Ashley, Richard K. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. Millennium 17.2 (1988): 227–62. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bdd93bbb-290d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Bleilker, Roland. ‘Forget IR Theory’. Alternatives 22.1 (1997): 57–85. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=583bfcb1-4d58-e811-80cd-005056af4099.
Burchill, Scott. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
———. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Cox, Robert W. ‘Chapter 6, Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory (1981)’. Pages 85–123 in Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ba7af99e-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
———. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Keohane, Robert O. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32.4 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600589?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Laffey, Mark, and Tarah Barkawi. ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’. Review of International Studies 32.2 (2006): 329–52. http://search.proquest.com/docview/204894376/A33D8DDB9B9E414CPQ/8?accountid=8018.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52.4 (1998): 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Michael W. Doyle. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. The American Political Science Review 80.4 (1986): 1151–69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Schieder, Siegfried, Manuela Spindler, and Alex Skinner. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
Waltz, Kenneth N. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory.’ Journal of International Affairs. Spring/Summer 44.1 (n.d.). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9609193524&site=ehost-live.
Weber, Cynthia. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23.2 (1994): 337–49. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8b64a6b6-280d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
