1.
Moore J. Behaviorism. The Psychological Record. 2011;61(3):449-463. doi:10.1007/BF03395771
2.
Smith III JP, diSessa AA, Roschelle J. Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1994;3(2):115-163. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
3.
On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Amin. On Conceptual Metaphor and the Flora and Fauna of Mind: Commentary on Brookes and Etkina; and Jeppsson, Haglund, and Amin. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025248
4.
Norman DA. Chapter 1, The psychopathology of everyday things. In: The Design of Everyday Things. Rev. and expanded ed. MIT Press; 2013:1-36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=36a46993-9b82-e711-80cb-005056af4099
5.
diSessa AA, Sherin BL. What Changes in Conceptual Change? International journal of science education. 2006;20(10):1155-1191. doi:doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
6.
Greeno JG, Goldman SV. Chapter 7, Cultivating Conceptual Change with Benchmark Lessons. In: Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998:155-188. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1166478&ppg=166
7.
Norman DA. Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science. 1980;4(1):1-32. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0401_1
8.
Miller GA. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003;7(3):141-144. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
9.
L.S. Vygotskiĭ. Chapter 6, Interaction between learning and development. In: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press; 1978:79-91. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3301299
10.
Crowley K, Callanan MA, Jipson JL, Galco J, Topping K, Shrager J. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education. 2001;85(6):712-732. doi:10.1002/sce.1035
11.
Crowley K, Callanan MA, Jipson JL, Galco J, Topping K, Shrager J. Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity. Science Education. 2001;85(6):712-732. doi:10.1002/sce.1035
12.
Sherin B, Reiser BJ, Edelson D. Scaffolding Analysis: Extending the Scaffolding Metaphor to Learning Artifacts. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13(3):387-421. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_5
13.
Davis P, Horn M, Block F, et al. "Whoa! We’re going deep in the trees!”: Patterns of collaboration around an interactive information visualization exhibit. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2015;10(1):53-76. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9209-z
14.
Anderson JR, Boyle CF, Reiser BJ. Intelligent tutoring systems. Intelligent tutoring systems. 1985;228(4698):456-462. doi:10.1126/science.228.4698.456
15.
Georghiades P. From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education. 2004;26(3):365-383. doi:10.1080/0950069032000119401
16.
Papleontiou-louca E. The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher Development. 2003;7(1):9-30. doi:10.1080/13664530300200184
17.
Sawyer RK. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Vol Cambridge handbooks in psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526
18.
Quintana C, Zhang M, Krajcik J. A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding. Educational Psychologist. 2005;40(4):235-244. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_5
19.
Azevedo R, Hadwin AF. Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds. Instructional Science. 2005;33(5-6):367-379. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1272-9
20.
Edelson DC. Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2001;38(3):355-385.
21.
Palincsar AS, Herrenkohl LR. Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts. Theory Into Practice. 2002;41(1):26-32. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
22.
Hu-Pei Au K. Participation Structures in a Reading Lesson with Hawaiian Children: Analysis of a Culturally Appropriate Instructional Event. Anthropology & Education Quarterly. 1980;11(2):91-115. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3216582
23.
Loewenberg Ball D, Feiman-Nemser S. Using Textbooks and Teachers’ Guides: A Dilemma for Beginning Teachers and Teacher Educators. Curriculum Inquiry. 1988;18(4):401-423. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1179386
24.
Bruckman A. Situated Support for Learning: Storm’s Weekend With Rachael. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2000;9(3):329-372. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0903_4
25.
Cohen DK. A Revolution in One Classroom: The Case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1990;12(3):311-329. doi:10.3102/01623737012003311
26.
Delpit LD. The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People’s Children. Harvard Educational Review. 1988;58(3):280-298. https://search.proquest.com/docview/212264098?accountid=8018
27.
Henning JE, Nielsen LE, Henning MC, Schulz EU. Designing Discussions: Four Ways to Open Up a Dialogue. The Social Studies. 2008;99(3):122-126. doi:10.3200/TSSS.99.3.122-126
28.
Herrenkohl LR, Palincsar AS, DeWater LS, Kawasaki K. Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1999;8(3-4):451-493. doi:10.1080/10508406.1999.9672076
29.
Lee CD. Is October Brown Chinese? A Cultural Modeling Activity System for                Underachieving Students. American Educational Research Journal. 2001;38(1):97-141. doi:10.3102/00028312038001097
30.
Lee CD. Toward A Framework for Culturally Responsive Design in Multimedia Computer Environments: Cultural Modeling as a Case. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 2003;10(1):42-61. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA1001_05
31.
Lehrer R, Shumow L. Aligning the Construction Zones of Parents and Teachers for Mathematics Reform. Cognition and Instruction. 1997;15(1):41-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3233755
32.
Lepper MR. Motivational Considerations in the Study of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction. 1988;5(4):289-309. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0504_3
33.
Palincsar AS, Herrenkohl LR. Designing Collaborative Learning Contexts. Theory Into Practice. 2002;41(1):26-32. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_5
34.
Rosebery AS, Warren B, Conant FR. Appropriating Scientific Discourse: Findings From Language Minority Classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1992;2(1):61-94. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2
35.
Smith BK, Frost J, Albayrak M, Sudhakar R. Facilitating narrative medical discussions of type 1 diabetes with computer visualizations and photography. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006;64(1-3):313-321. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.011
36.
Patten J van, Chao CI, Reigeluth CM. A Review of Strategies for Sequencing and Synthesizing Instruction. Review of Educational Research. 1986;56(4):437-471. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170341
37.
Easterday MW, Rees Lewis DG, Gerber EM. The logic of the theoretical and practical products of design research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. Published online 11 July 2016. doi:10.14742/ajet.2464