Bibliography for M34113: International Investment Law BETA

ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf.

ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf.

‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’ (1ADa). Available at: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.

‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’ (1ADb). Available at: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.

‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’ (1ADc). Available at: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.

Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and  Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf.

Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on  Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0020_0.pdf.

Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona  S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine  Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0803.pdf.

Aldrich, George H. (1994) ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’, American Journal of International Law, 88. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil88&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002) (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf.

Alvarez-Jiménez, A. (2006) ‘The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the  Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign  Investors’, 23(5), pp. 427–434. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26892.

American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf.

Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French text only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0380.pdf.

‘Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC)’ (19AD). Available at: http://www.isdb.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Articles%20of%20Agreement/ICIEC_Articles-of-Agreement.pdf.

Asante, Samuel K. B. (1988) ‘International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 37. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq37&div=33&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf.

Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf.

Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991),  580-655, per dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1035.pdf.

Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.

Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.

Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0075.pdf.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf.

Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf.

Ben Hamid, W. (2005) ‘The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts relating to the status of pre-investment expenditures’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 47–76.

‘Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5’ (2007). New York and Geneva: United Nations. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiia20065_en.pdf.

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No.  ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf.

Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No.  ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf.

Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.

Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.

Blackaby, N. et al. (2015a) Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189.

Blackaby, N. et al. (2015b) Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189.

Blessing, M. (2005) ‘State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions?’, Journal of International Arbitration, 22(6), pp. 435–486. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26350.

Bonnitcha, J. (2016) Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1719625.

Brower, C.N. and Wrong, J. (2005) ‘General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 281–323.

Carr, C. (2006) ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental’, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, pp. 257–269. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130495.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9 (no date a). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9 (no date b). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928) (no date a). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf.

Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928) (no date b). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf.

‘Case Summary’ (no date). Available at: http://www.biicl.org/files/3914_2004_occidental_v_ecuador.pdf.

Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0144.pdf.

Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0147.pdf.

Christie, G. C. (1962) ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law’, British Year Book of International Law, 38. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&div=9&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab.

CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf.

CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf.

CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0180.pdf.

CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.

CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.

CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.

Collier, J.G. and Lowe, A.V. (1999) The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations - Trade - European Commission (no date). Available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364.

Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0206.pdf.

Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf.

Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000) (no date a). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152.

Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000) (no date b). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152.

‘Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC)’ (no date). Kuwait. Available at: http://www.iaigc.net/UserFiles/file/en/EngConven.pdf.

‘Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99’ (11AD). Seoul. Available at: https://www.miga.org/who-we-are/miga-convention.

‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’ (no date a). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.

‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’ (no date b). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.

‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’ (no date c). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.

‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’ (no date d). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.

Cordero Moss, G. (2008) ‘Full Protection and Security’, in Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cremades, B.M. and Cairnes, D.J.A. (2002) ‘The Brave New World of Global Arbitration’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 3(2), pp. vii–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00085.

Delaume, G.R. (1998) ‘Consent to ICSID Arbitration’, in The changing world of international law in the twenty-first century: a tribute to the late Kenneth R. Simmonds. The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 155–178.

Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0248_0.pdf.

Dolzer, R. (2005) ‘The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice’, in Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–275.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012a) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012b) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012c) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012d) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012e) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012f) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012g) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012h) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012i) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012j) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012k) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012l) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012m) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012n) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012o) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012p) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. (2012q) Principles of international investment law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.

Dolzer, Rudoff (2005) ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’, International Lawyer, 39. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr39&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Douglas, Z. (2011a) ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), pp. 97–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.

Douglas, Z. (2011b) ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), pp. 97–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.

Dumberry, P. (2002) ‘The Quest to Define “Fair and Equitable Treatment” for Investors under International Law’, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 3(4), pp. 657–691. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00427.

Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15 (no date a). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf.

Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15 (no date b). Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf.

Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.

Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision  on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.

Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0290.pdf.

‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’ (2012). Geneva: UNCTAD. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf.

Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf.

Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf.

Faruque, A. (2006) ‘Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value’, Journal of International Arbitration, 23(4), pp. 317–336. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26690.

Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf.

Feldman v Mexico [also known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM  625 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.

Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.

Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.

Fietta, S. (2006) ‘Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration’, Journal of International Arbitration, 23(5), pp. 375–399. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26890.

Footer, Mary E. (2009a) ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’, Michigan State Journal of  International Law, 18. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Footer, Mary E. (2009b) ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’, Michigan State Journal of  International Law, 18. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Franck, Susan D. (2006) ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law’, Global Business & Development Law Journal, 19. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tranl19&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf.

Gaillard, E. (2009) ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’, in International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 403–416. Available at: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001/acprof-9780199571345.

Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0358.pdf.

Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf.

Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf.

Higgins, R. (1982) ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’, Recueil des cours, 176, pp. 259–392.

Hobér, K. (2008) ‘State Responsibility and Attribution’, in The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 549–583.

HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on  Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf.

‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (22ADa). Available at: http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx.

‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’ (22ADb). Available at: http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx.

Ibrahim F I (1972) ‘Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project’, Journal of world trade law, 6.

‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’ (10ADa). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.

‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’ (10ADb). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.

‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’ (10ADc). Available at: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.

Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf.

International Law Commission (12AD) ‘Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. Available at: http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup06/basicmats2/DASR.pdf.

Ishikawa, Tomoko (2010) ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq59&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Jagusch, Stephen (2009) ‘Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 10. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0441.pdf.

Laborde, G. (2010) ‘The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(1), pp. 97–122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idp008.

Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008a) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008b) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008c) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008d) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008e) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008f) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008g) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Lowenfeld, A.F. (2008h) International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.

Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0496.pdf.

Malintoppi, L. (2009) ‘Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties  Request and What Tribunals Order’, in International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–184.

Marboe, Irmgard (2006) ‘Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 7. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit7&div=42&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Materials on the IBA website (no date). Available at: http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx.

Mendelson, M. (2005) ‘The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 97–149.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.

Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the  Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15  January 2001 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf.

Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.

Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf.

Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf.

Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf.

Mortenson, J. (2010) ‘The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), pp. 257–318. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj51&id=259.

‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE,  Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2’ (no date). Available at: http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf.

Mouri, A. (1994) The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.

Muchlinski, P. (2006) ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 55(03), pp. 527–558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei104.

Muchlinski, P. (2007a) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muchlinski, P. (2007b) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muchlinski, P. (2007c) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muchlinski, P. (2007d) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muchlinski, P. (2007e) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muchlinski, P. (2007f) Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

NAFTA (31AD) ‘Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of  Arbitration Documents’. Available at: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (7ADa) ‘Statement on non-disputing party participation’. Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (7ADb) ‘Statement on non-disputing party participation’. Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (7ADc) ‘Statement on notices of intent to submit a claim to arbitration’. Available at: http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/Noticeintent_e.pdf.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (31ADa) ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11  Provisions’. Available at: http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp.

NAFTA Free Trade Commission (31ADb) ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11  Provisions’. Available at: http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp.

‘National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements)’ (2000). Available at: http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.aspx?publicationid=340.

‘North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)’ (1994a). Available at: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download.

‘North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)’ (1994b). Available at: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download.

Occidental  Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.

Occidental  Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.

Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT) (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.

OECD (2004) ‘"Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/780155872321.

‘OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones’ (2006). Paris: OECD. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/corporateresponsibility/36885821.pdf.

Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0587.pdf.

Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. no 91-175. 83 Stat (no date). Available at: https://www.opic.gov/.

Paparinskis, M. (2011) ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’, ICSID Review, 26(2), pp. 14–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14.

Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf.

Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf.

Perezcano, Hugo (2005) ‘Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 6. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit6&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Perry, Maura B. (1995) ‘A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 36. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint36&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0686.pdf.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf.

Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf.

Reisman, W.M. and Sloane, R.D. (2004) ‘Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation’, British Yearbook of International Law, 74(1), pp. 115–150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/74.1.115.

‘Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 53rd Session, 2001, reproduced as an annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility)’ (no date). Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.

Roberts, Anthea (2012) ‘Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration’, ASIL Proceedings, 106. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/asilp106&div=91&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’ (10ADa). Available at: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.

‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’ (10ADb). Available at: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.

‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’ (10ADc). Available at: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.

Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S.  v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0728.pdf.

S D Myers Inc.  v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf.

S D Myers Inc.  v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf.

Sacerdoti, G. (1997) ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’, Recueil des cours, 269, pp. 298–338.

Sacerdoti, G. (2005) ‘Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law’, in Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 276–298.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. (1990) ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’, International Lawyer, 24. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr24&div=53&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. (2005a) ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’, Harvard International Law Journal, 46. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. (2005b) ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’, Harvard International Law Journal, 46. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Salacuse, J.W. (2021a) The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.

Salacuse, J.W. (2021b) The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.

Salacuse, J.W. (2021c) The law of investment treaties. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.

Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A.  v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003) (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf.

Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf.

Saluka  Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.

Schill, S. (2006) ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6)’. Available at: http://www.iilj.org/publications/2006-6Schill.asp.

Schill, Stephan W. (2009) ‘Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw27&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Schill, S.W. (2011) ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(2), pp. 353–371. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idr004.

Schlemmer, E.C. (2001) ‘Investor protection and forum selection in bilateral investment treaties’, South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg, 26, pp. 174–180.

Schlemmer, E.C. (2003) ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and  ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina’, South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg, pp. 292–300.

Schreuer, C. (2005) ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 281–323.

Schwebel, S. (2005) ‘The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties’, in Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 261–275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494499.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case  No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No.  ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf.

SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines  (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf.

Shaw, M.N. (2014) International law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shaw, M.N. (2017) International law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shihata, I.F.I. (1988) MIGA and foreign investment: origins, operations, policies, and basic documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.

Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.

Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0788.pdf.

Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.

Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.

Sinclair, A.C. (2004) ‘The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection’.

Söderlund, C. (2005) ‘Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial  Proceedings’, 22(4), pp. 301–322. Available at: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26277.

Sornarajah, M. and British Institute of International and Comparative Law (2007) ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity?’, in F. Ortino (ed.) Investment treaty law: current issues II : nationality and investment treaty claims, fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017a) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017b) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017c) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017d) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017e) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017f) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017g) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017h) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017i) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017j) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017k) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary (2017l) The international law on foreign investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.

Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf.

Stern, B. (2010) ‘The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment’, ICSID Review, 24(2). Available at: http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/534.full.pdf+html.

Stern, B. (no date) ‘Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration’, ICSID Review, 25(1). Available at: http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/1/26.

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0813.pdf.

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v  The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad  General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del  Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG  Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the  Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/documents/Suez-VivendiChallenge2.pdf.

‘Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15’ (2000). New York and Geneva: UNCTAD. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd15.en.pdf.

Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A.  v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133 (no date a). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A.  v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133 (no date b). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.

Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.

Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0858.pdf.

Thirlway, H. (2018) ‘The Sources of International Law’, in International law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 91–117.

Thomas Waelde (2008) ‘Compensation, Damages and Valuation’, in The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1049–1124.

Thunderbird v Mexico [also known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0431.pdf.

Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’ (no date a). Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’ (no date b). Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’ (no date c). Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’ (no date d). Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.

‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’ (no date e). Available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.

‘UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention)’ (10AD). New York. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf.

‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration’ (no date). Available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/transparency-convention/Transparency-Convention-e.pdf.

‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention)’ (17AD). Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/transparency.

‘UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new Article 1(4), as adopted in 2013)’ (no date). Available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf.

‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration’ (no date a). Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf.

‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration’ (no date b). Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf.

UNCITRAL Transparency Rules applied for the first time in investor-State arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills (no date). Available at: http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/.

‘United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules  as revised in 2013’ (no date a). Available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf.

‘United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules  as revised in 2013’ (no date b). Available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf.

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf.

United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003 (no date). Available at: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/disp-diff/ups-52.pdf.

United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf.

United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf.

Van Harten, G. (2007a) ‘Chapter 7, The businessman’s court’, in Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152–184. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e4b596d2-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.

Van Harten, G. (2007b) Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001.

Vandevelde, Kenneth J. (2010) ‘A Unified Theory of FET’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 43. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp43&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Vandevelde, K.J. (2010) Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Vargiu, Paolo (2009) ‘Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention’, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 10. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=45&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Waelde, T. and Kolo, A. (2001) ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq50&div=58&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

Wallace, D. (2005) ‘FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 669–700.

Waste Management Inc.  v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf.

Weiler, T. (2005a) ‘Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 701–745.

Weiler, T. (2005b) ‘Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law’, in International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May, pp. 557–595.

Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896 (no date). Available at: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf.

Wong, Jarrod (2006) ‘Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes’, George Mason Law Review, 14. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gmlr14&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.

World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, paras. 138-157 (no date). Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlm46&page=337&collection=journals.

Yala, F. (2005) ‘The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting  Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly’, Journal of International Arbitration, (22), pp. 105–126. Available at: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26225.

Yannaca-Small, K. (2008) ‘FET Standard: Recent Developments’, in Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–141.

Yannaca-Small, K. (no date) ‘Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE  Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on  International Investment, Number 2006/3’. Available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9hkssg1xxt.pdf?expires=1439565908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=13117F01915B052B89921E4F1F0B76A9.

Ziegler, A.R. and Gratton, L.-P. (2008) ‘Investment Insurance’, in The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 524–548.