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration. ASIL Proceedings, 106. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/asilp106&div=91&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. (10 C.E.a). http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. (10 C.E.b). http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID. (10 C.E.c). http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S. v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0728.pdf
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
Sacerdoti, G. (1997). Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection. Recueil Des Cours, 269, 298–338.
Sacerdoti, G. (2005). Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law. In Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano (pp. 276–298). Cambridge University Press.
Salacuse, J. W. (2021a). The law of investment treaties: Vol. The Oxford international law library (Third edition.). Oxford University Press. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
Salacuse, J. W. (2021b). The law of investment treaties: Vol. The Oxford international law library (Third edition.). Oxford University Press. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
Salacuse, J. W. (2021c). The law of investment treaties: Vol. The Oxford international law library (Third edition.). Oxford University Press. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
Salacuse, Jeswald W. (1990). BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. International Lawyer, 24. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr24&div=53&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Salacuse, Jeswald W. (2005a). Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal, 46. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Salacuse, Jeswald W. (2005b). Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal, 46. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003). (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf
Saluka Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
Schill, S. (2006). Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6). http://www.iilj.org/publications/2006-6Schill.asp
Schill, S. W. (2011). Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(2), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idr004
Schill, Stephan W. (2009). Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw27&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Schlemmer, E. C. (2001). Investor protection and forum selection in bilateral investment treaties. South African Yearbook of International Law: Suid-Afrikaanse Jaarboek Vir Volkereg, 26, 174–180.
Schlemmer, E. C. (2003). Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina. South African Yearbook of International Law: Suid-Afrikaanse Jaarboek Vir Volkereg, 292–300.
Schreuer, C. (2005). Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 281–323). Cameron May.
Schwebel, S. (2005). The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties. In Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano (pp. 261–275). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494499
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf
Shaw, M. N. (2014). International law (7th ed). Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International law (8th ed). Cambridge University Press.
Shihata, I. F. I. (1988). MIGA and foreign investment: origins, operations, policies, and basic documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. M. Nijhoff.
Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0788.pdf
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
Sinclair, A. C. (2004). The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection (Vol. 20, Issue 4).
Söderlund, C. (2005). Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. 22(4), 301–322. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26277
Sornarajah, M. & British Institute of International and Comparative Law. (2007). The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity? In F. Ortino (Ed.), Investment treaty law: current issues II : nationality and investment treaty claims, fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law. British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017a). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017b). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017c). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017d). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017e). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017f). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017g). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017h). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017i). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017j). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017k). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Sornarajah, M. & MyiLibrary. (2017l). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf
Stern, B. (n.d.). Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration. ICSID Review, 25(1). http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/1/26
Stern, B. (2010). The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment. ICSID Review, 24(2). http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/534.full.pdf+html
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0813.pdf
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/documents/Suez-VivendiChallenge2.pdf
Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15. (2000). UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd15.en.pdf
Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133. (n.d.-a). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133. (n.d.-b). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0858.pdf
Thirlway, H. (2018). The Sources of International Law. In International law (5th ed, pp. 91–117). Oxford University Press.
Thomas Waelde. (2008). Compensation, Damages and Valuation. In The Oxford handbook of international investment law (pp. 1049–1124). Oxford University Press.
Thunderbird v Mexico [also known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0431.pdf
Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012). (n.d.-a). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012). (n.d.-b). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012). (n.d.-c). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012). (n.d.-d). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012). (n.d.-e). http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). (10 C.E.). https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration. (n.d.). http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/transparency-convention/Transparency-Convention-e.pdf
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention). (17 C.E.). https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/transparency
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new Article 1(4), as adopted in 2013). (n.d.). http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration. (n.d.-a). https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration. (n.d.-b). https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf
UNCITRAL Transparency Rules applied for the first time in investor-State arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills. (n.d.). http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013. (n.d.-a). http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013. (n.d.-b). http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003. (n.d.). http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/disp-diff/ups-52.pdf
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf
Van Harten, G. (2007a). Chapter 7, The businessman’s court. In Investment treaty arbitration and public law: Vol. Oxford monographs in international law (pp. 152–184). Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e4b596d2-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Van Harten, G. (2007b). Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001
Vandevelde, K. J. (2010). Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. (2010). A Unified Theory of FET. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 43. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp43&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Vargiu, Paolo. (2009). Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 10. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=45&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
Waelde, T., & Kolo, A. (2001). Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq50&div=58&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
Wallace, D. (2005). FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 669–700). Cameron May.
Waste Management Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
Weiler, T. (2005a). Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 701–745). Cameron May.
Weiler, T. (2005b). Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law. In International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law (pp. 557–595). Cameron May.
Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896. (n.d.). http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf
Wong, Jarrod. (2006). Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes. George Mason Law Review, 14. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gmlr14&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, paras. 138-157. (n.d.). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlm46&page=337&collection=journals
Yala, F. (2005). The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly. Journal of International Arbitration, 22, 105–126. http://www.kluwerarbitration.com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26225
Yannaca-Small, K. (n.d.). Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9hkssg1xxt.pdf?expires=1439565908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=13117F01915B052B89921E4F1F0B76A9
Yannaca-Small, K. (2008). FET Standard: Recent Developments. In Standards of investment protection (pp. 113–141). Oxford University Press.
Ziegler, A. R., & Gratton, L.-P. (2008). Investment Insurance. In The Oxford handbook of international investment law (pp. 524–548). Oxford University Press.
