1.
Ashworth R, Ferlie E, Hammerschmid G, Moon MJ, Reay T. Theorizing Contemporary Public Management: International and Comparative Perspectives. British Journal of Management. 2013;24:S1-S17. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12035
2.
Bevir M, Rhodes RAW. Searching for civil society: changing patterns of governance in Britain. Public Administration. 2003;81(1):41-62. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00336
3.
Bevir M, Rhodes RAW, Weller P. Traditions of governance: interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration. 2003;81(1):1-17. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00334
4.
Brandsen T, Kim S. Contextualizing the meaning of public management reforms: a comparison of the Netherlands and South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2010;76(2):367-386. doi:10.1177/0020852309365671
5.
Chandler J, Barry J, Clark H. Stressing Academe: The Wear and Tear of the New Public Management. Human Relations. 2002;55(9):1051-1069. doi:10.1177/0018726702055009019
6.
Considine M, Lewis JM. Bureaucracy, Network, or Enterprise? Comparing Models of Governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Public Administration Review. 2003;63(2):131-140. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00274
7.
Dunleavy P. New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005;16(3):467-494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
8.
Ferlie E, Hartley J, Martin S. Changing Public Service Organizations: Current Perspectives and Future Prospects. British Journal of Management. 2003;14(s1):S1-S14. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2003.00389.x
9.
Hajer M. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences. 2003;36(2):175-195. doi:10.1023/A:1024834510939
10.
HOOD C. Intellectual Obsolescence and Intellectual Makeovers: Reflections on the Tools of Government after Two Decades. Governance. 2007;20(1):127-144. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
11.
HOOD C, DIXON R. A MODEL OF COST-CUTTING IN GOVERNMENT? THE GREAT MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION IN UK CENTRAL GOVERNMENT RECONSIDERED. Public Administration. 2013;91(1):114-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02072.x
12.
Hood C. The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2004;14(3):267-282. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh019
13.
Jones BD. Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2003;13(4):395-412. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug028
14.
Kickert WJM. Beneath consensual corporatism: traditions of governance in the Netherlands. Public Administration. 2003;81(1):119-140. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00339
15.
LE GRAND J. Knights, Knaves or Pawns? Human Behaviour and Social Policy. Journal of Social Policy. 1997;26(2):149-169. doi:10.1017/S0047279497004984
16.
Lynn Jr. LE. The Myth of the Bureaucratic Paradigm: What Traditional Public Administration Really Stood For. Public Administration Review. 2001;61(2):144-160. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00016
17.
Martin S. The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes. Public Management Review. 2002;4(3):291-307. doi:10.1080/14616670210151595
18.
Rhodes RAW. The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies. 1996;44(4):652-667. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
19.
Rhodes RAW. Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies. 2007;28(8):1243-1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
20.
Skelcher C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration. 2000;15(3):3-19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
21.
Stewart J, Walsh K. Change in the management of public services. Public administration. 1992;70(4):499-518.
22.
Zafirovski M. Administration and Society: Beyond Public Choice? Public Administration. 2001;79(3):665-688. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00274
23.
Bryson JM. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review. 2004;6(1):21-53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
24.
Hajer M, Versteeg W. performing governance through networks. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):340-347. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034
25.
Hartley J, Sørensen E, Torfing J. Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review. 2013;73(6):821-830. doi:10.1111/puar.12136
26.
Klijn E hans. designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):328-339. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210035
27.
KLIJN EH, SKELCHER C. DEMOCRACY AND GOVERNANCE NETWORKS: COMPATIBLE OR NOT? Public Administration. 2007;85(3):587-608. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
28.
Papadopoulos Y. taking stock of multi-level governance networks. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):316-327. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210032
29.
Skelcher C, Mathur N, Smith M. The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy. Public Administration. 2005;83(3):573-596. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
30.
Smith M, Beazley M. Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation. Public Administration. 2000;78(4):855-878. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00234
31.
Sørensen E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):348-357. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210033
32.
Stoker G. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration. 2006;36(1):41-57. doi:10.1177/0275074005282583
33.
STOKER G. WAS LOCAL GOVERNANCE SUCH A GOOD IDEA? A GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE. Public Administration. 2011;89(1):15-31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01900.x
34.
Torfing J. symposium: governance networks. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):301-304. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210030
35.
Torfing J. governance network theory: towards a second generation. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):305-315. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210031
36.
WEST K, DAVIS P. WHAT IS THE PUBLIC VALUE OF GOVERNMENT ACTION? TOWARDS A (NEW) PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO VALUES QUESTIONS IN PUBLIC ENDEAVOURS. Public Administration. 2011;89(2):226-241. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01847.x
37.
Skelcher C. Changing images of the State: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration. 2000;15(3):3-19. doi:10.1177/095207670001500302
38.
Adsera A. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 2003;19(2):445-490. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewg017
39.
Bawn K, Rosenbluth F. Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(2):251-265. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00182.x
40.
Chapman R, Lowndes V. Accountable, authorized or authentic? What do ‘faith representatives’ offer urban governance? Public Money & Management. 2009;29(6):371-378. doi:10.1080/09540960903378233
41.
Christensen M, Skærbæk P. Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2007;20(1):101-132. doi:10.1108/09513570710731227
42.
Considine M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance. 2002;15(1):21-40. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00178
43.
Cunningham GM, Harris JE. Toward a Theory of Performance Reporting to Achieve Public Sector Accountability: A Field Study. Public Budgeting <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Finance. 2005;25(2):15-42. doi:10.1111/j.0275-1100.2005.00359.x
44.
Dereli C. Smoke and mirrors and performance management. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2011;24(1):42-56. doi:10.1108/09513551111099217
45.
Flinders M. Daring to be a Daniel: The Pathology of Politicized Accountability in a Monitory Democracy. Administration & Society. 2011;43(5):595-619. doi:10.1177/0095399711403899
46.
Glynn JJ, Murphy MP. Public management. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 1996;9(5/6):125-137. doi:10.1108/09513559610146492
47.
Heinrich CJ. Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review. 2002;62(6):712-725. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00253
48.
Monfardini P. Accountability in the new public sector: a comparative case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2010;23(7):632-646. doi:10.1108/09513551011078897
49.
Mulgan R. ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Public Administration. 2000;78(3):555-573. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00218
50.
Papenfuss U, Schaefer C. Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision - an empirical Internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2010;76(3):555-576. doi:10.1177/0020852310372451
51.
Ryan C, Walsh P. Collaboration of public sector agencies: reporting and accountability challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2004;17(7):621-631. doi:10.1108/09513550410562284
52.
Shaoul J. ‘Sharing’ political authority with finance capital: The case of Britain’s Public Private Partnerships. Policy and Society. 2011;30(3):209-220. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.07.005
53.
Tetlock PE. Vying for Rhetorical High Ground in Accountability Debates: It Is Easy to Look Down on Those Who Look Soft on. Administration & Society. 2011;43(6):693-703. doi:10.1177/0095399711426848
54.
Willems T, Van Dooren W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2011;77(3):505-530. doi:10.1177/0020852311408648
55.
Sørensen E. the democratic problems and potentials of network governance. European Political Science. 2005;4(3):348-357. doi:10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210033
56.
Berg AM. Transforming public services – transforming the public servant? International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2006;19(6):556-568. doi:10.1108/09513550610686627
57.
BATTEN E, CORREIA L, HEDGES H, et al. EXPERTISE AND POLICY-MAKING: LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Public Administration. 2006;84(3):771-781. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00611.x
58.
Burgess S. The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2003;19(2):285-300. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.285
59.
Carboni N. Changing relationships between politicians and bureaucrats in contemporary democracies: an empirical analysis of the Italian experience. International public management review. 2010;11(1):90-109. http://journals.sfu.ca/ipmr/index.php/ipmr/article/view/77/77
60.
Farrell C, Morris J. The `Neo-Bureaucratic’ State: Professionals, Managers and Professional Managers in Schools, General Practices and Social Work. Organization. 2003;10(1):129-156. doi:10.1177/1350508403010001380
61.
Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E. Professionals: Back to the Future? Human Relations. 2000;53(5):713-739. doi:10.1177/0018726700535005
62.
Greener I. Understanding NHS Reform: The Policy-Transfer, Social Learning, and Path-Dependency Perspectives. Governance. 2002;15(2):161-183. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00184
63.
Horner L, Lekhi R, Blaug R. Deliberative democracy and the role of public managers. Published online 2006. http://www.theworkfoundation.com/DownloadPublication/Report/107_107_Deliberative%20democracy%20and%20the%20role%20of%20public%20managers.pdf
64.
HOWLETT M, WELLSTEAD AM. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government. Politics & Policy. 2011;39(4):613-633. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00306.x
65.
Kearney, Richard C. Professionalism and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conflict or Compatibility? Public Administration Review. 1988;48(1). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=4599374&site=ehost-live
66.
Kirkpatrick I, Jespersen PK, Dent M, Neogy I. Medicine and management in a comparative perspective: the case of Denmark and England. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2009;31(5):642-658. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01157.x
67.
Parsons W. Modernising Policy-making for the Twenty First Century: The Professional Model. Public Policy and Administration. 2001;16(3):93-110. doi:10.1177/095207670101600307
68.
Pedersen D, Hartley J. The changing context of public leadership and management. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2008;21(4):327-339. doi:10.1108/09513550810880214
69.
Probst HB, Hussain ZB, Andersen O. Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureau... - PubMed - NCBI. Published online 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22136810
70.
Sehested K. HOW NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORMS CHALLENGE THE ROLES OF PROFESSIONALS. International Journal of Public Administration. 2002;25(12):1513-1537. doi:10.1081/PAD-120014259
71.
Taylor I, Kelly J. Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re‐visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2006;19(7):629-642. doi:10.1108/09513550610704662
72.
Tummers L. Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement new policies: a policy alienation framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2011;77(3):555-581. doi:10.1177/0020852311407364
73.
Considine M. The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance. 2002;15(1):21-40. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00178
74.
Willems T, Van Dooren W. Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2011;77(3):505-530. doi:10.1177/0020852311408648
75.
Alcock P. A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK. Voluntary sector review. 2010;1(1):5-24. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1885989521?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=8018
76.
Bode I. Co-governance within networks and the non-profit – for-profit divide. Public Management Review. 2006;8(4):551-566. doi:10.1080/14719030601022932
77.
CUNNINGHAM I. A RACE TO THE BOTTOM? EXPLORING VARIATIONS IN EMPLOYMENT CONDITIONS IN THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR. Public Administration. 2008;86(4):1033-1053. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00752.x
78.
Davis Smith J. The inflatable log: volunteering, the state and democracy. Voluntary action. 2001;3(3):13-26.
79.
Harris B. Voluntary action and the state in historical perspective. Voluntary sector review. 2010;1(1):25-40. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1885989660/shibboleth?accountid=8018
80.
Harrow J, Jung T. Philanthropy is Dead; Long Live Philanthropy? Public Management Review. 2011;13(8):1047-1056. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.619062
81.
KELLY J. REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE UK: BRINGING IN THE THIRD SECTOR. Public Administration. 2007;85(4):1003-1022. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00680.x
82.
Lewis J. New Labour’s Approach to the Voluntary Sector: Independence and the Meaning of Partnership. Social Policy and Society. 2005;4(2):121-131. doi:10.1017/S147474640400226X
83.
LOWNDES V, PRATCHETT L, STOKER G. LOCAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION: THE IMPACT OF RULES-IN-USE. Public Administration. 2006;84(3):539-561. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00601.x
84.
Lowndes V, Sullivan H. Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well do Local Partnerships and Public Participation go Together? Local Government Studies. 2004;30(1):51-73. doi:10.1080/0300393042000230920
85.
Srinivas N. Against NGOs?: A Critical Perspective on Nongovernmental Action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2009;38(4):614-626. doi:10.1177/0899764009334308
86.
Taylor M. Co-option or Empowerment?: The Changing Relationship between the State and the Voluntary and Community Sectors. Local Governance. 2002;28(1):1-11.
87.
Tiwana M, Belay N. Civil society: the clampdown is real. Published online 2010. http://www.civicus.org/view/media/CIVICUS_%20paper_%20global_%20trends_%20Civil%20Society_%20Space_%202009-201012[1].pdf
88.
Aberbach JD, Christensen T. Citizens and Consumers. Public Management Review. 2005;7(2):225-246. doi:10.1080/14719030500091319
89.
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35(4):216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
90.
Bang HP. ‘Yes we can’: identity politics and project politics for a late-modern world. Urban research & practice. 2009;2(2):117-137. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17535060902979022
91.
Bang HP, Sorensen E. The everyday maker: a new challenge to democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 1999;21(3):324-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10841806.1999.11643381
92.
Davies JS. The governance of urban regeneration: a critique of the ‘governing without government’ thesis. Public Administration. 2002;80(2):301-322. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00305
93.
Davies JS. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies. 2007;55(4):779-800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
94.
Dwyer P. Making sense of social citizenship: some user views on welfare rights and responsibilities. Critical Social Policy. 2002;22(2):273-299. doi:10.1177/02610183020220020601
95.
Hastak, Manoj. The Role of Consumer Surveys in Public Policy Decision Making. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 2001;20(2). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=5578310&site=ehost-live
96.
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management. 2003;23(3):147-154. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
97.
Nancarrow C, Evans M, Pallister J. Polls apart! Political, research and ethical lessons from UK pressure groups’ use of opinion polls. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 2003;8(2):181-193. doi:10.1002/nvsm.211
98.
Prabhakar R. Commercialisation or Citizenship? Politics. 2004;24(3):215-220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2004.00222.x
99.
Stolle D, Hooghe M. Consumers as political participants? Shifts in political action repetoires in Western societies. In: Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present. Transaction Publishers; 2003.
100.
Roberts N. Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation. The American Review of Public Administration. 2004;34(4):315-353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288
101.
Davis Smith J. ‘The Inflatable Log’: volunteering, the state and democracy. Published online 2001.
102.
Alford J. Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?: Toward a Contingency Theory. Administration & Society. 2002;34(1):32-56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004
103.
Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35(4):216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
104.
Bovaird T. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review. 2007;67(5):846-860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
105.
Brandsen T, Pestoff V. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review. 2006;8(4):493-501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874
106.
Davies JS. The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies. 2007;55(4):779-800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x
107.
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management. 2003;23(3):147-154. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
108.
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization. 2008;20(2):339-360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
109.
Pestoff V. Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Public Management Review. 2006;8(4):503-519. doi:10.1080/14719030601022882
110.
Prentice S. Childcare, co-production and the third sector in Canada. Public Management Review. 2006;8(4):521-536. doi:10.1080/14719030601022890
111.
Johnson C, Osborne SP. Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance. Public Money and Management. 2003;23(3):147-154. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00362
112.
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization. 2008;20(2):339-360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
113.
Allen, Barbara Ann. BRIDGING THE DIVIDE - COMMERCIAL PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: ARE THERE LESSONS FOR HEALTH CARE COMMISSIONING IN ENGLAND? Journal of Public Procurement. 2009;9(1):79-108. http://search.proquest.com/docview/223182037/7627EE4859384E9CPQ/6?accountid=8018
114.
Aritua B, Smith NJ, Bower D. What risks are common to or amplified in programmes: Evidence from UK public sector infrastructure schemes. International Journal of Project Management. 2011;29(3):303-312. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.004
115.
Bartlett W. Quasi‐markets and contracts: A markets and hierarchies perspective on NHS reform. Public money & management. 1991;11(3):53-61.
116.
Baxter K, Weiss M, Le Grand J. The dynamics of commissioning across organisational and clinical boundaries. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2008;22(2):111-128. doi:10.1108/14777260810876295
117.
Bovaird T. Public–Private Partnerships: from Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2004;70(2):199-215. doi:10.1177/0020852304044250
118.
Bovaird T. Developing New Forms of Partnership With the ‘Market’ in the Procurement of Public Services. Public Administration. 2006;84(1):81-102. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2006.00494.x
119.
Boyne GA. Competitive Tendering In Local Government: A Review Of Theory And Evidence. Public Administration. 1998;76(4):695-712. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00132
120.
Bradley S, Taylor J. The Effect of the Quasi-market on the Efficiency-equity Trade-off in the Secondary School Sector. Bulletin of Economic Research. 2002;54(3):295-314. doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00154
121.
Bradley S, Taylor J. Diversity, Choice and the Quasi-market: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education Policy in England*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2010;72(1):1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00572.x
122.
Chalkley M. Competition in NHS quasi-markets. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1996;12(4):89-99. doi:10.1093/oxrep/12.4.89
123.
Dopson S, Locock L. The Commissioning Process in the NHS: The theory and application. Public Management Review. 2002;4(2):209-229. doi:10.1080/14616670210130552
124.
Fischbacher M, Beaumont PB. PFI, Public—Private Partnerships and the Neglected Importance of Process: Stakeholders and the Employment Dimension. Public Money and Management. 2003;23(3):171-176. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00365
125.
Gibbons, Stephen. CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND PUPIL ACHIEVEMENT. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2008;6(4). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=32604699&site=ehost-live
126.
Gray KE, Ghosh D. An empirical analysis of the purchaser‐provider relationship in the NHS internal market. Journal of Management in Medicine. 2000;14(1):57-68. doi:10.1108/02689230010340561
127.
Ham C. World class commissioning: a health policy chimera? Journal of health services policy research. 2008;13(2):116-121. https://www-jstor-org.nottingham.idm.oclc.org/stable/26751153?sid=primo
128.
Hoxley M. Purchasing UK public sector property and construction professional services: competition v quality. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2001;7(2):133-139. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00026-5
129.
KNAPP M, HARDY B, FORDER J. Commissioning for Quality: Ten Years of Social Care Markets in England. Journal of Social Policy. 2001;30(02). doi:10.1017/S0047279401006225
130.
Lunt, Neil. Economic discourse and the market: The case of community care. Public Administration. 74(3). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9702216351&site=ehost-live
131.
Matosevic T, Knapp M, Le Grand J. Motivation and Commissioning: Perceived and Expressed Motivations of Care Home Providers. Social Policy & Administration. 2008;42(3):228-247. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00594.x
132.
Murray JG. Towards a common understanding of the differences between purchasing, procurement and commissioning in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2009;15(3):198-202. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2009.03.003
133.
Petsoulas C, Allen P, Hughes D, Vincent-Jones P, Roberts J. The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: A case study analysis. Social Science & Medicine. 2011;73(2):185-192. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.021
134.
Wade E. Commissioning reform in the NHS: will he who pays the piper ever really call the tune? Clinical Medicine. 2011;11(1):35-39. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.11-1-35
135.
Williams I, Bovaird T, Brown H, et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management. 2012;6(2):83-92. http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/10153987/Designing_whole_systems_commissioning.pdf
136.
Williams I, Bovaird T, Brown H, et al. Designing whole-systems commissioning: Lessons from the English experience. Journal of care services management. 2012;6(2):83-92. http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/10153987/Designing_whole_systems_commissioning.pdf
