1.
Russell B. The Problems of Philosophy. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 1998. http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5827
2.
van Inwagen, Peter. Metaphysics. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/
3.
Steup, Matthias. Epistemology. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
4.
DeRose K, Warfield TA. Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oxford University Press; 1999.
5.
Steup, Matthias, Turri, John, Sosa, Ernest. Jonathan Vogel, The Refutation of Skepticism, in Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Pp. 108-119. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1245461&ppg=124
6.
Lemos NM. An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Vol Cambridge introductions to philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 2007.
7.
Brueckner A. The Structure of the Skeptical Argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1994;54(4). doi:10.2307/2108413
8.
Klein, Peter. Skepticism. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism/
9.
Greco J. External World Skepticism. Philosophy Compass. 2007;2(4):625-649. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00090.x
10.
Bryan Frances. When a Skeptical Hypothesis Is Live. Noûs. 2005;39(4):559-595. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3506112?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
11.
Descartes R, Moriarty M. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Vol Oxford world’s classics. Oxford University Press; 2008. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Nottingham&isbn=9780191539718
12.
Jonathan Vogel. Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation. The Journal of Philosophy. 1990;87(11):658-666. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2026858?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
13.
Hickey L. Brain in a Vat Argument. http://www.iep.utm.edu/brainvat/
14.
Brueckner AL. Brains in a Vat. The Journal of Philosophy. 1986;83(3). http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2026572?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104642255653
15.
Brueckner A, Oxford University Press. Essays on Skepticism. Oxford University Press; 2010. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/philosophy/9780199585861/toc.html
16.
Cunning D. The Cambridge Companion to Descartes’ Meditations. Vol Cambridge companions to philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139088220
17.
Wright C. On Putman’s Proof that we are not Brains-in-a-Vat. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 1992;92. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4545146?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104642255653
18.
Rosen GA. Alex Byrne, ‘Skepticism about the Internal World’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 282-290. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
19.
Rosen GA. Gilbert Ryle, ‘Self-Knowledge’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 274-282. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
20.
Rosen GA. David M. Armstrong, ‘Introspection’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 265-273. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
21.
Gertler, Brie. Self-Knowledge. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-knowledge/
22.
A Treatise of Human Nature, by David Hume. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4705/4705-h/4705-h.htm#link2H_4_0026
23.
Vickers, John. The Problem of Induction. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/
24.
Rosen GA. Peter Strawson, ‘The “Justification” of Induction’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 151-159. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
25.
Harman GH. The Inference to the Best Explanation. The Philosophical Review. 1965;74(1). doi:10.2307/2183532
26.
Gettier EL. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis. 1963;23(6). doi:10.2307/3326922
27.
Lemos NM. An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Vol Cambridge introductions to philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=288614
28.
Rosen GA. Timothy Williamson, ‘Knowledge and Belief’ in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 124-130. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
29.
Zagzebski L. The Inescapability of Gettier Problems. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1994;44(174). doi:10.2307/2220147
30.
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins. The Analysis of Knowledge. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/
31.
Greco J, Sosa E. Linda Zagzebski ‘What Is Knowledge?’, In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, Pp. 92-116. Vol Blackwell philosophy guides. Blackwell Publishers; 1999.
32.
Armstrong DM. Belief, Truth and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press; 1973.
33.
Crane T. The Problem of Perception (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/perception-problem/
34.
Strawson PF. Perception and its Objects. In: Philosophical Writings. Oxford University Press; 2011:125-145. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587292.003.0011
35.
Lowe EJ. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press; 2000. https://nottingham-uk.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=9474523920005561&institutionId=5561&customerId=5560
36.
Siegel S. Direct Realism and Perceptual Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2006;73(2):378-410. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00623.x
37.
Berkeley G, Robinson H, Berkeley G. Principles of Human Knowledge: And, Three Dialogues. Vol Oxford world’s classics. [New ed.]. Oxford University Press; 1999. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Nottingham&isbn=9780191592508
38.
Fogelin RJ. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. Vol Routledge philosophy guidebooks. Routledge; 2001. http://www.NOTTINGHAM.eblib.com/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=E_391816_0
39.
Soteriou, Matthew. The Disjunctive Theory of Perception. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-disjunctive/
40.
Lowe EJ. Indirect Perception and Sense Data. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1981;31(125). doi:10.2307/2219403
41.
Logue H. Why naive realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback). 2012;112(2pt2):211-237. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x
42.
Lowe EJ. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press; 2000. https://nottingham-uk.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=9474267270005561&institutionId=5561&customerId=5560
43.
Martin MGF. The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies. 2004;120(1-3):37-89. doi:10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97
44.
Fish, William. Philosophy of Perception. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=488018
45.
Dancy J. Arguments From Illusion. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1995;45(181). doi:10.2307/2220307
46.
Shoemaker S. Qualities and Qualia: What’s in the Mind? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1990;50. doi:10.2307/2108035
47.
Martin MGF. The Transparency of Experience. Mind and Language. 2002;17(4):376-425. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00205
48.
Rosen GA. Michael Tye, ‘The Puzzle of Transparency’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 439-447. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
49.
Nagel J. Epistemic Intuitions. Philosophy Compass. 2007;2(6):792-819. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00104.x
50.
Lowe EJ, MyiLibrary. The Routledge Guidebook to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Vol Routledge guides to the great books. [2nd ed.]. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1125268
51.
Rosen GA. David Hume, ‘Of the Idea of Necessary Connection’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 197-204. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
52.
Carroll JW, Markosian N. Chapter 2, in An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
53.
Rosen GA. John S. Mill, ‘The Method of Difference’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 215-222. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
54.
Rosen GA. Ned Hall, ‘Causation and Correlation’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 223-234. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
55.
Hume, David, Millican, Peter. Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. OUP Oxford; 2007. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uon/reader.action?docID=10212199
56.
Rosen GA. David Hume, from ‘An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding’, Sections IV-V, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 141-149. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
57.
Rosen GA. David Hume, ‘Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 302-312. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
58.
Thomasson AL. The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects. Philosophy Compass. 2010;5(7):591-601. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00303.x
59.
Carroll JW, Markosian N. Chapters 8 and 9, in An Introduction to Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
60.
Loux MJ, Zimmerman DW. Chapter 5, Peter van Inwagen, ‘Existence, Ontological Committment, and Fictional Entities’, in The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press; 2003.
61.
Maurin AS. Bradley’s Regress. Philosophy Compass. 2012;7(11):794-807. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00516.x
62.
Alex Oliver. The Metaphysics of Properties. Mind. 1996;105(417):1-80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2254537?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Max Black. The Identity of Indiscernibles. Mind. 1952;61(242):153-164. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2252291?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64.
Rosen GA. John Locke, ‘Some Further Considerations Concerning Our Simple Ideas’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 457-464. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
65.
Lowe EJ, MyiLibrary. Chapter 3, ‘Perception’, in The Routledge Guidebook to Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Pp. 34-65. Vol Routledge guides to the great books. [2nd ed.]. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1125268
66.
Smith AD. Of Primary and Secondary Qualities. The Philosophical Review. 1990;99(2). doi:10.2307/2185490
67.
Paul A. Boghossian and J. David Velleman. Colour as a Secondary Quality. Mind. 1989;98(389):81-103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255062?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
68.
Rosen GA. David M. Armstrong, ‘The Secondary Qualities’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 466-474. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
69.
Martha Brandt Bolton. The Origins of Locke’s Doctrine of Primary and Secondary Qualities. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1976;26(105):305-316. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2218861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
70.
Rosen GA. Colin McGinn, ‘Secondary Qualities’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 483-490. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
71.
Locke J, Winkler K. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: Abridged and Edited, With an Introduction and Notes. Hackett; 1996.
72.
Hardin CL. Are ‘Scientific’ Objects Coloured? Mind. 1984;XCIII(372):491-500. doi:10.1093/mind/XCIII.372.491
73.
Ryan Wasserman. The Standard Objection to the Standard Account. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 2002;111(3):197-216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321317?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
74.
Bardon, Adrian, Dyke, Heather. Dana Goswick (2013) ‘Change and Identity over Time’ in A Companion to the Philosophy of Time, Pp. 365-86. Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=3422113&ppg=385
75.
Judith Jarvis Thomson. The Statue and the Clay. Noûs. 1998;32(2):149-173. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2671962
76.
Wasserman, Ryan. Material Constitution. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/material-constitution/
77.
Gallois, Andre. Identity Over Time. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/#4.4
78.
Hawley, Katherine. Temporal Parts. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/temporal-parts/
79.
Rosen GA. Stephen Yablo, ‘A Thing and Its Matter’, in The Norton Introduction to Philosophy, Pp. 517-522. 1st ed. W.W. Norton; 2015.
80.
Burke MB. Copper Statues and Pieces of Copper: A Challenge to the Standard Account. Analysis. 1992;52(1). doi:10.2307/3328875
81.
Roderick M. Chisholm. Parts as Essential to Their Wholes. The Review of Metaphysics. 1973;26(4):581-603. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20126296?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
82.
Kit Fine. The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter. Mind. 2003;112(446):195-234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3093593
83.
Thomson JJ. Parthood and Identity Across Time. The Journal of Philosophy. 1983;80(4). doi:10.2307/2026004
84.
Lewis D. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies. The Journal of Philosophy. 1971;68(7). doi:10.2307/2024902