[1]
Alcock, P. et al. 2012. The student’s companion to social policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[2]
Alcock, P. et al. 2012. The student’s companion to social policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[3]
Alcock, P. et al. 2012. The student’s companion to social policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[4]
Alcock, P. et al. 2012. The student’s companion to social policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
[5]
Amery, F. 2014. Social Questions, Medical Answers: Contesting British Abortion Law. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 21, 1 (Mar. 2014), 26–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt003.
[6]
Amery, F. 2014. Solving the ‘Woman Problem’ in British Abortion Politics: A Contextualised Account. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. (Jul. 2014), n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12045.
[7]
Amery, F. 2014. Solving the ‘Woman Problem’ in British Abortion Politics: A Contextualised Account. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. (Jul. 2014), n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12045.
[8]
Andrews, G. 1991. Citizenship. Lawrence & Wishart.
[9]
Ann Shola Orloff 2009. Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda. Sociological Theory. 27, 3 (2009), 317–343.
[10]
Annesley, C. 2010. Gender, Politics and Policy Change: The Case of Welfare Reform Under New Labour. Government and Opposition. 45, 01 (Jan. 2010), 50–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01304.x.
[11]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[12]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[13]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[14]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[15]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[16]
Annesley, C. et al. 2007. Women and New Labour: engendering politics and policy?. Policy.
[17]
Annesley, C. and Gains, F. 2010. The Core Executive: Gender, Power and Change. Political Studies. 58, 5 (Dec. 2010), 909–929. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00824.x.
[18]
Ashe, J. et al. 2010. ‘Stand by your man’: Women’s political recruitment at the 2010 UK general election. British Politics. 5, 4 (Dec. 2010), 455–480. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2010.17.
[19]
Baldock, J. 1999. Social policy. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Bardasi, E. and Gornick, J.C. 2008. Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries. Feminist Economics. 14, 1 (Jan. 2008), 37–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700701716649.
[21]
Beccy Shipman and Carol Smart: ‘It’s Made a Huge Difference’: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/1/shipman.html.
[22]
Beckwith, K. and Cowell-Meyers, K. 2007. Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 03 (Sep. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759270707154X.
[23]
Bennett, B. 2004. Abortion. Dartmouth.
[24]
Bernstein, M. and Reimann, R. 2001. Queer families, queer politics: challenging culture and the state. Columbia University Press.
[25]
Black, J.H. and Erickson, L. 2003. Women candidates and voter bias: do women politicians need to be better? Electoral Studies. 22, 1 (Mar. 2003), 81–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00028-2.
[26]
Bock, G. and Thane, P. 1991. Maternity and gender policies: women and the rise of the European welfare states, 1880s-1950s. Routledge.
[27]
Bristow, J. and Wilson, A.R. 1993. Activating theory: lesbian, gay, bisexual politics. Lawrence & Wishart.
[28]
Brown, W. 1995. States of injury: power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press.
[29]
Bryson, V. 2016. Feminist political theory: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
[30]
Bukodi, E. and Dex, S. 2010. Bad Start: Is There a Way Up? Gender Differences in the Effect of Initial Occupation on Early Career Mobility in Britain. European Sociological Review. 26, 4 (Aug. 2010), 431–446. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp030.
[31]
Burchardt, T. 2010. Time, income and substantive freedom: A capability approach. Time & Society. 19, 3 (Nov. 2010), 318–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10369754.
[32]
Bystydzienski, J.M. 1992. Women transforming politics: worldwide strategies for empowerment. Indiana University Press.
[33]
C. H. Browner 2000. Situating Women’s Reproductive Activities. American Anthropologist. 102, 4 (2000), 773–788.
[34]
Cahill, S. et al. 2007. Policy issues affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. University of Michigan Press.
[35]
Campbell, B. 1987. The iron ladies: why do women vote Tory?. Virago.
[36]
Campbell, R. et al. 2010. Do Women Need Women Representatives? British Journal of Political Science. 40, 01 (Jan. 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990408.
[37]
CAMPBELL, R. et al. 2006. Women’s Equality Guarantees and the Conservative Party. The Political Quarterly. 77, 1 (May 2006), 18–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00726.x.
[38]
Campbell, R. and Childs, S. 2010. ‘Wags’, ‘Wives’ and ‘Mothers’ ... But what about Women Politicians? Parliamentary Affairs. 63, 4 (Oct. 2010), 760–777. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq022.
[39]
Carling, A.H. et al. 2002. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge.
[40]
Catherine Donovan Sexualities. 8, 131–136.
[41]
Charles, N. and Campling, J. 2000. Feminism, the state and social policy. Macmillan.
[42]
Childs, S. 2004. New Labour’s women MPs: women representing women. Routledge.
[43]
Childs, S. et al. 2011. Sex, gender and the Conservative party: from iron lady to kitten heels. Palgrave Macmillan.
[44]
Childs, S. 2008. Women and British party politics: descriptive, substantive and symbolic representation. Routledge.
[45]
Childs, S. and Withey, J. 2004. Women Representatives Acting for Women: Sex and the Signing of Early Day Motions in the 1997 British Parliament. Political Studies. 52, 3 (Oct. 2004), 552–564. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00495.x.
[46]
Christine Percheski 2008. Opting out? Cohort Differences in Professional Women’s Employment Rates from 1960 to 2005. American Sociological Review. 73, 3 (2008), 497–517.
[47]
Clasen, J. and Oxford University Press 2011. Converging worlds of welfare?: British and German social policy in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Coffey, A. and ebrary, Inc 2004. Reconceptualizing social policy: sociological perspectives on contemporary social policy. Open University Press.
[49]
COOLE, D. 1990. PATRIARCHY & CONTRACT: READING PATEMAN. Politics. 10, 1 (Apr. 1990), 25–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1990.tb00173.x.
[50]
COWLEY, P. and CHILDS, S. 2003. Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour’s Women MPs. British Journal of Political Science. 33, 03 (Jul. 2003), 345–365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123403000164.
[51]
Crompton, R. et al. 2007. Women, men, work and family in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
[52]
Dahlerup, D. 2006. Women, quotas and politics. Routledge.
[53]
Dale, A. 2006. A Life-Course Perspective on Ethnic Differences in Women’s Economic Activity in Britain. European Sociological Review. 22, 4 (Apr. 2006), 459–476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl009.
[54]
Daly, M. 1994. A Matter of Dependency: Gender in British Income Maintenance Provision. Sociology. 28, 3 (Aug. 1994), 779–797. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038594028003008.
[55]
Daly, M. and Rake, K. 2003. Gender and the welfare state: care, work and welfare in Europe and the USA. Polity.
[56]
Daly, M. and Rake, K. 2003. Gender and the welfare state: care, work and welfare in Europe and the USA. Polity.
[57]
Daniels, C.R. and ebrary, Inc 1993. At women’s expense: state power and the politics of fetal rights. Harvard University Press.
[58]
Daniels, C.R. and ebrary, Inc 1993. At women’s expense: state power and the politics of fetal rights. Harvard University Press.
[59]
Davis-Floyd, R. and Dumit, J. 1998. Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots. Routledge.
[60]
Donovan, C. 2005. New Parenting: Opportunities and Challenges. Sexualities. 8, 2 (May 2005), 131–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705050848.
[61]
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. 1991. A theory of human need. Macmillan.
[62]
Dwyer, P. 2004. Understanding social citizenship: themes and perspectives for policy and practice. Policy.
[63]
Elizabeth Peel Sexualities. 11, 658–666.
[64]
Ellingsaeter, A.L. 2010. Chapter 12, Feminist policies and feminist conflicts: daddy’s care or mother’s milk? Gender inequalities in the 21st century: new barriers and continuing constraints. Edward Elgar.
[65]
Elshtain, J.B. 1981. Public man, private woman: women in social and political thought. Robertson.
[66]
Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The incomplete revolution: adapting to women’s new roles. Polity.
[67]
Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The incomplete revolution: adapting to women’s new roles. Polity.
[68]
Evans, G. and Norris, P. 1999. Critical elections: British parties and voters in long-term perspective. SAGE.
[69]
Faludi, S. 2000. Stiffed: the betrayal of the modern man. Vintage.
[70]
Featherstone, B. and ebrary, Inc 2004. Family life and family support: a feminist analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
[71]
Feinman, C. 1992. The criminalization of a woman’s body. Harrington Park Press.
[72]
Fitzpatrick, T. 2004. Social Policy and Time. Time & Society. 13, 2–3 (Sep. 2004), 197–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X04043502.
[73]
Folbre, N. et al. 2004. Family time: the social organization of care. Routledge.
[74]
Folbre, N. et al. 2004. Family time: the social organization of care. Routledge.
[75]
Folbre, N. 2008. Reforming Care. Politics & Society. 36, 3 (Sep. 2008), 373–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208320567.
[76]
Franklin, S. et al. 2004. Off-centre: feminism and cultural studies. Routledge.
[77]
Fraser, N. 1997. Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. Routledge.
[78]
FRASER, N. and GORDON, L. 1994. "Dependency” Demystified: Inscriptions of Power in a Keyword of the Welfare State. Social Politics. 1, 1 (1994), 4–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/1.1.4.
[79]
Fried, M.G. 1990. From abortion to reproductive freedom: transforming a movement. South End Press.
[80]
Geddes, A. and Tonge, J. 2005. Britain decides: the UK general election 2005. Palgrave Macmillan.
[81]
Giddens, A. 1992. The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press.
[82]
Gillies, V. 2007. Marginalised mothers: exploring working-class experiences of parenting. Routledge.
[83]
Gillies, V. 2005. Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy. Critical Social Policy. 25, 1 (Feb. 2005), 70–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305048968.
[84]
Ginsburg, F.D. and Rapp, R. 1995. Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. University of California Press.
[85]
Githens, M. and Stetson, D.M. 1996. Abortion politics: public policy in cross-cultural perspective. Routledge.
[86]
Goldthorpe, J.H. 1983. Women and Class Analysis: In Defence of the Conventional View. Sociology. 17, 4 (Nov. 1983), 465–488. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038583017004001.
[87]
GOODIN, R.E. 2010. Temporal Justice. Journal of Social Policy. 39, 01 (Jan. 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990225.
[88]
Gornick, J.C. et al. 2009. Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor. Verso.
[89]
Gornick, J.C. et al. 2009. Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor. Verso.
[90]
Gornick, J.C. et al. 2009. Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor. Verso.
[91]
Gornick, J.C. et al. 2009. Gender equality: transforming family divisions of labor. Verso.
[92]
Gornick, J.C. and Meyers, M. 2003. Families that work: policies for reconciling parenthood and employment. Russell Sage Foundation.
[93]
Hadas Mandel 2012. Winners and Losers: The Consequences of Welfare State Policies for Gender Wage Inequality. European Sociological Review. 28, 2 (2012), 241–262.
[94]
Hantrais, L. 2004. Family policy matters: responding to family change in Europe. Policy Press.
[95]
Harding, R. 2008. Recognizing (and Resisting) Regulation: Attitudes to the Introduction of Civil Partnership. Sexualities. 11, 6 (Dec. 2008), 740–760. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460708096916.
[96]
HARKNESS, S. and EVANS, M. 2011. The Employment Effects of Recession on Couples in the UK: Women’s and Household Employment Prospects and Partners’ Job Loss. Journal of Social Policy. 40, 04 (Oct. 2011), 675–693. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279411000201.
[97]
Hartsock, N.C.M. 1983. Money, sex, and power: toward a feminist historical materialism. Longman.
[98]
Hubbard, P. 2013. Kissing is not a universal right: Sexuality, law and the scales of citizenship. Geoforum. 49, (Oct. 2013), 224–232. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.08.002.
[99]
Iris Marion Young 1989. Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship. Ethics. 99, 2 (1989), 250–274.
[100]
Jackson, E. 2001. Regulating reproduction: law, technology and autonomy. Hart.
[101]
Jennifer L. Lawless 2004. Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation. Political Research Quarterly. 57, 1 (2004), 81–99.
[102]
Josephson, J. 2005. Citizenship, Same-Sex Marriage, and Feminist Critiques of Marriage. Perspectives on Politics. 3, 02 (Jun. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050206.
[103]
Joya Misra, Stephanie Moller and Michelle J. Budig 2007. Work-Family Policies and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America. Gender and Society. 21, 6 (2007), 804–827.
[104]
Joya Misra, Stephanie Moller and Michelle J. Budig 2007. Work-Family Policies and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America. Gender and Society. 21, 6 (2007), 804–827.
[105]
jsp1100020a - NONE: http://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/2568814591/fmt/pi/rep/NONE?hl=&cit%3Aauth=HARKNESS%2C+SUSAN%3BEVANS%2C+MARTIN&cit%3Atitle=The+Employment+Effects+of+Recession+on+Couples+in+the+UK%3A+Women%27s+and+...&cit%3Apub=Journal+of+Social+Policy&cit%3Avol=40&cit%3Aiss=&cit%3Apg=675&cit%3Adate=Oct+2011&ic=true&cit%3Aprod=ProQuest&_a=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%3D%3D&_s=jncauVAguS2%2BkH8eqErK%2FmW8kSQ%3D.
[106]
KALLIANES, V. and RUBENFELD, P. 1997. Disabled Women and Reproductive Rights. Disability & Society. 12, 2 (Apr. 1997), 203–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727335.
[107]
Kershaw, P. 2006. Carefair : Choice, Duty, and the Distribution of Care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 13, 3 (Jul. 2006), 341–371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxl004.
[108]
Kershaw, P. 2006. Carefair : Choice, Duty, and the Distribution of Care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 13, 3 (Jul. 2006), 341–371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxl004.
[109]
Kiernan, K. et al. 1998. Lone motherhood in twentieth-century Britain: from footnote to front page. Clarendon Press.
[110]
Kramer, A.-M. 2010. Defending Biomedical Authority and Regulating the Womb as Social Space: Prenatal Testing in the Polish Press. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 17, 1 (Feb. 2010), 43–59. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506809350860.
[111]
Kremer, M. and ebrary, Inc 2007. How welfare states care: culture, gender, and parenting in Europe. Amsterdam University Press.
[112]
Krook, M.L. et al. 2011. Gender, politics and institutions: towards a feminist institutionalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
[113]
Krook, M.L. et al. 2009. Gender Quotas and Models of Political Citizenship. British Journal of Political Science. 39, 04 (Oct. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990123.
[114]
Krook, M.L. 2010. Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection. Political Studies Review. 8, 2 (May 2010), 155–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00185.x.
[115]
Krook, M.L. 2010. Women’s Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Political Studies. 58, 5 (Dec. 2010), 886–908. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00833.x.
[116]
Krook, M.L. and Oxford University Press 2009. Quotas for women in politics: gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press.
[117]
Kulic, N. 2014. European Women: The Link Between Money, Career, and Financial Satisfaction. European Sociological Review. 30, 3 (Jun. 2014), 287–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct030.
[118]
Laurie Shrage 2002. From Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Barbie: Post-Porn Modernism and Abortion. Feminist Studies. 28, 1 (2002), 61–93.
[119]
Laury Oaks 2000. Smoke-Filled Wombs and Fragile Fetuses: The Social Politics of Fetal Representation. Signs. 26, 1 (2000), 63–108.
[120]
Lewis, G. et al. 2000. Rethinking social policy. Open University in association with Sage Publications.
[121]
Lewis, J. 2013. Continuity and Change in English Childcare Policy 1960-2000. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 20, 3 (Sep. 2013), 358–386. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxt013.
[122]
LEWIS, J. 2011. From Sure Start to Children’s Centres: An Analysis of Policy Change in English Early Years Programmes. Journal of Social Policy. 40, 01 (Jan. 2011), 71–88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279410000280.
[123]
Lewis, J. 1992. Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes. Journal of European Social Policy. 2, 3 (Jan. 1992), 159–173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879200200301.
[124]
Lewis, J. 2009. Work-family balance, gender and policy. Edward Elgar.
[125]
Lewis, J. and Campbell, M. 2007. UK Work/Family Balance Policies and Gender Equality, 1997-2005. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 14, 1 (Mar. 2007), 4–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm005.
[126]
LEWIS, J. and CAMPBELL, M. 2007. Work/Family Balance Policies in the UK since 1997: A New Departure? Journal of Social Policy. 36, 03 (Jul. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279407001067.
[127]
LEWIS, J. and CAMPBELL, M. 2007. Work/Family Balance Policies in the UK since 1997: A New Departure? Journal of Social Policy. 36, 03 (Jul. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279407001067.
[128]
Lewis, J. and MyiLibrary 2006. Children, changing families and welfare states. Edward Elgar.
[129]
Lewis, Jane Employment and care: The policy problem, gender equality and the issue of choice. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 8, 2, 103–114.
[130]
Liddle, J. and Michielsens, E. 2007. ‘NQOC’: Social Identity and Representation in British Politics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9, 4 (Nov. 2007), 670–695. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00268.x.
[131]
Lister, R. 2007. Gendering citizenship in Western Europe: new challenges for citizenship research in a cross-national context. Policy.
[132]
Lister, R. 2002. The dilemmas of pendulum politics: balancing paid work, care and citizenship. Economy and Society. 31, 4 (Nov. 2002), 520–532. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514022000020661.
[133]
Lister, R. and MyiLibrary 2003. Citizenship: feminist perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[134]
London Women’s Liberation Campaign for Legal and Financial Independence and Rights of Women 1979. Disaggregation Now! Another Battle for Women’s Independence. Feminist Review. 2 (1979), 19–31.
[135]
Lovell, T. 1990. British feminist thought: a reader. Blackwell.
[136]
Lovenduski, J. 2005. Chapter 6, Making a Difference? Conclusions. Feminizing politics. Polity Press. 140–180.
[137]
Lovenduski, J. 2005. Feminizing politics. Polity Press.
[138]
Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P. 2003. Westminster Women: the Politics of Presence. Political Studies. 51, 1 (Mar. 2003), 84–102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00414.
[139]
Luker, K. and ebrary, Inc 1984. Abortion and the politics of motherhood. University of California Press.
[140]
Marge Berer 1988. Whatever Happened to ‘A Woman’s Right to Choose’? Feminist Review. 29 (1988), 24–37.
[141]
Mary Gilmartin and Allen White 2011. Signs. 36, 2 (2011), 275–280.
[142]
Mason, C. 2000. CRACKED BABIES AND THE PARTIAL BIRTH OF A NATION: MILLENNIALISM AND FETAL CITIZENSHIP. Cultural Studies. 14, 1 (Jan. 2000), 35–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/095023800334977.
[143]
McDougall, L. 1998. Westminster women. Vintage.
[144]
Miles, J. and Probert, R. 2009. Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Hart Pub.
[145]
Misra, Joya Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 9, 2.
[146]
Misra, Joya Reconciliation policies and the effects of motherhood on employment, earnings and poverty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. 9, 2.
[147]
Morgan, K.J. 2003. Paid to Care: The Origins and Effects of Care Leave Policies in Western Europe. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 10, 1 (Mar. 2003), 49–85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxg004.
[148]
Morgan, K.J. 2006. Working mothers and the welfare state: religion and the politics of work-family policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford University Press.
[149]
Mowlam, M. 2003. Momentum: the struggle for peace, politics and the people. Coronet.
[150]
Nancy Fraser 1994. After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State. Political Theory. 22, 4 (1994), 591–618.
[151]
Nathan Stormer 2000. Prenatal Space. Signs. 26, 1 (2000), 109–144.
[152]
Nelson, B.J. and Caudhurī, N. 1994. Women and politics worldwide. Yale University Press.
[153]
Nelson, B.J. and Caudhurī, N. 1994. Women and politics worldwide. Yale University Press.
[154]
New Left Review - Johanna Brenner, Maria Ramas: Rethinking Women’s Oppression: http://newleftreview.org/I/144/johanna-brenner-maria-ramas-rethinking-women-s-oppression.
[155]
New Left Review - Nancy Fraser: Rethinking Recognition: http://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition.
[156]
Norris, P. and Lovenduski, J. 1995. Political recruitment: gender, race, and class in the British Parliament. Cambridge University Press.
[157]
Oaks, L. 2002. "Abortion is part of the irish experience, it is part of what we are”. Women’s Studies International Forum. 25, 3 (May 2002), 315–333. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00258-3.
[158]
Okin, S.M. 1991. Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.
[159]
Orloff, A.S. 2009. Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda. Sociological Theory. 27, 3 (Sep. 2009), 317–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01350.x.
[160]
Orloff, A.S. and Palier, B. 2009. The Power of Gender Perspectives: Feminist Influence on Policy Paradigms, Social Science, and Social Politics. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 16, 4 (Dec. 2009), 405–412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp021.
[161]
P. Lealle Ruhl 2002. Disarticulating Liberal Subjectivities: Abortion and Fetal Protection. Feminist Studies. 28, 1 (2002), 37–60.
[162]
Palmer, J. 2009. Seeing and knowing: Ultrasound images in the contemporary abortion debate. Feminist Theory. 10, 2 (Aug. 2009), 173–189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700109104923.
[163]
Pascall, G. 2012. Gender equality in the welfare state?
[164]
Pascall, G. and ebrary, Inc 1997. Social policy: a new feminist analysis. Routledge.
[165]
Pascall, G. and ebrary, Inc 1997. Social policy: a new feminist analysis. Routledge.
[166]
Past and Present Society 1975. Past & present: Supplement. (1975).
[167]
Pateman, C. 2014. The patriarchal welfare state. The welfare state reader. Polity. 133–150.
[168]
Pateman, C. 2014. The patriarchal welfare state. The welfare state reader. Polity. 133–150.
[169]
Pateman, C. 1988. The sexual contract. Polity.
[170]
Peel, E. 2004. Divorcing Romance, Rights and Radicalism: Beyond Pro and Anti in the Lesbian and Gay Marriage Debate. Feminism & Psychology. 14, 4 (Nov. 2004), 588–599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353504046874.
[171]
Phillips, A. 2004. Defending Equality of Outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 1 (Mar. 2004), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00188.x.
[172]
Phillips, A. 1991. Engendering democracy. Polity Press in association with Blackwell.
[173]
Phillips, A. 1987. Feminism and equality. B. Blackwell.
[174]
Phillips, A. 1998. Feminism and politics. Oxford University Press.
[175]
Phillips, A. 1999. Which equalities matter?. Polity Press.
[176]
Porter, R. 2000. Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world. Allen Lane.
[177]
Powell, M.A. et al. 2005. Social policy review 17: analysis and debate in social policy, 2005. Policy Press.
[178]
Rai, S. and ebrary, Inc 2000. International perspectives on gender and democratisation. St. Martin’s Press.
[179]
Rapp, R. and ebrary, Inc 1999. Testing women, testing the fetus: the social impact of amniocentesis in America. Routledge.
[180]
Ridge, T. and Wright, S. 2008. Understanding inequality, poverty and wealth: policies and prospects. Policy.
[181]
Roberts, D.E. 1999. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. Vintage Books.
[182]
Rory Mc Veigh and Maria-Elena D. Diaz 2009. Voting to Ban Same-Sex Marriage: Interests, Values, and Communities. American Sociological Review. 74, 6 (2009), 891–915.
[183]
Rosenblum, N.L. 1989. Liberalism and the moral life. Harvard University Press.
[184]
Ross, K. 2002. Women, politics, media: uneasy relations in comparative perspective. Hampton Press.
[185]
ross-final - media.PDF: http://www.qub.ac.uk/cawp/research/media.PDF.
[186]
Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. 2002. Lone parent families: gender, class and state. Prentice Hall.
[187]
Ruth Lister 1997. Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis. Feminist Review. 57 (1997), 28–48.
[188]
Schoen, J. 2005. Choice & coercion: birth control, sterilization, and abortion in public health and welfare. University of North Carolina Press.
[189]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2010. Gender inequalities in the 21st century: new barriers and continuing constraints. Edward Elgar.
[190]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2010. Gender inequalities in the 21st century: new barriers and continuing constraints. Edward Elgar.
[191]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2010. Gender inequalities in the 21st century: new barriers and continuing constraints. Edward Elgar.
[192]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2008. Women and employment: changing lives and new challenges. Edward Elgar.
[193]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2008. Women and employment: changing lives and new challenges. Edward Elgar.
[194]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2008. Women and employment: changing lives and new challenges. Edward Elgar.
[195]
Scott, J.L. et al. 2008. Women and employment: changing lives and new challenges. Edward Elgar.
[196]
Seal, V. 1990. Whose choice?: working class women and the control of fertility. Fortress.
[197]
Sharp, K. and Earle, S. 2002. Feminism, Abortion and Disability: Irreconcilable differences? Disability & Society. 17, 2 (Mar. 2002), 137–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590120122297.
[198]
Smith, M. 2010. Gender Politics and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate in the United States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 17, 1 (Mar. 2010), 1–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp027.
[199]
Smyth, L. 2005. Abortion and nation: the politics of reproduction in contemporary Ireland. Ashgate.
[200]
Smyth, L. 2002. Feminism and abortion politics. Women’s Studies International Forum. 25, 3 (May 2002), 335–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00256-X.
[201]
Sones, B. et al. 2005. Women in Parliament: the new suffragettes. Politico’s.
[202]
Squires, J. 1999. Gender in political theory. Polity Press.
[203]
Stanley, K. and Institute for Public Policy Research (London, England) 2005. Daddy dearest?: active fatherhood and public policy. IPPR.
[204]
Stanworth, M. 1984. Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe. Sociology. 18, 2 (May 1984), 159–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038584018002001.
[205]
Stanworth, M.D. 1987. Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine. Polity in association with Blackwell.
[206]
Stevens, A. 2007. Women, power and politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[207]
Studlar, D.T. and McAllister, I. 2002. Does a critical mass exist? A comparative analysis of women’s legislative representation since 1950. European Journal of Political Research. 41, 2 (Mar. 2002), 233–253. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00011.
[208]
Stychin, C.F. 2006. ‘Las Vegas is not where we are’: Queer readings of the Civil Partnership Act. Political Geography. 25, 8 (Nov. 2006), 899–920. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.05.003.
[209]
Suad Joseph 1997. The Public/Private: The Imagined Boundary in the Imagined Nation/State/Community: The Lebanese Case. Feminist Review. 57 (1997), 73–92.
[210]
Susan Himmelweit 1988. More Than ‘A Woman’s Right to Choose’? Feminist Review. 29 (1988), 38–56.
[211]
Taylor, Y. 2005. Inclusion, Exclusion, Exclusive? Sexual Citizenship and the Repeal of Section 28/2a. Sexualities. 8, 3 (Jul. 2005), 375–380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705053339.
[212]
Taylor, Y. and MyiLibrary 2009. Lesbian and gay parenting: securing social and educational capital. Palgrave Macmillan.
[213]
The Meaning of Matrimony: Debating Same-Sex Marriage: http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/TheMeaningOfMatrimony.pdf.
[214]
Tolz, V. and Booth, S. 2005. Nation and gender in contemporary Europe. Manchester University Press.
[215]
Treas, J. et al. 2010. Dividing the domestic: men, women, and household work in cross-national perspective. Stanford University Press.
[216]
Tremblay, M. et al. 2011. The lesbian and gay movement and the state: comparative insights into a transformed relationship. Ashgate.
[217]
Turner, B.S. 1993. Citizenship and social theory. SAGE Publications.
[218]
Ungerson, C. and Kember, M. 1997. Women and social policy: a reader. Macmillan.
[219]
Verta Taylor, Katrina Kimport, Nella Van Dyke and Ellen Ann Andersen 2009. American Sociological Review. 74, 6 (2009), 865–890.
[220]
Vianello, M. and Moore, G. 2000. Gendering elites: economic and political leadership in 27 industrialised societies. Macmillan Press.
[221]
Victoria Clarke Feminism & Psychology. 14, 7–8.
[222]
Vogler, C. 2005. Cohabiting couples: rethinking money in the household at the beginning of the twenty first century. The Sociological Review. 53, 1 (Mar. 2005), 1–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00501.x.
[223]
Vogler, C. et al. 2006. Intimate relationships and changing patterns of money management at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The British Journal of Sociology. 57, 3 (Sep. 2006), 455–482. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00120.x.
[224]
Vogler, C. and Pahl, J. 2008. Money, power and inequality within marriage. The Sociological Review. 42, 2 (Jun. 2008), 263–288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1994.tb00090.x.
[225]
Waaldijk, Kees 2000. Civil Developments: Patterns of Reform in the Legal Position of Same-Sex Partners in Europe. 17, (2000).
[226]
Waites, M. 2005. The Fixity of Sexual Identities in the Public Sphere: Biomedical Knowledge, Liberalism and the Heterosexual/Homosexual Binary in Late Modernity. Sexualities. 8, 5 (Dec. 2005), 539–569. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705058393.
[227]
Walby, S. 1997. Gender transformations. Routledge.
[228]
Walby, S. 1997. Gender transformations. Routledge.
[229]
Walby, S. 1997. Gender transformations. Routledge.
[230]
Wasoff, F. and Dey, I. 2000. Family policy. Gildredge Press.
[231]
Weeks, J. et al. 2001. Same sex intimacies: families of choice and other life experiments. Routledge.
[232]
Weeks, J. 2007. The world we have won: the remaking of erotic and intimate life. Routledge.
[233]
Werbner, P. and Yuval-Davis, N. 1999. Women, citizenship and difference. Zed.
[234]
Weston, K. and MyiLibrary 1997. Families we choose: lesbians, gays, kinship. Columbia University Press.
[235]
Williams, F. 2012. Care relations and public policy: social justice claims and social investment frames. Families, Relationships and Societies. 1, 1 (2012), 103–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/204674312X633199.
[236]
Williams, F. and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian 2004. Rethinking families. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
[237]
Williams, J. and ebrary, Inc 2000. Unbending gender: why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.
[238]
Wilson, A.R. 2010. Feminism and Same-Sex Marriage: Who Cares? Politics & Gender. 6, 01 (2010), 134–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990560.
[239]
Wilson, A.R. 2007. With friends like these: The liberalization of queer family policy. Critical Social Policy. 27, 1 (Feb. 2007), 50–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307072207.
[240]
Wintemute, R. 1995. Sexual orientation and human rights: the United States Constitution, the European Convention, and the Canadian Charter. Clarendon Press.
[241]
Young, I.M. 2001. Equality of Whom? Social Groups and Judgments of Injustice. Journal of Political Philosophy. 9, 1 (Mar. 2001), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00115.
[242]
Fathers and work‐life balance in France and the UK: policy and practice: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy: Vol 31, No 1/2.
[243]
Feature: The Price of Reconciliation: Part-Time Wo...
[244]
Forgone Income and Motherhood: What do Recent British Data Tell Us? - 2584786.pdf.
[245]
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy: Vol 32, No 9/10.
[246]
krook_and_squires_06.pdf.
[247]
More or Less Unequal? Evidence on the Pay of Men and Women from the British...: EBSCOhost.
[248]
Perspectives: Abortion and Genocide: The Unbridgeable Gap. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society. 14, 1, 126–153.
[249]
2010. Sexual Citizenship and the Pursuit of Relationship-Recognition Policies in Australia and the United States. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly. 38, 1–2 (2010), 132–156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0216.
[250]
Special issue of International Political Science Review on women and politics.
[251]
Table of Contents — January 1, 2002, 55 (1).
[252]
THE INTERSECTION OF GENDER AND RACE IN THE LABOR MARKET - annurev.soc.29.010202.100016. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100016.
[253]
Women MPs and the Media: Representing the Body Politic.
[254]
Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries.: EBSCOhost.
