[1]
L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, and P. Johnson, Intellectual property law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[2]
P. Torremans and J. Holyoak, Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[3]
Green v Broadcasting Corporation of New Zealand [1989] 2 All ER 1056. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZnZyJn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[4]
Creation Records v News Group Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXaJn4edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
[5]
Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No2) [2000] FSR 363. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCdoXyZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[6]
Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39 (27 July 2011). [Online]. Available: https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKSC/2011/39.html&query=(.2011.)+AND+(UKSC)+AND+(39)
[7]
‘C-393/09 Bezpečnostní softwarová asociace - Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury [2011] ECDR 3’. [Online]. Available: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-393/09
[8]
‘Copyright and Its Categories of Original Works’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 229–254, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqq009.
[9]
L. Bently and B. Sherman, Intellectual property law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[10]
P. Torremans and J. Holyoak, Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[11]
Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416. [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=ia744cc630000014d9f733755dc297a23&docguid=I98667580E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I98664E70E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=196&crumb-action=append&context=80&resolvein=true
[12]
Sawkins v Hyperion Records Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 565 [2005] 3 All ER 636. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/sawkins-v-hyperion-records-ltd
[13]
C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening [2009] ECDR 16. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Cto5GtmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[14]
C-604/10 Football Dataco Ltd v Yahoo! UK Ltd [2012] 2 CMLR 24. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4edm1Gto5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/football-dataco-ltd-v-yahoo-uk-ltd-c60410
[15]
‘The idea/expression dichotomy and the games that people play’, European Intellectual Property Review, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d9f774bbcd6f5f645&docguid=IB8E874F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB8E874F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=89&resolvein=true
[16]
Patrick Masiyakurima, ‘The futility of the idea/expression dichotomy in UK copyright law’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IC163EEB08C7F11DDA308CE7DDE22A835
[17]
E. Derclaye, ‘Wonderful or worrisome? The impact of the ECJ ruling in Infopaq on UK copyright law’, European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 32, no. 5, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB72704A030AC11DF9C83BB18AACF6BDB/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=%28sc.Default%29
[18]
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GJmYiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[19]
‘Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273’ [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0ytoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[20]
‘Copyright in photographs’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744cc630000014da017fb0120102e0c&docguid=IB799ADD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB799ADD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=9&resolvein=true
[21]
‘Photographing paintings in the public domain: a response to Garnett’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&srguid=i0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Fdocguid%3DICFAADD40E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838%26td%3D3%26spos%3D1%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a%26refer%3D%252Fmaf%252Fwluk%252Fapp%252Fdocument%253Ftd%253D3%2526spos%253D1%2526rank%253D1%2526epos%253D1%2526hitguid%253DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2526docguid%253DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%2526resolvein%253Dtrue%2526srguid%253Di0ad629030000014d9f591f4f101e575a%2526crumb-action%253Dappend%2526context%253D5%26epos%3D1%26src%3Dri%26hitguid%3DIB7886FC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D16&crumb-action=append&context=32
[22]
‘The compatibility of the skill and labour originality standard with the Berne Convention and the TRIPs Agreement’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c09a0000014d9f6fb5dac7d18af6&docguid=IB744D711E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB744D711E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=57&resolvein=true
[23]
‘An Intentional View of the Copyright Work’, Modern Law Review, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 535–558, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00705.x.
[24]
A. Rahmatian, ‘Originality in UK Copyright Law: The Old "Skill and Labour” Doctrine Under Pressure’, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 4–34, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40319-012-0003-4.
[25]
E. Derclaye, ‘Assessing the impact and reception of the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on UK copyright law: what does the future hold?’, Revue Internationale du Droit d’auteur, vol. 240, pp. 5–117, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/3613/
[26]
L. Bently and B. Sherman, Intellectual property law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[27]
P. Torremans and J. Holyoak, Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[28]
Francis Day & Hunter v Bron [1963] Ch 587. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo4iJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
[29]
Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4mdn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[30]
Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No2) [2000] FSR 363. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCdoXyZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[31]
Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks and Spencer plc [2003] 1 AC 551. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[32]
Baigent v Random House Group Ltd [2006] EWHC 719 (Ch). [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000014d9f7c65405ffdddf4&docguid=I6D9771B0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I6D972391E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=52&crumb-action=append&context=107&resolvein=true
[33]
C-5/08 Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening [2009] ECDR 16. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Cto5GtmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[34]
‘The hedgehog and the fox, a substantial part of the law of copyright?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d9f807c4558b0afb3&docguid=IB78F4D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IB78F4D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=125&resolvein=true
[35]
‘Test of infringement: what is it now?’, European intellectual property review, 2014.
[36]
‘“Joy” for the claimant: can a film also be protected as a dramatic work?’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c09a0000014d87a4ec45c7cffa7a&docguid=I7FA49810E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FA49810E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=34&crumb-action=append&context=70&resolvein=true
[37]
‘Joy: a reply’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=ia744c0970000014d87a6fd800a3bb51f&docguid=I7FA50D40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FA50D40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=51&crumb-action=append&context=79&resolvein=true
[38]
‘British film copyright and the incorrect implementation of the E.C. Copyright Directives’, Entertainment Law Review, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014d87aca10f05dbc7f7&docguid=I81502530E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I81502530E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=107&resolvein=true
[39]
E. Derclaye, ‘Debunking some of UK copyright law’s longstanding myths and misunderstandings’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I874421C0677511E28B5E802FB0D6A23E
[40]
J. Griffiths, ‘Dematerialization, Pragmatism and the European Copyright Revolution’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 767–790, 2013, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqt017.
[41]
L. Bently and B. Sherman, Intellectual property law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[42]
P. Torremans and J. Holyoak, Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law, 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[43]
Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84. [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada60000015f24a6c3d5f879d8da&docguid=IC4449F60E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=IC4447850E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=29&resolvein=true
[44]
Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd [1999] 1 WLR 605. [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad6ada60000015f24a9d86df4f20ff0&docguid=I2914BA60E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I29149350E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=35&resolvein=true
[45]
Hyde Park Residence Ltd v Yelland [2001] Ch 143. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3qZn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[46]
Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Marks and Spencer plc [2003] 1 AC 551. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[47]
Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2002] Ch 149. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2yJnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
[48]
‘Preserving judicial freedom of movement - interpreting fair dealing in copyright law’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014da02426b5f04f995a&docguid=I7FB3DA50E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FB3DA50E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&crumb-action=append&context=28&resolvein=true
[49]
‘Copyright law after Ashdown - time to deal fairly with the public’, Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014da025b229c86a28e4&docguid=I7FB44F80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I7FB44F80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=5&crumb-action=append&context=38&resolvein=true
[50]
‘Acknowledging the conflict between copyright law and freedom of expression under the Human Rights Act’, Entertainment Law Review, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad629030000014da02751782ac4c3e2&docguid=I849EDB00E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&hitguid=I849EDB00E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&rank=5&spos=5&epos=5&td=5&crumb-action=append&context=48&resolvein=true
[51]
J. Griffiths, ‘Pre-empting conflict - a re-examination of the public interest defence in UK copyright law’, Legal Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 76–102, 2014, doi: 10.1111/lest.12006.
[52]
L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, and P. Johnson, ‘Chapter 10, from:  Intellectual Property Law’, in Intellectual property law, 5th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[53]
J. Holyoak and P. Torremans, Intellectual property law. London: Butterworths, 1995.
[54]
Sawkins v Hyperion Records Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 565 [2005] 3 All ER 636. [Online]. Available: https://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/sawkins-v-hyperion-records-ltd
[55]
Morrison Leahy Music Limited v Lightbond Limited [1995] EMLR 144. [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000015f24b844b994f7cd73&docguid=I05B5B471E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I05B5B471E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=47&resolvein=true
[56]
Pasterfield v Denham [1999] FSR 168. [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad629030000015f24c082df1e63b7f9&docguid=I1A540670E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&hitguid=I1A53B850E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=66&resolvein=true
[57]
Gerald Dworkin, ‘Moral rights in English law - the shape of rights to come’, European Intellectual Property Review [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IB9E8F500E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[58]
Stina Teilmann, ‘Framing the law: the right of integrity in Britain’, European Intellectual Property Review [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I7FA66CD0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[59]
Jane C. Ginsburg, ‘Moral rights in a common law system’, Entertainment Law Review [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IB13AD1D1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[60]
W.R. Cornish, ‘Moral rights under the 1988 Act’, European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 11, no. 12, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I7FB8BC51E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&crumb-action=append&context=15