1
Moore J. Behaviorism. The Psychological Record 2011;61:449–63. doi:10.1007/BF03395771
2
Smith III JP, diSessa AA, Roschelle J. Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1994;3:115–63. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
3
On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Amin. On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Aminhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025248
4
Norman DA. Chapter 1, The psychopathology of everyday things. In: The design of everyday things. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2013. 1–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=36a46993-9b82-e711-80cb-005056af4099
5
diSessa AA, Sherin BL. What Changes in Conceptual Change? International journal of science education 2006;20:1155–91. doi:doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
6
Greeno JG, Goldman SV. Chapter 7, Cultivating Conceptual Change with Benchmark Lessons. In: Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1998. 155–88.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1166478&ppg=166
7
Norman DA. Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science 1980;4:1–32. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0401_1
8
Miller GA. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003;7:141–4. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
9
L.S. Vygotskiĭ. Chapter 6, Interaction between learning and development. In: Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1978. 79–91.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3301299
10
Crowley K, Callanan MA, Jipson JL, et al. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education 2001;85:712–32. doi:10.1002/sce.1035
11
Crowley K, Callanan MA, Jipson JL, et al. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education 2001;85:712–32. doi:10.1002/sce.1035
12
Sherin B, Reiser BJ, Edelson D. Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2004;13:387–421. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5
13
Davis P, Horn M, Block F, et al. "Whoa! We’re going deep in the trees!”: Patterns of collaboration around an interactive information visualization exhibit. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2015;10:53–76. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9209-z
14
Anderson JR, Boyle CF, Reiser BJ. Intelligent tutoring systems. Intelligent tutoring systems 1985;228:456–62. doi:10.1126/science.228.4698.456
15
Georghiades P. From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education 2004;26:365–83. doi:10.1080/0950069032000119401
16
Papleontiou-louca E. The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development 2003;7:9–30. doi:10.1080/13664530300200184
17
Sawyer RK. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. 2nd ed. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
18
Quintana C, Zhang M, Krajcik J. A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding. Educational Psychologist 2005;40:235–44. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
19
Azevedo R, Hadwin AF. Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds. Instructional Science 2005;33:367–79. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
20
Edelson DC. Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2001;38:355–85.
21
Palincsar AS, Herrenkohl LR. Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts. Theory Into Practice 2002;41:26–32. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
22
Hu-Pei Au K. Participation Structures in a Reading Lesson with Hawaiian Children: Analysis of a Culturally Appropriate Instructional Event. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 1980;11:91–115.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3216582
23
Loewenberg Ball D, Feiman-Nemser S. Using Textbooks and Teachers’ Guides: A Dilemma for Beginning Teachers and Teacher Educators. Curriculum Inquiry 1988;18:401–23.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1179386
24
Bruckman A. Situated Support for Learning: Storm’s Weekend With Rachael. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2000;9:329–72. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_4
25
Cohen DK. A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1990;12:311–29. doi:10.3102/01623737012003311
26
Delpit LD. The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children. Harvard Educational Review 1988;58:280–98.https://search.proquest.com/docview/212264098?accountid=8018
27
Henning JE, Nielsen LE, Henning MC, et al. Designing Discussions: Four Ways to Open Up a Dialogue. The Social Studies 2008;99:122–6. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.3.122-126
28
Herrenkohl LR, Palincsar AS, DeWater LS, et al. Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1999;8:451–93. doi:10.1080/10508406.1999.9672076
29
Lee CD. Is October Brown Chinese? A Cultural Modeling Activity System for                Underachieving Students. American Educational Research Journal 2001;38:97–141. doi:10.3102/00028312038001097
30
Lee CD. Toward A Framework for Culturally Responsive Design in Multimedia Computer Environments: Cultural Modeling as a Case. Mind, Culture, and Activity 2003;10:42–61. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA1001_05
31
Lehrer R, Shumow L. Aligning the Construction Zones of Parents and Teachers for Mathematics Reform. Cognition and Instruction 1997;15:41–83.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233755
32
Lepper MR. Motivational Considerations in the Study of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 1988;5:289–309. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0504_3
33
Palincsar AS, Herrenkohl LR. Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts. Theory Into Practice 2002;41:26–32. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
34
Rosebery AS, Warren B, Conant FR. Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Language Minority Classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1992;2:61–94. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2
35
Smith BK, Frost J, Albayrak M, et al. Facilitating narrative medical discussions of type 1 diabetes with computer visualizations and photography. Patient Education and Counseling 2006;64:313–21. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.011
36
Patten J van, Chao C-I, Reigeluth CM. A Review of Strategies for Sequencing and Synthesizing Instruction. Review of Educational Research 1986;56:437–71.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170341
37
Easterday MW, Rees Lewis DG, Gerber EM. The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Published Online First: 11 July 2016. doi:10.14742/ajet.2464