Bibliography for Theories of the Modern State (POLI3088) BETA

[1]

Kenneth H. F. Dyson, The state tradition in Western Europe. New York, 1980.

[2]

J. B. Elshtain, Sovereignty: God, state, and self. New York: Basic Books, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=894890

[3]

R. H. Jackson, Sovereignty: evolution of an idea. Cambridge: Polity, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1272656

[4]

Brian R. Nelson, The making of the modern state. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=308255

[5]

C. Pierson, The modern state, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2011.

[6]

R. Prokhovnik, Sovereignty: history and theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1220809

[7]

A. Vincent, Theories of the state. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1987.

[8]

D. Richard, ‘Chapter 11, The Modern State’, in An Introduction to International Relations: Australian Perspectives, 3rd ed., D. Richard, G. Jim, and P. Sarah, Eds. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–184 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2bcf8e8e-15ae-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[9]

R. Geuss, ‘Chapter 1, The State’, in History and illusion in politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 14–68 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9361035c-03c3-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[10]

J. Bodin and J. H. Franklin, ‘Book I, Chapter 8: On Sovereignty’, in On sovereignty: four chapters from The six books of the commonwealth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 1–45 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802812.008

[11]

D. Grimm and B. Cooper, ‘Chapter 1: “Bodin’s Significance for the Concept of Sovereignty”’, in Sovereignty: the origin and future of a political and legal concept, New York: Columbia University Press, 2015, pp. 13–32 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1985520

[12]

D. Lee and Oxford University Press, Popular sovereignty in early modern constitutional thought, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 187–224 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745167.001.0001

[13]

Q. Skinner, ‘Chapter 14 on “From the State of Princes to the Person of the State”’, in Visions of politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 368–413 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=402&docID=201519&tm=1537180600583

[14]

S. Beaulac, The power of language in the making of international law: the word sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the myth of Westphalia, vol. v. 46. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2004, pp. 101–125 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3003944

[15]

D. Engster, ‘Jean Bodin, Scepticism and Absolute Sovereignty’, History of Political Thought, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 469–499 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26217042?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[16]

J. H. Franklin, ‘Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics’, in The Cambridge history of political thought, 1450-1700, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, pp. 298–328 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521247160

[17]

F. Kratochwil, ‘Chapter 2, Sovereignty as Dominium: Is there a right of humanitarian intervention’, in Beyond Westphalia?: state sovereignty and international intervention, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp. 21–42 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=71fa4ccf-d5aa-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[18]

T. Krogh, ‘Jean Bodin: The Modern State Comes into Being’, in Philosophy of Justice, G. Fløistad, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015, pp. 43–60 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=51&docID=1968028&tm=1535633063923

[19]

J. Salmon, ‘The Legacy of Jean Bodin: Absolutism, Populism or Constitutionalism?’, History of Political Thought, vol. 17, no. 4 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26217043?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[20]

R. Bourke and Q. Skinner, Popular sovereignty in historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 115–141 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4354756

[21]

O. Keohane, ‘Bodin on Sovereignty: Taking Exception to Translation?’, Paragraph, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 245–260, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.3366/para.2015.0161.

[22]

S. Miglietti, ‘Sovereignty, Territory, and Population in Jean Bodin’s République’, French Studies, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 17–34, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1093/fs/knx220.

[23]

T. Hobbes and R. Tuck, ‘Chapters 16 (“Of Persons, Authors, and Things Personated”) and 17 (“Of the Causes, Generation, and Definition of a Commonwealth”)’, in Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=73&docID=3314552&tm=1537183087898

[24]

Q. Skinner, ‘Hobbes and the Concept of the State’, in From humanism to Hobbes: studies in rhetoric and politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, pp. 341–383.

[25]

S. Fleming, ‘The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state’, European Journal of Political Theory, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1474885117731941.

[26]

A. P. Martinich, ‘Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan’, in The Oxford handbook of Hobbes, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 315–338.

[27]

J. Bartelson, ‘Sovereignty and the Personality of the State’, in The concept of the State in international relations: philosophy, sovereignty, cosmopolitanism, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015, pp. 81–107 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=90&docID=4746643&tm=1535625647603

[28]

‘Chapter 2: “Dramatic Representation”’, in The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State, Leiden: Brill, pp. 75–144 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=635131

[29]

J. Hampton, ‘Authorizing the Sovereign’, in Hobbes and the social contract tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/hobbes-and-the-social-contract-tradition/269668B2323D23C3799CCC84A6A64D66

[30]

G. Newey, ‘Sovereignty, State, Commonwealth’, in Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan, London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1682260

[31]

D. Runciman, ‘The Concept of the State: The Sovereignty of a Fiction’, in States and citizens: history, theory, prospects, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 29–38.

[32]

P. J. Steinberger, ‘Hobbes, Rousseau and the Modern Conception of the State’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 595–611, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1017/S002238160808064X.

[33]

H. S. Turner, ‘Chapter 8: “Leviathan, Incorporated”’, in The corporate commonwealth: pluralism and political fictions in England, 1516-1651, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016, pp. 203–224 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=4437812&ppg=230

[34]

‘Chapter 5: Kingdoms Founded’, in Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law, Princeton University Press, 2011, pp. 115–141 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=664628&ppg=99

[35]

J. Dunn, ‘The significance of Hobbes’s conception of power’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 417–433, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13698231003787844.

[36]

M. Charles W., ‘Body Politic, Bodies Impolitic’, Social Research, vol. 78, no. 2 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23347191?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

[37]

E. J. Sieyès, M. Sonenscher, E. J. Sieyès, and T. Paine, ‘’What is the Third Estate?’, in Political writings: including the debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=57&docID=1693754&tm=1537177294485

[38]

I. Hont, ‘Chapter 7, The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: "Nation-State” and "Nationalism” in Historical Perspective’, in Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005, pp. 447–528 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6ad12f25-9ed6-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[39]

L. Rubinelli, ‘How to think beyond sovereignty: On Sieyes and constituent power’, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 18, no. 1, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1474885116642170.

[40]

M. Sonenscher, ‘Introduction’, in Political writings: including the debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co, 2003, pp. vii–lxiv.

[41]

B. Baczko, ‘The Social Contract of the French: Sieyès and Rousseau’, The Journal of Modern History, vol. 60, pp. S98–S125, Sep. 1988, doi: 10.1086/243376.

[42]

M. G. Forsyth, Reason and revolution: the political thought of the Abbé Sieyès. [Leicester]: Leicester University Press, 1987.

[43]

P. Pasquino, ‘The Constitutional Republicanism of Emmanuel Sieyès’, in The invention of the modern republic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 107–117.

[44]

D. Runciman, ‘Chapter 9: “Two Revolutions, One Revolutionary”’, in The politics of good intentions: history, fear and hypocrisy in the new world order, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 155–174 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=457899&ppg=110

[45]

W. H. Sewell, A rhetoric of bourgeois revolution: the Abbé Sieyes and What is the Third Estate. Durham, N.C: Duke University Press, 1994 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3008114

[46]

M. Sonenscher, ‘Chapter 1: “Facing the Future”’, in Before the deluge: public debt, inequality, and the intellectual origins of the French Revolution, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007, pp. 22–94 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=445552

[47]

N. Urbinati, ‘Chapter 4: “A Nation of Electors: Sieyès” Model of Representative Government’’, in Representative Democracy, University Of Chicago Press, 2006, pp. 138–161 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=408439

[48]

S. Frank, ‘The general will beyond Rousseau: Sieyès’ theological arguments for the sovereignty of the Revolutionary National Assembly’, History of European Ideas, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 337–343, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2011.02.001.

[49]

M. M. Mandelbaum, ‘The fantasy of congruency’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 246–266, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0191453715617503.

[50]

S. Muralidharan, ‘The Nation and its Citizens: Of Identity, Property, and Other Forms of Tyranny’, Social Scientist, vol. 41, no. 9 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23611088

[51]

G. W. F. Hegel, ‘Chapter 24: “Philosophy of Right: Preface and Introduction”’, in The Hegel reader, Oxford: Blackwell, 1998, pp. 325–339 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bc70f7a9-fbc2-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[52]

G. Klosko, ‘Chapter 9: G. W. F. Hegel’, in History of political theory: an introduction, Volume II: Modern, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1132326

[53]

L. Siep, ‘Hegel’s Liberal, Social, and "Ethical” State’, in The Oxford Handbook of Hegel, Dean Moyar, Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 515–534 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8f69e863-11d6-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[54]

A. Vincent, ‘The Hegelian state and International polities’, Review of International Studies, vol. 9, no. 03, Jul. 1983, doi: 10.1017/S026021050011589X.

[55]

S. Avineri, ‘Chapter 9: “The State – The Consciousness of Freedom”’, in Hegel’s theory of the modern state, London: Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 176–193 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171441.011

[56]

T. Burns, ‘Hegel and global politics: Communitarianism or cosmopolitanism?’, Journal of International Political Theory, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 325–344, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1755088214539409.

[57]

P. Franco, ‘Hegel and Liberalism’, The Review of Politics, vol. 59, no. 04, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0034670500028345.

[58]

D. Knowles and G. W. F. Hegel, ‘Chapter 13: “The State: §§257-360”’, in Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hegel and the Philosophy of right, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 303–342 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=180103&ppg=322

[59]

Z. A. Pelczynski, ‘The Hegelian Conception of the State’, in Hegel’s political philosophy: problems and perspectives : a collection of new essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971, pp. 1–29 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d25ef0bf-4a93-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[60]

S. Sedgwick, ‘The State as Organism: The Metaphysical Basis of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, no. S1, pp. 171–188, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01850.x.

[61]

G. Stedman Jones, ‘Chapter 6, Hegel and the Economics of Civil Society’, in Civil society : history and possibilities, S. Kaviraj and S. Khilnani, Eds. Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–130 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=59b1401e-a0d6-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[62]

J. Alexander, ‘Oakeshott on Hegel’s "Injudicious” Use of the Word State’, History of Political Thought, vol. 32, no. 1, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/hpt/2011/00000032/00000001/art00008

[63]

T. Brooks, S. Stein, and Oxford University Press, Hegel’s political philosophy: on the normative significance of method and system. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198778165.001.0001/oso-9780198778165

[64]

S. Buck-Morss, ‘Chapter 2: Hegel and Haiti’, in Hegel, Haiti, and universal history, Pittsburgh, Pa: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2009, pp. 21–75.

[65]

M. Weber, P. Lassman, and R. Speirs, ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’, in Weber: political writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 309–369 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=488571bd-09cb-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[66]

A. Anter and K. Tribe, ‘Chapter 1: “Aspects of the Concept of the State”’, in Max Weber’s theory of the modern state: origins, structure and significance, English edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 9–45 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=22&docID=1645523&tm=1535039448309

[67]

P. Lassman, ‘The rule of man over man: politics, power and legitimation’, in The Cambridge companion to Weber, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 81–98 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781139002295A010/type/book_part

[68]

K. Palonen, ‘Chapter 9: “The State as a Chance Concept: Max Weber’s De-Substantialisation and Neutralisation of the Concept”’, in A political style of thinking: essays on Max Weber, Colchester: ECPR Press, 2017, pp. 119–134 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c27824cd-f6fe-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[69]

K. Dusza, ‘Max Weber’s conception of the state’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–105, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.1007/BF01430691.

[70]

D. Kelly and British Academy, ‘Chapter 3, ‘Unmasking the "Personality” of the State: Max Weber, Staatsrechtslehre, and the Modern State’’, in The state of the political: conceptions of politics and the state in the thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann, Oxford: Oxford University Press for The British Academy, 2003, p. 73. 309-160, 353 [Online]. Available: http://britishacademy.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.5871/bacad/9780197262870.001.0001/upso-9780197262870-chapter-3

[71]

Kim, Sung Ho, ‘Chapter 6: “Max Weber’s Politics of Civil Society”’, in MAX WEBER’S POLITICS OF CIVIL SOCIETY., NEW YORK: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 2004, pp. 173–190 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=266549

[72]

P. Lottholz and N. Lemay-Hébert, ‘Re-reading Weber, re-conceptualizing state-building: from neo-Weberian to post-Weberian approaches to state, legitimacy and state-building’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1467–1485, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/09557571.2016.1230588.

[73]

A. Palumbo and A. Scott, ‘Weber, Durkheim and the sociology of the modern state’, in The Cambridge history of twentieth-century political thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 368–391 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781139053600A025/type/book_part

[74]

G. Poggi, ‘Chapter 7:  “The State and Bureaucracy”’, in Weber: a short introduction, Cambridge: Polity, 2006, pp. 105–126.

[75]

F. K. Ringer, ‘Chapter 2: “Weber’s Politics”’, in Max Weber: an intellectual biography, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004, pp. 41–76 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=557582

[76]

P. Breiner, Max Weber & democratic politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996.

[77]

T. B. Strong, ‘Chapter 3: “Max Weber, Magic, and the Politics of Social Scientific Objectivity”’, in Politics without vision: thinking without a banister in the twentieth century, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012, pp. 91–136.

[78]

A. Zimmerman, ‘Decolonizing Weber’, Postcolonial Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–79, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1080/13668250500488827.

[79]

M. Foucault, ‘Governmentality’, in The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 87–104 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1e6d369e-7cba-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[80]

T. Lemke and E. Butler, ‘Chapter 7: The Genealogy of the Modern State’, in Foucault’s analysis of modern governmentality: a critique of political reason, London: Verso, 2019, pp. 153–197 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=351bbce3-2f94-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[81]

M. Dillon, ‘Security, Race and War’, in Foucault on politics, security and war, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 166–196 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057%2F9780230229846.pdf

[82]

B. Jessop, ‘From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power’, Political Geography, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 34–40, Jan. 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629806000898

[83]

M. Dean and K. Villadsen, ‘Chapter 5: “Blood-Dried Codes”’, in State Phobia and Civil Society: The Political Legacy of Michel Foucault, Stanford University Press: Stanford, 2016, pp. 67–86 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4414758

[84]

S. Elden, ‘Governmentality, Calculation, Territory’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 562–580, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1068/d428t.

[85]

I. Hacking, ‘Chapter 1: “The Argument”’, in The taming of chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 1–10.

[86]

T. LEMKE, ‘An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory’, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 43–64, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.

[87]

D. Macey, ‘Rethinking Biopolitics, Race and Power in the Wake of                Foucault’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 186–205, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0263276409349278.

[88]

M. A. Peters, ‘Foucault, biopolitics and the birth of neoliberalism’, Critical Studies in Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 165–178, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1080/17508480701494218.

[89]

S. W. Sawyer, ‘Foucault and the State’, The Tocqueville Review, vol. 36, no. 1, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/contemporary-critical-thought/files/foucault_and_the_state_by_sawyer.pdf

[90]

C. Taylor, ‘Biopower’, in Michel Foucault: Key Concepts, Acumen Publishing, 2011, pp. 41–54 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1886870

[91]

S. Elden, Foucault’s last decade. Cambridge: Polity, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=4530029

[92]

J. Rehmann, ‘The Unfulfilled Promises of the Late Foucault and Foucauldian "Governmentality Studies”’, in Foucault and neoliberalism, Cambridge: Polity, 2015, pp. 134–158.

[93]

J. W. Crampton and S. Elden, ‘Beyond the European Province: Foucault and Postcolonialism’, in Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 265–289 [Online]. Available: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/27715/1/Chap24Stephen%20Legg.pdf

[94]

K. Marx and D. McLellan, ‘The German Ideology’, in Selected writings, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 175–208 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d477347-79ba-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[95]

R. J. Das, ‘Marxist Theories of the State’, in Alternative theories of state, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, pp. 64–90 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=73&docID=1039827&tm=1535034228099

[96]

M. Carnoy, ‘Chapter 2: “Marx, Lenin, Engels and the State”’, in The state and political theory, Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1984, pp. 44–64 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=53&docID=1701235&tm=1535033911919

[97]

E. M. Wood, ‘Chapter 8: “Enlightenment or Capitalism?”’, in Liberty and property: a social history of Western political thought from Renaissance to Enlightenment, London: Verso, 2012, pp. 289–319 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=238&docID=5177019&tm=1535033241040

[98]

S. Clarke, Ed., ‘Chapter 1, The State Debate’, in The State debate, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1991, pp. 1–69 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7830e2b5-7c92-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[99]

Ralph Miliband, ‘Chapter 1: “Marx and the State”’, in Class power and state power, London: Verso, 1983, pp. 3–25.

[100]

‘The Problem of the Capitalist State’, New Left Review, vol. 58, 1969 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/issues/I58

[101]

J. Rosenberg, ‘Chapter 5: ‘The Empire of Civil Society’’, in The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations, London: Verso, 1994, pp. 123–158.

[102]

B. Teschke, ‘Chapter 8: “Towards the Modern States-System: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism”’, in The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations, London: Verso, 2003, pp. 249–270.

[103]

Paul Wetherly, ‘Chapter 7: “State Autonomy – A Conceptual Framework”’, in Marxism and the State, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 156–173 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=259596

[104]

E. O. Wright, Class, crisis and the state. London: Verso, 1979.

[105]

M. Abensour, M. Blechman, and M. Breaugh, Democracy against the state: Marx and the Machiavellian moment. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.

[106]

S. Avineri, ‘Chapter 1: “Hegel’s Political Philosophy Reconsidered”’, in The social and political thought of Karl Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968, pp. 8–40.

[107]

S. Sinha and R. Varma, ‘Marxism and Postcolonial Theory: What’s Left of the Debate?’, Critical Sociology, vol. 43, no. 4–5, pp. 545–558, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0896920515616263.

[108]

C. Pateman, ‘Chapter 4: “Genesis, Fathers and the Political Liberty of Sons”’, in The sexual contract, Cambridge: Polity, 1988, pp. 77–115 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=125&docID=1662645&tm=1535033315319

[109]

C. A. MacKinnon, ‘Chapter 8: “The Liberal State”’, in Toward a feminist theory of the state, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989, pp. 157–170 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5eb309a8-6ac2-e811-80cd-005056af4099

[110]

J. Oksala, ‘Feminism and Neoliberal Governmentality’, Foucault Studies, no. 16, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.22439/fs.v0i16.4116.

[111]

J. Ursel, ‘The State and the Maintenance of Patriarchy: A Case Study of Family, Labour and Welfare Legislation in Canada’, in Family, Economy & State, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 150–191 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92417cb8-47ec-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[112]

J. Boucher, ‘Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s The Sexual Contract’, Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, vol. 36, no. 01, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1017/S0008423903778524.

[113]

W. Brown, ‘Chapter 6: “Liberalism’s Family Values”’, in States of injury: power and freedom in late modernity, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 135–165.

[114]

J. B. Elshtain, ‘Woman, the State, and War’, International Relations, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 289–303, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0047117809104640.

[115]

Nancy J. Hirschmann, ‘Chapter 1: “The Problem of Women in Political Obligation”’, in Rethinking obligation, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cfdea916-b1f1-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[116]

John Hoffman, ‘Chapter 10: “A Relational View of Sovereignty”’, in Gender and Sovereignty, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 185–208 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=791e897c-7692-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[117]

J. Kantola, ‘Chapter 6, Feminism’, in The state: theories and issues, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, pp. 118–134 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=651c4fce-8092-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[118]

J. Richardson, ‘Hobbes, Unhealthy Desires, and Freedom: A Feminist Reading’, in Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy, M. Drakopoulou, Ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013, pp. 50–65 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=61&docID=1582679&tm=1535033431103

[119]

J. Butler, ‘Antigine’s Claim’, in Antigone’s claim: kinship between life & death, New York: Columbia University Press, 2000, pp. 1–26.

[120]

A. Stone, ‘Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism, and the Difference between Men and Women’, in Hegel’s philosophy and feminist thought, K. Hutchings and T. Pulkkinen, Eds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 211–232 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=619292

[121]

C. Pateman and C. W. Mills, ‘Chapter 1: “Contract and Social Change”’, in Contract and domination, Cambridge: Polity, 2007, pp. 10–34 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1180907&ppg=24

[122]

C. W. Mills, ‘Chapter 1: “Overview”’, in The racial contract, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997, pp. 9–40 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=24&docID=3138625&tm=1535025023033

[123]

D. T. Goldberg, ‘Introduction: The State of Race Theory’, in The racial state, Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 2002, pp. 1–13 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2cb91452-db91-e911-80cd-005056af4099

[124]

D. Jagmohan, ‘Race and the social contract: Charles Mills on the consensual foundations of white supremacy’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 488–503, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1080/21565503.2015.1063442.

[125]

A. Reed, ‘Marx, Race, and Neoliberalism’, New Labor Forum, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 49–57, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1095796012471637.

[126]

G. E. Bracey, ‘Toward a Critical Race Theory of State’, Critical Sociology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 553–572, May 2015, doi: 10.1177/0896920513504600.

[127]

M. R. Duffield, ‘Chapter 8: Racism, Circulation and Security’, in Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples, Cambridge: Polity, 2007, pp. 184–214.

[128]

B. Gruffydd Jones, ‘"Good Governance” and "State Failure”: The Pseudo-Science of Statesmen in our Times’, in Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Colour Line, A. Anievas, N. Manchanda, and R. Shilliam, Eds. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015, pp. 62–80 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1829364

[129]

D. R. James, ‘Theories of Race and the State’, in The handbook of political sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge, 2005, pp. 187–198 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?ppg=211&docID=237595&tm=1535025176068

[130]

M.-K. Jung and Y. Kwon, ‘Theorizing the US Racial State: Sociology Since Racial Formation’, Sociology Compass, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 927–940, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1111/soc4.12078.

[131]

M. Omi and H. Winant, Racial formation in the United States, Third edition. New York: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=1715791

[132]

S. Sullivan, ‘White Ignorance and Colonial Oppression: Or, Why I Know So Little about Puerto Rico’, in Race and epistemologies of ignorance, Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007, pp. 153–172 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3407494

[133]

T. Shelby, We who are dark: the philosophical foundations of Black solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=3300369

[134]

G. Wilder, Freedom time: negritude, decolonization, and the future of the world. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.

[135]

A. Blair, ‘Chapter 4: Bodin’s Philosophy of Nature’, in The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=4821884&ppg=131

[136]

B. Holland, ‘Conclusion’, in The moral person of the state: Pufendorf, sovereignty and composite polities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 208–221 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=5267205

[137]

A. O. Hirschman, ‘Money-Making and Commerce as Innocent and Doux’, in The passions and the interests: political arguments for capitalism before its triumph, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977, pp. 56–63 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=1275334&ppg=83

[138]

A. Buchwalter, Ed., ‘Hegel Discovers Capitalism: Critique of Individualism, Social Labor and Reification during the Jena Period (1801-1807)’, in Hegel and Capitalism, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2015, pp. 19–34 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/reader.action?docID=4396599&ppg=28

[139]

G. Browning, ‘Hegel on War, Recognition and Justice’, in Hegel and Global Justice, A. Buchwalter, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, pp. 193–209 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/nottingham/detail.action?docID=972011

[140]

E. Frazer and K. Hutchings, ‘Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber’, Political Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 56–73, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00841.x.

[141]

D. King and P. Le Galès, ‘“The Three Constituencies of the State: Why the State has Lost Unifying Energy”’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, no. Special issue on ’The Trump/Brexit Moment: Causes and Consequences’, 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12318.

[142]

G. K. Bhambra, ‘Brexit, Trump, and “methodological whiteness”: on the misrecognition of race and class’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, pp. S214–S232, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12317.

[143]

A. P. Martinich., ‘Chapter 14. Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan’, in The Oxford handbook of Hobbes, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 315–338 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a4a1ba90-b299-e911-80cd-005056af4099