Aldrich, George H. ‘What Constitutes a Compensable Taking of Property--The Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal’. American Journal of International Law 88 (1994). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil88&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto. ‘The Methanex Final Award: An Analysis from the Perspectives of Environmental Regulatory Authorities and Foreign Investors’ 23.5 (2006): 427–34. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26892.
Asante, Samuel K. B. ‘International Law and Foreign Investment: A Reappraisal’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37 (1988). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq37&div=33&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Ben Hamid, Walid. ‘The Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Case: Some Thoughts Relating to the Status of Pre-Investment Expenditures’. Pages 47–76 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, Martin Hunter, and Alan Redfern. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189.
———. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document/KLI-KA-Redfern-06-006#a0189.
Blessing, Marc. ‘State Arbitrations: Predictably Unpredictable Solutions?’ Journal of International Arbitration 22.6 (2005): 435–86. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26350.
Bonnitcha, Jonathan. Substantive Protection under Investment Treaties: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Vol. 110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1719625.
Brower, Charles N, and Jarrod Wrong. ‘General Valuation Principles: The Case of Santa Elena’. Pages 281–323 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Carr, Christopher. ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties: Ecuador v Occidental’. Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly (2006): 257–69. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.i-law.com/ilaw/doc/view.htm?id=130495.
Christie, G. C. ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law’. British Year Book of International Law 38 (1962). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&div=9&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab.
Collier, John G., and A. V. Lowe. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Cordero Moss, G. ‘Full Protection and Security’. Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Cremades, Bernardo M., and David J. A. Cairnes. ‘The Brave New World of Global Arbitration’. The Journal of World Investment & Trade 3.2 (2002): vii–209. https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00085.
Delaume, Georges R. ‘Consent to ICSID Arbitration’. Pages 155–78 in The Changing World of International Law in the Twenty-First Century: A Tribute to the Late Kenneth R. Simmonds. The Hague: Kluwer, 1998.
Dolzer, Rudoff. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Key Standard in Investment Treaties’. International Lawyer 39 (2005). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr39&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Dolzer, Rudolf. ‘The Notion of Investment in Recent Practice’. Pages 261–75 in Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Dolzer, Rudolf, and Christoph Schreuer. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
———. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1120174.
Douglas, Z. ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.1 (2011): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
———. ‘The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.1 (2011): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
Dumberry, Patrick. ‘The Quest to Define “Fair and Equitable Treatment” for Investors under International Law’. The Journal of World Investment & Trade 3.4 (2002): 657–91. https://doi.org/10.1163/221190002X00427.
Faruque, Abdullah. ‘Validity and Efficacy of Stabilisation Clauses: Legal Protection vs. Functional Value’. Journal of International Arbitration 23.4 (2006): 317–36. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26690.
Fietta, Stephen. ‘Expropriation and the "Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ "Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 23.5 (2006): 375–99. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26890.
Footer, Mary E. ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’. Michigan State Journal of International Law 18 (2009). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
———. ‘BITs and Pieces: Social and Environmental Protection in the Regulation of Foreign Investment’. Michigan State Journal of International Law 18 (2009). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mistjintl18&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Franck, Susan D. ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the Rule of Law’. Global Business & Development Law Journal 19 (2006). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tranl19&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Gaillard, Emmanuel. ‘Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in ICSID Practice’. Pages 403–16 in International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001/acprof-9780199571345.
Higgins, Rosalyn. ‘The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law’. Recueil Des Cours 176 (1982): 259–392.
Hobér, Kaj. ‘State Responsibility and Attribution’. Pages 549–83 in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Ibrahim F I. ‘Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation – A Regional Investment Insurance Project’. Journal of World Trade Law 6 (1972).
International Law Commission. ‘Draft Articles On Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’, 12AD. http://www.ilsa.org/jessup/jessup06/basicmats2/DASR.pdf.
Ishikawa, Tomoko. ‘Third Party Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 59, 2010. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq59&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Jagusch, Stephen. ‘Compensation for the Breach of Relative Standards of Treaty Protection’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 10 (2009). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Laborde, G. ‘The Case for Host State Claims in Investment Arbitration’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1.1 (2010): 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idp008.
Lowenfeld, Andreas F. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
———. International Economic Law. 2nd ed. Vol. International economic law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=975432.
Malintoppi, Lorette. ‘Provisional Measures in Recent ICSID Proceedings: What Parties Request and What Tribunals Order’. Pages 157–84 in International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Marboe, Irmgard. ‘Compensation and Damages in International Law - The Limits of Fair Market Value’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 7 (2006). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit7&div=42&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Mendelson, Maurice. ‘The Runaway Train: The Continuous Nationality Rule from the Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case to Loewen’. Pages 97–149 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Mortenson, J. ‘The Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law’. Harvard International Law Journal 51.1 (2010): 257–318. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj51&id=259.
Mouri, Allahyar. The International Law of Expropriation as Reflected in the Work of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Vol. Developments in international law. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1994.
Muchlinski, Peter. ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor Under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55.03 (2006): 527–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei104.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
———. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. 2nd ed. Vol. Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
NAFTA. ‘Statement on NAFTA Article 1105 and the Availability of Arbitration Documents’, 31AD. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng.
NAFTA Free Trade Commission. ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’, 31AD. http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp.
———. ‘Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’, 31AD. http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp.
———. ‘Statement on Non-Disputing Party Participation’, 7AD. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf.
———. ‘Statement on Non-Disputing Party Participation’, 7AD. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/38791.pdf.
———. ‘Statement on Notices of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration’, 7AD. http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/Noticeintent_e.pdf.
OECD. ‘"Indirect Expropriation” and the "Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2004/4’, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1787/780155872321, http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/indirect-expropriation-and-the-right-to-regulate-in-international-investment-law_780155872321.
Paparinskis, M. ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’ ICSID Review 26.2 (2011): 14–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14.
Perezcano, Hugo. ‘Damages in Investment Arbitration: Are the Standards Different from Commercial Arbitration - The Need for Consistency’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 6 (2005). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit6&div=8&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Perry, Maura B. ‘A Model for Efficient Foreign Aid: The Case for the Political Risk Insurance Activities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation’. Virginia Journal of International Law 36 (1995). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint36&div=23&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Reisman, W. M., and R. D. Sloane. ‘Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation’. British Yearbook of International Law 74.1 (2004): 115–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/74.1.115.
Roberts, Anthea. ‘Divergence between Investment and Commercial Arbitration’. ASIL Proceedings 106 (2012). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/asilp106&div=91&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Sacerdoti, Giorgio. ‘Arbitration of Investment Disputes under UNCITRAL Rules and the Choice of Applicable Law’. Pages 276–98 in Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
———. ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’. Recueil Des Cours 269 (1997): 298–338.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’. International Lawyer 24 (1990). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr24&div=53&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
———. ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’. Harvard International Law Journal 46 (2005). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
———. ‘Do BITs Really Work: An Evaluation of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Their Grand Bargain’. Harvard International Law Journal 46 (2005). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj46&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.
———. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.
———. The Law of Investment Treaties. Third edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. https://opil-ouplaw-com.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law/9780198850953.001.0001/law-9780198850953.
Schill, S. W. ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.2 (2011): 353–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idr004.
Schill, Stephan. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law (IILJ Working Paper 2006/6)’ (2006). http://www.iilj.org/publications/2006-6Schill.asp.
Schill, Stephan W. ‘Mulitilateralizing Investment Treaties through Most-Favored-Nation Clauses’. Berkeley Journal of International Law 27 (2009). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/berkjintlw27&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Schlemmer, E C. ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties, Protection of Shareholders, and ICSID: CMS Gas Transmission Company v the Republic of Argentina’. South African Yearbook of International Law: Suid-Afrikaanse Jaarboek Vir Volkereg (2003): 292–300.
———. ‘Investor Protection and Forum Selection in Bilateral Investment Treaties’. South African Yearbook of International Law: Suid-Afrikaanse Jaarboek Vir Volkereg 26 (2001): 174–80.
Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and Jurisdiction over Contract Claims – the Vivendi I Case Considered’. Pages 281–323 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Schwebel, Stephen. ‘The Reshaping of the International Law of Foreign Investment by Concordant Bilateral Investment Treaties’. Pages 261–75 in Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494499.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. 8th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
———. International Law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I. MIGA and Foreign Investment: Origins, Operations, Policies, and Basic Documents of the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 1988.
Sinclair, Anthony C. ‘The Origins of the Umbrella Clause in the International Law of Investment Protection’, 2004.
Söderlund, Christer. ‘Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings’ 22.4 (2005): 301–22. https://nottingham.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26277.
Sornarajah, M and British Institute of International and Comparative Law. ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard: Whose Treatment? Whose Equity?’ Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues II : Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law. Edited by Federico Ortino. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2007.
Sornarajah, M. and MyiLibrary. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
———. The International Law on Foreign Investment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=263131.
Stern, Brigitte. ‘Are There New Limits on Access to International Arbitration’. ICSID Review 25.1 (n.d.). http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/1/26.
———. ‘The Contours of the Notion of Protected Investment’. ICSID Review 24.2 (2010). http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/534.full.pdf+html.
Thirlway, Hugh. ‘The Sources of International Law’. Pages 91–117 in International Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Thomas Waelde. ‘Compensation, Damages and Valuation’. Pages 1049–1124 in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Van Harten, Gus. ‘Chapter 7, The Businessman’s Court’. Pages 152–84 in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e4b596d2-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
———. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. ‘A Unified Theory of FET’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 43 (2010). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp43&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Vargiu, Paolo. ‘Beyond Hallmarks and Formal Requirements: A Jurisprudence Constante on the Notion of Investment in the ICSID Convention’. Journal of World Investment & Trade 10 (2009). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jworldit10&div=45&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.
Waelde, Thomas, and Abba Kolo. ‘Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and Regulatory Taking in International Law’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50 (2001). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq50&div=58&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Wallace, Don. ‘FET and Denial of Justice: Loewen v US and Chattin v Mexico’. Pages 669–700 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Weiler, Todd. ‘Good Faith and Regulatory Transparency: The Story of Metalclad v. Mexico’. Pages 701–45 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
———. ‘Saving Oscar Chin-Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law’. Pages 557–95 in International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law. London: Cameron May, 2005.
Wong, Jarrod. ‘Umbrella Clauses in Bilateral Investment Treaties: Of Breaches of Contract, Treat Violations, and the Divide between Developing and Developed Countries in Foreign Investment Disputes’. George Mason Law Review 14 (2006). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gmlr14&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults.
Yala, Farouk. ‘The Notion of "Investment” in ICSID Case Law: A Drifting Jurisdictional Requirement? Some "Un-Conventional Thoughts” on Salini, SGS and Mihaly’. Journal of International Arbitration 22 (2005): 105–26. http://www.kluwerarbitration.com.ezproxy.nottingham.ac.uk/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn26225.
Yannaca-Small, K. ‘FET Standard: Recent Developments’. Pages 113–41 in Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Yannaca-Small, Katia. ‘Interpretation of the Umbrella Clause in Investment Agreements, OECD/OCDE Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, Number 2006/3’, n.d. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5l9hkssg1xxt.pdf?expires=1439565908&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=13117F01915B052B89921E4F1F0B76A9.
Ziegler, Andreas R, and Louis-Philippe Gratton. ‘Investment Insurance’. Pages 524–48 in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
ADF Group v United States of America (2003), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, 6 ICSID Reports 470, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf.
ADF Group v United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/1, Award, 9 January 2003, 18 ICSID Review-FILJ (2003) 195, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0009.pdf.
‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’, 1AD. http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.
‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’, 1AD. http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.
‘Agreement between the Government of the Sultanate of Oman and the Government of the Republic of Austria for the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments, Muscat’, 1AD. http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/Download/TreatyFile/210.
Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae, 19 May 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0815.pdf.
Aguas Del Tunari S.A. v Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3), Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0020_0.pdf.
Aguas Provinciales de Santa Fe S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in Response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae, 17 March 17 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0803.pdf.
Alex Genin, Eastern Credit, Inc., and AS Baltoil v The Republic of Estonia [Genin v Estonia], ICSID Case No. ARB/99/2, Award of 25 June 2001, 17 ICSID Review – FLIJ (2002), n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0359.pdf.
American Machine Tools (AMT) v Republic of Zaire, ICSID Case No. ARB/93, Award, 21 February 1997, 36 ILM (1997) 1531, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0028.pdf.
Antoine Goetz and Others v Republic of Burundi (1999), ICSID Case No. ARB/95/3, 10 February 1999 (French Text Only), (2000)15 ICSID Review–FILJ 457, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0380.pdf.
‘Articles of Agreement of the Islamic Corporation for the Insurance of Investment and Export Credit (ICIEC)’, 19AD. http://www.isdb.org/irj/go/km/docs/documents/IDBDevelopments/Internet/English/IDB/CM/About%20IDB/Articles%20of%20Agreement/ICIEC_Articles-of-Agreement.pdf.
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf.
Asian Agricultural Products (AAPL) v Republic of Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No. ARB/87/3, Award, 27 June 1990, 30 ILM (1991) 577, 4 ICSID Reports 245, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. (AAPL) v. Republic of Sri Lanka, 30 ILM (1991), 580-655, per Dissenting Opinion of the Arbitrator, Asante, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1035.pdf.
Azurix Corp. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award of 14 July 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award, 14 July 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.
Azurix v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12 Award, 14 July 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0061.pdf.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award, 27 August 2009, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0075.pdf.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi A Ş v Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf.
Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret Ve Sanayi AŞ v Islamic Republic of Pakistan [Bayinder v Pakistan], ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 November 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0074.pdf.
‘Bilateral Investment Treaties 1995-2006: Trends in Investment Rulemaking, UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2006/5’. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2007. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiia20065_en.pdf.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 3, 29 September 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0089.pdf.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22), Procedural Order No 5, 2 February 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0091_0.pdf.
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.
Biwater Gauff v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9, n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 9, n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_09/28_Usine_de_Chorzow_Competence_Arret.pdf.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928), n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf.
Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), (1927), PCIJ, Ser. A., No. 17, (Judgement on the Merits) (1928), n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf.
‘Case Summary’, n.d. http://www.biicl.org/files/3914_2004_occidental_v_ecuador.pdf.
Československa Obchodní Banka (CSOB) AS v The Slovak Republic (1999), Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 24 May 1999, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/4, (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 330, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0144.pdf.
Champion Trading v Egypt, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 October 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/9, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0147.pdf.
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf.
CME Czech Republic B.V. (The Netherlands) v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 September 2001, 9 ICSID Reports 121, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0178.pdf.
CME v Czech Republic, Final Award, 14 March 2003, 9 ICSID Reports 264, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0180.pdf.
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005, 44 ILM (2005) 1205, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.
CMS Gas Transmission Co v Republic of Argentina (2005), ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, (2005) 44 ILM 1205, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.
CMS Gas Transmission v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award, 12 May 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf.
‘Commission Proposes New Investment Court System for TTIP and Other EU Trade and Investment Negotiations - Trade - European Commission’, n.d. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1364.
Compañía de Aguas Del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina), Award, 21 November 2000, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0206.pdf.
Compañía de Aguas Del Aconquija, S.A. and Vivendi International v Argentina (Vivendi v Argentina) Decision on Annulment, 3 July 2002, (2002) 41 ILM 1135, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0210.pdf.
Compañía Del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000), n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152.
Compañía Del Desarollo de Santa Elena SA v The Republic of Costa Rica (2000), ICSID Case No. ARB/96/1, 17 February 2000, 15 ICSID Review: FILJ (2000), n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC539_En&caseId=C152.
‘Convention Establishing the Inter-Arab Investment Guarantee Corporation (IAIGC)’. Kuwait, n.d. http://www.iaigc.net/UserFiles/file/en/EngConven.pdf.
‘Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, 1508 U.N.T.S. 99’. Seoul, 11AD. https://www.miga.org/who-we-are/miga-convention.
‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as Amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’, n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.
‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as Amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’, n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.
‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as Amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’, n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.
‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (1965), as Amended, 575 UNTS 159, 4 ILM 524 (1966)’, n.d. https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/StaticFiles/basicdoc/CRR_English-final.pdf.
Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17. Award of 6 February 2008, (2009) 48 ILM 82, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0248_0.pdf.
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15, n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf.
Elettronica Sicula SpA (ELSI) (United States of America v Italy), [1989] ICJ Rep. 15, n.d. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf.
Emilio Agustín Maffezini v The Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, 5 ICSID Reports or (2001) 40 ILM 1129, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.
Emilio Augustin Maffezini v Kingdom of Spain (ICSID Case No. ARB/97/7), Decision on Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.
Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assets, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on Jurisdiction, 14 January 2004, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0290.pdf.
‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2012. http://unctad.org/en/docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf.
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award, 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No., ARB/07/20, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf.
Fakes v Republic of Turkey, Award of 14 July 2010, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/20, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0314.pdf.
Fedax NV v The Republic of Venezuela, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 11 July 1997 (1997) ICSID Case No. ARB/96/3; (2002) 5 ICSID Reports 183, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0315_0.pdf.
Feldman v Mexico [Also Known as Karpa (Marvin Roy Feldman) (CEMSA) v United Mexican States], ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, (2003) 42 ILM 625, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.
Feldman v Mexico, ICSID Case No. Arb(AF)/99/1, Award of 16 December 2002, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0319.pdf.
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. The Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25, Award, 16 August 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf.
Generation Ukraine Inc. v Ukraine, Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/9, 16 September 2003, 44 ILM (2005) 404, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0358.pdf.
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf.
Glamis Gold, Ltd. v United States, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 8 June 2009, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0378.pdf.
HOCHTIEF AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31), Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf.
‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’, 22AD. http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx.
‘IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration’, 22AD. http://www.ibanet.org/ENews_Archive/IBA_July_2008_ENews_ArbitrationMultipleLang.aspx.
‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’, 10AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.
‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’, 10AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.
‘ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Proceedings (Arbitration Rules)’, 10AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx.
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award, 2 August 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf.
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Award on Jurisdiction, 6 August 2004, 19 ICSID Review-FILJ (2004), 486, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0441.pdf.
Loewen Group, Inc. and Raymond L. Loewen v United States of America ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/98/3, (2003), Award, 26 June 2003, (2003) 42 ILM 811, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf.
Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v The Government of Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10), Award on Jurisdiction, 17 May 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0496.pdf.
‘Materials on the IBA Website’, n.d. http://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1 (2003) 5 ICSID Reports 209, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 209, (2001) 40 ILM 36, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.
Metalclad v The United States of Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, 5 ICSID Reports 212, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005), 1345, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America (2005), UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005 44 ILM (2005) 1345, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to Intervene as ‘Amici Curiae’, 15 January 2001, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0517_0.pdf.
Methanex Corporation v United States of America, UNCITRAL/NAFTA, Award, 3 August 2005, (2005) 44 ILM 1345, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co, v Arab Republic of Egypt (2002), ICSID Case No. ARB/99//6, 12 April 2002, 7 ICSID Reports 178, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf.
Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling, Co. v Arab Republic of Egypt, Award, 12 April 2002, ICSID Case No. ARB/99/6, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0531.pdf.
Mondev International Ltd v United States of America, Final Award ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2, 11 October 2002, (2003) 42 ILM, 85, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1076.pdf.
‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment in International Investment Law, OECD/OCDE, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Working Papers on International Investment, No. 2004/2’, n.d. http://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/WP-2004_2.pdf.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A.. (MTD) v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.
MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. (MTD) v Chile [MTD v Chile] Award, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7, 25 May 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 6, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0544.pdf.
‘National Treatment, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/11 (Vol. IV in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements)’, 2000. http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationArchive.aspx?publicationid=340.
‘North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)’, 1994. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download.
‘North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)’, 1994. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaty-files/2413/download.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004, 12 ICSID Reports 59, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA/UNCITRAL, Final Award, 1 July 2004, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467, 1 July 2004, (United States/Ecuador BIT), n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
‘OECD Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Enterprises in Weak Governance Zones’. Paris: OECD, 2006. http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/corporateresponsibility/36885821.pdf.
Olguín v Republic of Paraguay, Award, 26 July 2001, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/5, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0587.pdf.
‘Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), Created by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, Pub L. No 91-175. 83 Stat’, n.d. https://www.opic.gov/.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Lithuania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v Republic of Lithuania (Parkerings v Lithuania), ICSID Case No. ARB/05/8), Award, 11 September 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf.
Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/24), Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Damages, 31 May 2002, 41 ILM (2002), 1347, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0686.pdf.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, 122 International Law Reports (2002), 352, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf.
Pope & Talbot v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA Award on Merits, 10 April 2001, (2002) 41 ILM 1347, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0678.pdf.
‘Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001, Text Adopted by the International Law Commission at Its 53rd Session, 2001, Reproduced as an Annex to General Assembly Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001 (ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility)’, n.d. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.
‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’, 10AD. http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.
‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’, 10AD. http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.
‘Rules Governing the Additional Facility for the Administration of Proceedings by the Secretariat of ICSID’, 10AD. http://sice.oas.org/dispute/comarb/icsid/icsid3.asp.
Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telesim Mobil Telekomkaysyan Hizmetleri A.S. v Kazakhstan [Rumeli v Kazakhstan] ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award, 29 July 2008, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0728.pdf.
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, First Partial Award, 13 November 200, 40 ILM (2001), 1408, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf.
S D Myers Inc. v Government of Canada, UNICTRAL/NAFTA, First Partial Award, 13 November 2000, 40 ILM (2001) 1408, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0747.pdf.
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 23 July 2001, 42 I.L.M. 609 (2003), n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf.
Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001, (2003) 42 ILM 609, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0738.pdf.
Saluka Investments B.V. v Czech Republic, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/13), Decision on Jurisidiction, 6 August 2003, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29), Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6), Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf.
Siemens A.G. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Award of the Tribunal, 6 February 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.
Siemens AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8), Decision on Jurisdiction, 3 August 2004, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0788.pdf.
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.
Siemens v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Award 6 February 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0790.pdf.
Soufraki v United Arab Emirates, Award of 7 July 2004, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf.
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del Agua SA v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability, 30 July 2010, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0813.pdf.
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and Vivendi Universal S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A., and InterAguas Servicios Integrales Del Agua S.A. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17) and AWG Group Ltd v The Argentine Republic, Decision on a Second Proposal for the Disqualification of a Member of the Arbitral Tribunal, 12 May 2008, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/documents/Suez-VivendiChallenge2.pdf.
‘Taking of Property, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements, UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/15’. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD, 2000. http://unctad.org/en/docs/psiteiitd15.en.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales TECMED SA v Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2004), ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) S.A. v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, 43 ILM (2004) 133, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed (TECMED) SA v Mexico, Award, 29 May 2003, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, (2004) 43 ILM 133, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
Telenor Mobile Communications A.S. (Telenor) v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/15, Award, 13 September 2006, (2006) 21 ICSID Review- FILJ 603, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0858.pdf.
Thunderbird v Mexico [Also Known as International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v United Mexican States, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Award, 26 January 2006, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0431.pdf.
Tokios Tokelĕs v Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, (2005) 20 ICSID Review-FILJ 205, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf.
‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’, n.d. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’, n.d. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’, n.d. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’, n.d. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
‘Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of [Country] Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment (US Model BIT 2012)’, n.d. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
‘UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention)’. New York, 10AD. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/new-york-convention-e.pdf.
‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration’, n.d. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/transparency-convention/Transparency-Convention-e.pdf.
‘UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention)’, 17AD. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/transparency.
‘UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with New Article 1(4), as Adopted in 2013)’, n.d. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules-2013/UNCITRAL-Arbitration-Rules-2013-e.pdf.
‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration’, n.d. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf.
‘UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-Based Investor-State Arbitration’, n.d. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/rules-on-transparency-e.pdf.
‘UNCITRAL Transparency Rules Applied for the First Time in Investor-State Arbitration | Herbert Smith Freehills’, n.d. http://hsfnotes.com/publicinternationallaw/2015/10/26/uncitral-transparency-rules-applied-for-the-first-time-in-investor-state-arbitration/.
‘United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as Revised in 2013’, n.d. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf.
‘United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules as Revised in 2013’, n.d. http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/arb-rules/arb-rules.pdf.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0883.pdf.
United Parcel Service of America Inc. v Government of Canada, NAFTA/UNCITRAL, Further Order on Amicus Submissions, 1 August 2003, n.d. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/assets/pdfs/disp-diff/ups-52.pdf.
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Award, 24 May 2007, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0885.pdf.
United Parcel Services (UPS) Ltd. v CanadaPost (2003) NAFTA Chapter 11, Decision on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0884.pdf.
Waste Management Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Final Award, 30 April 2004, (2004) 43 ILM 967, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf.
Wena Hotels v Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4, Award, 8 December 2000, (2002) 41 ILM 896, n.d. http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0902.pdf.
World Duty Free v Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award, 4 October 2006, Paras. 138-157, n.d. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlm46&page=337&collection=journals.
