[2007] FSR 9. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb81c7decd0338d2&docguid=I1F997190B72E11DB8DA99717B137B2CF&hitguid=I29896B80670911DB957BD10069DE77AF&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=27&crumb-action=append&context=210&resolvein=true>
[2011] UKSC 39. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d0640000014cc7e2a07baafdb11f&docguid=I326C22D0C92711E0B767B8A3BB42CB5E&hitguid=I0C305000B84211E09CEF84D8174DB20E&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=114&crumb-action=append&context=46&resolvein=true>
[2012] EWCA Civ 1339 (CA). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d0640000014cea86bbd95b6df548&docguid=I66BA07D05ABE11E2A63DEC2C6D4EF61A&hitguid=I8CCF8050198511E2B9D3C8E267B74666&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=46&crumb-action=append&context=48&resolvein=true>
[2012] FSR 4. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014cea8468933f609451&docguid=I27F296E0537E11E1A85FFAC494F36EFB&hitguid=I9F334AD000F211E183D9EBA939154F53&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=15&crumb-action=append&context=35&resolvein=true>
[2014] EWCA Civ 181. n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/181.html>
A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004, 1013 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001). n.d. <http://uk.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?db=506&findtype=Y&fn=%5Ftop&MT=208&ordoc=2004116619&pbc=13322657&referenceposition=1013&referencepositiontype=S&rs=WLUK9%2E09&serialnum=2001141036&spa=ukmigrat%2D000&strRecreate=no&sv=Split&vr=2%2E0>
A. Fulton Co Ltd v Grant Barnett & Co Ltd [2001] RPC 16 (Ch D). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb73860e9ed52496&docguid=I472D0081E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I472D0080E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=41&crumb-action=append&context=157&resolvein=true>
Akester, Patricia. 2008. Chapter 3 Peer to Peer, from: A Practical Guide to Digital Copyright Law (Sweet and Maxwell), pp. 39–77 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=353d570c-f12f-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Aplin, Tanya Frances. 2005. Copyright Law in the Digital Society: The Challenges of Multimedia (Hart)
——, and Jennifer Davis. 2017. Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 3rd ed (Oxford University Press)
Baby Dan AS v Brevi SRL [1999] FSR 377. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744c09a0000014ceb70cf3a403cd155&docguid=I6D656531E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I6D656530E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=22&crumb-action=append&context=139&resolvein=true>
Bailey (t/a Elite Angling Products) v Haynes (t/a RAGS) [2007] FSR 10. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014cea80680efefe667a&docguid=I19C76C40B72E11DB8DA99717B137B2CF&hitguid=I19B98990B72E11DB8DA99717B137B2CF&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=24&crumb-action=append&context=8&resolvein=true>
BBC Worldwide Ltd v Pall Screen Painting Ltd and Others [1998] FSR 665. n.d.
Benjamin, J. M. 1995. ‘Unregistered Design Right (Case Comment on Amoena v Trulife [1995] EIPR D-346)’, European Intellectual Property Review, 17.12 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb6a1caf35ce6dc4&docguid=I7FBADF30E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FBADF30E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=103&resolvein=true>
Bently, L. 2012. ‘The Return of Industrial Copyright?’, European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014cc7f434026a49c424&docguid=IEEC3D091FE7311E1A971F0366C4E22CA&hitguid=IEEC3D091FE7311E1A971F0366C4E22CA&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=21&crumb-action=append&context=134&resolvein=true>
Bently, Lionel, and Brad Sherman. 2018. Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford University Press)
*BMW v. Round and Metal Ltd and P. Gross [2012] EWHC 2099 (Pat). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d0650000014cea87f03b286c248b&docguid=IDB154810172511E2B192B2541B1B1573&hitguid=I168BB000D84211E1826F9E9D7BA9DAB9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=29&crumb-action=append&context=54&resolvein=true>
Case C 345/13, Karen Millen Fashions v Dunnes Stores [2014] ECR I-000. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb5213f10ed8d16a&docguid=I88ED623031F311E4B8E9E4894498BDD4&hitguid=I89347D5031F311E4B8E9E4894498BDD4&rank=4&spos=4&epos=4&td=38&crumb-action=append&context=45&resolvein=true>
*Case C 406/10, SAS Institute v World Programming Available on Curia.Europa.Eu (2012). n.d. <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-406/10>
‘Cases in All United Kingdom Courts, but Only from 1996’. n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/databases.html#ew>
Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional (CEGASA) v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamiento (PROIN), Case C-488/10 (2012). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc640000014ceb4e9f9a98465555&docguid=IA4B52630C18211E1A8D3B40ADFF490ED&hitguid=IA499D600C18211E1A8D3B40ADFF490ED&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=20&crumb-action=append&context=12&resolvein=true>
*C&H Engineering v Klucznik & Sons [1992] FSR 421. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb66a4a354971c94&docguid=I80498410E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I80495D00E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=51&crumb-action=append&context=78&resolvein=true>
Christie, A. 1989. ‘The UK Design Copyright Exemption’, European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d0650000014cc7f25736fec560cf&docguid=I7FB1B770E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FB1B770E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=154&crumb-action=append&context=127&resolvein=true>
Christie, Andrew. 2023. Blackstone’s Statutes on Intellectual Property, 16th Ed, Sixteenth edition. (Oxford University Press)
Clinisupplies v K. Park et al [2012] EWHC 3453. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014ceb827ea36b18f4b3&docguid=I3DBAA8A0EA8111E2BC35D07BA96682D8&hitguid=I6377CC003F5D11E2906DDC485ACFF0BD&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=27&crumb-action=append&context=219&resolvein=true>
*Computer Associates v Altai, 982 F. 2d 693 (2nd Cir. 1992). n.d. <http://uk.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?mt=114&db=350&findtype=Y&tc=-1&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&spa=ukmigrat-000&ordoc=0389793447&serialnum=1992218838&vr=2.0&fn=_top&sv=Split&tf=-1&pbc=1772FA5F&rs=WLUK15.04>
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. n.d. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents>
Cornish, W. R. 2006. Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property, 5th ed (Sweet & Maxwell)
——, David Llewelyn, and Tanya Frances Aplin. 2013a. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights, 8th ed (Sweet & Maxwell)
——, David Llewelyn, and Tanya Frances Aplin. 2013b. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trademarks and Allied Rights, 8th ed (Sweet & Maxwell)
Cornwell, J. 2013. ‘Dyson and Samsung Compared: Functionality and Aesthetics in the Design Infringement Analysis’, European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014cc7faec7e84555c42&docguid=I866007F1A18C11E29D04F85E3F49CD0B&hitguid=I866007F1A18C11E29D04F85E3F49CD0B&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=36&crumb-action=append&context=172&resolvein=true>
Council Directive 91/250/EEC on the Legal Protection of Com¬puter Programs [1991] OJ L 122/42, Codified by Directive 2009/24/EC. n.d. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0024>
‘Courts of the European Union Cases’. n.d. <http://curia.europa.eu/>
*Creation Records Ltd and Others v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1997] EMLR 444. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=I8FF0A061E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Fdocguid%3DI8FF0A060E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%26src%3Ddoc%26linktype%3Dref%26crumb-action%3Dreplace%26context%3D35&crumb-action=append&context=36>
Davis, Jennifer. 2012. Intellectual Property Law, 4th ed (Oxford University Press), Core text series
Derclaye, E. 2000a. ‘Software Copyright Protection: Can Europe Learn from American Case Law? Part 1’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 7–16 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014cc77161db78766000&docguid=IB7A96540E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB7A96540E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=6&crumb-action=append&context=41&resolvein=true>
——. 2000b. ‘Software Copyright Protection: Can Europe Learn from American Case Law? Part 2’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 56–68 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014cc773cc62bf9a4358&docguid=IB7A93E31E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB7A93E31E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=49&resolvein=true>
——. 2008. ‘Flashing Badge v Groves: A Step Forward in the Clarification of the Copyright/Design Interface’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 251–54 <http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=estelle_derclaye>
——. 2012. ‘Football Dataco: Skill and Labour Is Dead! | Kluwer Copyright Blog’ <http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2012/03/01/football-dataco-skill-and-labour-is-dead/>
——. 2013. ‘A Decade of Registered and Unregistered Design Rights Decisions in the UK: What Conclusions Can We Draw for the Future of Both Types of Rights?’, IP Theory, 3.2, pp. 144–57 <http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=ipt>
——. 2014. ‘The Database Directive’, in EU Copyright Law : A Commentary (Edward Elgar Publishing), pp. 298–354 <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1694018&ppg=358>
Derclaye, Estelle. 2008. The Legal Protection of Databases: A Comparative Analysis (Edward Elgar)
——. 2009a. ‘Are Fashion Designers Better Protected in Continental Europe than in the United Kingdom? A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Case Law in France, Italy and the United Kingdom’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13.3, pp. 315–65, doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00389.x
——. 2009b. ‘Are Fashion Designers Better Protected in Continental Europe than in the United Kingdom? A Comparative Analysis of the Recent Case Law in France, Italy and the United Kingdom’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13.3, pp. 315–65, doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00389.x
Dixon, A. 2009. ‘Liability of Users and Third Parties for Copyright Infringements on the Internet: Overview of International Developments’, in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Secondary Liability in Copyright Law (Edward Elgar) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=449321&ppg=30>
Dworkin, Gerald, and Richard D. Taylor. 1989. Blackstone’s Guide to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988: The Law of Copyright and Related Rights (Blackstone)
Dyson Ltd v Qualtex (UK) Ltd [2006] RPC 31. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb8042c1eee9ff76&docguid=I3A75147043D811DBABF38979B479525B&hitguid=I681F7E20EC8911DAA302F1B38251C4C6&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=47&crumb-action=append&context=195&resolvein=true>
*Dyson v Vax [2010] FSR 39. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d0640000014cea82f729389e1b6e&docguid=IC8194CC0F11611DFACFBF047D151A08B&hitguid=ID715CBA09B6B11DF98BCC80D13AE39EB&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=23&crumb-action=append&context=29&resolvein=true>
Electronic Techniques (Anglia) Ltd v Critchley Components Ltd [1997] FSR 401. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb6e40904ffd5729&docguid=IA073EBE0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IA073C4D1E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=40&crumb-action=append&context=121&resolvein=true>
‘European Union Law’. n.d. <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/>
*Farmers Build Ltd v Carrier Bulk Materials [1999] RPC 461 (CA). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb6fe63a0ff0b490&docguid=IA5960220E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IA595DB10E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=55&crumb-action=append&context=133&resolvein=true>
*Flashing Badge Co Ltd v Groves [2007] EWHC 1372 (Ch); [2007] F.S.R. 36, Ch D. n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/1372.html>
Garnett, K. M., and others. 2017. Copinger and Skone James on Copyright, 17th ed (Sweet & Maxwell) <https://nusearch.nottingham.ac.uk/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=44NOTUK_ALEPH001796004&context=L&vid=44NOTUK&lang=en_US&search_scope=44NOTUK_LOCAL&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=44notuk_local&query=any,contains,Copinger%20and%20Skone%20James%20on%20copyright&sortby=date&facet=frbrgroupid,include,2187621348&offset=0>
Geerts, P. 2014. ‘The Informed User in Design Law: What Should He Compare and How Should He Make the Comparison?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 36.3 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad82d080000014cc7fc5f475f46e363&docguid=I08352CC0926D11E38DA8999EF41581A2&hitguid=I08352CC0926D11E38DA8999EF41581A2&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=22&crumb-action=append&context=199&resolvein=true>
*George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1975] RPC 31 (HL). n.d. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IAE3160A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?navigationPath=Search%2Fv1%2Fresults%2Fnavigation%2Fi0ad6ad3f0000018b38ce72223ea4e3bf%3Fppcid%3D4360ee1fef20438689c761270b40ba61%26Nav%3DRESEARCH_COMBINED_WLUK%26fragmentIdentifier%3DIAE3160A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%26parentRank%3D0%26startIndex%3D1%26contextData%3D%2528sc.Search%2529%26transitionType%3DSearchItem&listSource=Search&listPageSource=dfa6dd4c48b03ec24b18c51b993eb10b&list=RESEARCH_COMBINED_WLUK&rank=1&sessionScopeId=68e60835cb05d3efaa069287b87b76b4354ba3e446b40545c01a74e445083a75&ppcid=4360ee1fef20438689c761270b40ba61&originationContext=Search%20Result&transitionType=SearchItem&contextData=(sc.Search)&comp=wluk>
Gimex International v The Chill Bag Company et al. [2012] EWPCC 31. n.d. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I6EEFDA90D52311E1A085ACF643AAFD83/View/FullText.html>
Green Lane Products v. PMS International [2008] EWCA Civ 358 (CA). n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/358.html>
Guild v Eskandar [2001] FSR 38 (ChD). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014cc7eaa95171791a1c&docguid=IB5992121E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IB5992120E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=10&crumb-action=append&context=90&resolvein=true>
Guild v Eskandar Ltd [2001] FSR 38 (ChD). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb760df05b4d50f6&docguid=IB5992121E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IB5992120E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=10&crumb-action=append&context=164&resolvein=true>
Guild v Eskandar Ltd [2003] FSR 3 (CA). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb77295045981871&docguid=IB598D300E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IB598ABF0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=10&crumb-action=append&context=171&resolvein=true>
Harris, M. 2002. ‘Unregistered Design Right: Nature of Reproduction Required for Infringement - Comparison with Copyright - Hedgehogs and Foxes (Case Comment on L Woolley Jewellers Ltd v A&A Jewellery Ltd [2003] FSR 15)’, European Intellectual Property Review, 24.12 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014ceb7ba50f6c872bdf&docguid=IB7784321E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB7784321E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=4&crumb-action=append&context=184&resolvein=true>
Jo-Y-Jo Ltd v Matalan Retail Ltd [2000] ECDR 178. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc640000014ceb71adee98465756&docguid=ICD3DFC60E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=ICD3DD550E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=9&crumb-action=append&context=145&resolvein=true>
*L Woolley Jewellers Ltd v A&A Jewellery Ltd [2003] FSR 15 (CA). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb7a4b80937b7888&docguid=ID62F6A20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=ID62F4311E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=15&crumb-action=append&context=179&resolvein=true>
Laddie, H. I. L., Peter Prescott, and Mary Vitoria. 2018. The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs, 5th ed (LexisNexis) <https://plus.lexis.com/api/permalink/a0e44302-212b-4eea-b84f-6625a5d9f493/?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
*Lambretta Clothing Co v Teddy Smith [2004] EWCA Civ 886 (CA). n.d.-a. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/886.html>
——. n.d.-b. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/886.html>
Landor & Hawa International Ltd v Azure Designs Ltd [2006] FSR 22. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb8103f00e04aa34&docguid=ID717F560E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=ID717CE50E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=16&crumb-action=append&context=201&resolvein=true>
Lewinski, Silke von. 2008. International Copyright Law and Policy (Oxford University Press)
*Lucasfilm v Ainsworth [2008] EWHC 1878 (Ch). n.d.-a. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014cc7e2391d420849d5&docguid=I40DB1A00B23311DD80B9FDC8389E03A8&hitguid=I82819F9065D711DDAB52A1D290E8D8E3&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=67&crumb-action=append&context=42&resolvein=true>
——. n.d.-b. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05e0000014cc7e2391d420849d5&docguid=I40DB1A00B23311DD80B9FDC8389E03A8&hitguid=I82819F9065D711DDAB52A1D290E8D8E3&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=67&crumb-action=append&context=42&resolvein=true>
Mackie Designs Inc v Behringer Specialised Studio Equipment (UK) Ltd & Others [1999] RPC 717. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d0640000014cc7ebc8ffb7b582dd&docguid=IEC52D580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEC52AE70E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=28&crumb-action=append&context=96&resolvein=true>
Magmatic v PMS International [2013] EWHC 1925. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb4fb2a822840f76&docguid=IE1F59CC0306F11E392B9EF6832C02EE2&hitguid=I4FDA17F0EA8111E2BC35D07BA96682D8&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=33&crumb-action=append&context=23&resolvein=true>
*Mark Wilkinson v Woodcraft Designs [1998] FSR 63. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb6f19b154971d1a&docguid=IEEB30CA0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEEB2E590E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=23&crumb-action=append&context=127&resolvein=true>
Marrakesh Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works For Persons Who Are Blind, Visually Impaired, or Otherwise Print Disabled 2013. n.d. <http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?doc_id=245323>
Massa, C., and A. Strowel. 2003. ‘Community Design: Cinderella Revamped’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 68–78 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb54daca6d690ec3&docguid=IB74C5120E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB74C5120E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=4&spos=4&epos=4&td=4&crumb-action=append&context=51&resolvein=true>
*Merlet v Mothercare [1986] RPC 115 (CA). n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014cc7e4da81d2942929&docguid=IF93D1BC0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IF93CF4B0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=33&crumb-action=append&context=60&resolvein=true>
*Metix v Maughan [1997] FSR 718. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d080000014cc7def4f25f46e11e&docguid=IF98150B0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IF98129A0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=23&crumb-action=append&context=21&resolvein=true>
Musker, D. 2003. ‘Hidden Meaning? UK Perspectives on Invisible in Use Designs’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 450–55 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d05f0000014cc7f94367182f3e16&docguid=I796B1E60E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I796B1E60E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=4&spos=4&epos=4&td=5&crumb-action=append&context=162&resolvein=true>
Ocular Sciences v AVCL [1997] RPC 289. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc640000014ceb6c485d984656fb&docguid=I1223ECE0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I1223C5D0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=122&crumb-action=append&context=109&resolvein=true>
Parker v Tidball [1997] FSR 680. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e0000014ceb6d5d6b54971d00&docguid=I19F8C710E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I19F8A001E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=16&crumb-action=append&context=115&resolvein=true>
*Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (CA). n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/936.html>
*Productores de Musica de Espana (Promusicae) v Telefonica de Espana SAU (C-275/06) [2008] All E.R. (EC) 809 (ECJ). n.d. <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?docid=70107&doclang=EN>
Ricketson, Sam, and Jane C. Ginsburg. 2022. International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond, Third edition (Oxford University Press) <https://academic.oup.com/book/43114>
Saez, V. 2002. ‘The Unregistered Community Design’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 585–90 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744d05e0000014cc7f5ed3e42084b3a&docguid=IB775AB11E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB775AB11E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=140&resolvein=true>
*Samsung Electronics v Apple [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat). n.d. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html>
Schlotelburg, M. 2003. ‘The Community Design: First Experience with Registrations’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 383–87 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c09a0000014ceb56ec088d86ef1f&docguid=IB75B9360E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB75B9360E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=57&resolvein=true>
Sealed Air v Sharp Interpack et al [2013] EWPCC 23. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014ceb8362689f8de10f&docguid=I34F76A70CD6F11E299D3E8A939A6423D&hitguid=I3AB3EB10C98111E2B196E864D308F4E0&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=12&crumb-action=append&context=225&resolvein=true>
Shelley v Rex Features [1994] EMLR 134. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744d05f0000014cc7e5900e182f3c6b&docguid=IA7A6EB50E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IA7A6C441E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=49&crumb-action=append&context=66&resolvein=true>
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 435, 104 S.Ct. 774, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984)). n.d. <http://uk.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?bhcp=1&db=708&findtype=Y&fn=%5Ftop&MT=208&ordoc=2004116619&pbc=13322657&rs=WLUK9%2E09&serialnum=1984103021&spa=ukmigrat%2D000&strRecreate=no&sv=Split&vr=2%2E0>
The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances 2012. n.d. <http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/avp_dc/avp_dc_20.pdf>
The Berne Convention 1886. n.d. <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283698>
The TRIPs Agreement. n.d. <https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/31bis_trips_01_e.htm>
The Universal Copyright Convention. n.d. <http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=15381&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>
The WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996. n.d. <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=295166>
Torremans, Paul, and Jon Holyoak. 2016a. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press)
——, and Jon Holyoak. 2016b. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press)
——, and Jon Holyoak. 2016c. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press)
——, and Jon Holyoak. 2016d. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press)
——, and Jon Holyoak. 2016e. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford University Press)
——, and Jon Holyoak. 2016f. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th edn (Oxford University Press)
‘United Kingdom Chancery Div. and CA Decisions’. n.d. <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service>
US Copyright Act. n.d. <http://www.copyright.gov/title17/>
*Vermaat v Boncrest [2001] FSR 43. n.d. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014cc7e69089fd3fb6e3&docguid=IE71C7E80E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IE71C7E80E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=4&crumb-action=append&context=84&resolvein=true>
Waelde, Charlotte, and others. 2016. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy, 4th ed (Oxford University Press)
Weston, S. 2012. ‘Software Interfaces - Stuck in the Middle: The Relationship between the Law and Software Interfaces in Regulating and Encouraging Interoperability’, IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, pp. 427–50 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014cc77593422279c93e&docguid=I18373E40C80911E19C6EBD03D9A013AE&hitguid=I18373E40C80911E19C6EBD03D9A013AE&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=64&resolvein=true>
Wilkinson, D. 2007. ‘Case Closed: Functional Designs Protected by Design Right’, European Intellectual Property Review, pp. 118–22 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=I90DD65F0B71011DBA965B828C7592EC4&hitguid=I90DD65F0B71011DBA965B828C7592EC4&srguid=i0ad629030000014ceb58fc78eee9fce6&spos=3&epos=3&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D3%26spos%3D3%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad629030000014ceb58fc78eee9fce6%26refer%3D%252Fmaf%252Fwluk%252Fapp%252Fdocument%253Fhitguid%253DI90DD65F0B71011DBA965B828C7592EC4%2526srguid%253Di0ad629030000014ceb58fc78eee9fce6%2526rank%253D3%2526docguid%253DI90DD65F0B71011DBA965B828C7592EC4%2526spos%253D3%2526crumb-action%253Dappend%2526td%253D3%2526resolvein%253Dtrue%2526epos%253D3%2526context%253D66%26epos%3D3%26hitguid%3DI90DD65F0B71011DBA965B828C7592EC4%26docguid%3DI5A7FB970B6FE11DBA87ED41C427A0CBD%26src%3Dri%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D69&crumb-action=append&context=71>
‘WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization’. n.d. <http://www.wipo.int/portal/en/>
