1
Ashworth R, Ferlie E, Hammerschmid G, et al. Theorizing Contemporary Public Management: International and Comparative Perspectives. British Journal of Management 2013;24:S1–17. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12035
2
Bevir M, Rhodes RAW. Searching for civil society: changing patterns of governance in Britain. Public Administration 2003;81:41–62. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00336
3
Bevir M, Rhodes RAW, Weller P. Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration 2003;81:1–17. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00334
4
Brandsen T, Kim S. Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: a comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2010;76:367–86. doi:10.1177/0020852309365671
5
Chandler J, Barry J, Clark H. Stressing Academe: The Wear and Tear of the New Public Management. Human Relations 2002;55:1051–69. doi:10.1177/0018726702055009019
6
Considine M, Lewis JM. Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review 2003;63:131–40. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00274
7
Dunleavy P. New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005;16:467–94. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
8
Ferlie E, Hartley J, Martin S. Changing Public Service Organizations: Current Perspectives and Future Prospects. British Journal of Management 2003;14:S1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00389.x
9
Hajer M. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences 2003;36:175–95. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939
10
HOOD C. Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance 2007;20:127–44. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
11
HOOD C, DIXON R. A MODEL OF COST-CUTTING IN GOVERNMENT? THE GREAT MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION IN UK CENTRAL GOVERNMENT RECONSIDERED. Public Administration 2013;91:114–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02072.x
12
Hood C. The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2004;14:267–82. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019
13
Jones BD. Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2003;13:395–412. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug028
14
Kickert WJM. Beneath consensual corporatism: traditions of governance in the Netherlands. Public Administration 2003;81:119–40. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00339
15
LE GRAND J. Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy 1997;26:149–69. doi:10.1017/S0047279497004984
16
Lynn Jr. LE. The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood For. Public Administration Review 2001;61:144–60. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00016
17
Martin S. The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes. Public Management Review 2002;4:291–307. doi:10.1080/14616670210151595
18
Rhodes RAW. The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies 1996;44:652–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
19
Rhodes RAW. Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies 2007;28:1243–64. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
20
Skelcher C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 2000;15:3–19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
21
Stewart J, Walsh K. Change in the management of public services. Public administration 1992;70:499–518.
22
Zafirovski M. Administration and Society: Beyond Public Choice? Public Administration 2001;79:665–88. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00274
23
Bryson JM. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review 2004;6:21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
24
Hajer M, Versteeg W. performing governance through networks. European Political Science 2005;4:340–7. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034
25
Hartley J, Sørensen E, Torfing J. Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review 2013;73:821–30. doi:10.1111/puar.12136
26
Klijn E. designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. European Political Science 2005;4:328–39. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210035
27
KLIJN E-H, SKELCHER C. DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE NETWORKS: COMPATIBLE OR NOT? Public Administration 2007;85:587–608. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
28
Papadopoulos Y. taking stock of multi-level governance networks. European Political Science 2005;4:316–27. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210032
29
Skelcher C, Mathur N, Smith M. The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy. Public Administration 2005;83:573–96. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
30
Smith M, Beazley M. Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation. Public Administration 2000;78:855–78. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00234
31
Sørensen E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science 2005;4:348–57. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210033
32
Stoker G. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration 2006;36:41–57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
33
STOKER G. WAS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUCH A GOOD IDEA? A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. Public Administration 2011;89:15–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x
34
Torfing J. symposium: governance networks. European Political Science 2005;4:301–4. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210030
35
Torfing J. governance network theory: towards a second generation. European Political Science 2005;4:305–15. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210031
36
WEST K, DAVIS P. WHAT IS THE PUBLIC VALUE OF GOVERNMENT ACTION? TOWARDS A (NEW) PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO VALUES QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC ENDEAVOURS. Public Administration 2011;89:226–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01847.x
37
Skelcher C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 2000;15:3–19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
38
Adsera A. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2003;19:445–90. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewg017
39
Bawn K, Rosenbluth F. Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science 2006;50:251–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00182.x
40
Chapman R, Lowndes V. Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance? Public Money & Management 2009;29:371–8. doi:10.1080/09540960903378233
41
Christensen M, Skærbæk P. Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2007;20:101–32. doi:10.1108/09513570710731227
42
Considine M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance 2002;15:21–40. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00178
43
Cunningham GM, Harris JE. Toward a Theory of Performance Reporting to Achieve Public Sector Accountability: A Field Study. Public Budgeting <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Finance 2005;25:15–42. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00359.x
44
Dereli C. Smoke and mirrors and performance management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2011;24:42–56. doi:10.1108/09513551111099217
45
Flinders M. Daring to be a Daniel: The Pathology of Politicized Accountability in a Monitory Democracy. Administration & Society 2011;43:595–619. doi:10.1177/0095399711403899
46
Glynn JJ, Murphy MP. Public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 1996;9:125–37. doi:10.1108/09513559610146492
47
Heinrich CJ. Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review 2002;62:712–25. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00253
48
Monfardini P. Accountability in the new public sector: a comparative case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2010;23:632–46. doi:10.1108/09513551011078897
49
Mulgan R. ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration 2000;78:555–73. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00218
50
Papenfuss U, Schaefer C. Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision - an empirical Internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2010;76:555–76. doi:10.1177/0020852310372451
51
Ryan C, Walsh P. Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2004;17:621–31. doi:10.1108/09513550410562284
52
Shaoul J. ‘Sharing’ political authority with finance capital: The case of Britain’s Public Private Partnerships. Policy and Society 2011;30:209–20. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.07.005
53
Tetlock PE. Vying for Rhetorical High Ground in Accountability Debates: It Is Easy to Look Down on Those Who Look Soft on. Administration & Society 2011;43:693–703. doi:10.1177/0095399711426848
54
Willems T, Van Dooren W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2011;77:505–30. doi:10.1177/0020852311408648
55
Sørensen E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science 2005;4:348–57. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210033
56
Berg AM. Transforming public services – transforming the public servant? International Journal of Public Sector Management 2006;19:556–68. doi:10.1108/09513550610686627
57
BATTEN E, CORREIA L, HEDGES H, et al. EXPERTISE AND POLICY-MAKING: LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Public Administration 2006;84:771–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00611.x
58
Burgess S. The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2003;19:285–300. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.285
59
Carboni N. Changing relationships between politicians and bureaucrats in contemporary democracies: an empirical analysis of the Italian experience. International public management review 2010;11:90–109.http://journals.sfu.ca/ipmr/index.php/ipmr/article/view/77/77
60
Farrell C, Morris J. The `Neo-Bureaucratic’ State: Professionals, Managers and Professional Managers in Schools, General Practices and Social Work. Organization 2003;10:129–56. doi:10.1177/1350508403010001380
61
Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E. Professionals: Back to the Future? Human Relations 2000;53:713–39. doi:10.1177/0018726700535005
62
Greener I. Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning, and Path-Dependency Perspectives. Governance 2002;15:161–83. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00184
63
Horner L, Lekhi R, Blaug R. Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers. 2006.http://www.theworkfoundation.com/DownloadPublication/Report/107_107_Deliberative%20democracy%20and%20the%20role%20of%20public%20managers.pdf
64
HOWLETT M, WELLSTEAD AM. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government. Politics & Policy 2011;39:613–33. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00306.x
65
Kearney, Richard C. Professionalism and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conflict or Compatibility? Public Administration Review 1988;48.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=4599374&site=ehost-live
66
Kirkpatrick I, Jespersen PK, Dent M, et al. Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: the case of Denmark and England. Sociology of Health & Illness 2009;31:642–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01157.x
67
Parsons W. Modernising Policy-making for the Twenty First Century: The Professional Model. Public Policy and Administration 2001;16:93–110. doi:10.1177/095207670101600307
68
Pedersen D, Hartley J. The changing context of public leadership and management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2008;21:327–39. doi:10.1108/09513550810880214
69
Probst HB, Hussain ZB, Andersen O. Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureau... - PubMed - NCBI. 2011.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22136810
70
Sehested K. HOW NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORMS CHALLENGE THE ROLES OF PROFESSIONALS. International Journal of Public Administration 2002;25:1513–37. doi:10.1081/PAD-120014259
71
Taylor I, Kelly J. Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re‐visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management 2006;19:629–42. doi:10.1108/09513550610704662
72
Tummers L. Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: a policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2011;77:555–81. doi:10.1177/0020852311407364
73
Considine M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance 2002;15:21–40. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00178
74
Willems T, Van Dooren W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2011;77:505–30. doi:10.1177/0020852311408648
75
Alcock P. A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK. Voluntary sector review 2010;1:5–24.https://www.proquest.com/docview/1885989521?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=8018
76
Bode I. Co-governance within networks and the non-profit – for-profit divide. Public Management Review 2006;8:551–66. doi:10.1080/14719030601022932
77
CUNNINGHAM I. A RACE TO THE BOTTOM? EXPLORING VARIATIONS IN EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS IN THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR. Public Administration 2008;86:1033–53. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00752.x
78
Davis Smith J. The inflatable log: volunteering, the state and democracy. Voluntary action 2001;3:13–26.
79
Harris B. Voluntary action and the state in historical perspective. Voluntary sector review 2010;1:25–40.https://search.proquest.com/docview/1885989660/shibboleth?accountid=8018
80
Harrow J, Jung T. Philanthropy is Dead; Long Live Philanthropy? Public Management Review 2011;13:1047–56. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.619062
81
KELLY J. REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE UK: BRINGING IN THE THIRD SECTOR. Public Administration 2007;85:1003–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00680.x
82
Lewis J. New Labour’s Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership. Social Policy and Society 2005;4:121–31. doi:10.1017/S147474640400226X
83
LOWNDES V, PRATCHETT L, STOKER G. LOCAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: THE IMPACT OF RULES-IN-USE. Public Administration 2006;84:539–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00601.x
84
Lowndes V, Sullivan H. Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well do Local Partnerships and Public Participation go Together? Local Government Studies 2004;30:51–73. doi:10.1080/0300393042000230920
85
Srinivas N. Against NGOs?: A Critical Perspective on Nongovernmental Action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2009;38:614–26. doi:10.1177/0899764009334308
86
Taylor M. Co-option or Empowerment?: The Changing Relationship between the State and the Voluntary and Community Sectors. Local Governance 2002;28:1–11.
87
Tiwana M, Belay N. Civil society: the clampdown is real. 2010.http://www.civicus.org/view/media/CIVICUS_%20paper_%20global_%20trends_%20Civil%20Society_%20Space_%202009-201012[1].pdf
88
Aberbach JD, Christensen T. Citizens and Consumers. Public Management Review 2005;7:225–46. doi:10.1080/14719030500091319
89
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1969;35:216–24. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
90
Bang HP. ‘Yes we can’: identity politics and project politics for a late-modern world. Urban research & practice 2009;2:117–37.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17535060902979022
91
Bang HP, Sorensen E. The everyday maker: a new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis 1999;21:324–41.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10841806.1999.11643381
92
Davies JS. The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis. Public Administration 2002;80:301–22. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00305
93
Davies JS. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies 2007;55:779–800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
94
Dwyer P. Making sense of social citizenship: some user views on welfare rights and responsibilities. Critical Social Policy 2002;22:273–99. doi:10.1177/02610183020220020601
95
Hastak, Manoj. The Role of Consumer Surveys in Public Policy Decision Making. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 2001;20.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5578310&site=ehost-live
96
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 2003;23:147–54. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
97
Nancarrow C, Evans M, Pallister J. Polls apart! Political, research and ethical lessons from UK pressure groups’ use of opinion polls. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 2003;8:181–93. doi:10.1002/nvsm.211
98
Prabhakar R. Commercialisation or Citizenship? Politics 2004;24:215–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2004.00222.x
99
Stolle D, Hooghe M. Consumers as political participants? Shifts in political action repetoires in Western societies. In: Politics, products, and markets: exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Transaction Publishers 2003.
100
Roberts N. Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation. The American Review of Public Administration 2004;34:315–53. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288
101
Davis Smith J. ‘The Inflatable Log’: volunteering, the state and democracy. 2001.
102
Alford J. Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?: Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society 2002;34:32–56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004
103
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1969;35:216–24. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
104
Bovaird T. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review 2007;67:846–60. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
105
Brandsen T, Pestoff V. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review 2006;8:493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874
106
Davies JS. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies 2007;55:779–800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
107
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 2003;23:147–54. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
108
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 2008;20:339–60. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
109
Pestoff V. Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Public Management Review 2006;8:503–19. doi:10.1080/14719030601022882
110
Prentice S. Childcare, co-production and the third sector in Canada. Public Management Review 2006;8:521–36. doi:10.1080/14719030601022890
111
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management 2003;23:147–54. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
112
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization 2008;20:339–60. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
113
Allen, Barbara Ann. BRIDGING THE DIVIDE - COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: ARE THERE LESSONS FOR HEALTH CARE COMMISSIONING IN ENGLAND? Journal of Public Procurement 2009;9:79–108.http://search.proquest.com/docview/223182037/7627EE4859384E9CPQ/6?accountid=8018
114
Aritua B, Smith NJ, Bower D. What risks are common to or amplified in programmes: Evidence from UK public sector infrastructure schemes. International Journal of Project Management 2011;29:303–12. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.004
115
Bartlett W. Quasi‐markets and contracts: A markets and hierarchies perspective on NHS reform. Public money & management 1991;11:53–61.
116
Baxter K, Weiss M, Le Grand J. The dynamics of commissioning across organisational and clinical boundaries. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2008;22:111–28. doi:10.1108/14777260810876295
117
Bovaird T. Public–Private Partnerships: from Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences 2004;70:199–215. doi:10.1177/0020852304044250
118
Bovaird T. Developing New Forms of Partnership With the ‘Market’ in the Procurement of Public Services. Public Administration 2006;84:81–102. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2006.00494.x
119
Boyne GA. Competitive Tendering In Local Government: A Review Of Theory And Evidence. Public Administration 1998;76:695–712. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00132
120
Bradley S, Taylor J. The Effect of the Quasi-market on the Efficiency-equity Trade-off in the Secondary School Sector. Bulletin of Economic Research 2002;54:295–314. doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00154
121
Bradley S, Taylor J. Diversity, Choice and the Quasi-market: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education Policy in England*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2010;72:1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x
122
Chalkley M. Competition in NHS quasi-markets. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 1996;12:89–99. doi:10.1093/oxrep/12.4.89
123
Dopson S, Locock L. The Commissioning Process in the NHS: The theory and application. Public Management Review 2002;4:209–29. doi:10.1080/14616670210130552
124
Fischbacher M, Beaumont PB. PFI, Public—Private Partnerships and the Neglected Importance of Process: Stakeholders and the Employment Dimension. Public Money and Management 2003;23:171–6. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00365
125
Gibbons, Stephen. CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND PUPIL ACHIEVEMENT. Journal of the European Economic Association 2008;6.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=32604699&site=ehost-live
126
Gray KE, Ghosh D. An empirical analysis of the purchaser‐provider relationship in the NHS internal market. Journal of Management in Medicine 2000;14:57–68. doi:10.1108/02689230010340561
127
Ham C. World class commissioning: a health policy chimera? Journal of health services policy research 2008;13:116–21.https://www-jstor-org.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/stable/26751153?sid=primo
128
Hoxley M. Purchasing UK public sector property and construction professional services: competition v quality. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 2001;7:133–9. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00026-5
129
KNAPP M, HARDY B, FORDER J. Commissioning for Quality: Ten Years of Social Care Markets in England. Journal of Social Policy 2001;30. doi:10.1017/S0047279401006225
130
Lunt, Neil. Economic discourse and the market: The case of community care. Public Administration;74.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9702216351&site=ehost-live
131
Matosevic T, Knapp M, Le Grand J. Motivation and Commissioning: Perceived and Expressed Motivations of Care Home Providers. Social Policy & Administration 2008;42:228–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00594.x
132
Murray JG. Towards a common understanding of the differences between purchasing, procurement and commissioning in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 2009;15:198–202. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2009.03.003
133
Petsoulas C, Allen P, Hughes D, et al. The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: A case study analysis. Social Science & Medicine 2011;73:185–92. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.021
134
Wade E. Commissioning reform in the NHS: will he who pays the piper ever really call the tune? Clinical Medicine 2011;11:35–9. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.11-1-35
135
Williams I, Bovaird T, Brown H, et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management 2012;6:83–92.http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/10153987/Designing_whole_systems_commissioning.pdf
136
Williams I, Bovaird T, Brown H, et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management 2012;6:83–92.http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/10153987/Designing_whole_systems_commissioning.pdf
