[1]
J. Moore, ‘Behaviorism’, The Psychological Record, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 449–463, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1007/BF03395771.
[2]
J. P. Smith III, A. A. diSessa, and J. Roschelle, ‘Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 115–163, Apr. 1994, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1.
[3]
‘On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Amin’, On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Amin [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025248
[4]
D. A. Norman, ‘Chapter 1, The psychopathology of everyday things’, in The design of everyday things, Rev. and Expanded ed., Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2013, pp. 1–36 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=36a46993-9b82-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[5]
A. A. diSessa and B. L. Sherin, ‘What Changes in Conceptual Change?’, International journal of science education, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1155–1191, 2006, doi: doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002.
[6]
J. G. Greeno and S. V. Goldman, ‘Chapter 7, Cultivating Conceptual Change with Benchmark Lessons’, in Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 155–188 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1166478&ppg=166
[7]
D. A. Norman, ‘Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science’, Cognitive Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0401_1.
[8]
G. A. Miller, ‘The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 141–144, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.
[9]
L.S. Vygotskiĭ, ‘Chapter 6, Interaction between learning and development’, in Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1978, pp. 79–91 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3301299
[10]
K. Crowley, M. A. Callanan, J. L. Jipson, J. Galco, K. Topping, and J. Shrager, ‘Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity’, Science Education, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 712–732, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1002/sce.1035.
[11]
K. Crowley, M. A. Callanan, J. L. Jipson, J. Galco, K. Topping, and J. Shrager, ‘Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity’, Science Education, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 712–732, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1002/sce.1035.
[12]
B. Sherin, B. J. Reiser, and D. Edelson, ‘Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 387–421, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5.
[13]
P. Davis et al., ‘"Whoa! We’re going deep in the trees!”: Patterns of collaboration around an interactive information visualization exhibit’, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 53–76, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11412-015-9209-z.
[14]
J. R. Anderson, C. F. Boyle, and B. J. Reiser, ‘Intelligent tutoring systems’, Intelligent tutoring systems, vol. 228, no. 4698, pp. 456–462, 1985, doi: 10.1126/science.228.4698.456.
[15]
P. Georghiades, ‘From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 365–383, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1080/0950069032000119401.
[16]
E. Papleontiou-louca, ‘The concept and instruction of metacognition’, Teacher Development, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–30, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1080/13664530300200184.
[17]
R. K. Sawyer, The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed., vol. Cambridge handbooks in psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
[18]
C. Quintana, M. Zhang, and J. Krajcik, ‘A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding’, Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 235–244, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5.
[19]
R. Azevedo and A. F. Hadwin, ‘Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds’, Instructional Science, vol. 33, no. 5–6, pp. 367–379, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9.
[20]
D. C. Edelson, ‘Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 355–385, 2001.
[21]
A. S. Palincsar and L. R. Herrenkohl, ‘Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts’, Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 26–32, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5.
[22]
K. Hu-Pei Au, ‘Participation Structures in a Reading Lesson with Hawaiian Children: Analysis of a Culturally Appropriate Instructional Event’, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 91–115, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3216582
[23]
D. Loewenberg Ball and S. Feiman-Nemser, ‘Using Textbooks and Teachers’ Guides: A Dilemma for Beginning Teachers and Teacher Educators.’, Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 401–423, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1179386
[24]
A. Bruckman, ‘Situated Support for Learning: Storm’s Weekend With Rachael’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 329–372, Jul. 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_4.
[25]
D. K. Cohen, ‘A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 311–329, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.3102/01623737012003311.
[26]
L. D. Delpit, ‘The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children.’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 280–298, 1988 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/212264098?accountid=8018
[27]
J. E. Henning, L. E. Nielsen, M. C. Henning, and E. U. Schulz, ‘Designing Discussions: Four Ways to Open Up a Dialogue’, The Social Studies, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 122–126, May 2008, doi: 10.3200/TSSS.99.3.122-126.
[28]
L. R. Herrenkohl, A. S. Palincsar, L. S. DeWater, and K. Kawasaki, ‘Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3–4, pp. 451–493, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/10508406.1999.9672076.
[29]
C. D. Lee, ‘Is October Brown Chinese? A Cultural Modeling Activity System for                Underachieving Students’, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 97–141, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.3102/00028312038001097.
[30]
C. D. Lee, ‘Toward A Framework for Culturally Responsive Design in Multimedia Computer Environments: Cultural Modeling as a Case’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 42–61, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1207/S15327884MCA1001_05.
[31]
R. Lehrer and L. Shumow, ‘Aligning the Construction Zones of Parents and Teachers for Mathematics Reform.’, Cognition and Instruction, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–83, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233755
[32]
M. R. Lepper, ‘Motivational Considerations in the Study of Instruction’, Cognition and Instruction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 289–309, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0504_3.
[33]
A. S. Palincsar and L. R. Herrenkohl, ‘Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts’, Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 26–32, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5.
[34]
A. S. Rosebery, B. Warren, and F. R. Conant, ‘Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Language Minority Classrooms’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–94, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2.
[35]
B. K. Smith, J. Frost, M. Albayrak, and R. Sudhakar, ‘Facilitating narrative medical discussions of type 1 diabetes with computer visualizations and photography’, Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 64, no. 1–3, pp. 313–321, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.011.
[36]
J. van Patten, C.-I. Chao, and C. M. Reigeluth, ‘A Review of Strategies for Sequencing and Synthesizing Instruction.’, Review of Educational Research, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 437–471, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170341
[37]
M. W. Easterday, D. G. Rees Lewis, and E. M. Gerber, ‘The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.14742/ajet.2464.