Bibliography for Law of Trusts (LAWW3051) (LAWW3024) (LAWW3025) BETA

Apr. 3, 4.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales (no date) Re Rose [1952] Ch 499, *499 In Re Rose. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001648408161f5dd6478e&docguid=I8F996330E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I8F993C20E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=15&spos=15&epos=15&td=18&crumb-action=append&context=24&resolvein=true.

Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Vaughan [1992] 4 All ER 22 (no date). Available at: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-60B5-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638.

Bishopgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan [1995] 1 All ER 347 (no date). Available at: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60R5-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638.

Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn0itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.

Boscawen v Bajwa [1995] 4 All ER 769 (no date). Available at: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601G-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638.

‘Charities Act 2011’ (no date). Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/contents/enacted.

Craig Rotherham (2004) ‘The property rights of unmarried cohabitees: the case for reform’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, pp. 268–292. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73757D0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Crown copyright (no date) Curtis v Pulbrook [2011] EWHC 167 (Ch), Richard Anthony Curtis, Judith Anne Ambler, Susan Edlizbeth Broker (the personal representatives of Arthur Ronald Towns, deceased) v Richard Henry Pulbrook, Anucha Pulbrook, Alice Pulbrook. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada700000164840a83bcfb0e859c&docguid=IB45F3170363C11E09562B961F78E26BE&hitguid=I2225BC2030BF11E080B7E3968EE9A6A3&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=50&resolvein=true.

‘Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust’ (2001a) Law Quarterly Review, 117. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=8&resolvein=true.

‘Developing the obligation characteristic of the trust’ (2001b) Law Quarterly Review, 117. Available at: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=8&resolvein=true.

‘Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation’ (1992) The Canterbury law review. [Christchurch, N.Z: Faculty of Law of the University of Canterbury. Available at: https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3253.

Emery, C.T. (1982) ‘The most hallowed principle: certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment’, The law quarterly review, 98. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9e42ab19-4e99-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

‘Explaining the Trust’ (2015) The law quarterly review [Preprint], (131).

Feb. 12, 13, 14, 15; March 29(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales (no date) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Rosset [1991] AC 107, *107 Lloyds Bank Plc. Appellants v Rosset and Another Respondents. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001685be02319fb1ea9e0&docguid=IE21B2C20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IE21B0510E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=145&resolvein=true.

Feb. 20.1941 Nov. 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales (no date) Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378, *134 Regal (Hastings) Ltd. v Gulliver and Others. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad62903000001685c23b2651cbe6fc9&docguid=I853552A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I85352B90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=17&resolvein=true.

FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] 3 WLR 535 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2mdo1KdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa.

Foskett v McKeown [1997] 3 All ER 392 (CA) (no date). Available at: https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60JM-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638.

Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/foskett-v-mckeown.

Gardner, S. (2011a) An introduction to the law of trusts. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=845987.

Gardner, S. (2011b) An introduction to the law of trusts. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, S. (2011c) An introduction to the law of trusts. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, S. (2011d) An introduction to the law of trusts. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gravells, Nigel P. (1977) ‘Public Purpose Trusts’, Modern Law Review, 40. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr40&div=40&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab.

Green, B. (1984) ‘Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell - A Contextual Reappraisal’, Modern Law Review [Preprint]. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/modlr47&id=405.

Hayton, D. (1995) ‘Chapter 1, Equity’s Identification Rules’, in Laundering and tracing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–21. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730137f3-f691-e611-80c7-005056af4099.

Hodge, D. (1980) ‘Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited’, The Conveyancer and property lawyer, 44(1), pp. 341–350. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55e0443c-9aa3-e711-80cb-005056af4099.

John Mee (2012) ‘Jones v Kernott: inferring and imputing in Essex’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, pp. 167–180. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I16D6DF4187B011E1BF2ED535FDE7B006/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF.

March 21, 22, 23; June 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales (no date) Bank of Credit and Commerce International V Akindele [2001] Ch 437, *437 Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd and Another v Akindele. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada7000001685c2b9675e60a8ad6&docguid=I6EBA6DE0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I6EBA46D0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=7&spos=7&epos=7&td=8&crumb-action=append&context=51&resolvein=true.

Marr (Appellant) v Collie (Respondent) (Bahamas) (no date). Available at: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeJmZGdo2qdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa/marr-appellant-v-collie-respondent-bahamas.

Martin Dixon (2012) ‘Editor’s notebook: the still not ended, never-ending story’, Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, pp. 83–86. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I16D57FB087B011E1BF2ED535FDE7B006/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Martin George* (2017) ‘Presuming too little about resulting and constructive trusts? Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17’, The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, pp. 303–312. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC23552707E7411E7AA22E07DFD66C964/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Mascall v Mascall (1985) 50 P. & C.R. 119 (no date) *119 Mascall v Mascall. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001648409510b5dd64796&docguid=IEF8836F0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEF880FE0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=14&crumb-action=append&context=36&resolvein=true.

McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utn1aZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.

Murad v Al-Saraj [2005] EWCA Civ 959 (no date) Murad v Al-Saraj. Available at: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada7000001685c255a59b922c4e7&docguid=I096CC900E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I096CA1F0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=25&resolvein=true.

Nelson v Greening & Sykes [2007] EWCA Civ 1358 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJnXeJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF.

Nicholls, Lord (1998) ‘Chapter 15, Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark, from: Restitution : past, present and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones’, in Restitution: past, present and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones. Oxford: Hart, pp. 231–246. Available at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1772785.

Parkinson, P. (2002) ‘Reconceptualising the express trust’, Cambridge Law Journal, 61(3). Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0008197302001769.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018a) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018b) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018c) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018d) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018e) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018f) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018g) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018h) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018i) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018j) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018k) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pearce, R.A. and Barr, W. (2018l) Pearce & Stevens’ trusts and equitable obligations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019a) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019b) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019c) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019d) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019e) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019f) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019g) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019h) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019i) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019j) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Penner, J.E. and Lau, J. (2019k) The law of trusts. Eleventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.

Re Baden (No 2) [1973] 1 Ch 9 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnZqJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/badens-deed-trusts-no-2-in-re.

Re Denley’s Trust Deed [1969] 1 Ch 373 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2ydo2adnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.

Re Lipinski [1976] Ch 235 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4utmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.

Re Vandervell (No 2) [1967] 2 AC 291 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4ytm3Cdm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/vandervell-v-commissioners-of-inland-revenue.

‘Reconceptualising the express trust’ (2002) Cambridge Law Journal, 61(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197302001769.

Roche, J. (2017) ‘RETURNING TO CLARITY AND PRINCIPLE: THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON STACK v DOWDEN’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 76(3), pp. 493–496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000769.

Rotherham, C. (2000) ‘Chapter 6, Tracing and Justice in Bankruptcy’, in Restitution and insolvency. London: Mansfield Press, pp. 113–133. Available at: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e6a61b4-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.

Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXitn1qdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa.

Sharing Homes | Law Commission (no date). Available at: https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/sharing-homes/#sharing-homes.

SIMON GARDNER.* (1993) ‘Rethinking family property’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 263–300. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD0DED70E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

SIMON GARDNER.* (1996) ‘Knowing assistance and knowing receipt: taking stock’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 56–94. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCE41E51E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Smith, L.D. (1995) ‘Tracing into the Payment of a Debt’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 54(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300083677.

Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden.

Target Holdings v Redferns [1996] AC 421 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qJn0GdnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/target-holdings-ltd-v-redferns-hl.

The Federal Republic of Brazil and another (Respondents) v Durant International Corporation and another (Appellants) (Jersey) (no date). Available at: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXaJn1GJnZadlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa/the-federal-republic-of-brazil-and-another-respondents-v-durant.

Thomas, S.B. (2001) ‘“Goodbye” Knowing Receipt. “Hello” Unconscientious Receipt’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(2), pp. 239–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/21.2.239.

Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291 (no date). Available at: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJn5KJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha.