Ashley, Richard K. 1988. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. Millennium 17 (2): 227–62. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bdd93bbb-290d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2017. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bleilker, Roland. 1997. ‘Forget IR Theory’. Alternatives 22 (1): 57–85. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=583bfcb1-4d58-e811-80cd-005056af4099.
Burchill, Scott. 2013a. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013b. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013c. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013d. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013e. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013f. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013g. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013h. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cox, Robert W. 1996. ‘Chapter 6, Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory (1981)’. In Approaches to World Order, Cambridge studies in international relations:85–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ba7af99e-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2016a. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016b. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016c. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016d. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016e. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016f. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016g. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016h. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016i. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2016j. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1988. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.
Laffey, Mark, and Tarah Barkawi. 2006. ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’. Review of International Studies 32 (2): 329–52. http://search.proquest.com/docview/204894376/A33D8DDB9B9E414CPQ/8?accountid=8018.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Michael W. Doyle. 1986. ‘Liberalism and World Politics’. The American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1151–69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Schieder, Siegfried, Manuela Spindler, and Alex Skinner. 2014a. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014b. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014c. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014d. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014e. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014f. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014g. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014h. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
———. 2014i. Theories of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1694670.
Waltz, Kenneth N. n.d. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory.’ Journal of International Affairs. Spring/Summer 44 (1). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=9609193524&site=ehost-live.
Weber, Cynthia. 1994. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls, and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (2): 337–49. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8b64a6b6-280d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.