[1]
B. Russell, The problems of philosophy, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5827
[2]
van Inwagen, Peter, ‘Metaphysics’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/
[3]
Steup, Matthias, ‘Epistemology’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
[4]
K. DeRose and T. A. Warfield, Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[5]
Steup, Matthias, Turri, John, Sosa, Ernest, Jonathan Vogel, The Refutation of Skepticism, in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, pp. 108-119. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1245461&ppg=124
[6]
N. M. Lemos, An introduction to the theory of knowledge, vol. Cambridge introductions to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[7]
A. Brueckner, ‘The Structure of the Skeptical Argument’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 54, no. 4, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.2307/2108413.
[8]
Klein, Peter, ‘Skepticism’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/
[9]
J. Greco, ‘External World Skepticism’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 625–649, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00090.x.
[10]
Bryan Frances, ‘When a Skeptical Hypothesis Is Live’, Noûs, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 559–595, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3506112?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[11]
R. Descartes and M. Moriarty, Meditations on first philosophy: with selections from the Objections and replies, vol. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Nottingham&isbn=9780191539718
[12]
Jonathan Vogel, ‘Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 658–666, 1990 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2026858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[13]
L. Hickey, ‘Brain in a Vat Argument’. [Online]. Available: http://www.iep.utm.edu/brainvat/
[14]
A. L. Brueckner, ‘Brains in a Vat’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 83, no. 3, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2026572?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104642255653
[15]
A. Brueckner and Oxford University Press, Essays on skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/philosophy/9780199585861/toc.html
[16]
D. Cunning, The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations, vol. Cambridge companions to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139088220
[17]
C. Wright, ‘On Putman’s Proof that we are not Brains-in-a-Vat’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 92, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4545146?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104642255653
[18]
G. A. Rosen, Alex Byrne, ‘Skepticism about the Internal World’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 282-290, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[19]
G. A. Rosen, Gilbert Ryle, ‘Self-Knowledge’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 274-282, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[20]
G. A. Rosen, David M. Armstrong, ‘Introspection’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 265-273, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[21]
Gertler, Brie, ‘Self-Knowledge’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-knowledge/
[22]
A Treatise of Human Nature, by David Hume. [Online]. Available: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm#link2H_4_0026
[23]
Vickers, John, ‘The Problem of Induction’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/
[24]
G. A. Rosen, Peter Strawson, ‘The “Justification” of Induction’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 151-159, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[25]
G. H. Harman, ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 74, no. 1, Jan. 1965, doi: 10.2307/2183532.
[26]
E. L. Gettier, ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis, vol. 23, no. 6, Jun. 1963, doi: 10.2307/3326922.
[27]
N. M. Lemos, An introduction to the theory of knowledge, vol. Cambridge introductions to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=288614
[28]
G. A. Rosen, Timothy Williamson, ‘Knowledge and Belief’ in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 124-130, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[29]
L. Zagzebski, ‘The Inescapability of Gettier Problems’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 174, Jan. 1994, doi: 10.2307/2220147.
[30]
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins, ‘The Analysis of Knowledge’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/
[31]
J. Greco and E. Sosa, Linda Zagzebski ‘What is Knowledge?’, in The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, pp. 92-116, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
[32]
D. M. Armstrong, Belief, Truth and Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
[33]
T. Crane, ‘The Problem of Perception (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2014 Edition)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/perception-problem/
[34]
P. F. Strawson, ‘Perception and its Objects’, in Philosophical writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 125–145 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587292.001.0001/acprof-9780199587292-chapter-11
[35]
E. J. Lowe, An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://nottingham-uk.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=9474523920005561&institutionId=5561&customerId=5560
[36]
S. Siegel, ‘Direct Realism and Perceptual Consciousness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 378–410, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00623.x.
[37]
G. Berkeley, H. Robinson, and G. Berkeley, Principles of human knowledge: and, Three dialogues, [New ed.]., vol. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Nottingham&isbn=9780191592508
[38]
R. J. Fogelin, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge, vol. Routledge philosophy guidebooks. London: Routledge, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.NOTTINGHAM.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_391816_0
[39]
Soteriou, Matthew, ‘The Disjunctive Theory of Perception’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-disjunctive/
[40]
E. J. Lowe, ‘Indirect Perception and Sense Data’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 125, Oct. 1981, doi: 10.2307/2219403.
[41]
H. Logue, ‘Why naive realism?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), vol. 112, no. 2pt2, pp. 211–237, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x.
[42]
E. J. Lowe, An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://nottingham-uk.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=9474267270005561&institutionId=5561&customerId=5560
[43]
M. G. F. Martin, ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness’, Philosophical Studies, vol. 120, no. 1–3, pp. 37–89, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97.
[44]
Fish, William, Philosophy of Perception. [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=488018
[45]
J. Dancy, ‘Arguments From Illusion’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 181, Oct. 1995, doi: 10.2307/2220307.
[46]
S. Shoemaker, ‘Qualities and Qualia: What’s in the Mind?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, Autumn 1990, doi: 10.2307/2108035.
[47]
M. G. F. Martin, ‘The Transparency of Experience’, Mind and Language, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 376–425, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00205.
[48]
G. A. Rosen, Michael Tye, ‘The Puzzle of Transparency’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 439-447, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[49]
J. Nagel, ‘Epistemic Intuitions’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 792–819, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00104.x.
[50]
E. J. Lowe and MyiLibrary, The Routledge Guidebook to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, [2nd ed.]., vol. Routledge guides to the great books. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1125268
[51]
G. A. Rosen, David Hume, ‘Of the Idea of Necessary Connection’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 197-204, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[52]
J. W. Carroll and N. Markosian, Chapter 2, in An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[53]
G. A. Rosen, John S. Mill, ‘The Method of Difference’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 215-222, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[54]
G. A. Rosen, Ned Hall, ‘Causation and Correlation’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 223-234, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[55]
Hume, David, Millican, Peter, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. OUP Oxford, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uon/reader.action?docID=10212199
[56]
G. A. Rosen, David Hume, from ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding’, Sections IV-V, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 141-149, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[57]
G. A. Rosen, David Hume, ‘Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 302-312, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[58]
A. L. Thomasson, ‘The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 591–601, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00303.x.
[59]
J. W. Carroll and N. Markosian, Chapters 8 and 9, in An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[60]
M. J. Loux and D. W. Zimmerman, Chapter 5, Peter van Inwagen, ‘Existence, Ontological Committment, and Fictional Entities’, in The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[61]
A.-S. Maurin, ‘Bradley’s Regress’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 794–807, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00516.x.
[62]
Alex Oliver, ‘The Metaphysics of Properties’, Mind, vol. 105, no. 417, pp. 1–80, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2254537?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[63]
Max Black, ‘The Identity of Indiscernibles’, Mind, vol. 61, no. 242, pp. 153–164, 1952 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2252291?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[64]
G. A. Rosen, John Locke, ‘Some Further Considerations Concerning Our Simple Ideas’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 457-464, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[65]
E. J. Lowe and MyiLibrary, Chapter 3, ‘Perception’, in The Routledge Guidebook to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, pp. 34-65, [2nd ed.]., vol. Routledge guides to the great books. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1125268
[66]
A. D. Smith, ‘Of Primary and Secondary Qualities’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 99, no. 2, Apr. 1990, doi: 10.2307/2185490.
[67]
Paul A. Boghossian and J. David Velleman, ‘Colour as a Secondary Quality’, Mind, vol. 98, no. 389, pp. 81–103, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255062?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[68]
G. A. Rosen, David M. Armstrong, ‘The Secondary Qualities’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 466-474, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[69]
Martha Brandt Bolton, ‘The Origins of Locke’s Doctrine of Primary and Secondary Qualities’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 105, pp. 305–316, 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2218861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[70]
G. A. Rosen, Colin McGinn, ‘Secondary Qualities’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 483-490, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[71]
J. Locke and K. Winkler, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: Abridged and Edited, With an Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett, 1996.
[72]
C. L. Hardin, ‘Are “Scientific” Objects Coloured?’, Mind, vol. XCIII, no. 372, pp. 491–500, 1984, doi: 10.1093/mind/XCIII.372.491.
[73]
Ryan Wasserman, ‘The Standard Objection to the Standard Account’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 197–216, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321317?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[74]
Bardon, Adrian, Dyke, Heather, Dana Goswick (2013) ‘Change and Identity over Time’ in A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, pp. 365-86. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=3422113&ppg=385
[75]
Judith Jarvis Thomson, ‘The Statue and the Clay’, Noûs, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 149–173, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2671962
[76]
Wasserman, Ryan, ‘Material Constitution’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/material-constitution/
[77]
Gallois, Andre, ‘Identity Over Time’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/#4.4
[78]
Hawley, Katherine, ‘Temporal Parts’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/temporal-parts/
[79]
G. A. Rosen, Stephen Yablo, ‘A Thing and Its Matter’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, pp. 517-522, 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.
[80]
M. B. Burke, ‘Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge to the Standard Account’, Analysis, vol. 52, no. 1, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.2307/3328875.
[81]
Roderick M. Chisholm, ‘Parts as Essential to Their Wholes’, The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 581–603, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20126296?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[82]
Kit Fine, ‘The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter’, Mind, vol. 112, no. 446, pp. 195–234, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3093593
[83]
J. J. Thomson, ‘Parthood and Identity Across Time’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 80, no. 4, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.2307/2026004.
[84]
D. Lewis, ‘Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 68, no. 7, Apr. 1971, doi: 10.2307/2024902.