1.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
2.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
3.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
4.
Gardner, S.: An introduction to the law of trusts. Oxford University Press, New York (2011).
5.
McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424.
6.
Re Baden (No 2) [1973] 1 Ch 9.
7.
Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation, https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3253, (1992).
8.
Emery, C.T.: The most hallowed principle: certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment. The law quarterly review. 98, (1982).
9.
Parkinson, P.: Reconceptualising the express trust. Cambridge Law Journal. 61, (2002).
10.
Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust. Law Quarterly Review. 117, (2001).
11.
Explaining the Trust. The law quarterly review. (2015).
12.
Gardner, S.: An introduction to the law of trusts. Oxford University Press, New York (2011).
13.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
14.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
15.
Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291.
16.
Re Vandervell (No 2) [1967] 2 AC 291.
17.
Nelson v Greening & Sykes [2007] EWCA Civ 1358.
18.
Green, B.: Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell - A Contextual Reappraisal. Modern Law Review. (1984).
19.
Hodge, D.: Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 44, 341–350 (1980).
20.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
21.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
22.
Apr. 3, 4.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales: Re Rose [1952] Ch 499.
23.
Mascall v Mascall (1985) 50 P. & C.R. 119.
24.
Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075.
25.
Crown copyright: Curtis v Pulbrook [2011] EWHC 167 (Ch).
26.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
27.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
28.
Gardner, S.: An introduction to the law of trusts. Oxford University Press, New York (2011).
29.
Gravells, Nigel P.: Public Purpose Trusts. Modern Law Review. 40, (1977).
30.
Charities Act 2011, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/contents/enacted.
31.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
32.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
33.
Gardner, S.: An introduction to the law of trusts. Oxford University Press, New York (2011).
34.
Re Denley’s Trust Deed [1969] 1 Ch 373.
35.
Re Lipinski [1976] Ch 235.
36.
Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust. Law Quarterly Review. 117, (2001).
37.
Reconceptualising the express trust. Cambridge Law Journal. 61, (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197302001769.
38.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
39.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
40.
Feb. 12, 13, 14, 15; March 29(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales: Lloyds Bank Ltd v Rosset [1991] AC 107.
41.
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432.
42.
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53.
43.
Martin Dixon: Editor’s notebook: the still not ended, never-ending story. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 83–86 (2012).
44.
John Mee: Jones v Kernott: inferring and imputing in Essex. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 167–180 (2012).
45.
Marr (Appellant) v Collie (Respondent) (Bahamas).
46.
SIMON GARDNER.*: Rethinking family property. Law Quarterly Review. 263–300 (1993).
47.
Craig Rotherham: The property rights of unmarried cohabitees: the case for reform. Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 268–292 (2004).
48.
Roche, J.: RETURNING TO CLARITY AND PRINCIPLE: THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON STACK v DOWDEN. The Cambridge Law Journal. 76, 493–496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000769.
49.
Martin George*: Presuming too little about resulting and constructive trusts? Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 303–312 (2017).
50.
Sharing Homes | Law Commission, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/sharing-homes/#sharing-homes.
51.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
52.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
53.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
54.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
55.
Target Holdings v Redferns [1996] AC 421.
56.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
57.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
58.
Feb. 20.1941 Nov. 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales: Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378.
59.
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46.
60.
FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] 3 WLR 535.
61.
Murad v Al-Saraj [2005] EWCA Civ 959.
62.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
63.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
64.
Boscawen v Bajwa [1995] 4 All ER 769.
65.
Bishopgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan [1995] 1 All ER 347.
66.
Foskett v McKeown [1997] 3 All ER 392 (CA).
67.
Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL).
68.
Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Vaughan [1992] 4 All ER 22.
69.
The Federal Republic of Brazil and another (Respondents) v Durant International Corporation and another (Appellants) (Jersey).
70.
Rotherham, C.: Chapter 6, Tracing and Justice in Bankruptcy. In: Restitution and insolvency. pp. 113–133. Mansfield Press, London (2000).
71.
Smith, L.D.: Tracing into the Payment of a Debt. The Cambridge Law Journal. 54, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300083677.
72.
Hayton, D.: Chapter 1, Equity’s Identification Rules. In: Laundering and tracing. pp. 1–21. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1995).
73.
Pearce, R.A., Barr, W.: Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
74.
Penner, J.E., Lau, J.: The law of trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019).
75.
Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378.
76.
March 21, 22, 23; June 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales: Bank of Credit and Commerce International V Akindele [2001] Ch 437.
77.
SIMON GARDNER.*: Knowing assistance and knowing receipt: taking stock. Law Quarterly Review. 56–94 (1996).
78.
Thomas, S.B.: ‘Goodbye’ Knowing Receipt. ‘Hello’ Unconscientious Receipt. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 21, 239–265 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/21.2.239.
79.
Nicholls, Lord: Chapter 15, Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark, from: Restitution : past, present and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones. In: Restitution: past, present and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones. pp. 231–246. Hart, Oxford (1998).