1.
Christie, A.: Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property, 16th ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2023).
2.
Bently, L., Sherman, B.: Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
3.
Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D., Aplin, T.F.: Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trademarks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
4.
Davis, J.: Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
5.
Waelde, C., Laurie, G., Brown, A., Kheria, S., Cornwell, J.: Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
6.
Lewinski, S. von: International copyright law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
7.
Aplin, T.F., Davis, J.: Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
8.
Cornish, W.R.: Cases and materials on intellectual property. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2006).
9.
European Union Law, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
10.
United Kingdom Chancery Div. and CA decisions, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service.
11.
Cases in all United Kingdom Courts, but only from 1996, http://www.bailii.org/databases.html#ew.
12.
Courts of the European Union cases, http://curia.europa.eu/.
13.
Garnett, K.M., Davies, G., Harbottle, G., Copinger, W.A., Skone James, E.P.: Copinger and Skone James on copyright. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2017).
14.
Dworkin, G., Taylor, R.D.: Blackstone’s guide to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988: the law of copyright and related rights. Blackstone, London (1989).
15.
Laddie, H.I.L., Prescott, P., Vitoria, M.: The modern law of copyright and designs. LexisNexis, London (2018).
16.
The Berne Convention 1886., http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283698.
17.
The Universal Copyright Convention., http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=15381&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.
18.
The WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996., http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=295166.
19.
The TRIPs Agreement, https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/31bis_trips_01_e.htm.
20.
The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances 2012, http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/avp_dc/avp_dc_20.pdf.
21.
Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works For Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or otherwise Print Disabled 2013, http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=245323.
22.
Ricketson, S., Ginsburg, J.C.: International copyright and neighbouring rights: the Berne Convention and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2022).
23.
Council Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of com¬puter programs [1991] OJ L 122/42, codified by Directive 2009/24/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0024.
24.
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents.
25.
*Computer Associates v Altai, 982 F. 2d 693 (2nd Cir. 1992).
26.
*Case C 406/10, SAS  Institute v World Programming  available on curia.europa.eu (2012).
27.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
28.
Derclaye, E.: Software copyright protection: can Europe learn from American case law? Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 7–16 (2000).
29.
Derclaye, E.: Software copyright protection: can Europe learn from American case law? Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review. 56–68 (2000).
30.
Weston, S.: Software interfaces - stuck in the middle: the relationship between the law and software interfaces in regulating and encouraging interoperability. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 427–450 (2012).
31.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
32.
Derclaye, E.: The database directive. In: EU copyright law : a commentary. pp. 298–354. Edward Elgar Publishing (2014).
33.
Derclaye, E.: The legal protection of databases: a comparative analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
34.
Derclaye, E.: Football Dataco: skill and labour is dead! | Kluwer Copyright Blog, http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2012/03/01/football-dataco-skill-and-labour-is-dead/.
35.
WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization, http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/.
36.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
37.
Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D., Aplin, T.F.: Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trademarks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
38.
Aplin, T.F.: Copyright law in the digital society: the challenges of multimedia. Hart, Oxford (2005).
39.
US copyright act, http://www.copyright.gov/title17/.
40.
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 435, 104 S.Ct. 774, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984)).
41.
A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1013 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001).
42.
*Productores de Musica de Espana (Promusicae) v Telefonica de Espana SAU (C-275/06) [2008] All E.R. (EC) 809 (ECJ).
43.
Akester, P.: Chapter 3 Peer to Peer, from: A Practical Guide to Digital Copyright Law. Presented at the (2008).
44.
Dixon, A.: Liability of Users and Third Parties for Copyright Infringements on the Internet: Overview of International Developments. In: Peer-to-peer file sharing and secondary liability in copyright law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2009).
45.
*Metix v Maughan [1997] FSR 718.
46.
*Creation Records Ltd and Others v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1997] EMLR 444.
47.
*Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch).
48.
[2011] UKSC 39.
49.
*George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1975] RPC 31 (HL).
50.
*Merlet v Mothercare [1986] RPC 115 (CA).
51.
Shelley v Rex Features [1994] EMLR 134.
52.
*Vermaat v Boncrest [2001] FSR 43.
53.
Guild v Eskandar [2001] FSR 38 (ChD).
54.
*Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch).
55.
Mackie Designs Inc v Behringer Specialised Studio Equipment (UK) Ltd & Others [1999] RPC 717.
56.
BBC Worldwide Ltd v Pall Screen Painting Ltd and Others [1998] FSR 665.
57.
*Lambretta Clothing Co v Teddy Smith [2004] EWCA Civ 886 (CA).
58.
*Flashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves [2007] EWHC 1372 (Ch); [2007] F.S.R. 36, Ch D.
59.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
60.
Derclaye, E.: Flashing Badge v Groves: A step forward in the clarification of the copyright/design interface. European Intellectual Property Review. 251–254 (2008).
61.
Christie, A.: The UK design copyright exemption. European Intellectual Property Review. (1989).
62.
Bently, L.: The return of industrial copyright? European Intellectual Property Review. (2012).
63.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
64.
Saez, V.: The unregistered Community design. European Intellectual Property Review. 585–590 (2002).
65.
Musker, D.: Hidden meaning? UK perspectives on invisible in use designs. European Intellectual Property Review. 450–455 (2003).
66.
Cornwell, J.: Dyson and Samsung compared: functionality and aesthetics in the design infringement analysis. European intellectual property review. (2013).
67.
Geerts, P.: The informed user in design law: what should he compare and how should he make the comparison? European Intellectual Property Review. 36, (2014).
68.
*Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (CA).
69.
Bailey (t/a Elite Angling products) v Haynes (t/a RAGS) [2007] FSR 10.
70.
Green Lane Products v. PMS International [2008] EWCA Civ 358 (CA).
71.
*Dyson v Vax [2010] FSR 39.
72.
[2012] FSR 4.
73.
*Samsung Electronics v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat).
74.
[2012] EWCA Civ 1339 (CA).
75.
*BMW v. Round and Metal Ltd and P. Gross [2012] EWHC 2099 (Pat).
76.
Gimex International v The Chill Bag Company et al. [2012] EWPCC 31.
77.
Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional (CEGASA) v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamiento (PROIN), Case C-488/10 (2012).
78.
Magmatic v PMS International [2013] EWHC 1925.
79.
[2014] EWCA Civ 181.
80.
Case C 345/13, Karen Millen Fashions v Dunnes stores [2014] ECR I-000.
81.
Massa, C., Strowel, A.: Community design: Cinderella revamped. European Intellectual Property Review. 68–78 (2003).
82.
Schlotelburg, M.: The Community design: first experience with registrations. European Intellectual Property Review. 383–387 (2003).
83.
Wilkinson, D.: Case closed: functional designs protected by design right. European Intellectual Property Review. 118–122 (2007).
84.
Derclaye, E.: Are Fashion Designers Better Protected in Continental Europe than in the United Kingdom? A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Case Law in France, Italy and the United Kingdom. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 315–365 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00389.x.
85.
*C&H Engineering v Klucznik & Sons [1992] FSR 421.
86.
Benjamin, J.M.: Unregistered design right (Case comment on Amoena v Trulife [1995] EIPR D-346). European Intellectual Property Review. 17, (1995).
87.
Ocular Sciences v AVCL [1997] RPC 289.
88.
Parker v Tidball [1997] FSR 680.
89.
Electronic Techniques (Anglia) Ltd v Critchley Components Ltd [1997] FSR 401.
90.
*Mark Wilkinson v Woodcraft Designs [1998] FSR 63.
91.
*Farmers Build Ltd v Carrier Bulk Materials [1999] RPC 461 (CA).
92.
Baby Dan AS v Brevi SRL [1999] FSR 377.
93.
Jo-Y-Jo Ltd v Matalan Retail Ltd [2000] ECDR 178.
94.
A. Fulton Co Ltd v Grant Barnett & Co Ltd [2001] RPC 16 (Ch D).
95.
Guild v Eskandar Ltd [2001] FSR 38 (ChD).
96.
Guild v Eskandar Ltd [2003] FSR 3 (CA).
97.
*L Woolley Jewellers Ltd v A&A Jewellery Ltd [2003] FSR 15 (CA).
98.
Harris, M.: Unregistered design right: nature of reproduction required for infringement - comparison with copyright - hedgehogs and foxes (Case comment on L Woolley Jewellers Ltd v A&A Jewellery Ltd [2003] FSR 15). European Intellectual Property Review. 24, (2002).
99.
*Lambretta Clothing Co v Teddy Smith [2004] EWCA Civ 886 (CA).
100.
Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd [2006] RPC 31.
101.
Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2006] FSR 22.
102.
[2007] FSR 9.
103.
Clinisupplies v K. Park et al [2012] EWHC 3453.
104.
Sealed Air v Sharp Interpack et al [2013] EWPCC 23.
105.
Torremans, P., Holyoak, J.: Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
106.
Derclaye, E.: Are Fashion Designers Better Protected in Continental Europe than in the United Kingdom? A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Case Law in France, Italy and the United Kingdom. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 315–365 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00389.x.
107.
Derclaye, E.: A Decade of Registered and Unregistered Design Rights Decisions in the UK: What Conclusions Can We Draw for the Future of Both Types of Rights? IP Theory. 3, 144–157 (2013).