1.
Whyte, C.: Gendering the nation: studies in modern Scottish literature. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1995).
2.
Norquay, G.: Chapter 10, Janice Galloway’s Novels: Fraudulent Mooching. In: Contemporary Scottish women writers. pp. 131–143. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2000).
3.
Jones, C.: Chapter 24, Burying the Man that was: Janice Galloway and Gender Disorientation. In: The Edinburgh companion to contemporary Scottish literature. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2007).
4.
Craig, C.: The modern Scottish novel: narrative and the national imagination. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1999).
5.
McGlynn, M.: ‘I Didn’t Need to Eat’: Janice Galloway’s Anorexic Text and the National Body. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 49, 221–240 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3200/CRIT.49.2.221-240.
6.
Ema Jelínková: Traumatized selves in Janice Galloway’s The Trick Is to Keep Breathing and A. L. Kennedy’s Night Geometry and the Garscadden Trains. Ars Aeterna. 10, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/aa-2018-0007.
7.
Patrick Parrinder, ,  Andrew Nash, , and  Nicola Wilson: New Directions in the History of the Novel. Palgrave Macmillan Limited (2014).
8.
Ng, A.H.S.: Coping with Reality: The Solace of Objects and Language in Janice Galloway’s. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 53, 238–250 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00111611003792769.
9.
Laing, R.D.: Self and others. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1969).
10.
Lehner, S.: CHAPTER 17 ‘Dangerous Liaisons’: Gender Politics in the Contemporary Scottish and Irish ImagiNation. In: Scottish literature and postcolonial literature: comparative texts and critical perspectives. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2011).
11.
Monteith, S.: Pat Barker. Northcote House Publishers Ltd (2017).
12.
Monteith, S.: Critical perspectives on Pat Barker. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia (2005).
13.
Johnson, P.: Embodying Losses in Pat Barker’s Regeneration Trilogy. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 46, 307–319 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3200/CRIT.46.4.307-319.
14.
Harris, G.: Compulsory Masculinity, Britain, and the Great War: The Literary-Historical Work of Pat Barker. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 39, 290–304 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619809599537.
15.
Whitehead, A.: Open to Suggestion: Hypnosis and History in Pat Barker’s Regeneration. MFS Modern Fiction Studies. 44, 674–694 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.1998.0071.
16.
Smethurst, T.: The Making of Torture in Pat Barker’s. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction. 55, 406–421 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2013.783781.
17.
Head, D.: Chapter 5, Unravelling the Binaries : The innocent and black dogs. In: Ian McEwan. pp. 91–119. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2007).
18.
Malcolm, D.: Chapter 7, Brushes with History (II): Black Dogs. In: Understanding Ian McEwan. pp. 131–154. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia (2002).
19.
Ryan, K.: Chapter 10, Feeding the Void: Black Dogs. In: Ian McEwan. pp. 61–68. Northcote House in association with the British Council, Plymouth (1994).
20.
Slay, J.: Chapter 8, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: The Innocent and Black Dogs. In: Ian McEwan. pp. 134–145. Twayne Publishers, New York (1996).
21.
Wells, L.: Chapter 5, The Innocent and Black Dogs. In: Ian McEwan. pp. 56–67. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).
22.
Raphael-Hernandez, H.: Blackening Europe: the African American presence. Routledge, New York (2004).
23.
Gilroy, P.: The black Atlantic: modernity and double consciousness. Verso, London (1993).
24.
Matthews, S., Groes, S.: Kazuo Ishiguro: contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London (2009).
25.
Ishiguro, K.: When we were orphans. Faber & Faber, London (2005).
26.
Auden, W.H.: The Guilty Vicarage. Harper’s.
27.
Webley, A.: ”Shanghaied” into service: Double Binds in When We Were Orphans. In: Kazuo Ishiguro: new critical visions of the novels. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
28.
Alexander M. Bain: International Settlements: Ishiguro, Shanghai, Humanitarianism. NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction. 40, 240–264 (2007).
29.
Ringrose, C.: ”In the end it has to shatter”: The Ironic Doubleness of Kazuo Ishiguro’s When We Were Orphans. In: Kazuo Ishiguro: new critical visions of the novels. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
30.
Reitz, C.: Detecting the nation: fictions of detection and the imperial venture. Ohio State University Press, Columbus (2004).
31.
Priestman, M.: Detective fiction and literature: the figure on the carpet. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1991).
32.
Kazuo Ishiguro - Nobel Lecture, https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2017/ishiguro-lecture.html.
33.
Machinal, H.: When We Were Orphans: Narration and Detection in the case of Christopher Banks. In: Kazuo Ishiguro: contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London (2009).
34.
Jouvert 7.1: Brian Finney, Figuring the Real: Ishiguro’s When We Were Orphans, https://legacy.chass.ncsu.edu/jouvert/v7is1/ishigu.htm.
35.
Wong, C.: Introduction. In: Kazuo Ishiguro. pp. 1–6. Northcote House, Plymouth (2000).
36.
Berberich, C.: Chapter 9, Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Remains of the Day: Working Through England’s Traumatic Past as a Critique of Thatcherism, from: Kazuo Ishiguro : new critical visions of the novels. In: Kazuo Ishiguro: new critical visions of the novels. pp. 118–132. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
37.
King, B.: Chapter 13, The New Internationalism: Shiva Naipaul, Salman Rushdie, Buchi Emecheta, Timothy Mo and Kazuo Ishiguro. In: The British and Irish novel since 1960. pp. 192–211. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (1991).
38.
Rushdie, S.: Fury. Jonathan Cape, London (2001).
39.
Zucker, D.J.: Fury meets and greets Sabbath’s Theater: Salman Rushdie’s homage to Philip Roth. Philip Roth Studies. Fall, 85–91 (2013).
40.
Brouillette, S.: Authorship as Crisis in Salman Rushdie’s Fury. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature. 40, 137–156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989405050669.
41.
Rushdie, S.: Joseph Anton: a memoir. Jonathan Cape, London (2012).
42.
Rushdie, S.: Step across this line: collected non-fiction, 1992-2002. Jonathan Cape, London (2002).
43.
Appiah, A.: Cosmopolitanism: ethics in a world of strangers. Allen Lane, London (2006).
44.
Harvey, D.: Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. Columbia University Press, New York (2009).
45.
Frangos, M.: The future of disillusionment: Rushdie’s                              and the politics of time. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature. 48, 237–252 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989412466402.
46.
Maurer, Y.: Rage against the machine: Cyberspace narratives in Rushdie’s. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature. 47, 121–135 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989411425480.
47.
Salman Rushdie and Rosemary Magee, Emory University Creativity Conversation, http://creativity.emory.edu/events/creativity-conversations/rushdie-cc-0211.html.
48.
Walkowitz, R.L.: Cosmopolitan style: modernism beyond the nation. Columbia University Press, New York (2006).
49.
Zimring, R.: The passionate cosmopolitan in Salman Rushdie’s. Journal of Postcolonial Writing. 46, 5–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/17449850903478130.
50.
Ernst, C.W., Martin, R.C.: Rethinking Islamic studies: from orientalism to cosmopolitanism. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, S.C. (2010).
51.
Clements, M.: Writing Islam from a South Asian Muslim perspective: Rushdie, Hamid, Aslam, Shamsie. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2015).
52.
Ahmed, A.S.: Postmodernism and Islam: predicament and promise. Routledge, London (1992).
53.
Rushdie, S.: The New Empire Within Britain. In: Imaginary homelands: essays and criticism 1981-1991. pp. 129–138. Granta in association with Penguin, London (1991).