[1]
Aldrich, James O. and Rodriguez, Hilda M. 2013. Building SPSS graphs to understand data. SAGE Publications.
[2]
Atkinson, Paul and Coffey, Amanda 2011. Analysing documentary realities. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[3]
Atkinson, Paul and Coffey, Amanda 2011. Analysing documentary realities. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[4]
Baker, Carolyn 2004. Membership categorization and interview accounts. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[5]
Bartlett, J. and Littler, M. 2011. Inside the EDL: populist politics in a digital age. Demos.
[6]
Baszanger, Isabelle and Dodier, Nicolas 2004. Ethnography: relating the part to the whole. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[7]
Blaikie, N. 2003. Analyzing quantitative data: from description to explanation. Sage.
[8]
Bleich, E. 2011. What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is There? Theorizing and Measuring an Emerging Comparative Concept. American Behavioral Scientist. 55, 12 (2011), 1581–1600. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409387.
[9]
Bloor, Michael 2011. Addressing social problems through qualitative research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[10]
Bond, J.R. 2007. The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on the Behavioral Evolution in Political Science. The Journal of Politics. 69, 4 (2007), 897–907. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00597.x.
[11]
Booth, A. et al. 2012. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
[12]
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Buckingham, A. and Saunders, P. 2004. The survey methods workbook. Polity.
[14]
Buscatto, Marie 2011. Using ethnography to study gender. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[15]
Buttice, M.K. and Milazzo, C. 2011. Candidate positioning in Britain. Electoral Studies. 30, 4 (2011), 848–857. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2011.08.005.
[16]
Campbell, R. and Cowley, P. 2013. What Voters Want: Reactions to Candidate Characteristics in a Survey Experiment. Political Studies. (2013), n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12048.
[17]
Clark, William Roberts et al. 2013. Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press.
[18]
Clinton, J.D. and Lapinski, J.S. 2004. ‘Targeted’ Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election. Journal of Politics. 66, 1 (2004), 69–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00142.x.
[19]
Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
[20]
Cumming, Susanna et al. 2011. Discourse, grammar and interaction. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
[21]
Dixon-Woods, Mary 2011. Systematic reviews and qualitative methods. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[22]
Doing a literature review: https://www2.le.ac.uk/colleges/ssah/documents/research-training-presentations/Writing%20a%20Lit%20Review%20-Feb%202011.pdf/view.
[23]
Drogus, Carol Ann and Orvis, Stephen Walter 2012. Introducing comparative politics: concepts and cases in context. CQ Press.
[24]
Eberle, Thomas S. and Maeder, Christoph 2011. Organizational ethnography. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[25]
Emmison, Michael 2011. Conceptualizing visual data. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[26]
Fairclough, Isabela and Fairclough, Norman 2012. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Routledge.
[27]
Fairclough, Norman 2003. Analyzing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
[28]
Fairclough, Norman 2010. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Longman.
[29]
Field, A. 2012. Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage.
[30]
Flick, U. 2009. An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.
[31]
Flick, Uwe 2011. Introducing research methodology: a beginner’s guide to doing a research project. SAGE.
[32]
Geddes, B. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 2, 1 (1990), 131–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/2.1.131.
[33]
Geddes, B. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis. 2, 1 (1990), 131–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/2.1.131.
[34]
Gerber, A.S. et al. 2008. Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment. American Political Science Review. 102, 01 (2008), 33–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808009X.
[35]
Gerber, A.S. et al. 2003. Voting May Be Habit-Forming: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Journal of Political Science. 47, 3 (2003), 540–550. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00038.
[36]
Gerber, A.S. and Green, D.P. 2000. The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. The American Political Science Review. 94, 3 (2000). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837.
[37]
Gobo, Giampietro 2011. Ethnography. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[38]
Goodwin, M.J. 2010. Activism in Contemporary Extreme Right Parties: The Case of the British National Party (BNP). Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 20, 1 (2010), 31–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903450690.
[39]
Goodwin, M.J. 2010. Activism in Contemporary Extreme Right Parties: The Case of the British National Party (BNP). Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 20, 1 (2010), 31–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903450690.
[40]
Greetham, Bryan 2009. How to write your undergraduate dissertation. Palgrave Macmillan.
[41]
Griffith, Arthur 2010. SPSS for dummies. Wiley Publishing, Inc.
[42]
Gronke, P. et al. 2010. U.S. Public Opinion on Torture, 2001–2009. PS: Political Science & Politics. 43, 03 (Jul. 2010), 437–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096510000697.
[43]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Answering research questions: requirements, components, and construction. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 129–163.
[44]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Answering research questions: requirements, components, and construction. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 129–163.
[45]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Asking questions: how to find and formulate research questions. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 101–128.
[46]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Comparative research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 202–229.
[47]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Comparative research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 202–229.
[48]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Ethnography and participant observation. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 287–308.
[49]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Ethnography and participant observation. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 287–308.
[50]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Ethnography and participant observation. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 287–308.
[51]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Experimental research. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 187–201.
[52]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Interviewing and focus groups. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 253–286.
[53]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Interviewing and focus groups. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 253–286.
[54]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Interviewing and focus groups. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 253–286.
[55]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Research design. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 164–183.
[57]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Surveys. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 230–252.
[58]
Halperin, Sandra and Heath, Oliver 2012. Textual analysis. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford University Press. 309–337.
[59]
Hancké, Bob 2010. The challenge of research design. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[60]
Heath, Christian 2004. Analysing face-to-face interaction: video, the visual and material. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[61]
Heritage, John 2004. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: analysing data. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[62]
Heritage, John 2011. Conversation analysis: practices and methods. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[63]
Holstein, James A. and Gubrium, Jaber F. 2011. Animating interview narratives. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[64]
Holstein, James A. and Gubrium, Jaber F. 2004. The active interview. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[65]
Hopkin, Jonathan 2010. The comparative method. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[66]
John, Peter 2010. Quantitative methods. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[67]
Knopf, J.W. 2006. Doing a Literature Review. PS: Political Science & Politics. 39, 01 (2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060264.
[68]
Kumar, Ranjit 2011. Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. SAGE.
[69]
Leech, Beth L. 2003. Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2003), 665–668. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129.
[70]
Leech, Beth L. 2003. Asking Questions: Techniques for Semistructured Interviews. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2003), 665–668. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096502001129.
[71]
Lenzner, T. 2012. Effects of Survey Question Comprehensibility on Response Quality. Field Methods. 24, 4 (2012), 409–428. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X12448166.
[72]
Machin, D. and Mayr, A. 2012. How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodal introduction. SAGE.
[73]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. Appendix B: Ethical standards in empirical research. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 410–412.
[74]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. Experimental research design. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 103–116.
[75]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. Survey research. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 135–158.
[76]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. Survey research. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 135–158.
[77]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. The research process. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 3–15.
[78]
Manheim, Jarol B. et al. 2012. Working from a plan: considerations in research design. Empirical political analysis. Pearson. 90–102.
[79]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Describing the data: the construction of tables and charts. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 237–248.
[80]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Describing the data: the construction of tables and charts. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 237–248.
[81]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Direct observation and political ethnography. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 328–350.
[82]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Direct observation and political ethnography. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 328–350.
[83]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Direct observation and political ethnography. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 328–350.
[84]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Elite and specialised interviewing. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 301–310.
[85]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Elite and specialised interviewing. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 301–310.
[86]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education.
[87]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Focus group methodologies. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 312–327.
[88]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Focus group methodologies. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 312–327.
[89]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. From abstract to concrete: operationalisation and measurement. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 63–89.
[90]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Quantitative comparative research. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 214–224.
[91]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Quantitative comparative research. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 214–224.
[92]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Revealing political understanding: discourse analysis. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 351–362.
[93]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Setting the foundation: techniques of systematic bibliographic search. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education.
[94]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Who, what, where, when: the problem of sampling. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 119–134.
[95]
Manheim, Jarol B. and Babb, James 2012. Writing (and reading) the research report. Empirical political analysis. Pearson Education. 379–393.
[96]
Margetts, Helen and Stoker, Gerry 2010. The experimental method: prospects for laboratory and field studies. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[97]
Markham, Annette N. 2011. Internet research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[98]
Markham, Annette N. 2011. Internet research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[99]
Marvasti, Amir 2011. Three aspects of writing qualitative research: practice, genre, and audience. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[100]
Mayr, Andrea and ebrary, Inc 2008. Language and power: an introduction to institutional discourse. Continuum.
[101]
Miller, Gale et al. 2004. Using qualitative data and analysis: reflections on organizational research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[102]
Miller, Gale and Fox, Kathryn J. 2004. Building bridges: the possibility of analytic dialogue between ethnography, conversation analysis and Foucault. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[103]
Miller, Jody and Glassner, Barry 2004. The ‘inside’ and the ‘outside’: finding realities in interviews. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[104]
Miller, Jody and Glassner, Barry 2011. The ‘inside’ and the ‘outside’: finding realities in interviews. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[105]
Miller, R.L. et al. 2002. SPSS for social scientists. Palgrave.
[106]
Notes on statistical sources and methods | The Equality Trust: http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/research/methods.
[107]
Ochs, Elinor 2011. Narrative in everyday life. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
[108]
Pallant, Julie 2010. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
[109]
Pearson, G. 2009. The researcher as hooligan: where ‘participant’ observation means breaking the law. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 12, 3 (2009), 243–255. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701804250.
[110]
Peräkylä, Anssi 2011. Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[111]
Peräkylä, Anssi 2011. Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[112]
Peräkylä, Anssi 2011. Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[113]
Pomerantz, Anita and Fejr, B.J. 2011. Conversation analysis: an approach to the analysis of social interaction. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
[114]
Potter, Jonathan 2004. Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[115]
Potter, Jonathan 2011. Discursive psychology and the study of naturally occurring talk. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[116]
Prior, Lindsay 2004. Doing things with documents. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[117]
Prior, Lindsay 2011. Using documents in social research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[118]
Punch, K.F. 2005. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
[119]
Rapley, Tim 2011. Some pragmatics of qualitative data analysis. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[120]
Riessman, Catherine Kohler 2011. What’s different about narrative inquiry? Cases, categories and contexts. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[121]
Ritchie, Jane 2014. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE.
[122]
Rivera, S.W. et al. 2002. Interviewing Political Elites: Lessons from Russia. Political Science & Politics. 35, 04 (2002), 683–688.
[123]
Rose, G. 2012. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage.
[124]
Ryen, Anne 2011. Ethics and qualitative research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[125]
Salkind, N.J. 2011. Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Sage.
[126]
Seale, Clive 2007. Qualitative research practice. SAGE.
[127]
Seale, Clive 2011. Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[128]
Silbergh, David M. 2001. Doing dissertations in politics: a student guide. Routledge.
[129]
Silverman, D. 2011. Interpreting qualitative data. Sage.
[130]
Silverman, David 2011. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[131]
Silverman, David 2004. Who cares about ‘experience’? Missing issues in qualitative research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[132]
Tiruneh, G. 2007. Does Attendance Enhance Political Science Grades? Journal of Political Science Education.
[133]
Twyman, J. 2008. Getting It Right: YouGov and Online Survey Research in Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 18, 4 (2008), 343–354. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802305169.
[134]
Urdan, T.C. 2010. Statistics in plain English. Routledge.
[135]
van Dijk, Teun A. 2011. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.
[136]
Van Leeuwen, Theo and Jewitt, Carey 2001. Handbook of visual analysis. SAGE.
[137]
Weiss, Gilbert and Wodak, Ruth 2003. Critical discourse analysis: theory and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan.
[138]
Wilkinson, Richard G. and Pickett, Kate 2011. The spirit level: why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press.
[139]
Wilkinson, Sue 2011. Analying focus group data. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[140]
Wilkinson, Sue 2004. Focus group research. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. Sage.
[141]
Wodak, Ruth et al. 2005. A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology, and interdisciplinary. J. Benjamins.
[142]
Wodak, Ruth et al. 2001. Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE.
[143]
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis. SAGE.
[144]
Wodak, Ruth and MyiLibrary 2011. The discourse of politics in action: politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.
[145]
Method-specific readings.
