‘Acknowledging the Conflict between Copyright Law and Freedom of Expression under the Human Rights Act’. 2003. Entertainment Law Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014da02751782ac4c3e2&docguid=I849EDB00E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I849EDB00E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=5&spos=5&epos=5&td=5&crumb-action=append&context=48&resolvein=true>
‘An Intentional View of the Copyright Work’. 2008. Modern Law Review, 71.4: 535–58 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00705.x>
Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2002] Ch 149. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Baigent v Random House Group Ltd [2006] EWHC 719 (Ch). [n.d.]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014d9f7c65405ffdddf4&docguid=I6D9771B0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I6D972391E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=52&crumb-action=append&context=107&resolvein=true>
Bently, Lionel, and Brad Sherman. 2018a. Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2018b. Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2018c. Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Bently, Lionel, Brad Sherman, Dev Gangjee, and Phillip Johnson. 2018a. ‘Chapter 10, from: Intellectual Property Law’, in Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2018b. Intellectual Property Law, 5th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
‘British Film Copyright and the Incorrect Implementation of the E.C. Copyright Directives’. 1998. Entertainment Law Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014d87aca10f05dbc7f7&docguid=I81502530E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I81502530E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=107&resolvein=true>
C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening [2009] ECDR 16. [n.d.-a]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Cto5GtmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Cto5GtmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
‘C-393/09 Bezpečnostní Softwarová Asociace - Svaz Softwarové Ochrany v Ministerstvo Kultury [2011] ECDR 3’. [n.d.]. <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-393/09>
C-604/10 Football Dataco Ltd v Yahoo! UK Ltd [2012] 2 CMLR 24. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4edm1Gto5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/football-dataco-ltd-v-yahoo-uk-ltd-c60410>
‘Copyright and Its Categories of Original Works’. 2010. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30.2: 229–54 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq009>
‘Copyright in Photographs’. 2000. European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744cc630000014da017fb0120102e0c&docguid=IB799ADD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB799ADD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=9&resolvein=true>
‘Copyright Law after Ashdown - Time to Deal Fairly with the Public’. 2002. Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014da025b229c86a28e4&docguid=I7FB44F80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FB44F80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=5&crumb-action=append&context=38&resolvein=true>
Creation Records v News Group Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXaJn4edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa>
Derclaye, Estelle. 2010. ‘Wonderful or Worrisome? The Impact of the ECJ Ruling in Infopaq on UK Copyright Law’, European Intellectual Property Review, 32.5 <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB72704A030AC11DF9C83BB18AACF6BDB/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29>
———. 2013. ‘Debunking Some of UK Copyright Law’s Longstanding Myths and Misunderstandings’, Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I874421C0677511E28B5E802FB0D6A23E>
———. 2014. ‘Assessing the Impact and Reception of the Court of Justice of the European Union Case Law on UK Copyright Law: What Does the Future Hold?’, Revue Internationale Du Droit d’auteur, 240: 5–117 <http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/3613/>
Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416. [n.d.-a]. <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014d9f733755dc297a23&docguid=I98667580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98664E70E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=196&crumb-action=append&context=80&resolvein=true>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4mdn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Francis Day & Hunter v Bron [1963] Ch 587. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Gerald Dworkin. [n.d.]. ‘Moral Rights in English Law - the Shape of Rights to Come’, European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IB9E8F500E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028>
Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New Zealand [1989] 2 All ER 1056. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZnZyJn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Griffiths, J. 2013. ‘Dematerialization, Pragmatism and the European Copyright Revolution’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33.4: 767–90 <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt017>
Griffiths, Jonathan. 2014. ‘Pre-Empting Conflict - a Re-Examination of the Public Interest Defence in UK Copyright Law’, Legal Studies, 34.1: 76–102 <https://doi.org/10.1111/lest.12006>
Holyoak, Jon, and Paul Torremans. 1995. Intellectual Property Law (London: Butterworths)
Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84. [n.d.]. <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada60000015f24a6c3d5f879d8da&docguid=IC4449F60E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IC4447850E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=29&resolvein=true>
Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland [2001] Ch 143. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3qZn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Jane C. Ginsburg. [n.d.]. ‘Moral Rights in a Common Law System’, Entertainment Law Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IB13AD1D1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028>
‘Joy: A Reply’. 2001. Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d87a6fd800a3bb51f&docguid=I7FA50D40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FA50D40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=51&crumb-action=append&context=79&resolvein=true>
‘“Joy” for the Claimant: Can a Film Also Be Protected as a Dramatic Work?’ 2000. Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c09a0000014d87a4ec45c7cffa7a&docguid=I7FA49810E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FA49810E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=34&crumb-action=append&context=70&resolvein=true>
‘Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273’. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0ytoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011). [n.d.]. <https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKSC/2011/39.html&query=(.2011.)+AND+(UKSC)+AND+(39)>
Morrison Leahy Music Limited v Lightbond Limited [1995] EMLR 144. [n.d.]. <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000015f24b844b994f7cd73&docguid=I05B5B471E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I05B5B471E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=47&resolvein=true>
Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks and Spencer Plc [2003] 1 AC 551. [n.d.-a]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No2) [2000] FSR 363. [n.d.-a]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCdoXyZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCdoXyZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF>
Pasterfield v Denham [1999] FSR 168. [n.d.]. <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000015f24c082df1e63b7f9&docguid=I1A540670E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I1A53B850E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=66&resolvein=true>
Patrick Masiyakurima. [n.d.]. ‘The Futility of the Idea/Expression Dichotomy in UK Copyright Law’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IC163EEB08C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835>
‘Photographing Paintings in the Public Domain: A Response to Garnett’. 2001. European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&srguid=i0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Fdocguid%3DICFAADD40E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838%26td%3D3%26spos%3D1%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a%26refer%3D%252Fmaf%252Fwluk%252Fapp%252Fdocument%253Ftd%253D3%2526spos%253D1%2526rank%253D1%2526epos%253D1%2526hitguid%253DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2526docguid%253DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2526resolvein%253Dtrue%2526srguid%253Di0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a%2526crumb-action%253Dappend%2526context%253D5%26epos%3D1%26src%3Dri%26hitguid%3DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D16&crumb-action=append&context=32>
‘Preserving Judicial Freedom of Movement - Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright Law’. 2002. Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014da02426b5f04f995a&docguid=I7FB3DA50E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FB3DA50E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=28&resolvein=true>
Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 605. [n.d.]. *605 Pro Sieben Media A.G. v Carlton U.K. Television Ltd. and Another <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada60000015f24a9d86df4f20ff0&docguid=I2914BA60E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I29149350E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=35&resolvein=true>
Rahmatian, Andreas. 2013. ‘Originality in UK Copyright Law: The Old "Skill and Labour” Doctrine Under Pressure’, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 44.1: 4–34 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-012-0003-4>
Sawkins v Hyperion Records Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 565 [2005] 3 All ER 636. [n.d.-a]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/sawkins-v-hyperion-records-ltd>
———. [n.d.-b]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/sawkins-v-hyperion-records-ltd>
Stina Teilmann. [n.d.]. ‘Framing the Law: The Right of Integrity in Britain’, European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7FA66CD0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A>
‘Test of Infringement: What Is It Now?’ 2014. European Intellectual Property Review (Oxford, [United Kingdom]: ESC Pub)
‘The Compatibility of the Skill and Labour Originality Standard with the Berne Convention and the TRIPs Agreement’. 2004. European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c09a0000014d9f6fb5dac7d18af6&docguid=IB744D711E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB744D711E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=57&resolvein=true>
‘The Hedgehog and the Fox, a Substantial Part of the Law of Copyright?’ 2001. European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d9f807c4558b0afb3&docguid=IB78F4D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB78F4D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=125&resolvein=true>
‘The Idea/Expression Dichotomy and the Games That People Play’. 1995. European Intellectual Property Review <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d9f774bbcd6f5f645&docguid=IB8E874F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB8E874F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=89&resolvein=true>
Torremans, Paul, and Jon Holyoak. 2016a. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2016b. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2016c. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
———. 2016d. Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 8th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601. [n.d.]. <https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GJmYiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha>
W.R. Cornish. 1989. ‘Moral Rights under the 1988 Act’, European Intellectual Property Review, 11.12 <https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I7FB8BC51E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=append&context=15>
