1.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
2.
Bisset A. Blackstone’s International Human Rights Documents. 11th ed. Oxford University Press; 2018.
3.
Clapham A. Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Vol Very short introductions. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=415420
4.
Joseph S, Castan M. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials, and Commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1426627
5.
Tomuschat C. Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism. Vol The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
6.
Smith RKM. Textbook on International Human Rights. 7th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.
7.
Rehman J. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Longman; 2010.
8.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013.
9.
Bantekas I, Oette L. International Human Rights Law and Practice. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2016.
10.
Schutter O de. International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary. Third edition. Cambridge University Press; 2019.
11.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Pages/WelcomePage.aspx
12.
Universal Human Rights Index of UN Documents. http://uhri.ohchr.org/
13.
Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/home
14.
Organisation of American States. http://www.oas.org/en/default.asp
15.
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. http://www.achpr.org/
16.
African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights. http://en.african-court.org/
17.
International Network for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. https://www.escr-net.org/
18.
Human Rights Watch. http://www.hrw.org/
19.
Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/
20.
University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/
21.
Bayefsky.com. http://www.bayefsky.com/
22.
CCPR Centre. http://ccprcentre.org/
23.
UPR Info. https://www.upr-info.org/en
24.
ESCR-Net. https://www.escr-net.org/
25.
History. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
26.
Baxi. Too Many, or Too Few, Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2001;1. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr1&div=9&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
27.
Alston. Conjuring Up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control. American Journal of International Law. 1984;78. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil78&div=37&start_page=607&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
28.
Tomuschat C. Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism. Vol The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
29.
Alston P, Goodman R. International Human Rights in Context : The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Law, Politics, Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013.
30.
Ishay M. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. [2008 ed.] with a new preface. University of California Press; 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4977910
31.
Sohn. The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States. American University Law Review. 1982;32. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/aulr32&div=8&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
32.
Roberts CNJ. The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights. Vol Cambridge studies in law and society. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
33.
McCrudden C. Human Rights Histories. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2015;35(1):179-212. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqu020
34.
Politics. In: International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2017.
35.
Lauren PG. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Vol Pennsylvania studies in human rights. University of Pennsylvania Press; 1998. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3442246
36.
Talking about Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review. Published online 2004:500-516. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IB69DC1A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
37.
Five Fables about Human Rights. In: The Human Rights Reader: Major Political Essays, Speeches, and Documents from Ancient Times to the Present. 2nd ed. Routledge; 2007:392-402.
38.
Shestack. The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1998;20. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq20&div=17&start_page=201&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
39.
Dembour. What are Human Rights? Four Schools of Thought. Human Rights Quarterly. 2010;32. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq32&div=4&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
40.
Critiques. In: International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2017.
41.
Normative and Theoretical Foundations of Human Rights. In: Human Rights: Politics and Practice. Oxford University Press; 2009.
42.
Gearty CA, Douzinas C. "Framing the project” of international human rights law: reflections on the dysfunctional "family” of the Universal Declaration. In: The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. Vol Cambridge companions. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-human-rights-law/A3FD30DEE60D69914F5507B91A405A97#
43.
Sources. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
44.
The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens, and General Principles. Australian Yearbook of International Law. 1988;12. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ayil12&div=9&start_page=82&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
45.
Lillich. The Growing Importance of Customary International Human Rights Law. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law. 1995;25. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gjicl25&div=6&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
46.
Shaw MN. International Law. 7th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
47.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013.
48.
The Legal Premises for the International Protection of Human Rights. In: The Reality of International Law: Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie. Oxford University Press; 1999.
49.
Roberts. Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation. American Journal of International Law. 2001;95. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil95&div=53&start_page=757&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
50.
Developing Human Rights Through International Customary Law. In: Implementing Human Rights: Essays in Honour of Morten Kjærum. Danish Institute for Human Rights; 2007:307-317.
51.
Thirlway H. Human Rights in Customary Law: An Attempt to Define Some of the Issues. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2015;28(03):495-506. doi:10.1017/S0922156515000266
52.
Sohn. The Human Rights Law of the Charter. Texas Journal of International Law. 1977;12. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tilj12&div=18&start_page=129&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
53.
Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19(3):491-508. doi:10.1093/ejil/chn026
54.
Shelton. Hierarchy of Norms and Human Rights: Of Trumps and Winners. Saskatchewan Law Review. 2002;65. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sasklr65&div=24&start_page=301&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
55.
Barelli. The Role of Soft Law in the International Legal System: The Case of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2009;58. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq58&div=57&start_page=957&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
56.
The Legal Status of Normative Pronouncements of Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Published online 2011. http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1387&context=faculty_publications
57.
Nature of Obligations. In: International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2017.
58.
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31. Published online 26AD. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.13
59.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 3. Published online 14AD. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2f1991%2f23%28SUPP%29
60.
The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1987;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&div=19&start_page=156&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
61.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 9. Published online 3AD. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24
62.
Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RemedyAndReparation.aspx
63.
Legal differentiation and the concept of the human rights treaty in international law. European Journal of International Law. 2000;11(3):489-519. doi:10.1093/ejil/11.3.489
64.
Reciprocity in Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. The British year book of international law. 1994;65.
65.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General Comment No. 19 on the Right to Social Security. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2fGC%2f19
66.
Young. The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content. Yale Journal of International Law. 2008;33. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil33&div=7&start_page=113&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
67.
Koch. Dichotomies, Trichotomies or Waves of Duties? Human Rights Law Review. 2005;5. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr5&div=8&start_page=81&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
68.
Sepúlveda Carmona MM. The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Vol School of Human Rights Research series. Intersentia; 2003.
69.
Nature of Obligations. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
70.
A, B AND C v. IRELAND. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["a, b, c"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-102332"]}
71.
Mellet v Ireland (Human Rights Committee). http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2F116%2FD%2F2324%2F2013&Lang=en
72.
The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Dreogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1985;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq7&div=9&start_page=3&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
73.
Limburg Principles on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1986. Human Rights Quarterly. 1987;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&div=16&start_page=122&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
74.
The Word ‘Laws’ in Article 30 of the American Convention on Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-06/86.; 9AD. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_06_ing.pdf
75.
Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism. Human rights law journal: HRLJ. 1998;19.
76.
McGoldrick D. A DEFENCE OF THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND AN ARGUMENT FOR ITS APPLICATION BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2016;65(01):21-60. doi:10.1017/S0020589315000457
77.
Benvenisti, E. Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 1999;31(4):843-854. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nyuilp31&id=851
78.
Arai-Takahashi Y. Chapter 19, Proportionality, The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2013:446-468. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1b469106-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
79.
Brems E, Lavrysen L. ‘Don’t Use a Sledgehammer to Crack a Nut’: Less Restrictive Means in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2015;15(1):139-168. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu040
80.
Cosentino C. Safe and Legal Abortion: An Emerging Human Right? The Long-lasting Dispute with State Sovereignty in ECHR Jurisprudence. Human Rights Law Review. 2015;15(3):569-589. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngv013
81.
Wicks E. A, B, C v Ireland: Abortion Law under the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2011;11(3):556-566. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngr015
82.
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 29. Published online 31AD. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.11
83.
A and Others v Secretary of State for Home Affairs (Belmarsh Detainees) [2004] UKHL 56. https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1aJm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
84.
French Derogation from ECHR. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&id=2389255&Site=COE&BackColorInternet=F7F8FB&BackColorIntranet=F7F8FB&BackColorLogged=F7F8FB&direct=true
85.
Turkish Derogation from ICCPR. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2016/CN.580.2016-Eng.pdf
86.
Paris Minimum Standards on Human Rights Norms in a State of Emergency. American Journal of International Law. 1985;79. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajil79&id=1078&collection=journals&index=journals/ajil#1078
87.
From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2001;23. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq23&div=33&start_page=625&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
88.
Derogations under Human Rights Treaties. The British year book of international law. 1976;48.
89.
Shah, Sangeeta. The UK’s Anti-Terror Legislation and the House of Lords: The First Skirmish. Human Rights Law Review. 2005;5. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr5&div=27&start_page=403&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
90.
Shah, Sangeeta. From Westminster to Strasbourg: A and Others v United Kingdom. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=33&start_page=473&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
91.
Bates E. A ‘Public Emergency Threatening the Life of the Nation’? The United Kingdom’s Derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights of 18 December 2001 and the ‘A’ Case. British Yearbook of International Law. 2006;76(1):245-336. doi:10.1093/bybil/76.1.245
92.
Muler, Amrei. Limitations to and Derogations from Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=40&start_page=557&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
93.
Habeas Corpus in Emergency Situations (Arts 27(2), 25(1) and 7(6) American Convention on Human Rights), Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-8/87.; 30AD. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_08_ing.pdf
94.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx
95.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 9. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24&Lang=en
96.
Committee on Economic,Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No.9, 3 December 1998. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f1998%2f24&Lang=en
97.
Nolan A, Porter B, Langford M. The Justiciability of Social and Economic Rights: An Updated Appraisal. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1434944.
98.
Mahon, C. Progress at the Front: The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2008;8(4):617-646. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&id=625
99.
IDG v Spain (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E/C.12/55/D/2/2014&Lang=en
100.
Alston, Philip, Quinn G. Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, The. Human Rights Quarterly. 1987;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq9&id=168&collection=journals&index=journals/hurq#168
101.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
102.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013.
103.
de Albuquerque C, Langford M. The Origins of the Optional Protocol. In: Langford M, ed. The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Commentary - Pretoria University Law Press (PULP). ; :17-37. http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/component/edocman/the-optional-protocol-to-the-international-covenant-on-economic-social-and-cultural-rights-a-commentary
104.
Law Journal Library Nordic Journal of Human Rights - HeinOnline.org. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnorjhur&collection=journals
105.
Rehman J. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Longman; 2010.
106.
Langford M. Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press; 2008.
107.
Pieterse, M. Coming to Terms with Judicial Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights. South African Journal on Human Rights. 2004;20(3):383-417. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/soafjhr20&id=393
108.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4 (1991). http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCESCR%2fGEC%2f4759&Lang=en
109.
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No 7 (1997). http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCESCR%2fGEC%2f6430&Lang=en
110.
Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, UN Doc. A/67/286 (10 August 2012). http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-67-286.pdf
111.
Grenfell Tower is a terrible betrayal of human rights | Leilani Farha | Housing Network | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/housing-network/2017/jun/21/grenfell-tower-terrible-betrayal--human-rights-uk-government
112.
Hohmann J. Chapter 10, Principles, Politics and Practice: The Role of UN Special Rapporteurs on the Right to Adequate Housing in the Development of the Right to Housing in International Law. In: The United Nations Special Procedures System. Vol Nottingham studies on human rights. Brill Nijhoff; 2017:271-296. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=452ec161-f19d-e711-80cb-005056af4099
113.
Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, UN Doc. A/HRC/34/51 (18 January 2017). http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/34/51
114.
Hohmann J. The Right to Housing: Law, Concepts, Possibilities. Hart; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1219555
115.
OHCHR | Annual Reports - Adequate housing. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx
116.
Nolan A. ‘Aggravated Violations’, Roma Housing Rights and Forced Expulsions in Italy: Recent Developments under the European Social Charter Collective Complaints System. Human Rights Law Review. 2011;11(2):343-361. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngr013
117.
Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others (CCT11/00) [2000] ZACC 19; 2001 (1) SA 46; 2000 (11) BCLR 1169 (4 October 2000). http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2000/19.html
118.
United Nations. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014:375-387.
119.
Human Rights Committee. General Comment 24. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.6
120.
Harris DJ. Extract from Chapter 10, Section 3. The making of treaties. In: Cases and Materials on International Law. 8th ed. Sweet & Maxwell; 2015:667-669. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2a08f4f4-0c84-e711-80cb-005056af4099
121.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. Report of the USA to the Human Rights Committee and Concluding Observations of the Committee. International human rights: the successor to International human rights in context : laws, politics and morals : text and materials. Published online 2013. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8279300-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
122.
General Assembly Resolution 68/268. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/268
123.
Human Rights Treaty Bodies. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/TreatyBodies.aspx
124.
Alston P. Chapter 9. Treaty Bodies: The ICCPR Human Rights Committee. In: International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013:768-787. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8279300-ed1d-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
125.
Final Report on enhancing the long-term effectiveness of the United Nations human rights treaty system, E/CN.4/1997/74. Published online 27AD. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/DocumentsSystem.aspx
126.
Rodley, Nigel. United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures of the Commission on Human Rights - Complementarity or Competition. Human Rights Quarterly. 2003;25. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq25&div=45&start_page=882&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
127.
O’Flaherty, Michael. The Concluding Observations of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Human Rights Law Review. 2006;6. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr6&div=5&start_page=27&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
128.
Rodley N. The Role and Impact of Treaty Bodies. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2013.
129.
Trechsel, Stefan. A World Court for Human Rights. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights. 2003;1. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr1&div=5&start_page=[i]&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
130.
The Historical Origins of the Concept of "General Comments” in Human Rights Law. In: The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality =: L’ordre Juridique International, Un Système En Quête d’équité et Universalité : Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2001.
131.
Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body, HRI/MC/2006/2. Published online 22AD. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/icm-mc/docs/HRI.MC.2006.2.pdf
132.
O’Flaherty, Michael. Reform of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Bodies: A Critique of the Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=12&start_page=141&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
133.
Johnstone, Rachael Lorna. Cynical Savings or Reasonable Reform - Reflections on a Single Unified UN Human Rights Treaty Body. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=13&start_page=173&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
134.
Nowak, Manfred. The Need for a World Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=16&start_page=251&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=2&men_tab=srchresults
135.
Alston P, Crawford J. The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
136.
Bayefsky AF. The UN Human Rights Treaty System in the 21st Century. Kluwer Law International; 2000.
137.
O’Flaherty M. Human Rights and the UN: Practice before the Treaty Bodies. Vol Nijhoff law specials. 2nd ed. M. Nijhoff Publishers; 2002.
138.
Keller H, Ulfstein G, Grover L. UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy. Vol Studies on human rights conventions. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=880630
139.
Conte, Alex. Defining Civil and Political Rights. Ashgate Publishing Group; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=438372
140.
Phuong, Catherine. The Relationship between the European Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee: Has the Same Matter Already Been Examined. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=26&start_page=385&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults
141.
Joseph S, Castan M. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials, and Commentary. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1426627
142.
United Nations. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
143.
Alston P. Chapter 8, The United Nations Human Rights System.  B The UN Human Rights Council. In: International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013:694-737. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9221fb3a-a76a-e611-80c6-005056af4099
144.
UK’s Universal Periodic Review – Annex Document, September 2012, A/HRC.21/9 Add.1. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A.HRC.21.9.Add.1_en.pdf
145.
Alston P. The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal. Clarendon Press; 1992.
146.
Gaer FD, Broecker CL. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Conscience for the World. Vol v.3. 1st ed. BRILL; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1524060
147.
Piccone T. Catalysts for Change: How the U. N. ’s Independent Experts Promote Human Rights. 1st ed. Brookings Institution Press; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=951312
148.
Nolan A, Freedman R, Murphy T. The United Nations Special Procedures System. Vol Nottingham studies on human rights. Brill Nijhoff; 2017. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4790457
149.
Freedman R. The United Nations Human Rights Council: A Critique and Early Assessment. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1154301
150.
Alfredsson G. International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms: Essays in Honour of Jakob Th. Möller. Vol Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2001.
151.
Alston, Philip. Neither Fish nor Fowl: The Quest to Define the Role of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 1997;8. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurint8&div=28&start_page=321&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
152.
Lauren, Paul Gordon. To Preserve and Build on Its Achievements and to Redress Its Shortcomings: The Journey from the Commission on Human Rights to the Human Rights Council. Human Rights Quarterly. 2007;29. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hurq29&div=18&start_page=307&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
153.
The United Nations Human Rights Council: Origins, Antecedents, and Prospects. In: New Institutions for Human Rights Protection. Vol The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546
154.
Developments at the Human Rights Council in 2007: A Reflection of Its Ambivalence. Human Rights Law Review. 2008;8. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&div=19&start_page=323&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
155.
Alston, Philip. Promoting the Accountability of Members of the New UN Human Rights Council. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy. 2005;15. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jtrnlwp15&div=6&start_page=49&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
156.
Abebe, Allehone Mulugeta. Of Shaming and Bargaining: African States and the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=4&start_page=1&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
157.
Sweeney, Gareth. An NGO Assessment of the New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr9&div=17&start_page=203&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
158.
Scannella, Patrizia. United Nations Human Rights Council: A Promise to be Fulfilled. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=8&start_page=41&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
159.
Alston, Philip. Reconceiving the UN Human Rights Regime: Challenges Confronting the New UN Human Rights Council. Melbourne Journal of International Law. 2006;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/meljil7&div=13&start_page=185&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
160.
Reforming the UN Human Rights Protection Procedures: A Legal Perspective on the Establishment of the Universal Periodic Review Mechanism. In: New Institutions for Human Rights Protection. Vol The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546
161.
United Nations Charter-Based Protection of Human Rights. In: United Nations Charter-Based Protection of Human Rights. Åbo Akademi University Institute for Human Rights; 2009.
162.
Gutter, Jeroen. Special Procedures and the Human Rights Council: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=10&start_page=93&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
163.
Boyle K. The United Nations Human Rights Council, Its Special Procedures, and its Relationship with the Treaty Bodies: Complementarity or Competition? In: New Institutions for Human Rights Protection. Vol The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570546.001.0001/acprof-9780199570546
164.
Flynn, E.J. The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;7. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&div=25&start_page=371&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
165.
Ramirez Reyes S. CANTÚ RIVERA, Humberto (ed.), The Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. CANTÚ RIVERA, Humberto (ed), The Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. 2017;17:839-843. https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-internacional/article/view/11055
166.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. In: 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
167.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. In: 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
168.
Steiner, Alston and Goodman (eds), International Human Rights in Context. Law, Politics and Morals. In: ; :925-932.
169.
Shelton D, Wright-Carozza P. Regional Protection of Human Rights. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1274301
170.
Helfer, Laurence R. Forum Shopping for Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1999;148. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/pnlr148&id=305&collection=journals&index=journals/pnlr#305
171.
Gearty CA, Douzinas C. The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. Vol Cambridge companions. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-human-rights-law/A3FD30DEE60D69914F5507B91A405A97
172.
Heyns C, Killander M. Universality and the Growth of Regional Systems. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press; 2013.
173.
Saunders, Pammela Quinn. Integrated Enforcement of Human Rights, The. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2012;45. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp45&id=101&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp#101
174.
Walker S. Chapter 16: International Human Rights Law: Towards Pluralism or Harmony? The Opportunities and Challenges of Coexistence: The View from the UN Treaty Bodies. In: Towards Convergence in International Human Rights Law: Approaches of Regional and International Systems. Vol v. 5. Brill Nijhoff; 2017:493-515. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=4772281&ppg=533
175.
Frans Viljoen and Lirette Louw. State Compliance with the Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 1994-2004. The American Journal of International Law. 2007;101(1):1-34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4149821?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
176.
Huneeus AV, Madsen MR. Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2017. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2976318
177.
Viljoen, F. The Relevance of the Inter-American Human Rights System for Africa. African Journal of International and Comparative Law. 1999;(4). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/afjincol11&id=679
178.
Neuman GL. Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19(1):101-123. doi:10.1093/ejil/chn002
179.
Farer TJ. The Rise of the Inter-American Human Rights Regime: No Longer a Unicorn, Not Yet an Ox. Human Rights Quarterly. 1997;19(3):510-546. doi:10.1353/hrq.1997.0025
180.
Grossman, C. The Inter-American System of Human Rights: Challenges for the Future. Indiana Law Journal. Published online 2008. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/indana83&id=1275
181.
Shah S. Detention and Trial. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
182.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 35. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2fGC%2f35&Lang=en
183.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 32. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2fGC%2f32&Lang=en
184.
UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinion No 54/2015.(22AD). http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Detention/A.HRC.WGAD.2015.docx#sthash.CMUp2gDi.dpuf
185.
Rodley NS, Pollard M, Oxford University Press. The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199693566.001.0001
186.
Udombana, N. J. The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights and the Development of Fair Trial Norms in Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal. 2006;(2). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/afrhurlj6&id=309
187.
Inter-American Commission, Report on the Use of Pretrial Detention in the Americas. http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/pdl/reports/pdfs/Report-PD-2013-en.pdf
188.
UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Deliberation No 9 concerning the definition and scope of arbitrary detention in customary international law (2013). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/189/35/PDF/G1218935.pdf?OpenElement
189.
Weissbrodt DS, Mitchell B. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: Procedures and Summary of Jurisprudence. Human Rights Quarterly. 2016;38(3):655-705. doi:10.1353/hrq.2016.0047
190.
Weissbrodt DS, Hallendorff M. Travaux Preparatoires of the Fair Trial Provisions -- Articles 8 to 11 -- of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 1999;21(4):1061-1096. doi:10.1353/hrq.1999.0055
191.
Droege, C. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review. Published online 2007. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/israel40&id=310
192.
Serdar Mohammed v. MoD. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/mohammed-v-mod.pdf
193.
HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["hassan"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-146501"]}
194.
Milanovic, Marko. Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1531596
195.
Milanovic, Marko. The Lost Origins of Lex Specialis: Rethinking the Relationship between Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2463957
196.
Milanovic, Marko. Extraterritorial Derogations from Human Rights Treaties in Armed Conflict. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2447183
197.
Krieger H. A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship Between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 2006;11(2):265-291. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krl011
198.
Provost R, ebrary, Inc. International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press; 2002. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/uon/Doc?id=10014584
199.
Abresch W. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law. 2005;16(4):741-767. doi:10.1093/ejil/chi139
200.
Doswald-Beck L, Vité S. International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross. 1993;33(293). doi:10.1017/S0020860400071539
201.
Ben Naftali O, Oxford University Press. International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: Pas de Deux. Vol v. 19/1. Oxford University Press; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780191001604.001.0001
202.
Boyle K, Shah S. chapter 11, Thought, Expression, Association and Assembly. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014:217-237.
203.
Robert Faurisson v. France, Communication No. 550/1993 , U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993(1996). http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/VWS55058.htm
204.
Human Rights Committee General Comment 34. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf
205.
Schauer F. The Exceptional First Amendment. SSRN Electronic Journal. Published online 2005. doi:10.2139/ssrn.668543
206.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International Human Rights: The Successor to International Human Rights in Context : Laws, Politics and Morals : Text and Materials. Oxford University Press; 2013.
207.
Barendt EM. Freedom of Speech. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2005.
208.
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights: a dialogue on freedom of expression standards. European Human Rights Law Review. Published online 2009.
209.
Hare I, Weinstein J, Oxford University Press. Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.001.0001
210.
Keller H, Sigron M. State Security v Freedom of Expression: Legitimate Fight against Terrorism or Suppression of Political Opposition? Human Rights Law Review. 2010;10(1):151-168. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngp041
211.
Keun-Tae Kim (Represented by Mr.Yong Whan Cho, Duksu Law Offices, in Seoul) v. Republic of Korea, Communication No 574/1994 CCPR/C/64/D/574/1994(4 January 1999). http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session64/view574.htm
212.
ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["animal defenders"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-119244"]}
213.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. In: 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
214.
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["schalk"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-99605"]}
215.
Obergefell v Hodges. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
216.
Human Rights Committee General Comment 18. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6622&Lang=en
217.
Arieh Hollis Waldman (Initially Represented by Mr. Raj Anand from Scott & Aylen, a Law Firm in Toronto, Ontario) v. Canada, Communication No. 694/1996, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/67/D/694/1996 (5 November 1999). http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/session67/view694.htm
218.
Jacobs v Belgium. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/html/943-2000.html
219.
ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["abdulaziz"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-57416"]}
220.
THLIMMENOS v. GREECE. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["thlimmenos"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-58561"]}
221.
TIMISHEV v. RUSSIA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["timishev"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-71627"]}
222.
D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["DH"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-83256"]}
223.
SEJDIĆ AND FINCI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["Sejdic"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-96491"]}
224.
MATHIEU-MOHIN AND CLERFAYT v. BELGIUM. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["clerfayt"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-57536"]}
225.
GLOR v. SWITZERLAND. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["glor"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-92525"]}
226.
S.L. v. AUSTRIA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["sl v austria"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-60877"]}
227.
EJIL: Talk! – Living Instruments, Judicial Impotence, and the Trajectories of Gay Rights in Europe and in the United States. https://www.ejiltalk.org/living-instruments-judicial-impotence-and-the-trajectories-of-gay-rights-in-europe-and-in-the-united-states/
228.
The Concepts of Equality and Non-Discrimination in Europe: A Practical Approach. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4553
229.
Young v Australia. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/941-2000.html
230.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. In: 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
231.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, MyiLibrary. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: A Commentary. Oxford University Press; 2012. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=397074
232.
CEDAW General Recommendation 25. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT/CEDAW/GEC/3733&Lang=en
233.
Charlesworth, H. Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations. Harvard Human Rights Journal. 2005;(18). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hhrj18&id=7
234.
Johnstone, R. Feminist Influences on the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Human Rights Quarterly. 2006;(1). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hurq28&id=156
235.
Nussbaum MC. Women’s Progress and Women’s Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2016;38(3):589-622. doi:10.1353/hrq.2016.0043
236.
Charlesworth, H.; Chinkin, C.; Wright, S. Feminist Approaches to International Law. American Journal of International Law. Published online 1991. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ajil85&id=633
237.
Byrnes, A.; Bath, E. Violence against Women, the Obligation of Due Diligence, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women - Recent Developments. Human Rights Law Review. 2008;(3). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr8&id=523
238.
Brems, E. Enemies or Allies - Feminism and Cultural Relativism as Dissident Voices in Human Rights Discourse. Human Rights Quarterly. 1997;(1). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hurq19&id=146
239.
Bond, J. E. International Intersectionality: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Exploration of Women’s International Human Rights Violations. Emory Law Journal. Published online 2003. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/emlj52&id=83
240.
Schopp-Schilling, H. Treaty Body Reform: The Case of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. Human Rights Law Review. 2007;(1). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr7&id=203
241.
Charlesworth H. What are Women’s International Human Rights? In: Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3441683
242.
CESCR General Comment 16. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f2005%2f4&Lang=en
243.
ILC Articles on State Responsibility 2001. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_6_2001.pdf
244.
Joseph S, Fletcher A. Scope of Application. In: International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
245.
BANKOVI� AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM AND OTHERS. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["bankovic"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER","DECISIONS"],"itemid":["001-22099"]}
246.
AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["al-skeini"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-105606"]}
247.
Coomans F, Kamminga MT. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Intersentia; 2004.
248.
Gondek M. The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Vol v. 32. Intersentia; 2009.
249.
Milanovic M. From Compromise to Principle: Clarifying the Concept of State Jurisdiction in Human Rights Treaties. Human Rights Law Review. 2008;8(3):411-448. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn021
250.
Milanovic M, Oxford University Press. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles and Policy. Oxford University Press; 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4700311
251.
Milanovic M. Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. European Journal of International Law. 2012;23(1):121-139. doi:10.1093/ejil/chr102
252.
Thienel T. The ECHR in Iraq: The Judgment of the House of Lords in R (Al-Skeini) v. Secretary of State for Defence. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2008;6(1):115-128. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqm077
253.
AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["al-saadoon"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-97575"]}
254.
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory | International Court of Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/131/advisory-opinions
255.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) | International Court of Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/116/judgments
256.
MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS v. FRANCE. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["medvedyev"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-97979"]}
257.
EJIL: Talk! – UK Supreme Court Decides Smith (No. 2) v. The Ministry of Defence. https://www.ejiltalk.org/uk-supreme-court-decides-smith-no-2-v-the-ministry-of-defence/
258.
JALOUD v. THE NETHERLANDS. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["jaloud"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-148367"]}
259.
CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["chiragov"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-155353"]}
260.
SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["sargsyan"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-155662"]}
261.
EJIL: Talk! – Extraterritorial Application Archive. https://www.ejiltalk.org/category/human-rights/extraterritorial-application/
262.
Wilde, R. Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties. Israel Law Review. Published online 2007. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/israel40&id=503
263.
GA Resolution 68/167 (18 December 2013). https://ccdcoe.org/sites/default/files/documents/UN-131218-RightToPrivacy.pdf
264.
Human Rights Committee General Comment 16. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=INT%2fCCPR%2fGEC%2f6624&Lang=en
265.
ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. RUSSIA. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"fulltext":["roman zakharov"],"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-159324"]}
266.
International Principles for the Application of Human Rights to Communication Surveillance. https://www.eff.org/files/necessaryandproportionatefinal.pdf
267.
OHCHR Report on the Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. http://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/hrc/regularsessions/session27/documents/a.hrc.27.37_en.pdf
268.
Deeks, A. An International Legal Framework for Surveillance. Virginia Journal of International Law. Published online 2015. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/vajint55&id=299
269.
Margulies, P. The NSA in Global Perspective: Surveillance, Human Rights, and International Counterterrorism. Fordham Law Review. Published online 2014. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/flr82&id=2176
270.
Milanovic, M. Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age. Harvard International Law Journal. Published online 2015. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hilj56&id=87
271.
EJIL: Talk! – ECHR Jurisdiction and Mass Surveillance: Scrutinising the UK Investigatory Power Tribunal’s Recent Ruling. https://www.ejiltalk.org/echr-jurisdiction-and-mass-surveillance-scrutinising-the-uk-investigatory-power-tribunals-recent-ruling/
272.
EJIL: Talk! – First Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy to the Human Rights Council. https://www.ejiltalk.org/first-report-of-the-un-special-rapporteur-on-the-right-to-privacy-to-the-human-rights-council/
273.
Update on the "Snooper’s Charter” | Just Security. https://www.justsecurity.org/30230/updates-snoopers-charter-second-reading/