1.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp
2.
International Law Commission. Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts [Internet]. 12AD. Available from: http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup06/basicmats2/DASR.pdf
3.
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
4.
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules) [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
5.
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
6.
UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) [Internet]. New York; 10AD. Available from: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf
7.
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new Article 1(4), as adopted in 2013) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf
8.
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration [Internet]. Available from: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf
9.
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention) [Internet]. 17AD. Available from: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/transparency
10.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on non-disputing party participation [Internet]. 7AD. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf
11.
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx
12.
Shaw MN. International law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
13.
Shaw MN. International law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
14.
Thirlway H. The Sources of International Law. In: International law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 91–117.
15.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
16.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
17.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
18.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
19.
Asante, Samuel K. B. International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 1988;37. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq37&div=33&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
20.
Franck, Susan D. Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law. Global Business & Development Law Journal [Internet]. 2006;19. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tranl19&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
21.
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
22.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
23.
Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf
24.
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf
25.
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0441.pdf
26.
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf
27.
Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0144.pdf
28.
Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0496.pdf
29.
Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf
30.
Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0147.pdf
31.
Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0587.pdf
32.
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf
33.
Stern B. Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration. ICSID Review [Internet]. 25(1). Available from: http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/1/26
34.
Mortenson, J. The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2010;51(1):257–318. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj51&id=259
35.
Stern B. The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment. ICSID Review [Internet]. 2010;24(2). Available from: http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/534.full.pdf+html
36.
Vargiu, Paolo. Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention. Journal of World Investment & Trade [Internet]. 2009;10. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=45&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
37.
Gaillard E. Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice. In: International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 403–16. Available from: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001/acprof-9780199571345
38.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
39.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
40.
Dolzer R. The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice. In: Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 261–75.
41.
Yala F. The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly. Journal of International Arbitration [Internet]. 2005;(22):105–26. Available from: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26225
42.
Mendelson M. The Runaway Train: the Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 97–149.
43.
Ben Hamid W. The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts relating to the status of pre-investment expenditures. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 47–76.
44.
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat [Internet]. 1AD. Available from: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
45.
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
46.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
47.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
48.
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties [Internet]. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
49.
Vandevelde KJ. Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
50.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2005;46. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
51.
Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5 [Internet]. New York and Geneva: United Nations; 2007. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiia20065_en.pdf
52.
Sacerdoti G. Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection. Recueil des cours. 1997;269:298–338.
53.
Carr C. Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;257–69. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130495
54.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2005;46. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
55.
Schlemmer EC. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. 2003;292–300.
56.
Schlemmer EC. Investor protection and forum selection in bilateral investment treaties. South African yearbook of international law: Suid-Afrikaanse jaarboek vir volkereg. 2001;26:174–80.
57.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. International Lawyer [Internet]. 1990;24. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr24&div=53&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
58.
Schwebel S. The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties. In: Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 261–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494499
59.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
60.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
61.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991), 580-655, per dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1035.pdf
62.
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
63.
Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
64.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
65.
Case Summary [Internet]. Available from: http://www.biicl.org/files/3914_2004_occidental_v_ecuador.pdf
66.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) [Internet]. 1994. Available from: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download
67.
NAFTA. Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng
68.
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
69.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
70.
Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. Geneva: UNCTAD; 2012. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf
71.
ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf
72.
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf
73.
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
74.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
75.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
76.
Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf
77.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf
78.
Waste Management Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
79.
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf
80.
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
81.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf
82.
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
83.
CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
84.
Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0248_0.pdf
85.
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf
86.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
87.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
88.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
89.
Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S. v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0728.pdf
90.
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
91.
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0813.pdf
92.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
93.
Bonnitcha J. Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis [Internet]. Vol. 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1719625
94.
Muchlinski P. ‘Caveat Investor’? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006 Jul;55(03):527–58.
95.
Sornarajah M, British Institute of International and Comparative Law. The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity? In: Ortino F, editor. Investment treaty law: current issues II : nationality and investment treaty claims, fair and equitable treatment in investment treaty law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law; 2007.
96.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
97.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
98.
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties [Internet]. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
99.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. A Unified Theory of FET. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2010;43. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp43&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
100.
Yannaca-Small K. FET Standard: Recent Developments. In: Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 113–41.
101.
Schill S. Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6). 2006; Available from: http://www.iilj.org/publications/2006-6Schill.asp
102.
Fietta S. Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration [Internet]. 2006;23(5):375–99. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26890
103.
Dolzer, Rudoff. Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties. International Lawyer [Internet]. 2005;39. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr39&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
104.
Weiler T. Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 701–45.
105.
Wallace D. FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 669–700.
106.
Dumberry P. The Quest to Define ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ for Investors under International Law. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2002 Jan 1;3(4):657–91.
107.
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) [Internet]. 1994. Available from: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download
108.
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
109.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
110.
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
111.
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
112.
American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf
113.
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf
114.
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
115.
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
116.
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
117.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
118.
Cordero Moss G. Full Protection and Security. In: Standards of investment protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
119.
Salacuse JW. The law of investment treaties [Internet]. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953
120.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
121.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
122.
ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf
123.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf
124.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0075.pdf
125.
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
126.
Feldman v Mexico [also known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM 625 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
127.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
128.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
129.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
130.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
131.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
132.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf
133.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0686.pdf
134.
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
135.
Thunderbird v Mexico [also known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0431.pdf
136.
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf
137.
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf
138.
Douglas Z. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011 Feb 1;2(1):97–113.
139.
Schill SW. Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011 Aug 1;2(2):353–71.
140.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
141.
Douglas Z. The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011 Feb 1;2(1):97–113.
142.
National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements) [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.aspx?publicationid=340
143.
Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf
144.
Weiler T. Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 557–95.
145.
Schill, Stephan W. Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses. Berkeley Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2009;27. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw27&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
146.
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat [Internet]. 1AD. Available from: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
147.
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
148.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
149.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
150.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
151.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
152.
Christie, G. C. What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law [Internet]. 1962;38. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&div=9&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab
153.
Higgins R. The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil des cours. 1982;176:259–392.
154.
Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on issues in international investment agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15 [Internet]. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD; 2000. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd15.en.pdf
155.
OECD. "Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/indirect-expropriation-and-the-right-to-regulate-in-international-investment-law_780155872321
156.
Aldrich, George H. What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1994;88. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil88&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
157.
Reisman WM, Sloane RD. Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law. 2004 Jan 1;74(1):115–50.
158.
Waelde T, Kolo A. Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2001;50. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq50&div=58&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
159.
Schreuer C. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 281–323.
160.
Faruque A. Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value. Journal of International Arbitration [Internet]. 2006;23(4):317–36. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26690
161.
Alvarez-Jiménez A. The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors. 2006;23(5):427–34. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26892
162.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
163.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
164.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
165.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
166.
Brower CN, Wrong J. General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena. In: International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. London: Cameron May; 2005. p. 281–323.
167.
Mouri A. The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. Vol. Developments in international law. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff; 1994.
168.
Thomas Waelde. Compensation, Damages and Valuation. In: The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 1049–124.
169.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
170.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
171.
Perezcano, Hugo. Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency. Journal of World Investment & Trade [Internet]. 2005;6. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit6&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
172.
Jagusch, Stephen. Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection. Journal of World Investment & Trade [Internet]. 2009;10. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab
173.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf
174.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
175.
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152
176.
Antoine Goetz and others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French text only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0380.pdf
177.
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf
178.
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf
179.
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
180.
Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0358.pdf
181.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
182.
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf
183.
Saluka Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
184.
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf
185.
Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf
186.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
187.
Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0858.pdf
188.
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
189.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf
190.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
191.
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf
192.
CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0180.pdf
193.
Compañía del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152
194.
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0290.pdf
195.
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf
196.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
197.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf
198.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
199.
Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, text adopted by the International Law Commission at its 53rd Session, 2001, reproduced as an annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility) [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
200.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
201.
Hobér K. State Responsibility and Attribution. In: The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 549–83.
202.
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0206.pdf
203.
Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf
204.
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
205.
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf
206.
Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf
207.
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. no 91-175. 83 Stat [Internet]. Available from: https://www.opic.gov/
208.
Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC) [Internet]. Kuwait; Available from: http://www.iaigc.net/UserFiles/file/en/EngConven.pdf
209.
Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC) [Internet]. 19AD. Available from: http://www.isdb.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Articles%20of%20Agreement/ICIEC_Articles-of-Agreement.pdf
210.
Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99 [Internet]. Seoul; 11AD. Available from: https://www.miga.org/who-we-are/miga-convention
211.
OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones [Internet]. Paris: OECD; 2006. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/corporateresponsibility/36885821.pdf
212.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
213.
Ziegler AR, Gratton LP. Investment Insurance. In: The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 524–48.
214.
Shihata IFI. MIGA and foreign investment: origins, operations, policies, and basic documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff; 1988.
215.
Ibrahim F I. Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project. Journal of world trade law. 1972;6.
216.
Perry, Maura B. A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Virginia Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1995;36. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint36&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
217.
Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat [Internet]. 1AD. Available from: http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210
218.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
219.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
220.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
221.
Footer, Mary E. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2009;18. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
222.
Laborde G. The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2010;1(1):97–122.
223.
Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
224.
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf
225.
World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, paras. 138-157 [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlm46&page=337&collection=journals
226.
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf
227.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
228.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
229.
Sacerdoti G. Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law. In: Law in the service of human dignity: essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 276–98.
230.
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
231.
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules) [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
232.
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
233.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf
234.
Blackaby N, Partasides C, Hunter M, Redfern A. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration [Internet]. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189
235.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
236.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
237.
Cremades BM, Cairnes DJA. The Brave New World of Global Arbitration. The Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2002 Jan 1;3(2):vii–209.
238.
Delaume GR. Consent to ICSID Arbitration. In: The changing world of international law in the twenty-first century: a tribute to the late Kenneth R Simmonds. The Hague: Kluwer; 1998. p. 155–78.
239.
Roberts, Anthea. Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration. ASIL Proceedings [Internet]. 2012;106. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/asilp106&div=91&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
240.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
241.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf
242.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf
243.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf
244.
Paparinskis M. MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review. 2011 Sep 1;26(2):14–58.
245.
Sinclair AC. The origins of the umbrella clause in the international law of investment protection. Vol. 20. 2004.
246.
Wong, Jarrod. Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes. George Mason Law Review [Internet]. 2006;14. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gmlr14&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
247.
Yannaca-Small K. Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9hkssg1xxt.pdf?expires=1439565908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=13117F01915B052B89921E4F1F0B76A9
248.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
249.
Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
250.
Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0788.pdf
251.
Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
252.
HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf
253.
Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966) [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf
254.
Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp
255.
ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules) [Internet]. 10AD. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
256.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as revised in 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf
257.
UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration [Internet]. Available from: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf
258.
UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration [Internet]. Available from: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/transparency-convention/Transparency-Convention-e.pdf
259.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on non-disputing party participation [Internet]. 7AD. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf
260.
IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx
261.
Van Harten G. Investment treaty arbitration and public law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001
262.
Van Harten G. Chapter 7, The businessman’s court. In: Investment treaty arbitration and public law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 152–84. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e4b596d2-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
263.
Dolzer R, Schreuer C. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174
264.
Commission proposes new Investment Court System for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations - Trade - European Commission [Internet]. Available from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364
265.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15 January 2001 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf
266.
Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0020_0.pdf
267.
Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf
268.
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf
269.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf
270.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf
271.
UNCITRAL Transparency Rules applied for the first time in investor-State arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills [Internet]. Available from: http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/
272.
Footer, Mary E. BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment. Michigan State Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2009;18. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
273.
Ishikawa, Tomoko. Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration. In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq59&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
274.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf
275.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/disp-diff/ups-52.pdf
276.
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0803.pdf
277.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Statement on notices of intent to submit a claim to arbitration [Internet]. 7AD. Available from: http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/Noticeintent_e.pdf
278.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp
279.
Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
280.
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/documents/Suez-VivendiChallenge2.pdf
281.
Materials on the IBA website [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx
282.
Sornarajah M, MyiLibrary. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131
283.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
284.
Lowenfeld AF. International economic law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432
285.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
286.
Marboe, Irmgard. Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value. Journal of World Investment & Trade [Internet]. 2006;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit7&div=42&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
287.
Blackaby N, Partasides C, Hunter M, Redfern A. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration [Internet]. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189
288.
Malintoppi L. Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties Request and What Tribunals Order. In: International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 157–84.
289.
Blessing M. State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions? Journal of International Arbitration [Internet]. 2005;22(6):435–86. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26350
290.
Söderlund C. Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. 2005;22(4):301–22. Available from: https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26277
