1.
Ashworth, R., Ferlie, E., Hammerschmid, G., Moon, M. J. & Reay, T. Theorizing Contemporary Public Management: International and Comparative Perspectives. British Journal of Management 24, S1–S17 (2013).
2.
Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R. A. W. Searching for civil society: changing patterns of governance in Britain. Public Administration 81, 41–62 (2003).
3.
Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W. & Weller, P. Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration 81, 1–17 (2003).
4.
Brandsen, T. & Kim, S. Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: a comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences 76, 367–386 (2010).
5.
Chandler, J., Barry, J. & Clark, H. Stressing Academe: The Wear and Tear of the New Public Management. Human Relations 55, 1051–1069 (2002).
6.
Considine, M. & Lewis, J. M. Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review 63, 131–140 (2003).
7.
Dunleavy, P. New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16, 467–494 (2005).
8.
Ferlie, E., Hartley, J. & Martin, S. Changing Public Service Organizations: Current Perspectives and Future Prospects. British Journal of Management 14, S1–S14 (2003).
9.
Hajer, M. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 36, 175–195 (2003).
10.
HOOD, C. Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance 20, 127–144 (2007).
11.
HOOD, C. & DIXON, R. A MODEL OF COST-CUTTING IN GOVERNMENT? THE GREAT MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION IN UK CENTRAL GOVERNMENT RECONSIDERED. Public Administration 91, 114–134 (2013).
12.
Hood, C. The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14, 267–282 (2004).
13.
Jones, B. D. Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13, 395–412 (2003).
14.
Kickert, W. J. M. Beneath consensual corporatism: traditions of governance in the Netherlands. Public Administration 81, 119–140 (2003).
15.
LE GRAND, J. Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy 26, 149–169 (1997).
16.
Lynn Jr., L. E. The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood For. Public Administration Review 61, 144–160 (2001).
17.
Martin, S. The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes. Public Management Review 4, 291–307 (2002).
18.
Rhodes, R. A. W. The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies 44, 652–667 (1996).
19.
Rhodes, R. A. W. Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies 28, 1243–1264 (2007).
20.
Skelcher, C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 15, 3–19 (2000).
21.
Stewart, J. & Walsh, K. Change in the management of public services. Public administration 70, 499–518 (1992).
22.
Zafirovski, M. Administration and Society: Beyond Public Choice? Public Administration 79, 665–688 (2001).
23.
Bryson, J. M. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review 6, 21–53 (2004).
24.
Hajer, M. & Versteeg, W. performing governance through networks. European Political Science 4, 340–347 (2005).
25.
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E. & Torfing, J. Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review 73, 821–830 (2013).
26.
Klijn, E. designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. European Political Science 4, 328–339 (2005).
27.
KLIJN, E.-H. & SKELCHER, C. DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE NETWORKS: COMPATIBLE OR NOT? Public Administration 85, 587–608 (2007).
28.
Papadopoulos, Y. taking stock of multi-level governance networks. European Political Science 4, 316–327 (2005).
29.
Skelcher, C., Mathur, N. & Smith, M. The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy. Public Administration 83, 573–596 (2005).
30.
Smith, M. & Beazley, M. Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation. Public Administration 78, 855–878 (2000).
31.
Sørensen, E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science 4, 348–357 (2005).
32.
Stoker, G. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration 36, 41–57 (2006).
33.
STOKER, G. WAS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUCH A GOOD IDEA? A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. Public Administration 89, 15–31 (2011).
34.
Torfing, J. symposium: governance networks. European Political Science 4, 301–304 (2005).
35.
Torfing, J. governance network theory: towards a second generation. European Political Science 4, 305–315 (2005).
36.
WEST, K. & DAVIS, P. WHAT IS THE PUBLIC VALUE OF GOVERNMENT ACTION? TOWARDS A (NEW) PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO VALUES QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC ENDEAVOURS. Public Administration 89, 226–241 (2011).
37.
Skelcher, C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 15, 3–19 (2000).
38.
Adsera, A. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19, 445–490 (2003).
39.
Bawn, K. & Rosenbluth, F. Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science 50, 251–265 (2006).
40.
Chapman, R. & Lowndes, V. Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance? Public Money & Management 29, 371–378 (2009).
41.
Christensen, M. & Skærbæk, P. Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20, 101–132 (2007).
42.
Considine, M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance 15, 21–40 (2002).
43.
Cunningham, G. M. & Harris, J. E. Toward a Theory of Performance Reporting to Achieve Public Sector Accountability: A Field Study. Public Budgeting <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Finance 25, 15–42 (2005).
44.
Dereli, C. Smoke and mirrors and performance management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 24, 42–56 (2011).
45.
Flinders, M. Daring to be a Daniel: The Pathology of Politicized Accountability in a Monitory Democracy. Administration & Society 43, 595–619 (2011).
46.
Glynn, J. J. & Murphy, M. P. Public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 9, 125–137 (1996).
47.
Heinrich, C. J. Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review 62, 712–725 (2002).
48.
Monfardini, P. Accountability in the new public sector: a comparative case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management 23, 632–646 (2010).
49.
Mulgan, R. ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration 78, 555–573 (2000).
50.
Papenfuss, U. & Schaefer, C. Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision - an empirical Internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences 76, 555–576 (2010).
51.
Ryan, C. & Walsh, P. Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17, 621–631 (2004).
52.
Shaoul, J. ‘Sharing’ political authority with finance capital: The case of Britain’s Public Private Partnerships. Policy and Society 30, 209–220 (2011).
53.
Tetlock, P. E. Vying for Rhetorical High Ground in Accountability Debates: It Is Easy to Look Down on Those Who Look Soft on. Administration & Society 43, 693–703 (2011).
54.
Willems, T. & Van Dooren, W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77, 505–530 (2011).
55.
Sørensen, E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science 4, 348–357 (2005).
56.
Berg, A. M. Transforming public services – transforming the public servant? International Journal of Public Sector Management 19, 556–568 (2006).
57.
BATTEN, E. et al. EXPERTISE AND POLICY-MAKING: LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Public Administration 84, 771–781 (2006).
58.
Burgess, S. The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, 285–300 (2003).
59.
Carboni, N. Changing relationships between politicians and bureaucrats in contemporary democracies: an empirical analysis of the Italian experience. International public management review 11, 90–109 (2010).
60.
Farrell, C. & Morris, J. The `Neo-Bureaucratic’ State: Professionals, Managers and Professional Managers in Schools, General Practices and Social Work. Organization 10, 129–156 (2003).
61.
Fitzgerald, L. & Ferlie, E. Professionals: Back to the Future? Human Relations 53, 713–739 (2000).
62.
Greener, I. Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning, and Path-Dependency Perspectives. Governance 15, 161–183 (2002).
63.
Horner, L., Lekhi, R. & Blaug, R. Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers. (2006).
64.
HOWLETT, M. & WELLSTEAD, A. M. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government. Politics & Policy 39, 613–633 (2011).
65.
Kearney, Richard C. Professionalism and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conflict or Compatibility? Public Administration Review 48, (1988).
66.
Kirkpatrick, I., Jespersen, P. K., Dent, M. & Neogy, I. Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: the case of Denmark and England. Sociology of Health & Illness 31, 642–658 (2009).
67.
Parsons, W. Modernising Policy-making for the Twenty First Century: The Professional Model. Public Policy and Administration 16, 93–110 (2001).
68.
Pedersen, D. & Hartley, J. The changing context of public leadership and management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 21, 327–339 (2008).
69.
Probst, H. B., Hussain, Z. B. & Andersen, O. Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureau... - PubMed - NCBI. (2011).
70.
Sehested, K. HOW NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORMS CHALLENGE THE ROLES OF PROFESSIONALS. International Journal of Public Administration 25, 1513–1537 (2002).
71.
Taylor, I. & Kelly, J. Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re‐visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19, 629–642 (2006).
72.
Tummers, L. Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: a policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77, 555–581 (2011).
73.
Considine, M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance 15, 21–40 (2002).
74.
Willems, T. & Van Dooren, W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77, 505–530 (2011).
75.
Alcock, P. A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK. Voluntary sector review 1, 5–24 (2010).
76.
Bode, I. Co-governance within networks and the non-profit – for-profit divide. Public Management Review 8, 551–566 (2006).
77.
CUNNINGHAM, I. A RACE TO THE BOTTOM? EXPLORING VARIATIONS IN EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS IN THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR. Public Administration 86, 1033–1053 (2008).
78.
Davis Smith, J. The inflatable log: volunteering, the state and democracy. Voluntary action 3, 13–26 (2001).
79.
Harris, B. Voluntary action and the state in historical perspective. Voluntary sector review 1, 25–40 (2010).
80.
Harrow, J. & Jung, T. Philanthropy is Dead; Long Live Philanthropy? Public Management Review 13, 1047–1056 (2011).
81.
KELLY, J. REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE UK: BRINGING IN THE THIRD SECTOR. Public Administration 85, 1003–1022 (2007).
82.
Lewis, J. New Labour’s Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership. Social Policy and Society 4, 121–131 (2005).
83.
LOWNDES, V., PRATCHETT, L. & STOKER, G. LOCAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: THE IMPACT OF RULES-IN-USE. Public Administration 84, 539–561 (2006).
84.
Lowndes, V. & Sullivan, H. Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well do Local Partnerships and Public Participation go Together? Local Government Studies 30, 51–73 (2004).
85.
Srinivas, N. Against NGOs?: A Critical Perspective on Nongovernmental Action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38, 614–626 (2009).
86.
Taylor, M. Co-option or Empowerment?: The Changing Relationship between the State and the Voluntary and Community Sectors. Local Governance 28, 1–11 (2002).
87.
Tiwana, M. & Belay, N. Civil society: the clampdown is real. (2010).
88.
Aberbach, J. D. & Christensen, T. Citizens and Consumers. Public Management Review 7, 225–246 (2005).
89.
Arnstein, S. R. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 216–224 (1969).
90.
Bang, H. P. ‘Yes we can’: identity politics and project politics for a late-modern world. Urban research & practice 2, 117–137 (2009).
91.
Bang, H. P. & Sorensen, E. The everyday maker: a new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis 21, 324–341 (1999).
92.
Davies, J. S. The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis. Public Administration 80, 301–322 (2002).
93.
Davies, J. S. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies 55, 779–800 (2007).
94.
Dwyer, P. Making sense of social citizenship: some user views on welfare rights and responsibilities. Critical Social Policy 22, 273–299 (2002).
95.
Hastak, Manoj. The Role of Consumer Surveys in Public Policy Decision Making. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 20, (2001).
96.
Johnson, C. & Osborne, S. P. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 23, 147–154 (2003).
97.
Nancarrow, C., Evans, M. & Pallister, J. Polls apart! Political, research and ethical lessons from UK pressure groups’ use of opinion polls. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8, 181–193 (2003).
98.
Prabhakar, R. Commercialisation or Citizenship? Politics 24, 215–220 (2004).
99.
Stolle, D. & Hooghe, M. Consumers as political participants? Shifts in political action repetoires in Western societies. in Politics, products, and markets: exploring political consumerism past and present (Transaction Publishers, 2003).
100.
Roberts, N. Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation. The American Review of Public Administration 34, 315–353 (2004).
101.
Davis Smith, J. ‘The Inflatable Log’: volunteering, the state and democracy. (2001).
102.
Alford, J. Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?: Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society 34, 32–56 (2002).
103.
Arnstein, S. R. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35, 216–224 (1969).
104.
Bovaird, T. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review 67, 846–860 (2007).
105.
Brandsen, T. & Pestoff, V. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review 8, 493–501 (2006).
106.
Davies, J. S. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies 55, 779–800 (2007).
107.
Johnson, C. & Osborne, S. P. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 23, 147–154 (2003).
108.
Mitlin, D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 20, 339–360 (2008).
109.
Pestoff, V. Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Public Management Review 8, 503–519 (2006).
110.
Prentice, S. Childcare, co-production and the third sector in Canada. Public Management Review 8, 521–536 (2006).
111.
Johnson, C. & Osborne, S. P. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 23, 147–154 (2003).
112.
Mitlin, D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 20, 339–360 (2008).
113.
Allen, Barbara Ann. BRIDGING THE DIVIDE - COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: ARE THERE LESSONS FOR HEALTH CARE COMMISSIONING IN ENGLAND? Journal of Public Procurement 9, 79–108 (2009).
114.
Aritua, B., Smith, N. J. & Bower, D. What risks are common to or amplified in programmes: Evidence from UK public sector infrastructure schemes. International Journal of Project Management 29, 303–312 (2011).
115.
Bartlett, W. Quasi‐markets and contracts: A markets and hierarchies perspective on NHS reform. Public money & management 11, 53–61 (1991).
116.
Baxter, K., Weiss, M. & Le Grand, J. The dynamics of commissioning across organisational and clinical boundaries. Journal of Health Organization and Management 22, 111–128 (2008).
117.
Bovaird, T. Public–Private Partnerships: from Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences 70, 199–215 (2004).
118.
Bovaird, T. Developing New Forms of Partnership With the ‘Market’ in the Procurement of Public Services. Public Administration 84, 81–102 (2006).
119.
Boyne, G. A. Competitive Tendering In Local Government: A Review Of Theory And Evidence. Public Administration 76, 695–712 (1998).
120.
Bradley, S. & Taylor, J. The Effect of the Quasi-market on the Efficiency-equity Trade-off in the Secondary School Sector. Bulletin of Economic Research 54, 295–314 (2002).
121.
Bradley, S. & Taylor, J. Diversity, Choice and the Quasi-market: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education Policy in England*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72, 1–26 (2010).
122.
Chalkley, M. Competition in NHS quasi-markets. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12, 89–99 (1996).
123.
Dopson, S. & Locock, L. The Commissioning Process in the NHS: The theory and application. Public Management Review 4, 209–229 (2002).
124.
Fischbacher, M. & Beaumont, P. B. PFI, Public—Private Partnerships and the Neglected Importance of Process: Stakeholders and the Employment Dimension. Public Money and Management 23, 171–176 (2003).
125.
Gibbons, Stephen. CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND PUPIL ACHIEVEMENT. Journal of the European Economic Association 6, (2008).
126.
Gray, K. E. & Ghosh, D. An empirical analysis of the purchaser‐provider relationship in the NHS internal market. Journal of Management in Medicine 14, 57–68 (2000).
127.
Ham, C. World class commissioning: a health policy chimera? Journal of health services policy research 13, 116–121 (2008).
128.
Hoxley, M. Purchasing UK public sector property and construction professional services: competition v quality. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 7, 133–139 (2001).
129.
KNAPP, M., HARDY, B. & FORDER, J. Commissioning for Quality: Ten Years of Social Care Markets in England. Journal of Social Policy 30, (2001).
130.
Lunt, Neil. Economic discourse and the market: The case of community care. Public Administration 74,.
131.
Matosevic, T., Knapp, M. & Le Grand, J. Motivation and Commissioning: Perceived and Expressed Motivations of Care Home Providers. Social Policy & Administration 42, 228–247 (2008).
132.
Murray, J. G. Towards a common understanding of the differences between purchasing, procurement and commissioning in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 15, 198–202 (2009).
133.
Petsoulas, C., Allen, P., Hughes, D., Vincent-Jones, P. & Roberts, J. The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: A case study analysis. Social Science & Medicine 73, 185–192 (2011).
134.
Wade, E. Commissioning reform in the NHS: will he who pays the piper ever really call the tune? Clinical Medicine 11, 35–39 (2011).
135.
Williams, I. et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management 6, 83–92 (2012).
136.
Williams, I. et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management 6, 83–92 (2012).
