[1]
Abensour, M. et al. 2011. Democracy against the state: Marx and the Machiavellian moment. Polity.
[2]
Alexander, J. 2011. Oakeshott on Hegel’s "Injudicious” Use of the Word State. History of Political Thought. 32, 1 (2011).
[3]
Anter, A. and Tribe, K. 2014. Chapter 1: ‘Aspects of the Concept of the State’. Max Weber’s theory of the modern state: origins, structure and significance. Palgrave Macmillan. 9–45.
[4]
Avineri, S. 1968. Chapter 1: ‘Hegel’s Political Philosophy Reconsidered’. The social and political thought of Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press. 8–40.
[5]
Avineri, S. 1972. Chapter 9: ‘The State – The Consciousness of Freedom’. Hegel’s theory of the modern state. Cambridge University Press. 176–193.
[6]
Baczko, B. 1988. The Social Contract of the French: Sieyès and Rousseau. The Journal of Modern History. 60, (Sep. 1988), S98–S125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/243376.
[7]
Bartelson, J. 2015. Sovereignty and the Personality of the State. The concept of the State in international relations: philosophy, sovereignty, cosmopolitanism. Edinburgh University Press. 81–107.
[8]
Beaulac, S. 2004. The power of language in the making of international law: the word sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the myth of Westphalia. Martinus Nijhoff.
[9]
Bhambra, G.K. 2017. Brexit, Trump, and ‘methodological whiteness’: on the misrecognition of race and class. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, (Nov. 2017), S214–S232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12317.
[10]
Blair, A. 1997. Chapter 4: Bodin’s Philosophy of Nature. The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton University Press.
[11]
Bodin, J. and Franklin, J.H. 1992. Book I, Chapter 8: On Sovereignty. On sovereignty: four chapters from The six books of the commonwealth. Cambridge University Press. 1–45.
[12]
Boucher, J. 2003. Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s The Sexual Contract. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique. 36, 01 (Mar. 2003). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423903778524.
[13]
Bourke, R. and Skinner, Q. 2016. Popular sovereignty in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
[14]
Bracey, G.E. 2015. Toward a Critical Race Theory of State. Critical Sociology. 41, 3 (May 2015), 553–572. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513504600.
[15]
Breiner, P. 1996. Max Weber & democratic politics. Cornell University Press.
[16]
Brian R. Nelson 2006. The making of the modern state. Palgrave Macmillan.
[17]
Brooks, T. et al. 2017. Hegel’s political philosophy: on the normative significance of method and system. Oxford University Press.
[18]
Brown, W. 1995. Chapter 6: ‘Liberalism’s Family Values’. States of injury: power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press. 135–165.
[19]
Browning, G. 2012. Hegel on War, Recognition and Justice. Hegel and Global Justice. A. Buchwalter, ed. Springer. 193–209.
[20]
Buchwalter, A. ed. 2015. Hegel Discovers Capitalism: Critique of Individualism, Social Labor and Reification during the Jena Period (1801-1807). Hegel and Capitalism. SUNY Press. 19–34.
[21]
Buck-Morss, S. 2009. Chapter 2: Hegel and Haiti. Hegel, Haiti, and universal history. University of Pittsburgh Press. 21–75.
[22]
Burns, T. 2014. Hegel and global politics: Communitarianism or cosmopolitanism? Journal of International Political Theory. 10, 3 (Oct. 2014), 325–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088214539409.
[23]
Butler, J. 2000. Antigine’s Claim. Antigone’s claim: kinship between life & death. Columbia University Press. 1–26.
[24]
Carnoy, M. 1984. Chapter 2: ‘Marx, Lenin, Engels and the State’. The state and political theory. Princeton University Press. 44–64.
[25]
Charles W., M. Body Politic, Bodies Impolitic. Social Research. 78, 2.
[26]
Clarke, S. ed. 1991. Chapter 1, The State Debate. The State debate. Macmillan. 1–69.
[27]
Crampton, J.W. and Elden, S. 2007. Beyond the European Province: Foucault and Postcolonialism. Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate. 265–289.
[28]
Das, R.J. 2006. Marxist Theories of the State. Alternative theories of state. Palgrave Macmillan. 64–90.
[29]
Dean, M. and Villadsen, K. 2016. Chapter 5: ‘Blood-Dried Codes’. State Phobia and Civil Society: The Political Legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford. 67–86.
[30]
Dillon, M. 2008. Security, Race and War. Foucault on politics, security and war. Palgrave Macmillan. 166–196.
[31]
Duffield, M.R. 2007. Chapter 8: Racism, Circulation and Security. Development, security and unending war: governing the world of peoples. Polity. 184–214.
[32]
Dunn, J. 2010. The significance of Hobbes’s conception of power. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13, 2–3 (Jun. 2010), 417–433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13698231003787844.
[33]
Dusza, K. 1989. Max Weber’s conception of the state. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. 3, 1 (Sep. 1989), 71–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01430691.
[34]
Elden, S. 2016. Foucault’s last decade. Polity.
[35]
Elden, S. 2007. Governmentality, Calculation, Territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 25, 3 (Jun. 2007), 562–580. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d428t.
[36]
Elshtain, J.B. 2008. Sovereignty: God, state, and self. Basic Books.
[37]
Elshtain, J.B. 2009. Woman, the State, and War. International Relations. 23, 2 (Jun. 2009), 289–303. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809104640.
[38]
Engster, D. Jean Bodin, Scepticism and Absolute Sovereignty. History of Political Thought. 17, 4, 469–499.
[39]
Fleming, S. 2017. The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state. European Journal of Political Theory. (Oct. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885117731941.
[40]
Forsyth, M.G. 1987. Reason and revolution: the political thought of the Abbé Sieyès. Leicester University Press.
[41]
Foucault, M. 1991. Governmentality. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality : with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press. 87–104.
[42]
Franco, P. 1997. Hegel and Liberalism. The Review of Politics. 59, 04 (Sep. 1997). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500028345.
[43]
Frank, S. 2011. The general will beyond Rousseau: Sieyès’ theological arguments for the sovereignty of the Revolutionary National Assembly. History of European Ideas. 37, 3 (Sep. 2011), 337–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2011.02.001.
[44]
Franklin, J.H. 1991. Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics. The Cambridge history of political thought, 1450-1700. Cambridge University Press. 298–328.
[45]
Frazer, E. and Hutchings, K. 2011. Virtuous Violence and the Politics of Statecraft in Machiavelli, Clausewitz and Weber. Political Studies. 59, 1 (Mar. 2011), 56–73. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00841.x.
[46]
Geuss, R. 2001. Chapter 1, The State. History and illusion in politics. Cambridge University Press. 14–68.
[47]
Goldberg, D.T. 2002. Introduction: The State of Race Theory. The racial state. Blackwell Publishers. 1–13.
[48]
Grimm, D. and Cooper, B. 2015. Chapter 1: ‘Bodin’s Significance for the Concept of Sovereignty’. Sovereignty: the origin and future of a political and legal concept. Columbia University Press. 13–32.
[49]
Gruffydd Jones, B. 2015. "Good Governance” and "State Failure”: The Pseudo-Science of Statesmen in our Times. Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Colour Line. A. Anievas et al., eds. Routledge. 62–80.
[50]
Hacking, I. 1990. Chapter 1: ‘The Argument’. The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press. 1–10.
[51]
Hampton, J. 1986. Authorizing the Sovereign. Hobbes and the social contract tradition. Cambridge University Press.
[52]
Hegel, G.W.F. 1998. Chapter 24: ‘Philosophy of Right: Preface and Introduction’. The Hegel reader. Blackwell. 325–339.
[53]
Hirschman, A.O. 1977. Money-Making and Commerce as Innocent and Doux. The passions and the interests: political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton University Press. 56–63.
[54]
Hobbes, T. and Tuck, R. 1991. Chapters 16 (‘Of Persons, Authors, and Things Personated’) and 17 (‘Of the Causes, Generation, and Definition of a Commonwealth’). Leviathan. Cambridge University Press.
[55]
Holland, B. 2017. Conclusion. The moral person of the state: Pufendorf, sovereignty and composite polities. Cambridge University Press. 208–221.
[56]
Hont, I. 2005. Chapter 7, The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: "Nation-State” and "Nationalism” in Historical Perspective. Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Harvard University Press. 447–528.
[57]
Jackson, R.H. 2007. Sovereignty: evolution of an idea. Polity.
[58]
Jagmohan, D. 2015. Race and the social contract: Charles Mills on the consensual foundations of white supremacy. Politics, Groups, and Identities. 3, 3 (Jul. 2015), 488–503. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2015.1063442.
[59]
James, D.R. 2005. Theories of Race and the State. The handbook of political sociology: states, civil societies, and globalization. Cambridge. 187–198.
[60]
Jessop, B. 2007. From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault’s work on statehood, state formation, statecraft and state power. Political Geography. 26, 1 (Jan. 2007), 34–40.
[61]
John Hoffman Chapter 10: ‘A Relational View of Sovereignty’. Gender and Sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan. 185–208.
[62]
Jung, M.-K. and Kwon, Y. 2013. Theorizing the US Racial State: Sociology Since Racial Formation. Sociology Compass. 7, 11 (Nov. 2013), 927–940. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12078.
[63]
Kantola, J. 2006. Chapter 6, Feminism. The state: theories and issues. Palgrave Macmillan. 118–134.
[64]
Kelly, D. and British Academy 2003. Chapter 3, ‘Unmasking the "Personality” of the State: Max Weber, Staatsrechtslehre, and the Modern State’. The state of the political: conceptions of politics and the state in the thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford University Press for The British Academy. 73. 309-160, 353.
[65]
Kenneth H. F. Dyson 1980. The state tradition in Western Europe.
[66]
Keohane, O. 2015. Bodin on Sovereignty: Taking Exception to Translation? Paragraph. 38, 2 (Jul. 2015), 245–260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2015.0161.
[67]
Kim, Sung Ho 2004. Chapter 6: ‘Max Weber’s Politics of Civil Society’. MAX WEBER’S POLITICS OF CIVIL SOCIETY. CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS. 173–190.
[68]
King, D. and Le Galès, P. 2017. ‘The Three Constituencies of the State: Why the State has Lost Unifying Energy’. British Journal of Sociology. 68, Special issue on ’The Trump/Brexit Moment: Causes and Consequences’ (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12318.
[69]
Klosko, G. 2013. Chapter 9: G. W. F. Hegel. History of political theory: an introduction, Volume II: Modern. Oxford University Press.
[70]
Knowles, D. and Hegel, G.W.F. 2002. Chapter 13: ‘The State: §§257-360’. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hegel and the Philosophy of right. Routledge. 303–342.
[71]
Kratochwil, F. 1995. Chapter 2, Sovereignty as Dominium: Is there a right of humanitarian intervention. Beyond Westphalia?: state sovereignty and international intervention. Johns Hopkins University Press. 21–42.
[72]
Krogh, T. 2015. Jean Bodin: The Modern State Comes into Being. Philosophy of Justice. G. Fløistad, ed. Springer. 43–60.
[73]
Lassman, P. 2000. The rule of man over man: politics, power and legitimation. The Cambridge companion to Weber. Cambridge University Press. 81–98.
[74]
Lee, D. and Oxford University Press 2016. Popular sovereignty in early modern constitutional thought. Oxford University Press.
[75]
LEMKE, T. 2007. An indigestible meal? Foucault, governmentality and state theory. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory. 8, 2 (Jan. 2007), 43–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2007.9672946.
[76]
Lemke, T. and Butler, E. 2019. Chapter 7: The Genealogy of the Modern State. Foucault’s analysis of modern governmentality: a critique of political reason. Verso. 153–197.
[77]
Lottholz, P. and Lemay-Hébert, N. 2016. Re-reading Weber, re-conceptualizing state-building: from neo-Weberian to post-Weberian approaches to state, legitimacy and state-building. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 29, 4 (Oct. 2016), 1467–1485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1230588.
[78]
Macey, D. 2009. Rethinking Biopolitics, Race and Power in the Wake of Foucault. Theory, Culture & Society. 26, 6 (Nov. 2009), 186–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349278.
[79]
MacKinnon, C.A. 1989. Chapter 8: ‘The Liberal State’. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press. 157–170.
[80]
Mandelbaum, M.M. 2016. The fantasy of congruency. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 42, 3 (Mar. 2016), 246–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715617503.
[81]
Martinich, A.P. 2016. Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan. The Oxford handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press. 315–338.
[82]
Martinich., A.P. 2016. Chapter 14. Authorization and Representation in Hobbes’s Leviathan. The Oxford handbook of Hobbes. Oxford University Press. 315–338.
[83]
Marx, K. and McLellan, D. 2000. The German Ideology. Selected writings. Oxford University Press. 175–208.
[84]
Miglietti, S. 2018. Sovereignty, Territory, and Population in Jean Bodin’s République. French Studies. 72, 1 (Jan. 2018), 17–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knx220.
[85]
Mills, C.W. 1997. Chapter 1: ‘Overview’. The racial contract. Cornell University Press. 9–40.
[86]
Muralidharan, S. The Nation and its Citizens: Of Identity, Property, and Other Forms of Tyranny. Social Scientist. 41, 9.
[87]
Nancy J. Hirschmann 1992. Chapter 1: ‘The Problem of Women in Political Obligation’. Rethinking obligation. Cornell University Press.
[88]
Newey, G. 2002. Sovereignty, State, Commonwealth. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Hobbes and Leviathan. Routledge.
[89]
Oksala, J. 2013. Feminism and Neoliberal Governmentality. Foucault Studies. 16 (Aug. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i16.4116.
[90]
Omi, M. and Winant, H. 2015. Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
[91]
Palonen, K. 2017. Chapter 9: ‘The State as a Chance Concept: Max Weber’s De-Substantialisation and Neutralisation of the Concept’. A political style of thinking: essays on Max Weber. ECPR Press. 119–134.
[92]
Palumbo, A. and Scott, A. 2003. Weber, Durkheim and the sociology of the modern state. The Cambridge history of twentieth-century political thought. Cambridge University Press. 368–391.
[93]
Pasquino, P. 1994. The Constitutional Republicanism of Emmanuel Sieyès. The invention of the modern republic. Cambridge University Press. 107–117.
[94]
Pateman, C. 1988. Chapter 4: ‘Genesis, Fathers and the Political Liberty of Sons’. The sexual contract. Polity. 77–115.
[95]
Pateman, C. and Mills, C.W. 2007. Chapter 1: ‘Contract and Social Change’. Contract and domination. Polity. 10–34.
[96]
Paul Wetherly Chapter 7: ‘State Autonomy – A Conceptual Framework’. Marxism and the State. Palgrave Macmillan. 156–173.
[97]
Pelczynski, Z.A. 1971. The Hegelian Conception of the State. Hegel’s political philosophy: problems and perspectives : a collection of new essays. Cambridge University Press. 1–29.
[98]
Peters, M.A. 2007. Foucault, biopolitics and the birth of neoliberalism. Critical Studies in Education. 48, 2 (Sep. 2007), 165–178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480701494218.
[99]
Pierson, C. 2011. The modern state. Routledge.
[100]
Poggi, G. 2006. Chapter 7: ‘The State and Bureaucracy’. Weber: a short introduction. Polity. 105–126.
[101]
Prokhovnik, R. 2008. Sovereignty: history and theory. Imprint Academic.
[102]
Ralph Miliband 1983. Chapter 1: ‘Marx and the State’. Class power and state power. Verso. 3–25.
[103]
Reed, A. 2013. Marx, Race, and Neoliberalism. New Labor Forum. 22, 1 (Jan. 2013), 49–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796012471637.
[104]
Rehmann, J. 2015. The Unfulfilled Promises of the Late Foucault and Foucauldian "Governmentality Studies”. Foucault and neoliberalism. Polity. 134–158.
[105]
Richard, D. Chapter 11, The Modern State. An Introduction to International Relations: Australian Perspectives. D. Richard et al., eds. Cambridge University Press. 170–184.
[106]
Richardson, J. 2013. Hobbes, Unhealthy Desires, and Freedom: A Feminist Reading. Feminist Encounters with Legal Philosophy. M. Drakopoulou, ed. Routledge. 50–65.
[107]
Ringer, F.K. 2004. Chapter 2: ‘Weber’s Politics’. Max Weber: an intellectual biography. University of Chicago Press. 41–76.
[108]
Rosenberg, J. 1994. Chapter 5: ‘The Empire of Civil Society’. The empire of civil society: a critique of the realist theory of international relations. Verso. 123–158.
[109]
Rubinelli, L. 2016. How to think beyond sovereignty: On Sieyes and constituent power. European Journal of Political Theory. 18, 1 (Apr. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116642170.
[110]
Runciman, D. 2006. Chapter 9: ‘Two Revolutions, One Revolutionary’. The politics of good intentions: history, fear and hypocrisy in the new world order. Princeton University Press. 155–174.
[111]
Runciman, D. 2003. The Concept of the State: The Sovereignty of a Fiction. States and citizens: history, theory, prospects. Cambridge University Press. 29–38.
[112]
Salmon, J. The Legacy of Jean Bodin: Absolutism, Populism or Constitutionalism? History of Political Thought. 17, 4.
[113]
Sawyer, S.W. 2015. Foucault and the State. The Tocqueville Review. 36, 1 (2015).
[114]
Sedgwick, S. 2010. The State as Organism: The Metaphysical Basis of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 39, S1 (Mar. 2010), 171–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01850.x.
[115]
Sewell, W.H. 1994. A rhetoric of bourgeois revolution: the Abbé Sieyes and What is the Third Estate. Duke University Press.
[116]
Shelby, T. 2005. We who are dark: the philosophical foundations of Black solidarity. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[117]
Siep, L. 2017. Hegel’s Liberal, Social, and "Ethical” State. The Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Dean Moyar, ed. Oxford University Press. 515–534.
[118]
Sieyès, E.J. et al. 2003. ’What is the Third Estate? Political writings: including the debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791. Hackett Publishing Co.
[119]
Sinha, S. and Varma, R. 2017. Marxism and Postcolonial Theory: What’s Left of the Debate? Critical Sociology. 43, 4–5 (Jul. 2017), 545–558. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920515616263.
[120]
Skinner, Q. 2002. Chapter 14 on ‘From the State of Princes to the Person of the State’. Visions of politics. Cambridge University Press. 368–413.
[121]
Skinner, Q. 2018. Hobbes and the Concept of the State. From humanism to Hobbes: studies in rhetoric and politics. Cambridge University Press. 341–383.
[122]
Sonenscher, M. 2007. Chapter 1: ‘Facing the Future’. Before the deluge: public debt, inequality, and the intellectual origins of the French Revolution. Princeton University Press. 22–94.
[123]
Sonenscher, M. 2003. Introduction. Political writings: including the debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine in 1791. Hackett Publishing Co. vii–lxiv.
[124]
Stedman Jones, G. Chapter 6, Hegel and the Economics of Civil Society. Civil society : history and possibilities. S. Kaviraj and S. Khilnani, eds. Cambridge University Press. 105–130.
[125]
Steinberger, P.J. 2008. Hobbes, Rousseau and the Modern Conception of the State. The Journal of Politics. 70, 3 (Jul. 2008), 595–611. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808064X.
[126]
Stone, A. 2010. Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism, and the Difference between Men and Women. Hegel’s philosophy and feminist thought. K. Hutchings and T. Pulkkinen, eds. Palgrave Macmillan. 211–232.
[127]
Strong, T.B. 2012. Chapter 3: ‘Max Weber, Magic, and the Politics of Social Scientific Objectivity’. Politics without vision: thinking without a banister in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press. 91–136.
[128]
Sullivan, S. 2007. White Ignorance and Colonial Oppression: Or, Why I Know So Little about Puerto Rico. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. State University of New York Press. 153–172.
[129]
Taylor, C. 2011. Biopower. Michel Foucault: Key Concepts. Acumen Publishing. 41–54.
[130]
Teschke, B. 2003. Chapter 8: ‘Towards the Modern States-System: International Relations from Absolutism to Capitalism’. The myth of 1648: class, geopolitics, and the making of modern international relations. Verso. 249–270.
[131]
Turner, H.S. 2016. Chapter 8: ‘Leviathan, Incorporated’. The corporate commonwealth: pluralism and political fictions in England, 1516-1651. The University of Chicago Press. 203–224.
[132]
Urbinati, N. 2006. Chapter 4: ‘A Nation of Electors: Sieyès’ Model of Representative Government’. Representative Democracy. University Of Chicago Press. 138–161.
[133]
Ursel, J. The State and the Maintenance of Patriarchy: A Case Study of Family, Labour and Welfare Legislation in Canada. Family, Economy & State. Palgrave Macmillan. 150–191.
[134]
Vincent, A. 1983. The Hegelian state and International polities. Review of International Studies. 9, 03 (Jul. 1983). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050011589X.
[135]
Vincent, A. 1987. Theories of the state. B. Blackwell.
[136]
Weber, M. et al. 1994. The Profession and Vocation of Politics. Weber: political writings. Cambridge University Press. 309–369.
[137]
Wilder, G. 2015. Freedom time: negritude, decolonization, and the future of the world. Duke University Press.
[138]
Wood, E.M. 2012. Chapter 8: ‘Enlightenment or Capitalism?’ Liberty and property: a social history of Western political thought from Renaissance to Enlightenment. Verso. 289–319.
[139]
Wright, E.O. 1979. Class, crisis and the state. Verso.
[140]
Zimmerman, A. 2006. Decolonizing Weber. Postcolonial Studies. 9, 1 (Mar. 2006), 53–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250500488827.
[141]
Chapter 2: ‘Dramatic Representation’. The Elements of Representation in Hobbes: Aesthetics, Theatre, Law, and Theology in the Construction of Hobbes’s Theory of the State. Brill. 75–144.
[142]
2011. Chapter 5: Kingdoms Founded. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton University Press. 115–141.
[143]
1969. The Problem of the Capitalist State. New Left Review. 58, (1969).
