Bibliography for International Human Rights Law (LAWW4112) (M34158) BETA

1.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

2.

Bisset A. Blackstone’s international human rights documents. 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

3.

Clapham A. Human rights: a very short introduction [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=415420

4.

Joseph S, Castan M. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: cases, materials, and commentary [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1426627

5.

Tomuschat C. Human rights: between idealism and realism. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

6.

Smith RKM. Textbook on international human rights. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

7.

Rehman J. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman; 2010.

8.

Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

9.

Bantekas I, Oette L. International human rights law and practice. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.

10.

Schutter O de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Third edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2019.

11.

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Pages/WelcomePage.aspx

12.

Universal Human Rights Index of UN Documents [Internet]. Available from: http://uhri.ohchr.org/

13.

Council of Europe [Internet]. Available from: http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/home

14.

Organisation of American States [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oas.org/en/default.asp

15.

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/

16.

African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://en.african-court.org/

17.

International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [Internet]. Available from: https://www.escr-net.org/

18.

Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/

19.

Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/

20.

University of Minnesota Human Rights Library [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/

21.

Bayefsky.com [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bayefsky.com/

22.

CCPR Centre [Internet]. Available from: http://ccprcentre.org/

23.

UPR Info [Internet]. Available from: https://www.upr-info.org/en

24.

ESCR-Net [Internet]. Available from: https://www.escr-net.org/

25.

History. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

26.

Baxi. Too Many, or Too Few, Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2001;1. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr1&div=9&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

27.

Alston. Conjuring Up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1984;78. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil78&div=37&start_page=607&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

28.

Tomuschat C. Human rights: between idealism and realism. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

29.

Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights in context : the successor to international human rights in context : law, politics, morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

30.

Ishay M. The history of human rights: from ancient times to the globalization era [Internet]. [2008 ed.] with a new preface. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4977910

31.

Sohn. The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States. American University Law Review [Internet]. 1982;32. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/aulr32&div=8&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

32.

Roberts CNJ. The contentious history of the International Bill of Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

33.

McCrudden C. Human Rights Histories. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2015;35(1):179–212.

34.

Politics. International human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

35.

Lauren PG. The evolution of international human rights: visions seen [Internet]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1998. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3442246

36.

Talking about Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2004;500–516. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IB69DC1A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

37.

Five Fables about Human Rights. The human rights reader: major political essays, speeches, and documents from ancient times to the present. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2007. p. 392–402.

38.

Shestack. The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1998;20. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq20&div=17&start_page=201&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

39.

Dembour. What are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2010;32. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq32&div=4&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

40.

Critiques. International human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

41.

Normative and Theoretical Foundations of Human Rights. Human rights: politics and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

42.

Gearty CA, Douzinas C. "Framing the project” of international human rights law: reflections on the dysfunctional "family” of the Universal Declaration. The Cambridge companion to human rights law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-human-rights-law/A3FD30DEE60D69914F5507B91A405A97#

43.

Sources. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

44.

The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles. Australian Yearbook of International Law [Internet]. 1988;12. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ayil12&div=9&start_page=82&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

45.

Lillich. The Growing Importance of Customary International Human Rights Law. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law [Internet]. 1995;25. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gjicl25&div=6&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

46.

Shaw MN. International law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

47.

Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

48.

The Legal Premises for the International Protection of Human Rights. The reality of international law: essays in honour of Ian Brownlie. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.

49.

Roberts. Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2001;95. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil95&div=53&start_page=757&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

50.

Developing Human Rights Through International Customary Law. Implementing human rights: essays in honour of Morten Kjærum. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights; 2007. p. 307–317.

51.

Thirlway H. Human Rights in Customary Law: An Attempt to Define Some of the Issues. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2015;28(03):495–506.

52.

Sohn. The Human Rights Law of the Charter. Texas Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1977;12. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tilj12&div=18&start_page=129&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

53.

Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19(3):491–508.

54.

Shelton. Hierarchy of Norms and Human Rights: Of Trumps and Winners. Saskatchewan Law Review [Internet]. 2002;65. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sasklr65&div=24&start_page=301&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

55.

Barelli. The Role of Soft Law in the International Legal System: The Case of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2009;58. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq58&div=57&start_page=957&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

56.

The Legal Status of Normative Pronouncements of Human Rights Treaty Bodies. 2011; Available from: http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=faculty_publications

57.

Nature of Obligations. International human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

58.

Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31 [Internet]. 26AD. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.13

59.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 3 [Internet]. 14AD. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2f1991%2f23%28SUPP%29

60.

The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1987;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&div=19&start_page=156&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

61.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 9 [Internet]. 3AD. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24

62.

Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RemedyAndReparation.aspx

63.

Legal differentiation and the concept of the human rights treaty in international law. European Journal of International Law. 2000;11(3):489–519.

64.

Reciprocity in Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. The British year book of international law. London: H. Frowde; 1994;65.

65.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 19 on the Right to Social Security [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2fGC%2f19

66.

Young. The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2008;33. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil33&div=7&start_page=113&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

67.

Koch. Dichotomies, Trichotomies or Waves of Duties? Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2005;5. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr5&div=8&start_page=81&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

68.

Sepúlveda Carmona MM. The nature of the obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Antwerpen: Intersentia; 2003.

69.

Nature of Obligations. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

70.

A, B AND C v. IRELAND [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["a, b, c"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-102332"]}

71.

Mellet v Ireland (Human Rights Committee) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F116%2FD%2F2324%2F2013&Lang=en

72.

The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Dreogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1985;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq7&div=9&start_page=3&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

73.

Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1986. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1987;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&div=16&start_page=122&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

74.

The Word ‘Laws’ in Article 30 of the American Convention on Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-06/86 [Internet]. 9AD. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_06_ing.pdf

75.

Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism. Human rights law journal: HRLJ. Kehl am Rhein [West Germany]: N.P. Engel; 1998;19.

76.

McGoldrick D. A DEFENCE OF THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND AN ARGUMENT FOR ITS APPLICATION BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2016 Jan;65(01):21–60.

77.

Benvenisti, E. Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 1999;31(4):843–854. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nyuilp31&id=851

78.

Arai-Takahashi Y. Chapter 19, Proportionality, The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 446–468. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1b469106-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb

79.

Brems E, Lavrysen L. ‘Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut’: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2015 Mar 1;15(1):139–168.

80.

Cosentino C. Safe and Legal Abortion: An Emerging Human Right? The Long-lasting Dispute with State Sovereignty in ECHR Jurisprudence. Human Rights Law Review. 2015 Sep;15(3):569–589.

81.

Wicks E. A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2011 Sep 1;11(3):556–566.

82.

Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 29 [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.11

83.

A and others v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (Belmarsh Detainees) [2004] UKHL 56 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1aJm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

84.

French Derogation from ECHR [Internet]. Available from: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=2389255&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=F7F8FB&BackColorIntranet=F7F8FB&BackColorLogged=F7F8FB&direct=true

85.

Turkish Derogation from ICCPR [Internet]. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2016/CN.580.2016-Eng.pdf

86.

Paris Minimum Standards on Human Rights Norms in a State of Emergency. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1985;79. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil79&id=1078&collection=journals&index=journals/ajil#1078

87.

From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2001;23. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq23&div=33&start_page=625&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

88.

Derogations under Human Rights Treaties. The British year book of international law. London: H. Frowde; 1976;48.

89.

Shah, Sangeeta. The UK’s Anti-Terror Legislation and the House of Lords: The First Skirmish. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2005;5. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr5&div=27&start_page=403&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

90.

Shah, Sangeeta. From Westminster to Strasbourg: A and Others v United Kingdom. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2009;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=33&start_page=473&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

91.

Bates E. A ‘Public Emergency Threatening the Life of the Nation’? The United Kingdom’s Derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights of 18 December 2001 and the ‘A’ Case. British Yearbook of International Law. 2006;76(1):245–336.

92.

Muler, Amrei. Limitations to and Derogations from Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2009;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=40&start_page=557&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

93.

Habeas Corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts 27(2), 25(1) and 7(6) American Convention on Human Rights), Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-8/87 [Internet]. 30AD. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_08_ing.pdf

94.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx

95.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 9 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24&Lang=en

96.

Committee on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No.9, 3 December 1998 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24&Lang=en

97.

Nolan A, Porter B, Langford M. The Justiciability of Social and Economic Rights: An Updated Appraisal. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1434944.

98.

Mahon, C. Progress at the Front: The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2008;8(4):617–646. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&id=625

99.

IDG v Spain (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E/C.12/55/D/2/2014&Lang=en

100.

Alston, Philip, Quinn G. Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, The. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1987;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&id=168&collection=journals&index=journals/hurq#168

101.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

102.

Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

103.

de Albuquerque C, Langford M. The Origins of the Optional Protocol. In: Langford M, editor. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Commentary - Pretoria University Law Press (PULP) [Internet]. p. 17–37. Available from: http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/component/edocman/the-optional-protocol-to-the-international-covenant-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-a-commentary

104.

Law Journal Library Nordic Journal of Human Rights - HeinOnline.org [Internet]. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnorjhur&collection=journals

105.

Rehman J. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman; 2010.

106.

Langford M. Social rights jurisprudence: emerging trends in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

107.

Pieterse, M. Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. South African Journal on Human Rights [Internet]. 2004;20(3):383–417. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/soafjhr20&id=393

108.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4 (1991) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCESCR%2fGEC%2f4759&Lang=en

109.

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 7 (1997) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCESCR%2fGEC%2f6430&Lang=en

110.

Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, UN Doc. A/67/286 (10 August 2012) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-67-286.pdf

111.

Grenfell Tower is a terrible betrayal of human rights | Leilani Farha | Housing Network | The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2017/jun/21/grenfell-tower-terrible-betrayal--human-rights-uk-government

112.

Hohmann J. Chapter 10, Principles, Politics and Practice: The Role of UN Special Rapporteurs on the Right to Adequate Housing in the Development of the Right to Housing in International Law. The United Nations special procedures system [Internet]. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff; 2017. p. 271–296. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=452ec161-f19d-e711-80cb-005056af4099

113.

Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, UN Doc. A/HRC/34/51 (18 January 2017) [Internet]. Available from: http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/34/51

114.

Hohmann J. The right to housing: law, concepts, possibilities [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1219555

115.

OHCHR | Annual Reports - Adequate housing [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx

116.

Nolan A. ‘Aggravated Violations’, Roma Housing Rights and Forced Expulsions in Italy: Recent Developments under the European Social Charter Collective Complaints System. Human Rights Law Review. 2011 Jun 1;11(2):343–361.

117.

Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others (CCT11/00) [2000] ZACC 19; 2001 (1) SA 46; 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (4 October 2000) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2000/19.html

118.

United Nations. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 375–387.

119.

Human Rights Committee. General Comment 24 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.6

120.

Harris DJ. Extract from Chapter 10, Section 3. The making of treaties. Cases and materials on international law [Internet]. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2015. p. 667–669. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a08f4f4-0c84-e711-80cb-005056af4099

121.

Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. Report of the USA to the Human Rights Committee and Concluding Observations of the Committee [Internet]. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8279300-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb

122.

General Assembly Resolution 68/268 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/268

123.

Human Rights Treaty Bodies [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/TreatyBodies.aspx

124.

Alston P. Chapter 9. Treaty Bodies: The ICCPR Human Rights Committee. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 768–787. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8279300-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb

125.

Final Report on enhancing the long-term effectiveness of the United Nations human rights treaty system, E/CN.4/1997/74 [Internet]. 27AD. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/DocumentsSystem.aspx

126.

Rodley, Nigel. United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures of the Commission on Human Rights - Complementarity or Competition. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2003;25. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq25&div=45&start_page=882&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

127.

O’Flaherty, Michael. The Concluding Observations of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2006;6. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr6&div=5&start_page=27&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

128.

Rodley N. The Role and Impact of Treaty Bodies. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

129.

Trechsel, Stefan. A World Court for Human Rights. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights [Internet]. 2003;1. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr1&div=5&start_page=[i]&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

130.

The Historical Origins of the Concept of "General Comments” in Human Rights Law. The international legal system in quest of equity and universality =: L’ordre juridique international, un système en quête d’équité et universalité : liber amicorum Georges Abi-Saab. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2001.

131.

Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body, HRI/MC/2006/2 [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/icm-mc/docs/HRI.MC.2006.2.pdf

132.

O’Flaherty, Michael. Reform of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Bodies: A Critique of the Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=12&start_page=141&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

133.

Johnstone, Rachael Lorna. Cynical Savings or Reasonable Reform - Reflections on a Single Unified UN Human Rights Treaty Body. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=13&start_page=173&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

134.

Nowak, Manfred. The Need for a World Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=16&start_page=251&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=2&men_tab=srchresults

135.

Alston P, Crawford J. The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

136.

Bayefsky AF. The UN human rights treaty system in the 21st century. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2000.

137.

O’Flaherty M. Human rights and the UN: practice before the treaty bodies. 2nd ed. The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers; 2002.

138.

Keller H, Ulfstein G, Grover L. UN human rights treaty bodies: law and legitimacy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=880630

139.

Conte, Alex. Defining Civil and Political Rights [Internet]. Ashgate Publishing Group; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=438372

140.

Phuong, Catherine. The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee: Has the Same Matter Already Been Examined. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=26&start_page=385&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults

141.

Joseph S, Castan M. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: cases, materials, and commentary [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1426627

142.

United Nations. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

143.

Alston P. Chapter 8, The United Nations Human Rights System.  B The UN Human Rights Council. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 694–737. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9221fb3a-a76a-e611-80c6-005056af4099

144.

UK’s Universal Periodic Review – Annex Document, September 2012, A/HRC.21/9 Add.1 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A.HRC.21.9.Add.1_en.pdf

145.

Alston P. The United Nations and human rights: a critical appraisal. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1992.

146.

Gaer FD, Broecker CL. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Conscience for the World [Internet]. 1st ed. Boston: BRILL; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1524060

147.

Piccone T. Catalysts for Change: How the U. N. ’s Independent Experts Promote Human Rights [Internet]. 1st ed. Blue Ridge Summit: Brookings Institution Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=951312

148.

Nolan A, Freedman R, Murphy T. The United Nations special procedures system [Internet]. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4790457

149.

Freedman R. The United Nations Human Rights Council: a critique and early assessment [Internet]. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1154301

150.

Alfredsson G. International human rights monitoring mechanisms: essays in honour of Jakob Th. Möller. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2001.

151.

Alston, Philip. Neither Fish nor Fowl: The Quest to Define the Role of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. European Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1997;8. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurint8&div=28&start_page=321&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

152.

Lauren, Paul Gordon. To Preserve and Build on Its Achievements and to Redress Its Shortcomings: The Journey from the Commission on Human Rights to the Human Rights Council. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2007;29. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq29&div=18&start_page=307&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

153.

The United Nations Human Rights Council: Origins, Antecedents, and Prospects. New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546

154.

Developments at the Human Rights Council in 2007: A Reflection of Its Ambivalence. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2008;8. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&div=19&start_page=323&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

155.

Alston, Philip. Promoting the Accountability of Members of the New UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy [Internet]. 2005;15. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jtrnlwp15&div=6&start_page=49&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

156.

Abebe, Allehone Mulugeta. Of Shaming and Bargaining: African States and the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2009;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=4&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

157.

Sweeney, Gareth. An NGO Assessment of the New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2009;9. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=17&start_page=203&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

158.

Scannella, Patrizia. United Nations Human Rights Council: A Promise to be Fulfilled. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=8&start_page=41&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

159.

Alston, Philip. Reconceiving the UN Human Rights Regime: Challenges Confronting the New UN Human Rights Council. Melbourne Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2006;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil7&div=13&start_page=185&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

160.

Reforming the UN Human Rights Protection Procedures: A Legal Perspective on the Establishment of the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism. New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546

161.

United Nations Charter-Based Protection of Human Rights. United Nations charter-based protection of human rights. Turku/Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Institute for Human Rights; 2009.

162.

Gutter, Jeroen. Special Procedures and the Human Rights Council: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=10&start_page=93&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

163.

Boyle K. The United Nations Human Rights Council, Its Special Procedures, and its Relationship with the Treaty Bodies: Complementarity or Competition? New institutions for human rights protection [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546

164.

Flynn, E.J. The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;7. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=25&start_page=371&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults

165.

Ramirez Reyes S. CANTÚ RIVERA, Humberto (ed.), The Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. CANTÚ RIVERA, Humberto (ed), The Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council [Internet]. 2017;17:839–843. Available from: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-internacional/article/view/11055

166.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

167.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

168.

Steiner, Alston and Goodman (eds), International Human Rights in Context. Law, Politics and Morals. p. 925–932.

169.

Shelton D, Wright-Carozza P. Regional protection of human rights [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1274301

170.

Helfer, Laurence R. Forum Shopping for Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Internet]. 1999;148. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/pnlr148&id=305&collection=journals&index=journals/pnlr#305

171.

Gearty CA, Douzinas C. The Cambridge companion to human rights law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-human-rights-law/A3FD30DEE60D69914F5507B91A405A97

172.

Heyns C, Killander M. Universality and the Growth of Regional Systems. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

173.

Saunders, Pammela Quinn. Integrated Enforcement of Human Rights, The. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2012;45. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp45&id=101&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp#101

174.

Walker S. Chapter 16: International Human Rights Law: Towards Pluralism or Harmony? The Opportunities and Challenges of Coexistence: The View from the UN Treaty Bodies. Towards convergence in international human rights law: approaches of regional and international systems [Internet]. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff; 2017. p. 493–515. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=4772281&ppg=533

175.

Frans Viljoen and Lirette Louw. State Compliance with the Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 1994-2004. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 2007;101(1):1–34. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4149821?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

176.

Huneeus AV, Madsen MR. Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2017;

177.

Viljoen, F. The Relevance of the Inter-American Human Rights System for Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law [Internet]. 1999;(4). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/afjincol11&id=679

178.

Neuman GL. Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Feb 1;19(1):101–123.

179.

Farer TJ. The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox. Human Rights Quarterly. 1997;19(3):510–546.

180.

Grossman, C. The Inter-American System of Human Rights: Challenges for the Future. Indiana Law Journal [Internet]. 2008; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/indana83&id=1275

181.

Shah S. Detention and Trial. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

182.

Human Rights Committee, General Comment 35 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2fGC%2f35&Lang=en

183.

Human Rights Committee, General Comment 32 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2fGC%2f32&Lang=en

184.

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinion No 54/2015 [Internet]. 22AD. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Detention/A.HRC.WGAD.2015.docx#sthash.CMUp2gDi.dpuf

185.

Rodley NS, Pollard M, Oxford University Press. The treatment of prisoners under international law [Internet]. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199693566.001.0001

186.

Udombana, N. J. The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights and the Development of Fair Trial Norms in Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal [Internet]. 2006;(2). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/afrhurlj6&id=309

187.

Inter-American Commission, Report on the Use of Pretrial Detention in the Americas [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/pdl/reports/pdfs/Report-PD-2013-en.pdf

188.

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Deliberation No 9 concerning the definition and scope of arbitrary detention in customary international law (2013) [Internet]. Available from: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/189/35/PDF/G1218935.pdf?OpenElement

189.

Weissbrodt DS, Mitchell B. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: Procedures and Summary of Jurisprudence. Human Rights Quarterly. 2016;38(3):655–705.

190.

Weissbrodt DS, Hallendorff M. Travaux Preparatoires of the Fair Trial Provisions -- Articles 8 to 11 -- of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1999;21(4):1061–1096.

191.

Droege, C. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/israel40&id=310

192.

Serdar Mohammed v. MoD [Internet]. Available from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/mohammed-v-mod.pdf

193.

HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["hassan"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-146501"]}

194.

Milanovic, Marko. Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1531596

195.

Milanovic, Marko. The Lost Origins of Lex Specialis: Rethinking the Relationship between Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2463957

196.

Milanovic, Marko. Extraterritorial Derogations from Human Rights Treaties in Armed Conflict. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2447183

197.

Krieger H. A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship Between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 2006 Jul 12;11(2):265–291.

198.

Provost R, ebrary, Inc. International human rights and humanitarian law [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2002. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uon/Doc?id=10014584

199.

Abresch W. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law. 2005 Sep 1;16(4):741–767.

200.

Doswald-Beck L, Vité S. International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross. 1993 Apr;33(293).

201.

Ben Naftali O, Oxford University Press. International humanitarian law and international human rights law: pas de deux [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780191001604.001.0001

202.

Boyle K, Shah S. chapter 11, Thought, Expression, Association and Assembly. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 217–237.

203.

Robert Faurisson v. France, Communication No. 550/1993 , U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993(1996). [Internet]. Available from: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/VWS55058.htm

204.

Human Rights Committee General Comment 34 [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf

205.

Schauer F. The Exceptional First Amendment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2005;

206.

Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.

207.

Barendt EM. Freedom of speech. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

208.

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights: a dialogue on freedom of expression standards. European Human Rights Law Review. 2009;

209.

Hare I, Weinstein J, Oxford University Press. Extreme speech and democracy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.001.0001

210.

Keller H, Sigron M. State Security v Freedom of Expression: Legitimate Fight against Terrorism or Suppression of Political Opposition? Human Rights Law Review. 2010 Mar 1;10(1):151–168.

211.

Keun-Tae Kim (represented by Mr.Yong Whan Cho, Duksu Law Offices, in Seoul) v. Republic of Korea, Communication No 574/1994 CCPR/C/64/D/574/1994(4 January 1999). [Internet]. Available from: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session64/view574.htm

212.

ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["animal defenders"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-119244"]}

213.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

214.

SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["schalk"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-99605"]}

215.

Obergefell v Hodges [Internet]. Available from: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

216.

Human Rights Committee General Comment 18 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6622&Lang=en

217.

Arieh Hollis Waldman (Initially represented by Mr. Raj Anand from Scott & Aylen, a law firm in Toronto, Ontario) v. Canada, Communication No. 694/1996, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/67/D/694/1996 (5 November 1999). [Internet]. Available from: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session67/view694.htm

218.

Jacobs v Belgium [Internet]. Available from: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/943-2000.html

219.

ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["abdulaziz"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-57416"]}

220.

THLIMMENOS v. GREECE [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["thlimmenos"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-58561"]}

221.

TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["timishev"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-71627"]}

222.

D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["DH"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-83256"]}

223.

SEJDIĆ AND FINCI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["Sejdic"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-96491"]}

224.

MATHIEU-MOHIN AND CLERFAYT v. BELGIUM [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["clerfayt"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-57536"]}

225.

GLOR v. SWITZERLAND [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["glor"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-92525"]}

226.

S.L. v. AUSTRIA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["sl v austria"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-60877"]}

227.

EJIL: Talk! – Living Instruments, Judicial Impotence, and the Trajectories of Gay Rights in Europe and in the United States [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/living-instruments-judicial-impotence-and-the-trajectories-of-gay-rights-in-europe-and-in-the-united-states/

228.

The Concepts of Equality and Non-Discrimination in Europe: A Practical Approach [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4553

229.

Young v Australia [Internet]. Available from: http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/941-2000.html

230.

Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

231.

Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, MyiLibrary. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com?id=397074

232.

CEDAW General Recommendation 25 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT/CEDAW/GEC/3733&Lang=en

233.

Charlesworth, H. Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations. Harvard Human Rights Journal [Internet]. 2005;(18). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hhrj18&id=7

234.

Johnstone, R. Feminist Influences on the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;(1). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hurq28&id=156

235.

Nussbaum MC. Women’s Progress and Women’s Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2016;38(3):589–622.

236.

Charlesworth, H.; Chinkin, C.; Wright, S. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1991; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ajil85&id=633

237.

Byrnes, A.; Bath, E. Violence against Women, the Obligation of Due Diligence, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women - Recent Developments. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2008;(3). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&id=523

238.

Brems, E. Enemies or Allies - Feminism and Cultural Relativism as Dissident Voices in Human Rights Discourse. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1997;(1). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hurq19&id=146

239.

Bond, J. E. International Intersectionality: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Exploration of Women’s International Human Rights Violations. Emory Law Journal [Internet]. 2003; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/emlj52&id=83

240.

Schopp-Schilling, H. Treaty Body Reform: The Case of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2007;(1). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&id=203

241.

Charlesworth H. What are Women’s International Human Rights? Human rights of women: national and international perspectives [Internet]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3441683

242.

CESCR General Comment 16 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f2005%2f4&Lang=en

243.

ILC Articles on State Responsibility 2001 [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf

244.

Joseph S, Fletcher A. Scope of Application. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

245.

BANKOVI� AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM AND OTHERS [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["bankovic"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER","DECISIONS"],"itemid":["001-22099"]}

246.

AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["al-skeini"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-105606"]}

247.

Coomans F, Kamminga MT. Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2004.

248.

Gondek M. The reach of human rights in a globalising world: extraterritorial application of human rights treaties. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2009.

249.

Milanovic M. From Compromise to Principle: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights Treaties. Human Rights Law Review. 2008 Jan 1;8(3):411–448.

250.

Milanovic M, Oxford University Press. Extraterritorial application of human rights treaties: law, principles and policy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4700311

251.

Milanovic M. Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. European Journal of International Law. 2012 Feb 1;23(1):121–139.

252.

Thienel T. The ECHR in Iraq: The Judgment of the House of Lords in R (Al-Skeini) v. Secretary of State for Defence. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008 Mar 1;6(1):115–128.

253.

AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["al-saadoon"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-97575"]}

254.

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory | International Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/131/advisory-opinions

255.

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) | International Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/116/judgments

256.

MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS v. FRANCE [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["medvedyev"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-97979"]}

257.

EJIL: Talk! – UK Supreme Court Decides Smith (No. 2) v. The Ministry of Defence [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/uk-supreme-court-decides-smith-no-2-v-the-ministry-of-defence/

258.

JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["jaloud"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-148367"]}

259.

CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["chiragov"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-155353"]}

260.

SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["sargsyan"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-155662"]}

261.

EJIL: Talk! – Extraterritorial Application Archive [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/category/human-rights/extraterritorial-application/

262.

Wilde, R. Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties. Israel Law Review [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/israel40&id=503

263.

GA Resolution 68/167 (18 December 2013) [Internet]. Available from: https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/documents/UN-131218-RightToPrivacy.pdf

264.

Human Rights Committee General Comment 16 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6624&Lang=en

265.

ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA [Internet]. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["roman zakharov"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-159324"]}

266.

International Principles for the Application of Human Rights to Communication Surveillance [Internet]. Available from: https://www.eff.org/files/necessaryandproportionatefinal.pdf

267.

OHCHR Report on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/hrc/regularsessions/session27/documents/a.hrc.27.37_en.pdf

268.

Deeks, A. An International Legal Framework for Surveillance. Virginia Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/vajint55&id=299

269.

Margulies, P. The NSA in Global Perspective: Surveillance, Human Rights, and International Counterterrorism. Fordham Law Review [Internet]. 2014; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/flr82&id=2176

270.

Milanovic, M. Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2015; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj56&id=87

271.

EJIL: Talk! – ECHR Jurisdiction and Mass Surveillance: Scrutinising the UK Investigatory Power Tribunal’s Recent Ruling [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/echr-jurisdiction-and-mass-surveillance-scrutinising-the-uk-investigatory-power-tribunals-recent-ruling/

272.

EJIL: Talk! – First Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy to the Human Rights Council [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/first-report-of-the-un-special-rapporteur-on-the-right-to-privacy-to-the-human-rights-council/

273.

Update on the "Snooper’s Charter” | Just Security [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justsecurity.org/30230/updates-snoopers-charter-second-reading/