Apr. 3, 4.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales, Re Rose [1952] Ch 499 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001648408161f5dd6478e&docguid=I8F996330E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I8F993C20E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=15&spos=15&epos=15&td=18&crumb-action=append&context=24&resolvein=true>
Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Vaughan [1992] 4 All ER 22 <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-49F0-TWP1-60B5-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
Bishopgate Investment Management Ltd v Homan [1995] 1 All ER 347 <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60R5-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn0itmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Boscawen v Bajwa [1995] 4 All ER 769 <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601G-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
‘Charities Act 2011’ <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/25/contents/enacted>
Craig Rotherham, ‘The Property Rights of Unmarried Cohabitees: The Case for Reform’ [2004] Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 268 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73757D0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Crown copyright, Curtis v Pulbrook [2011] EWHC 167 (Ch) <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada700000164840a83bcfb0e859c&docguid=IB45F3170363C11E09562B961F78E26BE&hitguid=I2225BC2030BF11E080B7E3968EE9A6A3&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=50&resolvein=true>
‘Developing the Obligation Characteristic of the Trust’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=8&resolvein=true>
‘——’ (2001) 117 Law Quarterly Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d7c0c50008d93177f&docguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=ICCAEDD80E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=8&resolvein=true>
‘Discretionary Trusts and Powers of Appointment: Progressive Assimilation’ <https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/3253>
Emery CT, ‘The Most Hallowed Principle: Certainty of Beneficiaries of Trusts and Powers of Appointment’ (1982) 98 The law quarterly review <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9e42ab19-4e99-e711-80cb-005056af4099>
‘Explaining the Trust’ [2015] The law quarterly review
Feb. 12, 13, 14, 15; March 29(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales, Lloyds Bank Ltd v Rosset [1991] AC 107 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001685be02319fb1ea9e0&docguid=IE21B2C20E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IE21B0510E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=145&resolvein=true>
Feb. 20.1941 Nov. 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24.(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales, Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1942] 1 All ER 378 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad62903000001685c23b2651cbe6fc9&docguid=I853552A0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I85352B90E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=17&resolvein=true>
FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2014] 3 WLR 535 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadn2mdo1KdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa>
Foskett v McKeown [1997] 3 All ER 392 (CA) <https://plus.lexis.com/api/document/collection/uk/id/4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60JM-00000-00?context=1001073&federationidp=P48HCM59638>
Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GJn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/foskett-v-mckeown>
Gardner S, An Introduction to the Law of Trusts, vol Clarendon law series (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2011) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=845987>
——, An Introduction to the Law of Trusts, vol Clarendon law series (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, An Introduction to the Law of Trusts, vol Clarendon law series (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
——, An Introduction to the Law of Trusts, vol Clarendon law series (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
Gravells, Nigel P., ‘Public Purpose Trusts’ (1977) 40 Modern Law Review <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/modlr40&div=40&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab>
Green, B., ‘Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell - A Contextual Reappraisal’ [1984] Modern Law Review <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/modlr47&id=405>
Hayton D, ‘Chapter 1, Equity’s Identification Rules’, Laundering and tracing (Clarendon Press 1995) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730137f3-f691-e611-80c7-005056af4099>
Hodge D, ‘Secret Trusts: The Fraud Theory Revisited’ (1980) 44 The Conveyancer and property lawyer 341 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55e0443c-9aa3-e711-80cb-005056af4099>
John Mee, ‘Jones v Kernott: Inferring and Imputing in Essex’ [2012] Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 167 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I16D6DF4187B011E1BF2ED535FDE7B006/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
March 21, 22, 23; June 14(c) Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England & Wales, Bank of Credit and Commerce International V Akindele [2001] Ch 437 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada7000001685c2b9675e60a8ad6&docguid=I6EBA6DE0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I6EBA46D0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=7&spos=7&epos=7&td=8&crumb-action=append&context=51&resolvein=true>
Marr (Appellant) v Collie (Respondent) (Bahamas) <http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeJmZGdo2qdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa/marr-appellant-v-collie-respondent-bahamas>
Martin Dixon, ‘Editor’s Notebook: The Still Not Ended, Never-Ending Story’ [2012] Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 83 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I16D57FB087B011E1BF2ED535FDE7B006/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Martin George*, ‘Presuming Too Little about Resulting and Constructive Trusts? Marr v Collie [2017] UKPC 17’ [2017] The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 303 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC23552707E7411E7AA22E07DFD66C964/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Mascall v Mascall (1985) 50 P. & C.R. 119 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001648409510b5dd64796&docguid=IEF8836F0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IEF880FE0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=14&crumb-action=append&context=36&resolvein=true>
McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2utn1aZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Murad v Al-Saraj [2005] EWCA Civ 959 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada7000001685c255a59b922c4e7&docguid=I096CC900E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I096CA1F0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=25&resolvein=true>
Nelson v Greening & Sykes [2007] EWCA Civ 1358 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJnXeJmZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Nicholls, Lord, ‘Chapter 15, Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark, from: Restitution : Past, Present and Future : Essays in Honour of Gareth Jones’, Restitution: past, present and future : essays in honour of Gareth Jones (Hart 1998) <http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1772785>
Parkinson P, ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal <https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0008197302001769>
Pearce RA and Barr W, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
——, Pearce & Stevens’ Trusts and Equitable Obligations (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2018)
Penner JE and Lau J, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
——, The Law of Trusts (Eleventh edition, Oxford University Press 2019)
Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2qdn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Re Baden (No 2) [1973] 1 Ch 9 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnZqJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/badens-deed-trusts-no-2-in-re>
Re Denley’s Trust Deed [1969] 1 Ch 373 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2ydo2adnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Re Lipinski [1976] Ch 235 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm4utmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Re Vandervell (No 2) [1967] 2 AC 291 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4ytm3Cdm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/vandervell-v-commissioners-of-inland-revenue>
‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’ (2002) 61 Cambridge Law Journal
Roche J, ‘RETURNING TO CLARITY AND PRINCIPLE: THE PRIVY COUNCIL ON STACK v DOWDEN’ (2017) 76 The Cambridge Law Journal 493
Rotherham C, ‘Chapter 6, Tracing and Justice in Bankruptcy’, Restitution and insolvency (Mansfield Press 2000) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4e6a61b4-ec1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb>
Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXitn1qdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa>
‘Sharing Homes | Law Commission’ <https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/sharing-homes/#sharing-homes>
SIMON GARDNER.*, ‘Rethinking Family Property’ [1993] Law Quarterly Review 263 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD0DED70E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, ‘Knowing Assistance and Knowing Receipt: Taking Stock’ [1996] Law Quarterly Review 56 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCE41E51E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Smith LD, ‘Tracing into the Payment of a Debt’ (1995) 54 The Cambridge Law Journal
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden>
Target Holdings v Redferns [1996] AC 421 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qJn0GdnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/target-holdings-ltd-v-redferns-hl>
The Federal Republic of Brazil and Another (Respondents) v Durant International Corporation and Another (Appellants) (Jersey) <http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXaJn1GJnZadlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa/the-federal-republic-of-brazil-and-another-respondents-v-durant>
Thomas SB, ‘“Goodbye” Knowing Receipt. “Hello” Unconscientious Receipt’ (2001) 21 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 239
Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291 <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJn5KJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
