1.
Ney, A. Metaphysics: An Introduction. (Routledge, 2014).
2.
Tallant, J. Metaphysics: An Introduction. (Continuum, 2011).
3.
Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D. W. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy (Blackwell, 2008).
4.
Loux, M. J. & Zimmerman, D. W. The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. (Oxford University Press, 2003).
5.
Sydney, Shoemaker. Identity cause and mind. (2003).
6.
van Inwagen, Peter. Metaphysics. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/metaphysics/ (2016).
7.
Haslanger, Sally. Feminist Metaphysics. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-metaphysics/ (2011).
8.
Barnes, E. Going Beyond the Fundamental: Feminism in Contemporary Metaphysics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 114, 335–351 (2014).
9.
Curtis, B. L. A critical introduction to the metaphysics of time. vol. Bloomsbury critical introductions to contemporary metaphysics (Bloomsbury, 2016).
10.
van Inwagen, P. Material Beings. (Cornell University Press, 1990).
11.
Markosian, N. Restricted Composition (in Sider, Hawthorne, & Zimmerman, eds. 2008). in (eds. Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D. W.) vol. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics 341–363 (Blackwell, 2008).
12.
Hawley, K. Ontological innocence. in Composition as identity 70–89 (Oxford University Press, 2014).
13.
Theodore Sider. Van Inwagen and the Possibility of Gunk. Analysis 53, 285–289 (1993).
14.
Bennett, K. Perfectly understood, unproblematic, and certain. in A companion to David Lewis vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy 250–261 (John Wiley, 2015).
15.
Thomasson, A. L. The Controversy over the Existence of Ordinary Objects. Philosophy Compass 5, 591–601 (2010).
16.
Swoyer, C. Abstract Entities (in Sider, Hawthorne, & Zimmerman, eds. 2008). in (eds. Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D. W.) vol. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics 11–31 (Blackwell, 2008).
17.
Gideon Rosen: ‘Abstract Objects’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/abstract-objects/.
18.
Mary Leng: ‘Introduction’ (to Mathematics & Reality). https://academic.oup.com/book/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280797.001.0001.
19.
Maddy, P. Quinean realism. in Naturalism in mathematics 95–107 (Clarendon Press, 1997).
20.
Lewis, D. K. On the plurality of worlds. (Blackwell, 1986).
21.
Bricker, P. Concrete Possible Worlds (in Sider, Hawthorne, & Zimmerman, eds. 2008). in (eds. Sider, T., Hawthorne, J. & Zimmerman, D. W.) vol. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics 111–134 (Blackwell, 2008).
22.
Sider, T. Reductive Theories of Modality. in (eds. Loux, M. J. & Zimmerman, D. W.) vol. The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics 180–208 (Oxford University Press, 2003).
23.
Brogaard, B. Two Modal-isms: Fictionalism and Ersatzism. Philosophical Perspectives 20, 77–94 (2006).
24.
deRosset, L. Possible Worlds I: Modal Realism. Philosophy Compass 4, 998–1008 (2009).
25.
Kristie Miller: ‘Presentism, Eternalism, and the Growing Block’. (2013).
26.
Ned Markosian: ‘Time’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/time/.
27.
Heather Dyke: ‘Time and Tense’. (2013).
28.
Thomson, J. J. McTaggart on Time. Nous 35, 229–252 (2001).
29.
Kind, A. Persons and personal identity. (Polity Press, 2015).
